|
|
||
From Georgy HAZINSKY
To UN Human Rights Committee
To UN Committee on Refugees
Dear Sir or Lady!
There is no need to describe our story in full. We support our present letter by all necessary documents, which will comment and reconstruct the nature of our appeal.
The purpose of this letter is our desire to know if any evaluation of our case was done and an eventual conclusion of such evaluation was presented to Canadian Immigration authorities.
The purpose of this letter is also to show or emphasize that:
A. In violation of the international law, rules and standards, Israel has artificially and purposefully provoked a situation, when we've lost our citizenship of Kazakhstan. [See Supplement "A"]
B. We were wrongly treated by Canadian Immigration as citizens of Israel when in reality we are not. A formal approach - regarding a physical presence of particular paperwork (Israeli "passports") - does not work in our situation. Were we given a real Israeli citizenship? There is a strong judicial basis to say "no". Reversing a refusal of Israeli citizenship to our children - which Israel based on pure racist definition - back to us, adults, we can clearly see that for Israeli government we are not Israeli citizens. [See Supplement "B"]
C. International law must be applied to our situation visa-versa, i.e. considering a "special" nature of Israeli law. Because International law actually have no legitimate ground on Israeli territory and Israeli law do not correspond democratic standards and standards of a civilized society, our situation must be subjected to a different approach. [See Supplement "C"]
D. As you already know from paragraph "B": giving a formal citizenship to us, adults, Israel has refused it to our children. This refusal was based on an evidently racist definition (my wife is from a mixed family, and I have no Jewish roots at all). This is an apartheid-style division, and its racial definition is utilized for justifying slavery. Our older son is still in Israel - as a hostage-prisoner, taken to a compulsory military service with no Israeli citizenship. In Israel our children will be enslaved till the end of their life, deprived of essential and basic rights. [See Supplement "D"]
E. In spite of an obvious danger for us in going back to Israel and a punishment that we will face their for illegally taking our younger son out of the country, Canadian Immigration, infected by an enormous Israeli influence, is not managing properly our humanitarian appeal. Let's remind that the Refugee Tribunal had no doubts about all described by us events: in the same time finding "no ground" for our refugee claim. [See Supplement "E"]
CONCLUSION: Projecting information that we provide (in all supplements that we enclose in our letter) to our present situation, any impartial obsever can see that a deportation to Israel will lead to our tremendous personal tragedy - as well as tremendous failure of justice.
SUPPLEMENTS
Supplement A
Confiscating our passports of Kazakhstan Israeli Ministry of Interior has prevented us from extending them and prevent them from expiery (which resulted - according to Kazakhstan rules - in lose of citizenship).
Supplement B
Two of Israeli basic law - the Law of Return and regulations about "tehudat zehut" (internal Israeli passport, which is wrongly called "an ID card") - does not relevant to Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Chapter Of Rights, Geneva Convention, and other basic International law (see more in Supplement "C"). To question our Israeli citizenship allows not just the situation with a refusal of Israeli citizenship to our children, but also the definition of our nationality in Israeli internal passports ("tehudat zehuts"). For Israeli government "an Israeli citizenship status" is a meaningless formality for an "external use": to assure that there is no international concern that Israeli multiplies apathrids, and that only generations of Palestinians were forced by Israelis to live without any citizenship. Actually Israel defines whom the state recognize as a citizen - and whom not - by the definition of nationality in "tehudat zehuts". Internally only those are considered as Israeli citizens, in whose "tehudat zehuts" their nationality is defined as "Israeli" ("Jew"). Others are not considered as "Israelis" ("Jews").
Supplement C
= International law actually have no legitimate ground on Israeli territory and Israeli law do not correspond democratic standards and standards of a civilized society. =
First of all, Israel has no constitution. Someone can say that United Kingdom has no constitution as well. Let's place it strictly. UK is an exclusion, and there are can not be 2 exclusions. Everyone knows that England has a "constitution" of very strong parliamentarian and social (democratic in a way) traditions, customs, habits and rules,
based on hundreds of years of practice. Israel was founded just half a century ago, without a constitution, arising from a chaos of war, terrorist activity, and fractional (and tribal) frictions and disagreements. In Israeli situation "no constitution" means "no civil society", "no democracy", "no human rights", "no prohibition of terrorism".
In his article at Montreal's newspaper "HOUR" (Dec. 15-21, 1994) Peter Wheeland wrote that "The Soviet Union
and Israel are the only countries where ethnic origin is indicated on your identity papers". Julius Grey, the most respected Canadian constitutional and human rights lawyer, thinks that Israel - a country "with a degree of excessive zeal, could react badly to someone, who attacked the very basis of Zionism. Further, insofar as mixed [religion] couples are concerned, there is a very clear injustice in Israel: people can't marry, they don't have full rights".
Israeli internal passport ("teudat zehut"), which carries indication of ethnic identity (as "Russian", "Jew", "Armenian", "Arab", or "ethnic origin was not define" - which is even a greater abjection), must be shown in Israel everywhere. Without presenting this document you can not enter any public place, hospital, institution, etc. Without "tehudat zehut" you can not receive job, education, social or legal service, etc. Absence of constitution, discriminatory and racist legislation, rules and regulations, which are racist, - all this is a pretext for terrorist-style violent attacks against
minorities inside Israel, and (by Jews or Israelis) against non-Jews outside Israel.
If we'll evaluate all changes in Israeli law, we will see that with time Israeli basic laws are gradually shifting towards
more open approval of the global Israeli terrorism and its justification. In Israeli laws we can find both legalization of
terrorism and the reason why to use it. Israeli basic laws (like the "Law of return", "Penal Code", etc.) are declaring a
war on all non-Jews and Jewish dissidents. This war is declared because of the "anti-Semitism", "hostility" and "guilt"
towards Jews, and because "goim" (non-Jews) don't want to recognize Jewish domination and superiority. From 1970-s to 1990-s (and after) Israeli laws have been drastically changing towards denial (and contradiction (to) of all international regulations and civilized norms; apart from all treaties that Israel signed, and from all international standards.
Israeli laws are designed to garantee an impunity to any Jew who killed a "goi" (non-Jew), any action against non-Jews, any brutality, which was committed in the name of "Jewish interests". Israeli laws specify non-Jews as sub-humans, and Jews as only humans in the world. According to Israeli laws it does not matter, whether a Jew resides on Israel's territory, or not: a Jew must be judged only by Israeli rules and regulations. Now, according to new changes to Israeli law, - a non-Jew must also be subjected to Israeli law (applicable to any part of the world) - if a matter that concerns a Jewish individual or a Jewish community is inflicted here. In real life it means legalization of any Israeli intervention in any part in the world, in any country, against any person, in violation of any universal convention or treaty.
