Кэнский Сергей Л. : другие произведения.

Гёрглинг

Самиздат: [Регистрация] [Найти] [Рейтинги] [Обсуждения] [Новинки] [Обзоры] [Помощь|Техвопросы]
Ссылки:


 Ваша оценка:

  
  
  
  
1
  
  
  "Well... the picture isn't bad. Not bad at all... I owe him some bonus," thought the editor-in-chief of the popular sci, sci-fi, and fantasy magazine "Amazing world" meaning by "him" the artist, of course. (As this is an impeccably and in every aspect truthful story, we have to convey verbatim not only all the words spoken, but all the words thought as well.) On the desk before the editor lay to be signed for the press the preprint of the September issue. Still, it was only a paper version. The main reader, as well as looker, waited for issue's coalescing in the cyberspace.
  
  On the magazine's cover, shown from a bird's eye view - more precisely, seen with the eyes of the passengers of an anti-gravitational flying vehicle - was depicted a chain of giant wind turbines stretching and accordingly decreasing in perspective towards the horizon. And out there, at the foothills of blue mountains, gleamed violet fields of solar panels. Amazing world of the future...
  
  However, the editor was held back by the present. It still remained a good hour of the working day, but the decision was made and nothing prevented him from signing the copy and going home to begin the next day a long-awaited vacation, if not for two circumstances.
  
  First: his (and general) secretary Lisa took an early leave today in order to pick up from or take to somewhere (maybe both) her child, which gave the editor too good to squander an opportunity to climb the pedestal of heroic devotion (in such hot weather, for sure) to the common publishing cause and this particular business' prosperity... and so on and so forth. It was clear that such moral stamina required some compensation in the form of a ticket to this show for the editor himself and, therefore, today - from tick to tick.
  
  Despite being a humble person and consequently easy to satisfy with the only spectator, the editor, quite naturally, didn't grudge a good example to his staff, for which reason he called a video conference, having ended not half an hour ago. Of course it was not the same as personal attendance, but one have to live such hard times one have to live in.
  
  No, there was something else mildly gnawing at his sense of perfection, as it is always the case with making virtue of necessity. For the real reason of the editor's staying in the office was that the same Lisa reported to him that their refrigerator had refused to work and all her efforts to reanimate it were in vain, so she called a service and they promised to send a repairman later in the afternoon, and since the editor was staying in anyway, could he please... alright? It was hard not to notice that Lisa (who called herself a smart and resourceful lady) diplomatically placed this information after receiving the editor's willing agreement to her early leave, so he couldn't help feeling a little duped and trapped.
  
  The magazine's headquarters on the seventh floor of an office building consisted of a small reception area and another one, much bigger room. This latter, flooded at the moment with sunlight, had a business-like atmosphere. It combined functions of the editor's study, meeting room and a warehouse for computer equipment standing on metallic shelves and for something else in boxes piled at the corners and under tables, not to mention a coffee machine, tea appliances, and, surely, the fridge. However, there was enough space left and the view from the windows, not obscured with tall buildings, disposed to dreamy reflections. The only digression from the second best office style was a two-barrel shotgun hanging on the wall behind the editor's chair.
  
  The editor sighed, got out a wet tissue from the pack, and wiped his bald head and his rheumy bulging eyes. Neither the wide open windows, nor a big fan, standing on the floor three meters away from his desk, did not save the situation. The editor filled a glass with mineral water, but even it, pouring out of the bottle, gurgled somehow lifelessly. "Warm..."
  
  The editor pulled his laptop closer.
  
  The job of a chief editor has its perquisites. What for a common office employee would be justly considered a deplorable transgression against discipline and a stealing of the working time (like loitering in the Internet), the same thing in the case of it being done by the boss acquires respectable colors of development the editorial strategies. But the news feed on the screen could hardly vouch for its usefulness in either capacity. It was full of reports of heavy rains that flooded Europe, of the forest fires in Yakutia, a heat dome over North America, and a decrease in the planet's albedo due to the melting of the Arctic ice shield. Another terrible summer of another coronavirus year...
  
