Коганицкий Григорий. Guidance Along Spiral And Overcoming Multilevel Missile Defense

All innovations declared here are the property of the author and cannot be used without his consent.

medium and long range tactical strike weapons

PART ONE - CRUISE MISSILE OF VARIABLE GEOMETRY, HAVING RAMJET ENGINE WITH ADDITIONAL INJECTING/FEDDENG OF INLET AIR FLOW

http://samlib.ru/k/koganickij_g_a/turnskin_2.shtml

PART TWO - ANTI-SHIP MISSILE, HAVING RAMJET ENGINE WITH ADDITIONAL INJECTING/FEEDING OF INLET AIR FLOW

http://samlib.ru/k/koganickij_g_a/anti_ship_missile.shtml

PART THREE_A - GUIDANCE ALONG SPIRAL AND OVERCOMING MULTILEVEL MISSILE DEFENSE

http://samlib.ru/k/koganickij_g_a/along_spiral.shtml

PART THREE_B - OVERCOMING MULTILEVEL MISSILE DEFENSE USING THE VIRTUAL MIRROR METHOD

Generals are always prepared to fight the last war.

Words from British Prime Minister Winston Churchill

ASSAULT ALONG SPIRAL

I began to be interested in the topics that I will talk about - "guidance and assault along spiral" and "radio countermeasures by forming a virtual mirror" back in the USSR, working at the Novosibirsk NIIAP, in programs the "Lily of the valley" and "Bouquet".

At first I published such topic in 2015, when the United States, completely senselessly and extremely dangerously, began to ignite a new world fire in the "Middle East."

I attempted to made a warning as for US and as for its adversaries about extremely dangers such action and performed the targeted mailings describing the possibility of BUDGET destruction of the CSG (aircraft carrier strike group).

/ Koganitsky G.A. Does Syria have the military opportunity to stop the United States of America!? It is supplemented (15/11/2015)/ - http://samlib.ru/k/koganickij_g_a/sodiumcanopy.shtml

The text of the article is in Russian, but below I will translate some fragments from it into English.

Why didn't I make a more serious and elaborate publication in English earlier!?

it was silly of me to think that self-censorship should be needed in such matters.

WHY I POSTING THIT NOW!?

After of stolen of several object of my intellectual properties were being consistently by American cowboys, I realized that a thief (such as the USA, in the person of "Lockheed Martin Corporation" and his great rocket scientist Matt Walker) begins to understand that stealing of intellectual properties is not good idea only when they can obtain a hit to its forehead by the Big and Gnarly Baton.

The second, and main, reason for my activity and the series of publications which are carried out by me is the US repeating, in an even more dangerous version for human civilization, the events of 2015.

WHAT IS HAPPENING NOW?

Israel has lost control of its far-right Nazis; Israeli right-wing Nazis have lost control over the development of their own provocation; Israeli society (including foreign structures) huddled in mass hysteria and, having ceased to critically and from the point of view of universal morality evaluate its own actions and it dragged its mandate territory, the United States, into global adventure.

For those who not had understand this phrase about "mandate territory" - Now there is a classic political situation when "the tail wagging the dog"

How big and technologically advanced must be the bludgeon that have to stop them!?

I have always tried on all major military-technical issues not only to take into account other people's opinions, but also to have my own opinion.

WHAT IS A MODERN, STRIKE, NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER ACCORDING TO THE UNITED STATES OPINION?

This is a symbol of their dominance;

This is something that everyone SHOULD be hysterically to afraid;

This is something that, in the style of a veritable American cowboy, gives him possibility a kindle conflagration and to climb into the chicken coops on all the world's ranches AVAILABLE to him (well, of course, it in case, if owner of the ranch doesn't have big and adequate bludgeon).

WHAT IS A MODERN, STRIKE NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER ACCORDING TO MY OPINION?

This is a large and slow-moving target, carrying easily damaged military equipment and not having defensive weapons adequate to its value.

As I already said, Americans are traditionalists. They, as a rule, are not able to create something fundamentally new and either they scale something that has long been familiar to them to Homeric proportions or build into their pieces of iron something of completely incomprehensible effectiveness, stolen from others, but at the same time, this is something, at the same time both terribly classified and maximally promoted in the media (they say, be afraid of me - as according to my OWN statement - I'm scary)

For fun, let compare situational effectiveness of the air defense of aircraft carriers of the Second World War and of modern aircraft carriers.