Israeli law violates the most basic and universal international law and human rights declarations: like "Geneva
Convention" and "Universal Declaration On Human Rights". However, what is the most outraged about the Israeli law - besides its content - is inaccessibility. Israeli laws are written in Hebrew, a language, which only 4 million (this statistics is in doubt: some annalists say - 3 million) Israelis can fluently speak and understand. However, there is a suggestion that near 30 % of Israelis don't know Hebrew well and don't speak it at work and at home. Hebrew is an artificial language, developed from an ancient Jewish language by people, who on purpose primitivized it, deriding most of the intellectual and emotional scale. Modern Hebrew is a military language, designed for commanding or arguing tone, a language of commands and obedience. However, Israeli regime have developed and pushed into life "another Hebrew", a special bureaucratic language, based on Hebrew, which almost nobody understands. This casuistic and deliberately "encoded" language differs from any bureaucratic jargon in European languages. When in European countries (or in North America) any document, issued by any bureaucratic institution (like municipality, police, or court), can be understood by any educated (accomplished a secondary school) person, in Israel even people, graduated from universities, can not understand this Orwell's novo-lingua. In Israel - a country, where fresh or recent immigrants are 15 or may be even 25 percent of the total population, there is no translation of Israeli laws into other languages. Besides, Israeli laws were made inaccessible even in Hebrew. There are no online libraries of Israeli laws, any books or law magazines, available to the public. To have an access to the sources of Israeli law you must be "in the system". It is very clear that this order was deliberately created by the Israeli regime for lawlessness and abuse of ordinary people.
In this situation we can learn about Israeli laws from very narrow number of sources:
1) Israeli newspapers - like "Jerusalem Post" or "Ha-Arets";
2) UN, "Amnesty International" and "Human Rights Watch" resolutions and other documents;
3) From lawyers-activists' statements.
However, even this small quantity astonishes! Racism, slavery, brutality, sadism; legalization of terrorism, tortures,
and discrimination are in Israeli laws.
The most important law in Israel is the "Law of Return". This law WAS translated into English. "Law of Return" is the
main stone, on which the State of Israel is based, the main justification for Israel's existence. The original text of this
law has already become the most racist law in human history. Let's recall words of Sobran: "Jewish courts have ruled
that non-Jews may not claim the same rights as Jews. Under the "right of return," any Jew in the world may "return"
to Israel (even if none of his ancestors ever lived there) and immediately claim rights denied to Palestinians whose
ancestors have lived there for untold centuries." Let's imagine that all 14 million Jews in the world, plus other millions
of the mix families' members, plus people, one of whose grandparents was a Jew, - decided (because of this or
another reason) to claim their "right of return". As a tiny state, with no water and other resources Israel is not able to
accommodate millions of people. It automatically means that Israel will then claim lands of all neighbor Muslim and
Christian countries: because expansionism, terrorism and aggression are logically hidden in Israeli basic law.
In Ralph Schoenman's "The Hidden History of Zionism" we can read: "The Zionist Vision of "Eretz Israel" - The
Israel of Theodore Herzl (1904) and Rabbi Fischmann (1947). In his Complete Diaries, Vol II, Page 711, Theodor
Herzl, the founder of Zionism, says that the area of the Jewish state stretches: "From the Brook of Egypt to the
Euphrates." Rabbi Fischmann, member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, declared in his testimony to the U.N.
Special Committee of Enquiry on July 9, 1947: "The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt to the
Euphrates. It includes parts of Syria and Lebanon." This perfectly corresponds to above mentioned hidden sense of
the Law of Return.
However, even this, already radically racist (and aggressive) text of the Law of Return - was subjected to further
changes: to the extremes of a profound aggression and racism. In 1954 the Law of Return was changed (enforced),
and in 1970 Golda Meir (her cabinet) has made some "amendments" to the Law of Return. So, what was the nature
of these changes?
(1954)
2. (a) Aliyah** shall be by oleh's visa.
(b) An oleh's visa shall be granted to every Jew who has expressed his
desire to settle in Israel, unless the Minister of Immigration is
satisfied that the applicant
(1) is engaged in an activity directed against the Jewish people; or
(2) is likely to endanger public health or the security of the State; OR
"(3) IS A PERSON WITH A CRIMINAL PAST, LIKELY TO
ENDANGER PUBLIC WELFARE."
3. (a) A Jew who has come to Israel and subsequent to his arrival has
expressed his desire to settle in Israel may, while still in Israel,
receive an oleh's certificate.
== 2. In sections 2 and 5 of the Law, the words "the Minister of
Immigration" shall be replaced by the words "the Minister of the
Interior".
MOSHE SHARETT Prime Minister
YOSEF SERLIN Minister of Health Acting Minister of the Interior
YITZCHAK BEN-ZVI President of the State
* Passed by the Knesset on August 23rd, 1954 ==
(1970)
LAW OF RETURN (AMENDMENT NO. 2), 5730-1970*
1. In the Law of Return, 5710-1950**, the following sections shall be
inserted after section 4:
4A. (a) The rights of a Jew under this Law and the rights of an oleh
under the Nationality Law, 5712-1952***, as well as the rights of an
oleh under any other enactment, are also vested in a child and a
grandchild of a Jew, the spouse of a Jew, the spouse of a child of a Jew
and the spouse of a grandchild of a Jew, except for a person who has
been a Jew and has voluntarily changed his religion.
(b) It shall be immaterial whether or not a Jew by whose right a right
under subsection (a) is claimed is still alive and whether or not he has
immigrated to Israel.
(c) The restrictions and conditions prescribed in respect of a Jew or
an oleh by or under this Law or by the enactments referred to in
subsection (a) shall also apply to a person who claims a right under
subsection (a).
4B. For the purposes of this Law, "Jew" means a person who was born of a
Jewish mother or has become converted to Judaism and who is not a member
of another religion.
2. In section 5 of the Law of Return, 5710-1950, the following shall be
added at the end: "Regulations for the purposes of sections 4A and 4B
require the approval of the Constitution, Legislation and Juridical
Committee of the Knesset.".
3. In the Population Registry Law, 5725-1965, the following section
shall be inserted after section 3:5725-1965.
3A. (a) A person shall not be registered as a Jew by ethnic affiliation
or religion if a notification under this Law or another entry in the
Registry or a public document indicates that he is not a Jew, so long as
the said notification, entry or document has not been controverted to
the satisfaction of the Chief Registration Officer or so long as
declaratory judgment of a competent court or tribunal has not otherwise
determined.
(b) For the purposes of this Law and of any registration or document
thereunder, "Jew" has the same meaning as in section 4B of the Law of
Return, 5710-1950.
(c) This section shall not derogate from a registration effected before
its coming into force.".
GOLDA MEIR Prime Minister / Acting Minister of the Interior
SHNEUR ZALMAN SHAZAR President of the State
* Passed by the Knesset March 10th, 1970
HAARETS -
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=199729
Last update - 02:50 26/08/2002
Chief rabbis call for revision to be made in Law of Return
By Mazal Mualem and Aluf Benn, Ha'aretz
Correspondents, and Ha'aretz Service
Israel's leading Jewish authorities, Sephardi Chief Rabbi Eliyahu Bakshi-Doron and
his Ashkenazi counterpart Yisrael Meir Lau called Sunday for an urgent revision to
be made to the Law of Return, Army Radio reported.
The two, speaking at the end of the annual convention of rabbis in Jerusalem,
warned that "seventy percent of the new immigrants to Israel are professed
non-Jews, with no connection to Judaism. We cannot continue to bring entire
Christian families to Israel."
=============
As we can clearly see, in 1954 and in 1970 the Law of Return was:
1) subsequent to a definition of Israel as a "police state" - as was transferred from jurisdiction of the Ministry of
Immigration to the Ministry of Interior. (Later the name of the Ministry of Immigration has been changed to "Ministry
of Absorption": a very significant name).