  "If it goes on like this," thought the editor, "then in just a few years..."
  
  In his mind vision appeared the limitless, deepest Canadian marshes and Siberian swamps, bound for the time being by permafrost along with trillions of cubic meters of methane, the greenhouse gas dozens of times more dangerous than infamous carbon dioxide. A small step is only needed to gain a critical mass of heat in the atmosphere and then some weather fluke will trigger the unstoppable chain reaction. And there will be a year when the winter won't come. And those swamps will turn into swamps again. The precipitous melting of the Antarctic and Greenland ice will commence, flooding giant continental areas with 70-meter layer of the brackish ocean waters, turning all the biggest cities into swamps as well, unsuitable for people's living.
  
  "And all will be over in a forty and two months. But first a dragon with seven heads will rise from the abyss of the sea, and each head will have a corona," the editor recalled. 'And the dragon will make every survivor receive a digital inscription on his hand or forehead, without which no one will be allowed to buy or sell...'
  
  A knock on the door.
  
  The editor shuddered and opened his eyes. A shabby, no longer young man in a washed overalls stood on the threshold, holding in his hand a sizable toolcase, typical for plumbers, electricians and suchlike professionals.
  
  "Who called a doctor for a sick fridge?" he asked cheerfully.
  
  'Yes, yes, this is it,' said the editor. "Here it is."
  
  The repairman unhurriedly entered the room, for some reason looked around and, coming to the refrigerator, opened its door. After saying the password or spell "Isobutane!" to someone there, he turned to the editor.
  
  "Have you notice? - before it broke, was it gurgling?"
  
  "Gurgling," the editor nodded automatically. "I mean, no, I don't remember."
  
  "Let's see..."
  
  The repairman began to move the refrigerator away from the wall, then took out from his case some kind of electrical device and half hide himself with it into the resulting gorge. After a few minutes of silence, mumbling, and shuffling, there was heard a short inhuman hiss and "Aha!" After which the repairman appeared from behind the refrigerator entirely.
  
  "A good news and a bad news. The compressor windings are intact, we just need to change the pill..."
  
  "The pill?"
  
  "Yes, the posistor in the start relay. But there was almost no coolant left in the system, and that's the bad news. Must be a leakage somewhere. Can you help me move it around?"
  
  Together with the editor they completely draw the refrigerator away from the wall and turned it so its back faced the room now.
  
  "So where is the pill?"
  
  "Here."
  
  The editor squatted down next to the repairman. Flattered by his interest the repairman added:
  
  "And this is a charging valve. The coolant is filled through this fitting - see? It's much the same as in car tires. As a rule they dead solder this pipe at the factory, but it seem your refrigerator has already been repaired and someone soldered in the valve to make it easier to fill it and control the pressure.
  
  "It has been repaired already?.." The editor got thoughtful. "I don't remember where the fridge came from; most likely it was left in the office when I rented it. But it looks pretty new, doesn't it?"
  
  "Yes, not old at all. But... that's the way they make them now. Planned obsolescence. Have you heard of the concept?"
  
  "Sure. The eternal light bulbs. We often get comments and emails on that score."
  
  'Light bulbs or no light bulbs, but no one better than us, repairmen, sees how the quality of household appliances changes from year to year,' the repairman said touchily, taking out from his kit a small compressor and some kind of brass pressure gauges with multi-colored tubes. "Just ten or fifteen years ago they made much more reliable things. And now it's quite good if it worked out its guarantee term..."
  
  "What are you going to do?"
  
  "I'll pump some air into the system and look for a leak. It's good as well that the condenser... this grate that heats up... that it is outside."
  
  "Where else would it be?"
  