During the Second World War, the Vickers QF 2 pounder anti-aircraft gun, a 40-mm Vickers Mk II anti-aircraft gun with an effective firing range of 2000 meters and a rate of fire of 100-115 rounds per minute, was the main means of short-range air defense.

Standard aircraft carrier air defense armament: since 1943 either 47 x4 - 20 mm anti-aircraft guns or 24x4 - 40 mm anti-aircraft guns... or combinations of them.

In that time, the main weapons to defeat of an aircraft carrier were torpedoes and free-falling bombs from aviation groups (as well controlled glide bombs were limited used).

At the final stage of the Second World War, as one of main of weapons to defeat of an aircraft carrier became kamikaze aircraft, including jets.

With the advent of scanning radars on aircraft carriers, the level of air defense of a single aircraft carrier became quite sufficient for its INDEPENDENT fight against piston bombers and torpedo bombers and its short-range air defense provided enough time to scramble covering fighters.

It is believed that the main enemy of a modern aircraft carrier is homing cruise missiles of various types (for the majority owners of "chicken coops" of the world-wide, which are limited in technology, they are outdated and subsonic).

The aircraft carrier's air defense is designed mainly to intercept such missiles at long and medium ranges, using medium anti-aircraft missiles and a cover air unit having medium and short range missiles.

Small-caliber artillery and combined systems (including their aiming systems) are considered secondary, auxiliary and them are having only as few units.

A modern aircraft carrier does not have enough of such systems to create an effective barrage against multiple targets in World War II style.

It is paradoxically, but a modern aircraft carrier, which has an insufficient number of systems to create a close barrage and has too much time lag to scramble a cover team, is not able to fully protect itself from an air strike.

Its main defensive short-range air defense weapons are different versions of missile systems, composed by modified air-to-air missiles, developed in the 60s and 70s.

These complexes and their missiles, during the interception process, are not intended as for volley firing and as for operating in the mode of operational redistribution of targets after moment of launching.

Block 1B (CRDC) with 11-cells RAM launcher to create an autonomous system (having missile optical guidance system)

Why did I emphasize "...to work in the mode of operational redistribution of aims after launching"?

Such weapons, as a rule, cannot use only their own sensors and a logic module to prepare and fire a shot, so they must be integrated with the ship's combat system, which guides the launcher to specific target or gives to it input data.

Such work on a several targets is limited by the speed of operation in the multiple task mode of the aircraft carrier's air defense command center and its ability to cooperate with the air defense of escort ships.

SeaRAM 116 and all RAMs, de facto, are based on various modifications of the AIM-9 Sidewinder... with all its disadvantages, the main one being low heading speed and angular speed.

These missiles, at medium and short distances, are capable of intercepting only a cruise, low-maneuverable slow-moving targets, and I doubt that they are capable of shooting down a hypersonic missile actively maneuvering on a collision course.

Currently, such weakness is compensated by a large escort squadron.

That is, a modern aircraft carrier can operate only as part of an CSG (an aircraft carrier strike group).

To a considerable extent, these escort ships serve as a mobile shield for the aircraft carrier and, in the event of a low-tech attack, are destroyed first.

In the case of using ships of "junior partners" for "an escort-service", these ships simply play the role of political hostages of American aggression.

For example, the modern CSG US includes up to 10 escort ships and one Virginia-class nuclear submarine.

What is the weakness of such air defense?

CSG air defense is echeloned, and the far echelon is not circular... 1 or 2 AWACS E2C Hawkeye aircraft are view each own sector - its target's detection range is 250-350 km. ... If it is necessary, another pair of AWACS aircraft is deployed to the 500 km line.

At a speed of five speed of sound, the missile covers a distance of 350 km faster than an AWACS aircraft is capable to take a working position.

When carrying out an attack on a CSG, it is important not only to directly counter its air defense, but also to spoof it by such method, in which the number of phantoms that the air defense sees as real, maneuvering targets must exceed its ability to carry out of analytic computing.

Under ability of "analytic computing" is understood as the sum of: the effective speed of target acquisition and analysis; ability to tracking them; speed of information exchange within the AUG and issuance of commands to intercept an attacking target.

ATTACK ONTO CSG USING LOW-TECH WEAPONS.

As I wrote above, for the first time the topic of "attack onto the CSG (herein and after, CSG is an aircraft carrier strike group) was raised by me in an article written in 2015, when it was created the same dangerous situation for humanity as and today.