2) a draconian body - "Chief Registration Officer's Office" was created; which function was to hunt, catch and
prosecute "hidden non-Jews". It is a kind of a "racial inquisition" (or a "racist KGB"); an atmosphere of denunciation
has deepened; an army of informants was motivated by jealousy, hatred and personal interest, they reported on their
rivals in love or in business.
3) the Law of Return was tighter linked to religion, to Judaism;
4) a wider definition of who's eligible to apply to the Law of Return made possible to bring huge masses of
immigrants to Israel - hundreds of thousands, could be - even millions; however, they had equal rights only to
"return" to Israel: inside Israel they were splendid into different casts with different rights and different social status,
given by birth.
"On that day," wrote John Kifner in The New York Times, "the vast
army of Arab laborers who wait on tables, pick vegetables, haul
garbage, lay brick and perform virtually all Israel's menial work,
stayed home." [John Kifner, New York Times, December 22, 1987]
This is why Golda Meir and her followers have widened the "Law of Return", because they needed Russians,
Ethiopians, and Arabs in Israel: for slavish manual work.
However, the rulers of Israel later have decided that it will be better to turn less powerful Jewish communities (like
Russian or Bukharian) into slaves - instead of Muslim and Christians. This is why they want to change the Law of
Return back, but they hesitate because they doubt if any Jew would be agree to become a slave.
Further legalization of Israeli terrorism and widening of the justification of slavery are two main priorities of Israeli
law-makers.
HA-ARETZ
Wednesday, September 11, 2002 Tishrei 5, 5763
Israel Time:14:13(GMT+3)
Defender of the Jews, wherever they may be
By Yossi Shain and Ze'ev Segal
(....) politicians and commentators alike have overlooked the
legal dimension of kinship responsibility (in the sense of kol
Yisrael arevim ze laze) that exists in the Israeli penal code.
Section 13 of this code, enacted in 1994, enshrines in law an
express Israeli commitment to the Diaspora-homeland security
nexus.
Section 13, part of a wider reform of the code, granted Israeli
courts jurisdiction over what is termed "extra-territorial crimes,
"that is, crimes committed outside Israel. Section 13 is unique in
the way it relates to what is defined in its title as "crimes against
the state or against the Jewish People."
Section 13 states that: "Israeli criminal law will also apply to
offenses committed outside Israeli territory against:
1. The life of an Israeli citizen, Israeli resident or public servant,
his body, his health, his freedom, or his property, because he is
one of the above.
2. The life of a Jew, his body, his health, or his property, because
he is a Jew, or the property of a Jewish institution, because it is
Jewish."
In this section, Israel defined in explicit terms the connection
between the Diaspora and the State of Israel as the state of the
Jewish people. Clearly, this connection was already affirmed
and defined in the Law of Return, which establishes that "every
Jew is entitled to make aliyah [immigrate] to Israel." It is also
clear that the Law of Return and the Israeli commitment to the
Jewish people that flows from it are the elements that often
defined the Israeli national interest as a "Jewish interest."
In other words - it means that Israel as a "Jewish state" can defend "Jewish interests" using military force for that in
any part of the world, violating any international rule and sovereignty of any country in the world. This is why
Ha-Arets wrote further:
"Israel's military ties and arms transfer policies were also
influenced, among other things, by the desire to guarantee the
well-being and civil rights of Diaspora communities (....) ".
So, we did not understand this clause wrongly.
"In 1994, when the Knesset added the "Security of the Jews"
clause, it established a new extraterritorial principle, an
additional connection that makes possible the application of
Israeli criminal norms outside the borders of the state."
Which is a tremendous violation of the sovereignty of other countries. This Israeli law is justifying for Israel what is
defined in all international definitions as "terrorism". Giving the legal basis for terrorism, Israeli law projects
legalization and justification to use terrorism only on the State of Israel, depriving other countries and nations of this
tool.
Dan Meridor, in the Knesset plenum, when the bill was going through its first reading, said:
"Likewise it should be emphasized that special protection is
granted in Section 13(b)(2) to the life, health, freedom or
property of a Jew, because he is a Jew (....)"
Here is a pure racial definition. Any national can be abused because of he or she is an Armenian, Russian, Arab, etc.
If Israel has rights to impose her jurisdiction on a citizen of any other country, then - logically - why should not other
countries impose their jurisdiction on citizens of Israel? If all other countries will copy Israeli "logic", then Russian
special military forces will be sent to Israel for punishing tenth of thousands of Israelis, who outrageously exploited,
abused, discriminated, raped, beaten, killed and robed Russians in Israel, or Armenia could send troops to Israel
because Israel abuse Armenian churches, confiscate Armenian communities' properties, and Israeli soldiers came to
Armenian churches - and shoot there. If the lawmakers in Arab countries will legislate a law, similar to Israeli law, -
Arab countries would be much more justified to start a military intervention in Israel in retaliation for mockeries,
tortures and killings of Arabs by Israelis. By bringing up her Section 13 law of her penal code Israel did not mean
that all other countries would bring up similar laws: which means that this law is racist.
According to "Ha-Arets" - Israeli politicians and lawyers recognize that this Israeli law is "unique and does not exist
in the laws of other states", but this does not concern them.
However, even more frightening and disturbing that Israel threats to punish any person in the world for "Section 13
states that: "Israeli criminal law will also apply to offenses committed outside Israeli territory (....) "against the state of
Israel and interests of the state of Israel" (from further interpretation of that law in the Knesset). It is absolutely clear
that the Israeli law encourages and justifies any terrorist crime, committed outside Israel against citizens of other
countries. Therefore - according to Israeli law the 9-11 attack against America (as well as Israeli attack against
American navy boat "USS Liberty") was absolutely legal if "served Israeli interests".
But even if not using military force, - by this law Israel subjects non-Jews to discriminatory legal treatment - as far as
any non-Jew will be forced to defend him (her) self (as a private person) by own restricted personal resources, when
a Jew will be supported by unlimited resources of Israeli government and will be judged by the racist Israeli Penal
Code. Besides, this Israeli law demonstrates an open accusation of anti-Semitism, directed against the whole
non-Jewish world. Violating the rule of the presumption of innocence, Israel declares any judgment outside Israel as
anti-Semite.
From Amnesty International's resolution "Human rights abuses of women trafficked from countries of the FSU into
Israel's sex industry" (or "Human rights abuses of women trafficked from countries of the former Soviet Union into
Israel's sex industry: "Amnesty International May 2000 AI Index: MDE 15/17/00 ) we can learn that Israeli laws
don't prohibit slavery, purchasing or selling people, keeping people as slaves (prisoners), keeping someone in Israel
against his/her will, bringing people to Israel by deceit - later turning into slaves (or even kidnapping people from
other countries, bringing them to Israel), and so on.
[http://zhurnal.lib.ru/editors/g/gunin_l_m/amneslav.shtml]
In the part "STATE RESPONSIBILITY UNDER INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW" Amnesty
International writes: "The Israeli government has failed to take adequate measures to prevent, investigate, prosecute
and punish human rights abuses committed against trafficked women. In general, trafficked women are effectively
treated as criminals by the various Israeli agencies with whom they come in contact, rather than as victims of human
rights abuses. This is so even though many of them have been subjected to. Human rights abuses such as
enslavement or torture, including rape and other forms of sexual abuse, by traffickers, pimps or others involved in
Israel's sex industry. Trafficked women come into contact with many different Israeli governmental agencies, but
there appears to be no coherent governmental policy to combat these human rights abuses."