  "Most often they hide it inside nowadays. Do you see any logic in that? Putting hot tubes inside the fridge box, hehe. They say it's more beautiful and you can put the refrigerator closer to the wall. Great achievement, that. As if anyone sees this side at all. In the older models you could turn out a few screws and remove the entire unit from the refrigerator box. Both repair and disassembly were easy. But now the f... now you can't really repair it from A to Z. Do you think it's just happened that way? No, the engineers are given such tasks on purpose. If the reparability was demanded before, now it is the un-reparability. The colossal industry made a world-wide U-turn and nobody seemed to notice anything. Light bulb, indeed...
  "But even that's not all. A normal engineering task is to ensure strength balancing, that is, to make so that all the main parts of the machine would have approximately the same service life, so that it worked long without failures, and when it breaks after all, you wouldn't grudge to scrap it all together. And in case the repair and maintenance works are still necessary, the design must allow them to be as simple and convenient as possible. Well, the task of engineers saboteurs is completely different now, and also, by the way, not an easy one. The main problem is to find points and means for the strength un-balancing. Simply speaking, to find where to plant a bomb. So that it would be impossible to defuse it, and the consequences of the explosion would be devastating, and it would explode exactly when necessary."
  
  The repairman turned off his compressor and closed the tap on the brass thing.
  
  "May I?.." he reached for the bottle with mineral water on the editor's desk.
  
  "Be my guest. Only it's warm..."
  
  The repairman took the bottle and pour a little water on a sponge, which he procured from his toolcase along with small piece of soap. Then he made lather and began to smear with it suspicious places in the refrigerator watching if bubbles would appear. The editor remained standing by.
  
  'Take, for example, the compressor,' the repairman resumed his gabbling. "Is it a good place to put a "bomb" there? No, it isn't. First, if the compressor breaks, it is only the compressor that breaks. Secondly, it is easy to replace. Thirdly, it is too complex. If you try to introduce a defect into it, then it is unpredictable: it can break down in a week or a year, or it can last ten years. Which is unacceptable, because it must work exactly three years of warranty plus one year maximum. The same applies to the electronic panel: you have to make it reliable, because you don't know what will burn out there and when, apart from it's too easy to replace... Easy, but not cheap. In the assembled refrigerator the same control unit costs three of four times less than if you buy it separately. It's the same blatant stick and carrot policy, of course, to make the client throw out quite a fit refrigerator and buy a new one. Although, I'll tell you a secret, nobody needs all this electronics either. And the quality of the cold is the same in any refrigerator, whether it is simple or fancy..."
  
  "Where, then, they are planting the "bombs"?
  
  "Pipes. They connect them using glue. Glue! Here you see soldered pipes, but there inside, away from the eye, they are glued. Because, you see, soldering also provide too unreliable... um, unreliability. And the sealant is destroyed in due time. Chemical decomposition. Well, not only the connections. The pipes themselves is a weak link too. It's like a safety fuse... or maybe the other way around. If one doesn't work, then the other will. Guaranteed breakage, so to speak. And again, you can't just use a low quality pipes. There must be a precise destroying factor. All my colleagues know very well at which constructive elements the pipes break first, ninety five percent of all such cases. Do you think the designers are unaware? But they do nothing, although it would be easy to protect them at those places."
  
  "Can't we protect them ourselves? Or glue the connections all over again?"
  