The attack can be carried out with widely used and low-tech weapons, and, in my estimation, can effectively destroy CSG that is appeared directly in the Red Sea

The text of this article was only in Russian, but below I will give a short collage of it in English.

(C_collage of the article) "... the most optimal time and method of attack is a night attack, under of the cover of a low-hanging canopy of dipole clouds that have high as optical and as radio brightness for neutralization of the observations by satellite and avia systems.

.....

The canopy must provide cover for cruise missiles, at least until the target is captured and the attack maneuver begins

That is, the virtual canopy during executing of attack, which synchronously moving together with missile boats, must confidently cover the moving attacking order at least, within of a distance of 450 km and within 170 minutes from the start of the attack.

....

.... There are standard shells of "hail" system having a similar purpose, but they, as I already wrote, are poorly designed for the ranges used by aviation and satellite surveillance...

....

In such a situation, it is easy can to modify the standard "grads" by replacing the warhead... to warhead from which burning sodium will be ejected throughout the entire flight path in the form of short-pulse gas jets....

.... the single jet is a quarter-wave reradiating-dipole of variable length, and the sea surface is a mirror-reflector. ... as a result, the frequency band covered by this canopy is quite wide.

.... As well, the sodium jet, burning in the atmosphere, provides a high level of over flare of optical channels in a wide range and after that it plays the role of a long-lived opague cloud in the centimeter and millimeter range. It forming a dense virtual surface for surveillance radars above attacking boats...

Radar radiation from above is simply reflected from this canopy, without giving marks from targets located below it.

... aircraft and helicopter can shoot at boats carrying launchers "hail" and at carriers of anti-ship missiles, either with cannon installations from a distance of less than 2 km, but for this its radars must see the target, or using missiles having homing head that working either by usage of radar of millimetric diapason or by infrared optics.

Radars, under a virtual veil of highly conductive jets, do not see targets, and the situation with infrared guidance is even worse - sodium jet, at the first moment of separation from the "hail", provides a high level of optic's over flare, due to sodium burning at a high temperature and it working as a powerful optical trap...

Having cooled down, it creates a fairly dense and long-hanging canopy in the manner of an airplane contrail, opaque to IR optics ....

....

EXECUTION DIAGRAM AND ATTACK CYCLORAMA

The attack can be executed: at night; from the coastal zone; by few tonnage vessels having sector polarized camouflage in the optical range.

.... The attack begins by low-tonnage civilian-class high-speed boats or uncrewed boats with simple software control, which form a moving sodium canopy over the attack order

Missile boats or torpedo boats equipped with missile launger with "yachonts" are joined into the attacking order only after the formation of a stable virtual surface....

.... the attacking order of boats moves at a speed of 60-80 km/h by a fairly compact group towards the attacked aggressor, with a depth of 10 kilometers and a width of 5 kilometers.

... As I already explained above, at ranges exceeding 24-30 kilometers, for ships of the squadron there is no direct visibility of the attack order and only over-the-horizon detection and aero tracking of the target is possible.

.... The CSG counteraction to such attack, taking into account: small size of attaking objects; difficulty of carrying out selection due to similar dimensions and numerous targets; the actions of projectiles generating sodium jets - can be carried out mainly by cannon armament, ensuring the interception of attacking missiles at close range or at an over-the-horizon distance by a suicidal low-altitude helicopters' attacks onto a boat-carriers ... " (end of collage)

Above, I have already explained the reasons for the low combat effectiveness of CSG in a close air defense zone.

In my assessment, such attack on the CSG, in the budget version described above, will be highly effective, and the high collateral losses of attackers for armed formations operating in this region doesn't matter.

ATTACK OF THE CSG BY USAGE OF HIGH-TECH MISSILE SYSTEMS WHICH WAS DESCRIBED IN PARTS ONE AND PART TWO

In 2011, I already described such a technical solution designed to attack on CSG - "Short and Medium Range Anti-Ship and Tactical Missiles"

Why small countries don't use such systems for their protection!?

It's too expensive and the country aggressor, having been preparing an attack for years, deliberately creates a barrier to access to high technology for its potential victims.

WHAT THE TECHNOLOGICAL PROBLEMS THERE ARE ON PATH OF USAGE OF SUCH MISSILES!?