Writing about Israeli law, Amnesty recognizes that (subparagraph "Relevant criminal legislation:) "Under Israeli law, it
is not illegal to engage in "prostitution", and that "Trafficking of women to Israel is not illegal." It means that Israel
DESIRES to turn non-Jews into slaves and ENCOURAGES slave trade as far as non-Jews are turned into slaves.
What about Jews? We can clearly see that in the same time Israeli law prohibits ISRAELI CITIZENS to engage
someone or be engaged into prostitution outside Israel: "Section 202(b) of the Penal Code makes it a criminal
offence to instigate a woman voluntarily or involuntarily to leave Israel with the intent that she should "practice
prostitution abroad". Why such an inequality? Clearly, it is because Israeli Penal Code is outrageously racist!
Amnesty International stresses that in Israel "Slavery and the buying and selling of persons are not criminal offences."
In his open letter to Mrs. Marsha von Duerckheim, General Consul of the Embassy of the United States of America,
famous Israeli politician and social activist, Michael Dorfman, leader of "Russian Panters" group, names other
cathegories of people, who are kept in Israel against their will. This letter, "The Modern slaves - Keeping people
against their will in Israel" written in the name of society "La Mierkav", can be found on Internet at
[]
In this letter we read: "In the 19th century, the British navy pursued pirate ships, which were involved in the slave
trade. Equally, the modern world has to stop the present Russian equivalent of slavery, a move which I heartily
applaud."
According to society "La Mierkav", people, kept in Israel as slaves are (besides women from ex-USSR countries,
enslaved in Israel):
"Children brought to Israel against their will or against the will of one of the parents.
Children sent by their parents to Israel in the frame of the Zionist upbringing program and unwillingly being kept
there. Also, boys and girls that are slipped out of school and made slaves in youth gangs.
Old people brought here to get state assistance, mortgage or allowance and left to the fates and without possibility of
returning.
People brought here by deceived promises of work and then criminal elements used them as means to get money."
According to various sources, Israel is involved in slave trade on international scale, and became a heaven for slave
traders from all around the world.
The author of this work in 1991 was taken to Israel by force. Together with my family I was deported by the
communist authorities in Belarus to Warsaw. In Warsaw we were surrounded by Israelis - and taken to Israel
against our will.
In Israel I met hundreds of people, who were taken to Israel against their will from Moldavian regions of a military
conflict and from other war areas. They were told that they will be evacuated to Moscow or to Poland, but were
taken to Israel. Alexander Orlowsky and Vova Chernin wrote about this problem.
There are innumerous cases of brutal abductions, committed by Israeli citizens. Coming to Russia, Ukraine, and
other places, Israelis kidnap women and children - and bring them to Israel against their will. Israeli authorities do
absolutely nothing to find kidnapped people and send them back to their native countries. Israeli police sabotage all
efforts made by activists and enthusiasts to catch criminals-slave traders and release enslaved by them people. Israeli
government sabotage United Nations and Amnesty International's efforts to bring an end to Israeli slave trafficking.
Policemen in Ottawa told me that he there are suspicions that 30 percents of children disappearances in Quebec is
Israel-related. However, this problem might be solved only on political level. Israeli government must have an
economic interest in slave trade - otherwise they would stop it. Local police outside Israel have no power to stop
Israeli bastards. And the Jewish lobby is so powerful that it will block any parliamentarian decision in this question.
Israel is such a police state, with strict security rules and total spying control over the population that is Israeli
government would wish to do something about this problem - they would achieve results in 24 hours. UN, AI,
Michael Dorfman and other sources accuse Israeli government in covering up the slave trafficking and blocking
international efforts to stop it.
Various Israeli laws encourage violence, economic crimes, terrorism and discrimination against non-Jews inside and
outside Israel, against minorities in Israel (such as Christians, Muslims, fresh immigrants from ex-USSR or from
Ethiopia, etc.).
An Israeli law, which prohibits religious tolerance and any non-Jewish missionary activity, is well known. Now there
are innumerous supplements and supplementary amendments, which Israeli regime is persistently adjusts to this
anti-Christian law.
An extract from my own work "GLOBAL WAR ON DEMOCRACY"
[http://zhurnal.lib.ru/editors/g/gunin_l_m/globalwar.shtml]
-- where I wrote: "[Souce - "Ha-Arets"] On 21 2001, Cvi Hendel, chairmen of the Knesset's (Parliament)
Committee on Alia and Absorption (Immigration) and the MAFDAL religious party Deputy, proposed a mass "
gyjur " (conversion into Judaism) for all non-Jews. He claims that non-Jews are 70 percent of the total number of
fresh immigrants...Rabbi Ovadia, Sefardic Jews' religious leader and the leader of SHAS movement (represented in
Knesset) is regularly exclaiming hatred and intolerance towards " Russian " immigrants : Jews and non-Jews. On the
7-th of April 2001 in his Easter speech, he told that Arabs are nation of evil and called for atrocity of Arabs - all of
them, every single person - without any mercy. In his attitude towards non-Jews in Israel he stands on more extreme
position then Rabbi Hendel.
Rabbi of Bat-Yam Yosef Bar-Shalom : several time during the summer 2001 expressed a view that "Russian" Jews
are not Jews - and must be banned from entering Israel. He also mentioned indirectly that all non-Jews must be
deported from Israel or forced through " gyjur ".
Every day Israeli Rabbis, members of Knesset and the government, Hebrew newspapers are calling for violence,
murders, spreading the hatred propaganda against non-Jews in general, Arabs, and Christians, and new immigrants
(Jews and non-Jews) in particular. No wonder that new immigrants and non-Jews are harassed, beaten, raped,
enormously exploited, cheated, and killed. Even children from Russian-speaking and Ethiopian families are beaten or
killed ("executed") at schools by their Hebrew-speaking classmates. Organization "Russian Panthers" and its
chairman Michael Dorfman describe the situation at Beer-Sheva's schools as outraged.
(On Internet: [http://ispr.org/panrus.html])
New anti-Christian legislation, laws, and regulations - like a flood - covered the whole political life in Israel. Let's
quote some of them.
Official Discrimination proposed in Jerusalem.
On December 7th, 2000, Jerusalem's mayor, Mr. Ehud Olmert, proposed to his city's Council that Jerusalem's 158
churches and religious institutions should be required to pay the municipal taxes from which the 1,198 Jewish
religious institutions ought to remain exempt.
In a pre-reading, on the 6th December 2000, the Knesset (our parliament) took the first of four steps necessary for
the enactment of a law, tabled by Rabbi MK Meir Gafni, one of the initial proponents of a religious censorship bill
which was meant to proscribe the distribution of materials which could be used to persuade anyone to change his
religious opinion. That bill failed in the process of legislative process due to the strenuous and determined effort of
hundreds of thousands of Christians overseas who wrote in protest to the Israeli Government and to its various
Ministers and to its diplomatic representatives overseas. The new bill went through its first reading with 23 Knesset
members from Likud, Yahadut HaTorah, Shas, Mafdal, Ahdut Leumit, and some of the Shinui party supporting and
the government opposing with the nine Knesset members from Yisrael Ahat and Meretz present at the session. The
law proposes to render all missionary activity illegal, including the distribution of evangelistic material by post, fax,
e-mail, or any other form of communication.