  "But how?" the repairman retorted in a caustic tone. "To get access to those places and connections you'd have to break apart the entire refrigerator. That's why I said it's good that you have a condenser of this type. It's mendable or - if needs be - replaceable, and the leakages are easily detectable here. Instead, most often now they not only glue pipes one to another, but they glue the whole condenser to the inside here (he patted the refrigerator on the side wall), and then fill the space between outer and inner walls with polyurethane foam. And that's the end of the story. You can't get there, you can do nothing. The same thing with the evaporator, only they glue it to the plastic inner wall, where you have the ice freezing on. By the way, you also have such evaporator.
  "Therefore," groaned the repairman, getting up from his haunches, "we are going to do this. I checked all the available connections, no leaks are visible. Now we have to wait at least half an hour. If the pressure on the gauge does not drop, then I change the filter and refill the system. If it falls, then I will also advise you to buy a new refrigerator. Such piece of sh... designer's art, it could only make sense to repair for some grandma in the village, and even in that case self-respecting craftsmen do not try to cut the walls and pick out the foam so that only shreds fly (the repairman giggled here, apparently remembering something), but leave the factory devises in peace and do everything in a new way... Or maybe it's better to say in the old way, but definitely the right way, as it should have been done from the very beginning. They drill holes in the rear side of the refrigerator and put everything separately, inside and out, both the condenser and the evaporator. And no glue."
  
  The editor returned to his table. The repairman also dragged a free chair to the refrigerator and sat down to wait for the readings of the pressure gauge.
  
  'It seems to me that you are drawing too global conclusions from poor-quality tube connections and, I fully admit, unfortunate design,' the editor said. "In my opinion, there is no reason to call it deliberate sabotage. Besides, the world does not converged on refrigerators, even if we talk only about household appliances. Say, do you repair washing machines?"
  
  "Sometimes it happens."
  
  "And what are there the clockwork bombs from the designers-saboteurs?"
  
  "They put plastic bearings on the drum."
  
  "Well I don't know..."
  
  A minute went by.
  
  "Why plastic bearings?" asked the editor suddenly.
  
  "Why not? All the conditions are met. Devastating, timing, concealment. In fact, it is the only place in the washing machine I myself see suitable for that purpose. So it is hardly a coincidence again. Otherwise they would have to plant a special chip disabling the machine after certain time of using, the same way they did in printers. There was a scandalous story on that score some years ago... Probably they are more cautious now, so if there is a crucial mechanical part they would use rather it. People tend to be more fatalistic when it comes to raw materials. Not forgetting to scold the manufacturers for economizing on them, of course."
  
  "Don't they?"
  
  "Producing five refrigerators working four years each instead of one working twenty? You must be joking."
  
  The silence fell again. Then the editor get up from his armchair, came to the fan and rearranged it so that a share of the air flow went to the repairman as well.
  
  
  
  
2
  
  
  "Bah, I myself have one of these disposable fridges," said the repairman. "And it also worked four years and that's it. Like by a clockwork. So do you know what I did?"
  
  "No, I don't know what you did," said the editor with a hint of irony in his voice.
  
  "Well... First I determined if the leak was on the high or the low side... Thank god, at least this is still possible to do in the sense of repair. It happened to be on the high one..."
  
  Noticing not understanding in the editor's eyes, the repairman explained:
  
  'I mean, on the high pressure side, in the condenser. The standard leakage into the plastic foam. So I took a length of copper pipe and soldered it here and here,' the repairman got up from his chair and pointed. "In other words I made a new condenser. And then I took a forty-liter plastic barrel like one used for pickling cucumbers and put it right on the refrigerator (he made gesture with both hands). Then I inserted (smooth movement) part of that pipe there inside. And poured water. As a result, I have now plenty of free hot water in the kitchen."
  
  "So simple?"
  
  "Yep."
  
  "Is it hot?"
  
  "Forty five degrees Celsius, average."
  
  "Is it hot?"
  
  "Hot enough to wash dishes or hands. Have you ever measured the temperature of the hot water you habitually use? But the temperature isn't the point, speaking broadly. Everything depends on what coolant is used. There are coolants that can heat the water to nearly boiling state. Isobutane of all the popular coolants gives the lowest temperature of the condenser and, consequently, of the water. And it is still hot enough. And if it isn't enough, you can get the remaining degrees from a common resistive heater integrated in the same water tank or in the flow heater after it. It wouldn't make the enterprise any less economically viable. The point is I don't plug in the kitchen boiler anymore and don't have to pay the respective money for electricity. If I had made this installation before, I wouldn't have bought the boiler at all. What effect can be more direct and obvious? Now imagine: what if all the refrigerators in the world were made like that? Voila, the global warming problem is solved."
  