Practically it is needed solving only of three problems -

Available engine;

Available control scheme;

Accessible concept of guidance to target

WHAT ARE THE SOLUTIONS OF SUCH PROBLEMS!?

It is about of concepts developing that adapt existing technologies to the capabilities of small countries.

For example, a rocket can be made as a combined design, as I already had explained in PART TWO

The scheme I have proposed allows the use of low-tech, low-impulse powder in the injector-supercharger of a ramjet engine, creating the main working thrust due to the combustion in afterburning chamber of the air-kerosene mixture.

The orientation of the rocket in space occurs due to the derivational interaction of the rotating rocket body with the oncoming air flow.

So as a modern missile must not only fly the required distance at the required speed but it must penetrate of the CSG missile defense zone and hit, at a minimum, a heavy aircraft carrier, therefore, the guidance schemes and control equipment which are used for modern missile systems are almost mast important Know-Haw than the missiles themselves.

As a rule, such an attack and breakthrough of defense occurs either at super speed - Mach 3-5, or at ultra-low altitude, which, for standard circuit solutions, requires completely unique control systems.

Moreover, countries leading in these areas use either satellite guidance systems or such advanced electronics and circuit solutions that it is virtually impossible for small countries to replicate or obtain.

Therefore, in solving this problem, I focused on the electronics known to me, available on the free market, and I used a non-standard missile's trajectory and a guidance scheme - the "guidance along spiral".

WHAT IS THE "GUIDANCE ALONG SPIRAL"!?

As the principle, everything is very simple - a missile (a group of missiles) does not fly along a pure, ballistic or atmospheric-ballistic trajectory, but circumscribes a spiral along of its attacking trajectory with a circular drift of several tens of meters and in addition, this missile is rotating around its own axis.

What does this give?

Firstly, intercepting a missile that is heading towards a target along such a trajectory becomes much more difficult.

For air defense devices, EACH such missile (group of missiles), flying in a spiral in "head-on" at target, looks like several marks conducting an evasive maneuver with large overloads, simultaneously in three coordinates.

Secondly, the missile can determine its own coordinates using the triangulation method by a wide base (a triangulation from the extreme positions of the missile at each step of the spiral).

Thirdly, scanners designed to determine position in space and direct optical aiming at a target operate by means of usage the simplest linear scan and do not have optical matrices that are easily damaged by laser radiation, which significantly reduces the complexity of the devices and increases its performance.

LET'S LOOKING HOW EXECUTES POINTING ON TARGET INSIDE OF AREA, FROM WERE THE SNAP OBJECT CAN BE OBSERVABLED

Astronomical objects as the sun, moon, bright stars; probe balls carrying a coded optical marker; a ACTIVE AIRCRAFT RADAR or marker of an observation cruise missile moving within the line of sight; or clearly distinguishable marker objects on the surface of land or sea - all of that can act as a "object of binding"

It is most realistic to use as a marker the radar radiation and thermal signature of AWACS Hawkeye aircraft, which constantly accompany the CSG in a certain pattern.

Since the American military cannot hide such a marker, they a priori believe that the enemy CANNOT / DOES NOT HAVE the moral right to take advantage of this and do not consider such a possibility.

The missile, using a simple single-axis optical scanner located on the rotating body of the missile, determines the reference angle at each half-turn of the spiral and calculates its current position.

The launching device in passively mode receives the markers of the "binding object" and transmits information about the change in the position of the target and of its current priority in the direction of the missile's location by means of usage an optical or radio beam and, in the case working at a moving "targeting object", transmits each change of position of the "binding object."

The launcher does not directly control the movement of the rocket, so such a simple signal has highly immune to interference and counteraction.

The required accuracy of entering into the optical capture zone is, supposedly +/- 10 km

PRECISE GUIDANCE OF A MISSILE TO A TARGET IN USAGE OF THE INFRARED RANGE SENSOR ON SHORT-DISTANCE

The algorithm of analysis is based on the bionic principle of on the primary analysis of a complex image by the human eye.

I have always been entertained by the abstruse reasoning of pompous roosters from science on the topic of recognizing images by the human brain by consecutive sorting pictures kept in mind.

Nature is very stingy and never operates with millions of pieces of information where and when it is possible, for starters, to compare dozens and hundreds of "primitives".

All this can be solved very simply and, what is very important, the first, approximate results will be given already at the initial moment of analysis.

I emphasize once again - All information processing occurs in a parallel circuit, so very high performance is ensured, even when using available, low-tech elements and the device is not critical doing of a casual failure or error.