(January 28 2001). Rev. Charles Kopp, head of the United Christian Council in Israel, was referring to a bill,
introduced by MK Moshe Gafni (United Torah Judaism) before the present Knesset recess, which would prohibit
missionary activity and the dissemination of missionary material, such as soliciting to change one's religion by means
of mail, fax, e-mail, or other instruments of communication. The bill passed a preliminary reading in the Knesset on
December 6 by a vote of 23 to nine, with the support of the religious parties, the Likud, the National Union, and
even some Shinui MKs, while Labor and Meretz MKs opposed it. Kopp said that if Sharon formed a coalition, he
would have to rely very heavily on the Orthodox parties, making it very probable that legislation of this sort would be
passed.
The last section of this law means that people in Christian countries might be persecuted by Israeli court for violating
the Israeli law. As we
know on experience in the former USSR, where anything any contact to the foreigner and even a peace of art, not
matching with soviet dogmas, - could be adjusted under "antisoviet activity", in Israel, where Rabbis will decide,
what falls under "persuade anyone to change his religious opinion", any card with a church, any reproduction of a
picture, on which there is a Christian symbolic, can be announced against the law, and the possessor will be
imprisoned.
It means a prohibition of the whole European art as well.
Proposed Penal Law (Amendment - Prohibition of Enticement to Change Religion by Mail), 5760-2000 Addition 1.
In Penal Law, 5733-1977 (1), after Section 174B will come: Section 174C "Prohibition of 174C. The
distributor of a document Enticement To Change Religion By Mail by means of the mail, the fax, the electronic mail
or by any other means, that is enticement to change religion, whether directly or indirectly, without obtaining the prior
consent of the addressee thereto, is subject to three months' imprisonment." Explanatory Statement The State of
Israel, within the framework of existing laws, opposes all missionary enticement to change religion. The Legislature
even provided in Section 368 of the Penal Law, 5733-1977, a special prohibition regarding changing religion of
minors.
The last means, that any parent, whose nationality has been written down in tehudat zehut as "Jew", is prohibited
from baptizing his (her) child - and will be pursued for that by the criminal law as in Israel, as well as in any country
of the World!
All new events mean that in spite of having already harsh anti-Christian laws, the state of Israel goes much further in
accelerating an undeclared war against Christianity.
We must take into consideration that this is not just a law against missionaries in general, but a pure anti-Christian
law. When any distribution or even possession of Christian-related materials, and (even!!!) submission of such
materials to Israel well be prohibited in Israel, any Jewish missionary propaganda, any offensive or even forcible
conversion into Judaism will be only welcomed! In his resent speech a general, who's a chief of the Propaganda and
Education Department of Israeli army, called for forcible conversion into Judaism of all non-Jews in Israeli army.
And we must remember that Israel has a compulsory military service law!"
In other words, we can see here the same extraterritorial principle - as in a number of other Israeli laws. By
proclaiming jurisdiction of its entire religious, penal and other racist laws beyond Israel's political-geographic limits,
Israeli regime is creating a legal basis to extend its power in the global scale by means of terrorism.
The same extraterritorial principle is potentially presents in Israeli legalization of tortures. In 1995 a new legislation,
so called "Levi-Landau" (or simply "Landau", or "The Landau Commission Report") law, was approved by Israeli
Knesset. Since its introduction it was condemned by all civilized nations, by United Nations, Amnesty International,
Human Rights Watch, and by the European Union. The closest Israeli buddy, United States, has condemned this law
through its Department of State's declarations and materials. Israel's refusal to sign in full the "Geneva Convention",
"Convention Against Torture" - and many of other important international treaties, and Israeli legislation, legalizing
tortures, have provoked a common outcry through all over the world. However, Israel did not agree to comply with
international standards, and continued to violate internationally human rights:
================
In its resolution from 1 November 1995 Amnesty International says that this bill
is "effectively legalizes torture in Israel and the Occupied Territories is an
outrage which violates Israel's treaty obligations, Amnesty International said today."
Amnesty says that the law, with hypocrisy called "Prohibition of Tortures" (a
pure Israeli-style logic!), practically legalize tortures:
"Palestinian detainees under interrogation are frequently hooded, deprived of sleep,
sometimes for four to six days while kept standing or sitting in painful positions,
beaten, violently shaken and confined to narrow, cupboard-sized cells.
For years Amnesty International and other human rights organizations have exposed
torture during Israeli interrogation of Palestinian detainees. The interrogation guidelines
appended to the report of the 1987 Landau Commission of Inquiry allow the General
Security Service (GSS, otherwise known as the Shin Bet or Shabak, the main security
service involved in interrogating Palestinian "security" offenders) to use "a moderate
measure of physical pressure". The details of these guidelines are secret. According to
the Landau Commission the physical pressure "must never reach the level of torture".
But this is doublespeak. The treatment consistently described by detainees under
interrogation is torture, which Israel is required to prevent as a party to the United
Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment
or Punishment (UN Convention against Torture). "
================
"United Nations
Committee against Torture, Consideration of reports
submitted by States Parties under article 19 of the
Convention, Israel, U.N. Doc. A/49/44 at 24
(Forty-ninth session, 1994).
159. The Committee considered the initial report of Israel
(CAT/C/16/Add.4) at its 183rd and 184th meetings on 25
April 1994 (CAT/C/SR.183 and 184), and has adopted the
following conclusions and recommendations:
A. Introduction
160. Israel ratified the Convention on 3 October 1991 and made reservations on articles 20 and 30. It also did not
make the declarations to accept the provisions of articles 21 and 22 of the Convention.
(....)
C. Subjects of concern
165. There is real concern that no legal steps have been taken to implement domestically the Convention against
Torture. Thus, the Convention does not form part of the domestic law of Israel and its provisions cannot be invoked
in Israeli courts.
166. The Committee regrets the clear failure to implement the definition of torture as contained in article 1 of the
Convention.
167. It is a matter of deep concern that Israeli law pertaining to the defences of "superior orders" and "necessity" are
in clear breach of that country's obligations under article 2 of the Convention.
168. The Landau Commission Report, permitting as it does "moderate physical pressure" as a lawful mode of
interrogation, is completely unacceptable to this Committee:
(a) As for the most part creating conditions leading to the risk of torture or cruel, or inhuman or degrading treatment
or punishment;
(b) By retaining in secret the crucial standards of interrogation to be applied in any case, such secrecy being a further
condition leading inevitably to some cases of ill-treatment contrary to the Convention against Torture.
169. The Committee is greatly concerned at the large number of heavily documented cases of ill-treatment in custody
that appear to amount to breaches of the Convention, including several cases resulting in death that have been drawn
to the attention of the Committee and the world by such reputable non-governmental organizations as Amnesty
International, Al Haq (the local branch of the International Commission of Jurists) and others.
D. Recommendations
170. The Committee recommends:
(a) That all the provisions of the Convention against Torture be incorporated by statute into the domestic law of
Israel;
(b) That interrogation procedures be published in full so that they are both transparent and seen to be consistent with
the standards of the Convention;
(....)