  The repairman finished gesticulating and sank back on his chair with a smug expression on his face.
  
  The editor smiled.
  
  "At my job I often have to deal with fantastic stories, but... (he nodded towards the bottle with the remnants of mineral water) how much heat can be in this to wash plates and incidentally stop the global warming?"
  
  'A very common misconception,' the repairman raised his finger instructively. "Granted, in the food as such there is little heat. But even if the refrigerator is actively used, that is, if you often put warm things in and take cold things out, not more than five percent of electricity consumed by your fridge is spent on cooling food. How do you like this efficiency?"
  
  'Well, so it can't be any better. Or what do you mean?"
  
  "I mean that if you, for example, go to bed at night and come into the kitchen in the morning... Or even better: if you go for a week's trip and then return home, you will hear that your refrigerator keeps turning on and off, on and off, the same way as always. But everything you put in it got cold a week ago, right? Why does it work, then? What is it cooling? Well, the air around it. And simultaneously it is warming this same air by this very grate, right here, in the immediate vicinity. Can this be called a rational of reasonable use of electricity? It's like ladling water with a sieve. Think now that a quarter of all electricity produced in the world is used for refrigerating and air conditioning. What if we utilize all this heat and stop spending clean and nice electricity for heating water or just the air outside the window, as it is the case with air conditioners making global warming in the most immediate way? But even that is not the gist yet. The most piquant detail is that for every unit of electric power the fridge takes from the outlet it can produce three to four times more heat than it is done by the plain resistive element used in common boilers. That's where the main potential is hidden."
  
  "Hmm... The potential is one thing, the realization is another," said the seemingly bored editor.
  
  "To shorten the argumentation regarding the technological feasibility and the economic aspect..."
  
  "Excuse my interruption. Have you always repaired refrigerators?"
  
  'In these hard times many people having lost their professions resort to crafts,' the repairman answered evasively. "So, in order not to argue whether it is possible and profitable I can only say that the idea is realized already in a dozen million heat pumps sold every year worldwide exactly for the purpose of heating water by air. The refrigerator is not less a heat pump as any thermal machine theoretically and practically known well before electricity. The only difference is that in heat pumps called heat pumps they strive to provide the supply of environmental heat to the evaporators, and in heat pumps called refrigerators they strive to prevent this, but as we see in the instance of the overnight fridge not too successfully. And another big difference: there are millions of heat pumps, but billions of refrigerators. Not to mention the trifle fact that the heat pump still needs to be bought, and the money for the refrigerator has been paid already."
  
  "How do you know there are billions of them?"
  
  "Looked up the statistics. Not that you can get the direct answer to this question, but it is possible to obtain a commercial information on the number of units sold in a certain country in a certain year. So if you divide the population of this country by this number multiplied by the expectant longevity of the unit, and make a correlation for the average number of family members in some most populated and poorest counties, you can come to the conclusion that there is one household refrigerator for every three people in the world. On the other hand, I could easily spare myself those investigations and calculations and come to that same figure in the intuitive way. Really, how many people can keep their food in the same refrigerator? That's it. And if there are eight billion people on Earth, as they say, then there are two point seven billion household refrigerators working every single day on the planet. And if we throw in all the world's home air conditioners... Wow."
  
  "What exactly are we talking about? How much energy can be taken from one refrigerator?"
  
  "It's simple. See this sticker? The energy efficiency class of your refrigerator is quite high, 'A' plus. The manufacturer - and let me mention that manufacturers wouldn't exaggerate this figure - writes here that it consumes 333 kilowatt-hours of electricity per year. We multiply this figure by at least three, and see that a thousand kilowatt-hours of thermal energy can be approximately obtained from one refrigerator each year. If we multiply it by four, it's one thousand three hundred. Now remember that it is 365 days in a year and that one fridge is used by three persons. So it is quite realistic to say that every human on the planet can get one kilowatt-hour of free or saved electricity every day. Impressive? That's a game changer, man!"
  