Such a device can be completely assembled on consumer goods hardware.

HOW CAN DOES PRIMARY OPTICAL TATGET ACQUISITION AND TARGET SELECTION FOR A MISSILE GOING BY A SPIRALING TRAJECTORY!?

An infrared scanner that is based on a photomultiplier, performs linear scanning in along a single-axis. This scanner located on the rotating body of the missile.

Full radial scanning "at an angle forward" is carried out by rotating the body.

The scanning and comparison of an information sequence is performed by comparing closed (the initial with the final) a group of figures of annular codes that describe the selection of brightness boundaries in the desired optical range according to a successively more complex scheme (by resolution) with an increase in the number of scans at each stage.

The simplest code received already on the first turn of the scanner is compared with ALL codes available in memory by usage of a parallel circuit.

Those memory structures in which this newly formed code gave a SUFFICIENT level of match with the LIMITED number of codes recorded in memory are activated, the rest are blocked.

CONVENTIONALLY, THE ENTIRE PROCEDURE FOR ASQUISITION AND SELECTING OF A TARGETS CAN BE DIVIDED INTO FOUR MAIN STAGES.

Primary acquisition of a group target, CSG (stage_0) is carried out at a conditional level of 0.707 without highlighting the contours of individual targets.

The second stage - with usage of minimal resolution, individual targets are separated out in the location patch.

The third stage - it is carrying out identification according by several parameters in the sequence, of the most significant goals.

The fourth stage is a comparison of the codes in date base with codes obtained which are carried out scanning the first target in this sequence.

If a sufficient level of matching is not achieved, the next target's codes are compared.

I emphasize once again that the entire analysis proceeds in parallel and in every next stage by more sophisticated scheme, so the results come from the first moment and the time of analysis only affects to the accuracy of the choice.

HOW "ANNULAR CODES" CAN BE SCANNED, FORMED AND GENERATED INTO A MEMORY

As for example, consider the analysis of a spot shaped like a triangle

The two nearby segments of that are broken outline are compared when carry out by forward and reverse scan stroke of the scan of the spot.

The analysis is carried out simultaneously by several optical receivers of different resolutions and, possibly, different ranges.

As can be seen in the figures, from which projection the selected contour is viewed does not matter.

For example, a triangle at any angle, except when sensor looking along parallel direction to the plane, is a triangle described groups of numbers of near configuration.

Each newly received code is compared with the one in the database according to the scheme described at the beginning of the paragraph and at each stage of analysis, starting from the first, an action command is issued.

As an "icing on the cake" to organize an attack on the CSG, you can also use the underwater drones that I proposed earlier for the attack on the Crimean bridge.

These drones are very cheap, simple and can be made in any boat workshop.

It is advisable to place these drones in advance on the UAG's line of movement and put them into "sleep mode."

Due to the characteristics of the materials used, optical masking with polarizing inserts usage and the specific circuit design, they are not direction-finding either by acoustic sonar, or by optical observation from the air, or by radar.