(d) That an immediate end be put to current interrogation practices that are in breach of Israel's obligations under the
Convention;
(e) That all victims of such practices should be granted access to appropriate rehabilitation and compensation
measures."
================
Concluding Observations - Eighteenth session :
Israel. 04/11/97. CAT/C/XVIII/CRP.1/Add.4.
(Concluding Observations/Comments)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document Type:Concluding Observations/CommentsDocument Date: 04/11/97Issued By:
CommitteeReference/Symbol: CAT/C/XVIII/CRP.1/Add.4Length: Page(s)Language: English
CAT/C/XVIII/CRP.1/Add.4
11 April 1997
ENGLISH
Original: ENGLISH/FRENCH/SPANISH
COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE
Eighteenth session
Geneva
28 April - 9 May 1997
Draft annual report of the Committee against Torture
under article 24 of the Convention
C. Recommendations
136. The Committee recommends that:
a) Interrogations applying the methods referred to above and any other methods that are in conflict with the
provisions of articles 1 and 16 of the Convention cease immediately.
b) The provisions of the Convention against Torture be incorporated by legislation into Israeli law, particularly the
definition of torture contained in article 1 of the Convention, as is currently under consideration by the Expert
Committee of the Ministerial Committee for Legislation.
c) Israel consider making the declarations provided for under articles 21 and 22 and withdrawing its reservation to
article 20 of the Convention.
d) Interrogation procedures pursuant to the ?Landau rules? in any event be published in full.
e) Israel includes information on the measures taken in response to these conclusions and recommendations in its
second periodic report which was due on 1 November 1996. That report should be submitted as soon as possible
and in any event no later than 1 September 1997, in order to allow the Committee to consider it at its next session.
========================
========================
In their numerous documents UN, Amnesty, and other most respected international organizations express their deep
concern that Israel has extended the practice of tortures to occupied territories (which is not Israel), and to other
territories. By connecting tortures to "necessity", Israeli law is practically highlighting a possibility to use tortures at
any part of the world. It is clear that the war crimes, committed by Israel's military forces, Israeli police, etc., in
Lebanon, Egypt, Israel, and occupied territories, assassinations, destruction of houses, practice to take hostages
(Israel took innocent Lebanese and Egyptian families as hostages - and kept them as prisoners in Israel as "living
currency": in case that they might be needed to exchange them for Israeli soldiers), and other brutal crimes were
committed NOT AGAINST, but ACCORDING to Israeli laws.
Israeli Labor Code, which was criticized by UN, Amnesty, and US Department of State for its irrelevancy to
international standards, property laws, Penal Code, and other laws, rules and regulations were condemned by the
world community as brutal (inhuman), racist and offensive.
Israeli "kviyut" and "kablanut" labor codes create two different categories of workers. One - an "upper", "superior",
category - is for native Israelis or for some most loyal immigrants-Jews. "Kviyut" is an assurance that your work
contract will never be terminated. If your employer fires you, then you are eligible for such a huge compensation that
nobody will ever fire you. You also can not be subjected to disciplinary measures, or transferred to another job or
position. It makes all "kviuyut" workers not accountable. Unimaginable mockeries and cruelty towards Christians,
Muslims and Russian immigrants at Israeli "misradim" ("offices") by Israeli bureaucrats partly originate from "kviyut":
because Israeli bureaucrats are not accountable. A municipality worker, who deliberately scalds an immigrant visitor
crying out "go back to Russia", feels her impunity because of the "kviyut". A salesperson, who sees a Russian
customer, ignores him - because she's not accountable. A teacher, who separates children from Russian-speaking
families from the others, not allowing them to go to an outdoor event - because "they are not true Jewish", - is doing
it partly because of the "kviyut". The "Kablanut" Labor Code is a legalization of slavery. "Kablan" is an individual or
collective slaves' master, who is renting slaves to another exploiter (like a company gives in rent a car or a
computer). There is no minimal wage or working conditions standards, no compensation for injuries, no vacations
and holidays, no free (payable) days in the week, no working hours norms, no any other norms and labor rules
protection for employees, working under "kablan". In the same time - workers on "kviyut" have innumerous
privileges: like the "13-th salary", annual rehabilitation at holidays reserves in Eilat, in 5-star hotels, free tickets to
concerts, sport events, sometimes free meals, etc. Privileges for "kviyut" workers are so numerous that it is hard to
list them all. Besides, every year the salary for "kviyut" workers is rising. Since 1996-98 "kviyut" was (as well as
"kablanut") utilized as an ethnic discrimination tool. Fresh immigrants - qualified professionals - are offered "kviyut" in
law-paid non-qualified works. In the hell of the first 1-2 years in Israel such an immigrant in desperation appreciates
this solution. However, later (after the trap is locked) it is difficult to climb to a higher social level. There is no need to
mention that victims of "kviyut" and "kablanut" are Muslims, Christians and Russian and Ethiopians immigrants.
UN sharply criticized Israel for discriminatory Labor Code in 1999 annual report.
Human rights organization, unsuccessfully trying to stop tortures, murders, destruction of houses, and other Israeli
crimes, are not able to understand a simple thing. If for ordinary Jews in Galut (outside Israel) non-Jews are people,
for Israelis (raised and educated on racism) non-Jews are like animals. This is why ethical norms, pity or
compassion, mercy towards non-Jews don't exist for Israelis. Israeli regime bares responsibility for such a disastrous
result of Israeli propaganda, education and racist political system.
In the Eastern World in general tendencies to abuse, discriminate, and persecute origins of the Northern
Hemisphere's culture are dangerously growing. However, the most systematic and ideologically hostile to Europeans
(in general), and Christians in particular, is the state of Israel. Tenth of thousands of the refugee cases (ex-USSR
citizens') from Israel, articles in Russian newspapers describe persecutions for relating to European culture. People
were persecuted for having a university (ex-USSR's) degree, not being circumcisioned, their atheistic views,
"non-Jewish behavior", celebrating the New Year Eve, or simply because they came from USSR, an "anti-Semite
state and great Satan"...
Russian-speaking people were enormously exploited, or even enslaved in Israel. They became cheap laborers,
slaves for Israelis, as well as Palestinian Arabs. Sometimes policemen are coming to places, where new Russian
immigrants and Arabs work, to pick them up and force them working for free. This is what happened to me when I
worked at Petach-Tikva's stadium. I have a signed by a witness and notarized affidavit that I was taken by
policemen, who forced me to work at being renovated private apartment of one of them for free.
Working conditions where "Russians" work were awful and unhealthy. They could be compared with tortures.
Israeli property rules and Housing Code are also a legal "soil", which supplies judicial basis to discrimination, racism
and abuse.
So-called "housing genocide" against new immigrants in 1990-s was by then one of the most outraged discriminatory
and brutal tools, used by the Israeli government to persecute most of the fresh "Russian" immigrants. Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon, by then - the Minister of Construction, - was the main criminal mind behind "housing genocide". It was
him, who forced "Russians" to sadly famous "caravan ghettos", who constructed tenth of thousands of housing units,
which were finally left empty; he was behind an artificial raise of the housing prices. It was him, who ordered a
megalomaniac Jewish construction at Arab territories, instead of building social and cheap houses for new
immigrants...