  "But not everyone heats water with electricity," objected the editor. "At my house, for instance, hot water just flows from a tap. How can I save electricity and reduce my bills on heating water, if I don't use electricity for that purpose at all?"
  
  "Still your hot water is not for free, is it? That is, it's not at the price of a cold water, right? Then maybe there is still sense to use heat from you fridge? In the final count, your not turning on your hot water tap is the same as my not switching on my electric boiler. But it's not just about money, far from it. For you to have hot water in your plumbing there must be burned gas or coal. If we even imagine that it can be done with a hundred percent efficiency, you'd have to add burning fuel for the extraction and delivery the fuel to your house or the communal boiler room, add heat losses on the way to your apartment, and all this means emissions into the atmosphere. But if you heat water with your refrigerator - no pun intended - then there are no new or additional emissions, pollutions and expenses."
  
  'But your installation also costs something?"
  
  "Well, let's calculate. With your permission I won't include the cost of the copper pipe. Why should I if I have already bought it and it is already there in my fridge. So what remains? A plastic barrel, five meters of plastic pipe? Personally I don't have to pay for the barrel too, as I have bought the boiler already and the only thing I lack in that boiler is a piece of metal tube going through the water inside there. But even if I had to buy all that, then with the current price for electricity it will pay off in a single month, two at the most. After that you will save money for decades. What other kind of your so called sustainable energy can boast of such cost efficiency?"
  
  "Even so, it is a narrow-minded approach", opined the editor. "You said yourself that refrigerators are probably the most used and sold household appliance in the world. So how can you leave out the point of view of the consumer? And not only his or her, but of the producer as well, who wants to satisfy the buyer the best possible and better than the rival manufacturer way? Fridge is fridge. It does exactly what I bought it for. Or I want, for example, to buy it as a gift and not as a problem for somebody. Not to mention that I want it compact and allowing me to easily transport and move it and put it here, there and everywhere without dragging a barrel of water together with it."
  
  The repairman flared up, started to blush and even stammer a little: "Then... then why shedding crocodile tears about global warming and so on? If all the ecological future of the planet together with all its species including humans is nothing in comparison with a consumer's hypothetical convenience to move the fridge around the kitchen. What is it, a chair, anyway? For God's sake!"
  
  "But your plastic barrel for pickling cucumbers atop the fridge - it's ridiculous, don't you understand it?" said the editor, who flared up a little in his turn. "What? Am I supposed to fill it with a bucket and took the water with a cup?"
  
  "No need for that. Naturally, I made everything automatic, which isn't such a big problem at all. For some while I contemplated filling the barrel with cold water the same way as it is done in toilet tanks with buoying valve and draining hot water through a hose with a buoy too, but then I stumble upon a better idea. You see, after my experiment proved a brilliant success, it was clear that I needed a much bigger tank, and to put it on the fridge wouldn't have been the best thing, if possible at all. So this time I bought 80-liter barrel and mounted everything into its lid (the repairman started gesticulating again), namely inlet and outlet of the pipe with coolant, which in this case, of course, is not a coolant but a heater, and inlet and outlet of water pipes. And screwed it tightly on the barrel.
  
  "But how did you screw the lid with those pipes in it connected to fridge and sink or whatever it is?" asked the editor wily.
  
  "You have a good spatial imagination," the repairman made a compliment to his client.
  
  "Thanks, but It's not me. It is your explaining everything so well with your hands... So?"
  
  "Actually, I screwed the barrel into the lid, when it was empty, of course," laughed the repairman.
  
  "Oh, I see. And...
  
  "And I have an additional tube in the lid especially for drainage."
  
  "So where did you put the barrel, if not on the fridge?"
  