I carry out mailings the articles into these addresses

Ministry of Defense	research organizations of Ministry of Defense
Canada - information@forces.gc.ca https://buyandsell.gc.ca/contact-us	DND.IDEaS-IDEeS.MDN@forces.gc.ca
the British Ministry of Defense no email address	centralenquiries@dstl.gov.uk AuroraProviderNetwork@QinetiQ.com https://www.qinetiq.com/en/contact-us
Ministry of Defense of Iran + info@mfa.gov.ir	research organizations of Ministry of Defense of Iran https://www.iranwatch.org/contact int@irost.ir
Ministry of Defense of China + mod@mod.gov.cn	research organizations of Ministry of Defense of China heidi.mcgregor@ithaka.org https://support.publishers.jstor.org/hc/en-us/requests/new?ticket_form_id=360003403994
Ministry of Defense of Poland kontakt@mon.gov.pl	The National Centre for Research and Development (NCRD, Polish) info@ncbr.gov.pl https://www.gov.pl/web/ncbr-en/information-point
Ministry of Defense of Sweden exp-hkv@mil.se	research organizations of Ministry of Defense of Sweden registrator@foi.se
Ministry of Defense of Norway postmottak@fd.dep.no	research organizations of Ministry of Defense of Norway info@ffi.no hanne.bjork@ffi.no firmapost@ffi.no runderland@mil.no
Ministry of Defense of Finland kirjaamo.plm@gov.fi registratorskontoret.fsm@gov.fi	research organizations of Ministry of Defense of Finland registry.plm@gov.fi
Ministry of Defense of India indiaportal@gov.in	research organizations of Ministry of Defense of India ws-dst@gov.in
Washington no email address	contact@nti.org DARPA - https://contact.darpa.mil/ Lockheed Martin - CSSCustPortalSuppt@sikorsky.com community.relations@lmco.com
Ministry of Defense of United Pakistan datacenter.mlc@gmail.com sotodgmlc@outlook.com	research organizations of Ministry of Defense of Pakistan issra@ndu.edu.pk
Ministry of Defense of South Africa pgvdb@sanavy.co.za Senior Staff Officer info@dod.mil.za secdef@dod.mil.za Director-General: Sonto Kudjoe, Ms	research organizations of Ministry of Defense of South Africa no email address
Ministry of Defense Italy udc@postacert.difesa.it	research organizations of Ministry of Defense of Italy udc@gabmin.difesa.it segrecapo.sm@casd.difesa.it
Ministry of Defense of North Korea dpr.korea@verizon.net admou@mil.gov.ua
Ministry of South Korea webmaster@pmo.go.kr
Ministry Saudi Arabia hostmaster@moda.gov.sa	Research organizations of Ministry of Defense of Saudi Arabia https://www.psdsarc.org.sa/about-us/
Ministry of Defense of TЭrkiye https://www.developmentaid.org/contact contact@tccb.gov.tr https://www.mfa.gov.tr/contact-us.en.mfa# https://www.mfa.gov.tr/contact-us.en.mfa	Research organizations of Ministry of Defense of TЭrkiye bideb2209b@tubitak.gov.tr sage@tubitak.gov.tr

As an "icing on the cake".

What, in my opinion, may be happen if one of the countries, and especially a coalition of Middle Eastern countries, disperses up the American aircraft carrier group and inflicts on it unacceptable, in the opinion of the American military coalition, losses in equipment and manpower?

Combined with what is happening in Ukraine, this will indicate the complete degradation of American military-industrial potential and the loss of America's status as a great power.

As a result, this will immediately provoke:

Anschluss of Taiwan by China and Anschluss of East Korea by North Korea;

A new Arab-Israeli war, in which a coalition of Middle Eastern countries will participate, followed by the complete liquidation of Israel both as a state and as an illegal Zionist entity;

Transformation of Iran into the Middle East hegemon, with a nuclear club in its hands;

Formation of the Northern Military-Political Union consisting of: Ukraine; Sweden; Norway; Finland; and of other countries which are associated with them , to which, after much chatter, will be joined as Germany and as England.

In such a situation, the global human society can either degrade as a result of global military confrontation, or reach a new level of progress of society, discarding the fascist structures and countries that prevent it from living normally.

Everything will depend on how quickly the Northern Military-Political Union is organized and what position China will take regarding this union.

America can be ignored in this development of events - for completely degradation of it, its own internal economic, political and social problems will be enough.

Contact

Koganitsky Grigory

koganitskyg@gmail.com or k_gert99@yahoo.ca

cell 1 514 8899875

Оставить комментарий © Copyright Коганицкий Григорий (gert99@mail.ru) Размещен: 29/12/2023, изменен: 15/01/2024. 50k. Статистика. Статья: Изобретательство IMPACT TACTICAL GROUPS Иллюстрации/приложения: 20 шт. Скачать FB2		Ваша оценка:
Аннотация: At first I published such topic in 2015, when the United States, completely senselessly and extremely dangerously, began to ignite a new world fire in the "Middle East." I attempted to made a warning as for US and as for its adversaries about extremely dangers such action and performed the targeted mailings describing the possibility of BUDGET destruction of the CSG (aircraft carrier strike group). Why didn't I make a more serious and elaborate publication in English earlier!? I was silly of me to think that self-censorship should be needed in such matters. After of stolen of several object of my intellectual properties were being consistently by American cowboys, I realized that a thief (such as the USA, in the person of "Lockheed Martin Corporation" and his great rocket scientist Matt Walker) begins to understand that stealing of intellectual properties is not good idea only when they can obtain a hit to its forehead by the Big and Gnarly Baton

Коганицкий Григорий : другие произведения.

Guidance Along Spiral And Overcoming Multilevel Missile Defense