Sharon was behind a legislation, which aimed to send "Russian" to the Negev desert and ban their right to reside in
Haifa, Tel-Aviv and Jerusalem.
I enclose several most typical cases of Russian-speaking people, seeking refuge in Canada from Israel. 2 of them are
actual cases, and people are asking for help.
They might be found on Internet:
http://www.total.net/~leog/Rights/h_en.txt
http://www.total.net/~leog/Rights/h_fr.txt
http://www.total.net/~leog/Rights/LevGunin/appealX.htm
http://www.total.net/~leog/Rights/LevGunin/mother.txt
http://www.interlog.com/~syedma/dstand/leo_updte02.html
http://www.total.net/~leog/Rights/Galina/galina.htm
http://www.total.net/~leog/Rights/galina/galina2.htm
http://www.total.net/~leog/Rights/Luda/luda.htm
http://www.total.net/~leog/Rights/Orlovsky/orl.htm
http://www.total.net/~leog/Rights/Orlovsky/orl2.htm
http://www.total.net/~leog/Rights/Orlovsky/orl3.htm
http://www.total.net/~leog/Rights/Orlovsky/orl4.htm
The most complete and systematic analysis, description, and history of so called "small" Russian genocide in Israel is
given in my huge work (approximately 1800 pages) "GULAG in Palestine" (in Russian). In this work all most
significant works on Israel, thousands of documents, materials, and sources were quoted and named. The work
might be found at Internet:
http://dynamo-ny.com/sakansky/paper/gunin/gulag1.htm -
the most complete version
http://polit.kulichki.net/biblio/guni.html -
another version
http://polit.kulichki.net/biblio/gunin.html -
Jewish Wars, another work on Israel, based on the "GULAG of Palestine"
http://www.dynamo-ny.com/sakansky/paper/gunin/JewishWars1.htm -
Jewish Wars
Main source of information about so called "housing genocide" and Israeli housing laws and practices is the
"GULAG of Palestine". In English some information might be available on Internet at:
http://www.total.net/~leog/Rights/General/houen.txt
http://www.total.net/~leog/Rights/General/to_all.htm
http://www.total.net/~leog/Rights/Orlovsky/orl.htm
In his essay in Israeli newspaper "Davar" (1995) Israel Shahak, a political activist and jounalist, wrote that Israel
uses Judaism for discrimination. He wrote that the rabbis of Safad issued a rule, which prohibits Jews in Israel to sell
anything or buy anything from non-Jews. This rule was active in ancient time as a part of the judicial system of
Judaism ("khalacha"). Since 1995 all Jewish religious courts make reference to this rule.
Jewish religious bodies like Rabbinates, house councils (where normally the ultra-orthodox dominate), cities' religious
authorities, and others, control the whole life in Israel more then in any religious Islamic state. The state of Israel
doesn't recognize civil or non-Jewish religious marriages, considering children from such marriages as "mamzerim"
(bastards). Mamzerim have no rights to marry in Israel, own land, buy a house (in some conditions), open a
business, work in state institutions, etc. Israeli government is practicing citizenship denials for "mamzerim". As we can
see in family Hazinsky case, they artificially create a situation, when people of this category are loosing another
citizenship (if they have one). Without any citizenship such people (many of them - children) become prisoners inside
Israel, having no passports or other travel documents.
At any time any man or woman in Israel might be forced into an awful procedure of definition of nationality, with their
life, work, and destiny depending on it.
Judaism under the Israeli regime became a kind of a Soviet-style (or fascist-style) ideology, with local Israeli religious
KGB terrorizing the nation. Organization "Yad La-Banim" is one of such local religious KGB. This is a secret
religious police, equipped and authorized for spying-like activity. They also publish books: hatred propaganda
books. In one of its books, with the Rabbi Feldman ("Yad La-Banim" chairman) introduction, they wrote that the
modern Christians are the same enemies of Jews (Israelis) as Crusaders, who burned Jews in the synagogues alive!
Tenth of thousands of such books, brochures, leaflets, etc. - are published in modern Israel. It is amazing how such a
regime as Israeli could exist on money that it gets or sucks from Christian countries, and to support its anti-Christian
propaganda, financed by money, extorted from the Christian world!
The whole system of racist social structure was designed to enslave "under-people" and exploit them without any
restrictions for the profit of high-status Israelis. The most exploited and discriminated are immigrants from ex-USSR
(most of them) and their children, Arabs, Christians in general and Ethiopians. We must add also foreign workers
(like Romanians and Filipinos), who are also abused, harassed, and enormously exploited. A very special housing
code and practices (fully described in above-mentioned "GULAG of Palestine" and articles), and Kablanut and
Kwiyut codes actually enable such exploitation specifics, extremity and lawlessness, which in real life associate with
slavery. Israeli labor laws are not compatible with even lowest international standards, and violate all international
agreements. "We have in Israel a system of Apartheid, which is more severe, that one in former SA" (one American
politician said).
In general Israel has no laws in European sense. As it was well formulated in family Hazinsky's appeal, "it is a norm
that in Israel there are always several contradicting to each other laws. Israel has no constitution and / or steady
juridical codes. It has only some common - general regulations and the law of a precedent. Such a system was
designed to create a total lawlessness and injustice, and enable (instead of justice) so-called "telephone right", or a
"law" of family - friendship - army brotherhood connections. This system made tortures (Landau law) and
persecutions of Christians (see in particular bill 174C) absolutely legal in Israel."
It is also important to mention that the state of Israel is a pirate brotherhood in a primitive criminal sense. It's an
island of almost unrestricted criminal activity such as money laundering, slave trade (including women and children),
donor organs illegal trade, smuggling, etc. When Russia was recently removed from the list of top money launders,
Israel is always on the list (and on the top). ...
Deeper you go into Israeli judicial system, into Israeli laws - more astonishing you are. It is easier to name few things,
which Israeli laws don't abuse, then to list hundreds of things, which they abuse. Drastic discrimination of women,
arbitrary assassination-style killings, legalization of assassination of debtors, brutal and inhuman army laws, rules and
regulations, which encourage systematic rapes of teenagers and women, taken to compulsory military service: and so
on, and so on. But the most astonishing phenomena is that human life for Israeli regime became less valuable then a
life of a fly. Of course, we speak about lives of non-Jews. Israeli laws and actions are depriving non-Jews of the
value of their lives. For Israelis loyalty to friends and allies does not exist.
When a court in Oslo was considering the guilt of the war criminal, Israeli Premier-Minister Sharon, they studied
materials from Lebanese militia sources, and had an intention to call former militia commanders for interrogation.
However, they could not do it: because 3 of the former Lebanese militia leaders were immediately assassinated. The
main important of them - Elie Hobeika - was assassinated in Beirut:
" Lebanese ex-militia leader buried
Thousands gathered outside the church
Mourners have packed a Beirut church for the
funeral of the assassinated former pro-Israeli
warlord and ex-cabinet minister Elie Hobeika.
Around 300 people attended the ceremony at
the Martakla church in the Beirut suburb of
Hazmiyeh on Saturday.
Thousands more gathered in the courtyard
outside, only metres from the spot where Mr
Hobeika, aged 45, was killed in a car bombing
on Thursday.
Mr Hobeika's wife prayed by his wreathed
coffin, which lay between the caskets of two
of the three bodyguards who also died in the attack."