  "On the floor. When I turn on the hot faucet, I actually turn on cold water filling the barrel at its bottom, and the cold water displaces hot water out of the upper part of the barrel, through the pipe going to the sink. The coolant, or course, heats water in the opposite direction, from the top to the bottom. That way hot water and cold water are two distinct and not mixing layers. Only their relative thicknesses are changing. And I didn't thermo-insulate the barrel's bottom. Together with the open return length of the coolant pipe it gives me full guarantee against coolant overheating. So due to all these simple tricks I can put the barrel in any suitable place not needing to look for a high place. It works under very slight water pressure, not more than twentieth part of that in the standard plumbing, but quite enough for any shower and at the same time it is so negligent that it doesn't demand strong walls of the tank or very good sealing. Besides, it is additionally safe, because even this slight excess pressure is created only while you actually use the water; it doesn't remain in the barrel. I don't know why they don't use this scheme in standard electric boilers. Too simple? Too cheap?"
  
  The repairman shrugged his shoulders and looked at the manometer.
  
  "So, the maximum that can be obtained from one fridge is four kilowatt-hours a day?" the editor asked. "Let me imagine... What is the power of this kettle?
  
  The repairman went to the table where the teapot stood, picked it up and looked at its bottom.
  
  "Two kilowatts."
  
  "So it is as much as a two-kilowatt kettle can heat in two hours..." said the editor, looking at something on the ceiling.
  
  'And it wouldn't be boiling water, but about fifty degrees,' the repairman help the editor's imagination.
  
  "Yes, it's not that little," said the editor. "But not that much either. For one person it would be probably enough if, say, it's a shower, not a bath. But for a family of three, if they, as you say, have one refrigerator between themselves, it's unlikely.
  
  'Here I take you at your word,' the repairman raised his finger again. "After all, until now we were talking about free hot water. Or free heating water, to be exact. But the compressor usually works only about twenty minutes out of an hour. Nothing prevents us, if necessary, make it work for forty minutes, or even all sixty. In the common fridge that depends on the flow of heat to the evaporator, either by warm food we want to cool or freeze, or just by the quality of thermal insulation of the fridge box. So this can be regulated quite simply, for instance, by something like a window that opens part of the insulation in the wall or in the door of the refrigerator, or opening some vent there, or maybe by just a half-open door. And then in addition to free water for one family member, there will be two same amounts for the other two. Not for free this time, but heated with the efficiency of a heat pump, that is, three or four times cheaper than in case it were heated by an electric boiler. Well, in extreme cases, as I said, you can additionally heat the water with a conventional heater, like in this kettle. And we should not be afraid of wasting the compressor resource: as we found out before, this is one of the most reliable parts of the refrigerator. So, the benefit is obvious and the environmental effect too, even for that not entirely free heating. Quite possibly, in the big picture this is even better than heating water in boiler rooms. Here I need to think about it... Yes, it's no worse than the efficiency of thermal power plants!.. Listen, it's a cool thing. Lossless energy transfer through the air, just like Tesla's great secret discovery. Transmission through the air in the form of the air itself," the repairman laughed. "That is, at the power plant we heat the air, and here we cool it."
  
  'Wait, I remembered...' the editor smiled, 'What did you say? To leave the refrigerator open? My wife wouldn't like it. She scolds me when I choose something too long in the open fridge. And now I'd have something to tell her back. There is definitely something in your idea."
  
  "Of course. Appreciate the indirect benefits. Psychological as well as economical. After all, the refrigerators themselves could be made cheaper. If there are no losses, if all of them turn into gain, then the walls of the refrigerator can be made thinner, and the compressor can be used the simplest one. The rubber sealing on the door is not tight enough? - don't care. To that extent don't care that... you know what would be the simplest and most convenient way to utilize the heat not only from the condenser, but from the compressor's casing, and at the same time to give it good working conditions? Paradoxically, it would be to put the compressor inside the fridge. Not outside, like it is here, but inside. Next to the food we want to cool! And it turns out that in terms of energy the class of any shoddy refrigerator will be the same, the highest. And this itself is a contribution to the environment."
  