It is quite natural that any normal person is shocked if comes to Israel as an immigrant.
Source: The Noontide Press,
1822 1/2 Newport Blvd., Suite 183,
Costa Mesa, CA 92627,
First Noontide Printing 1985,
Second Noontide Printing 1991,
ISBN 0-939482-01-0
The Life of an American Jew in Racist-Marxist Israel
by Jack Bernstein
Copyright 1984 by Jack Bernstein and Leonard (Len) Martin
Before Israel became a state in 1948, Jews world-wide were filled
with the Zionist propaganda that Israel would be a homeland for all
Jews, a refuge for persecuted Jews, a truly democratic country, and
the fulfillment of Biblical prophecy.
I am an Ashkenazi Jew who spent the first 25 years of my life in the
United States, the country that has given ALL Jews freedom and the
opportunity to prosper -- and prosper we Jews did, to the point that
one segment of the Jewish population (the Zionists) have gained a
position of political and economic dominance in the U.S.
To fully understand the story I am about to tell, it is important that you
understand what Zionism really is. Zionist propaganda has led the
American people to believe that Zionism and Judaism are one and the
same and that they are religious in nature. THIS IS A BLATANT LIE.
Judaism is a religion; but Zionism is a political movement started mainly
by East European (Ashkenazi) Jews who for centuries have been the
main force behind communism and socialism. The ultimate goal of the
Zionists is one-world government under the control of the Zionists and
the Zionist-oriented Jewish International Bankers. Communism and
socialism are merely tools to help them accomplish their goals."
In his book Jack Bernstein writes about racism, fascism and stalinism in Israel.
There are thousands of such confessions. Hundreds of thousands of the Russian speaking refugees or "double"
immigrants from Israel have each one their own confession, which is likely be more dark then what suffered an
American Jew in Israel.
Back in 1948, the leading Jewish intellectuals already knew that the fresh-created State of Israel is a bandit, terrorist
state, founded on base of organizations, created, financed and supported by Hitler and Stalin:
Prominent Jews' December, 1948
Letter To New York Times
From John Wheat Gibson
From RePorterNoteBook@aol.com
8-2-2
Below is a 'copy' in its entirety of a very important letter to the New
York Times from Jewish intellectuals including Albert Einstein, Hannah
Arendt, and Sidney Hook that appeared on December 4, 1948 While
it is quoted from in brief on several web sites, it appears nowhere in its
entirety, and it deserves to be disseminated as it originally appears.
-- John Wheat Gibson
Letters to The Times New York Times December 4, 1948
New Palestine Party Visit of Menachem Begin
and Aims of Political Movement Discussed
TO THE EDITORS OF THE NEW YORK TIMES:
Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the
emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the "Freedom
Party" (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization,
methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist
parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former
Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.
The current visit of Menachem Begin, leader of this party, to the United
States is obviously calculated to give the impression of American support
for his party in the coming Israeli elections, and to cement political ties with
conservative Zionist elements in the United States. Several Americans of
national repute have lent their names to welcome his visit. It is inconceivable
that those who oppose fascism throughout the world, if correctly informed
as to Mr. Begin's political record and perspectives, could add their names
and support to the movement he represents.
Before irreparable damage is done by way of financial contributions, public
manifestations in Begin's behalf, and the creation in Palestine of the impression
that a large segment of America supports Fascist elements in Israel, the
American public must be informed as to the record and objectives of Mr.
Begin and his movement.
The public avowals of Begin's party are no guide whatever to its actual
character. Today they speak of freedom, democracy and anti-imperialism,
whereas until recently they openly preached the doctrine of the Fascist state.
It is in its actions that the terrorist party betrays its real character; from its
past actions we can judge what it may be expected to do in the future.
Attack on Arab Village
A shocking example was their behavior in the Arab village of Deir Yassin.
This village, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish lands, had taken
no part in the war, and had even fought off Arab bands who wanted to use
the village as their base. On April 9 (THE NEW YORK TIMES), terrorist
bands attacked this peaceful village, which was not a military objective in the
fighting, killed most of its inhabitants-240 men, women, and children-and
kept a few of them alive to parade as captives through the streets of Jerusalem.
Most of the Jewish community was horrified at the deed, and the Jewish
Agency sent a telegram of apology to King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan. But the
terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of this massacre,
publicized it widely, and invited all the foreign correspondents present in the
country to view the heaped corpses and the general havoc at Deir Yassin.
The Deir Yassin incident exemplifies the character and actions of the
Freedom Party.
Within the Jewish community they have preached an admixture of
ultranationalism, religious mysticism, and racial superiority. Like other
Fascist parties they have been used to break strikes, and have themselves
pressed for the destruction of free trade unions. In their stead they have
proposed corporate unions on the Italian Fascist model. During the last
years of sporadic anti-British violence, the IZL and Stern groups
inaugurated a reign of terror in the Palestine Jewish community. Teachers
were beaten up for speaking against them, adults were shot for not letting
their children join them. By gangster methods, beatings, window-smashing,
and wide-spread robberies, the terrorists intimidated the population and
exacted a heavy tribute. The people of the Freedom Party have had no
part in the constructive achievements in Palestine. They have reclaimed no
land, built no settlements, and only detracted from the Jewish defense
activity. Their much-publicized immigration endeavors were minute, and
devoted mainly to bringing in Fascist compatriots.
Discrepancies Seen
The discrepancies between the bold claims now being made by Begin and
his party, and their record of past performance in Palestine bear the imprint
of no ordinary political party. This is the unmistakable stamp of a Fascist
party for whom terrorism (against Jews, Arabs, and British alike), and
misrepresentation are means, and a "Leader State" is the goal.
In the light of the foregoing considerations, it is imperative that the truth about
Mr. Begin and his movement be made known in this country. It is all the more
tragic that the top leadership of American Zionism has refused to campaign
against Begin's efforts, or even to expose to its own constituents the dangers to
Israel from support to Begin. The undersigned therefore take this means of
publicly presenting a few salient facts concerning Begin and his party; and of
urging all concerned not to support this latest manifestation of fascism.
(signed)
ISIDORE ABRAMOWITZ, HANNAH ARENDT, ABRAHAM BRICK,
RABBI JESSURUN CARDOZO, ALBERT EINSTEIN, HERMAN EISEN,
M.D., HAYIM FINEMAN, M. GALLEN, M.D., H.H. HARRIS, ZELIG S.
HARRIS, SIDNEY HOOK, FRED KARUSH, BRURIA KAUFMAN, IRMA
L. LINDHEIM, NACHMAN MAISEL, SEYMOUR MELMAN, MYER D.
MENDELSON, M.D., HARRY M. OSLINSKY, SAMUEL PITLICK, FRITZ
ROHRLICH, LOUIS P. ROCKER, RUTH SAGIS, ITZHAK SANKOWSKY,
I.J. SHOENBERG, SAMUEL SHUMAN, M. SINGER, IRMA WOLFE,
STEFAN WOLFE.
New York, Dec. 2, 1948
================
The "Likud" party, Begin's party, is now ruling the country, with its covered by blood from
his shoos to his head war criminal and Russian genocide creator Ariel Sharon. Sharon, who
told the worlds "we rule America". And the world kept silence....