  "By the way, what can be the contribution to the environment?" asked the editor.
  
  'If we take into account the efficiency and the share of thermal power plants, as well as shares of different sources of heating, it turns out that one such heat exchanger allows not to extract and burn an equivalent of one kilogram of coal a day, give or take. Over a year this would accumulate a rather large heap, roughly a thousand pounds, or between three and four hundred kilos. At present all the refrigerators in the world make burn - but in the nearest future can save - about seven to eight hundred million tons a year. That means two and a half billion tons of carbon dioxide, which can be removed from the atmospheric balance every year, one ton per refrigerator. And this, according to various estimations, constitutes ten to fifteen percent of everything that humanity burns in every form, starting from barbeque fires to turbojet engines. And we are speaking just about home refrigerators, not even home air conditioners, the heat of which can be as easily harvested by the same water barrel. Should I mention industrial cold, commercial cold? I think not. But the picture there is as deplorable, far from painted in green. All told, humanity has produced and accumulated a huge potential of clean and ready to be used energy, but stubbornly turns a blind eye to it. And if this madness had not continued all our lives, then no problems with the environment would have arisen at all. At least not in the present catastrophic proportions. Home refrigerators alone can save more electricity than is generated by all the nuclear power plants in the world, and perhaps we can throw in all the windmills and solar panels as well. Just this wild number of refrigerators and air conditioners allows us to talk about them as a global undiscovered source of energy. Like new oil or something..."
  
  "Well, that's great," said the editor. "You almost convinced me. But may I still be allowed to have a fridge without a water barrel? Judge for yourself, what would I do with it here? I don't take a bath in the office."
  
  "No problem. In fact, fridge and heat exchanger, they even have to be made separate units, if only for the reason of so different longevity of each device. Remember we talked about strength equality?"
  
  The editor chuckled: "And I will need to call a man like you every time I need to connect or disconnect them? You seem providing work for yourself for the years to come, no?"
  
  "But people do that already," retorted the repairman, "to connect and disconnect inner and outer blocks of air conditioners, don't they? And nobody makes a fuss about that. Neither it poses an unsurmountable technical problem, as you can see. By the by, those costly and ungainly outer blocks, we can get rid of them altogether and just don't buy them along with the costly service of mounting and maintaining them outside the building. If you are not interested in heating by the conditioner in winter time, that is. Yes, I know it is possible, but it isn't a reason not to utilize the heat in its cooling mode, for which it was bought in the first place. With fridges all these works would be even simpler, because both units remains inside the house, first, and, second, there would be actually no need to connect coolant pipes at all. The transmission of the heat from fridge to boiler can be made by a dry contact, the same way it is done in cooling computer processors. So, in the final count I seem cutting myself from the work, not ensuring it.
  "The only thing really needed is for the manufacturers of home refrigerators to change the design of their condensers so they could be used in aggregation with home electric boilers. And for the manufacturers of electric boilers - who are usually the same companies - to change the design of those boilers so that they could receive the heat from those condensers. Both changes would cost next to nothing and I would made it mandatory by the international law. Why not? They did make it when forbidding coolants harmful for the ozone layer and nobody is worse for it, even if some manufacturers were at first. As for you... your right to buy a fridge without heat utilization remains sacred. The question is who violated your and my right to buy a fridge with the heat utilization. And made it so that we even can't guess that them are violated. You can say that there is no consumer demand for such product, but how on earth can this demand appear, if no one offers such product at all? Do you think it's accidental?"
  
  "And you think it's a conspiracy?"
  
  The repairman winced.
  
  "I think that since there is no supply from above, then demand could be created from below. By such home-made modifications and by showing the result."
  
  "Well, do that. If everything is so nice and profitable, make these installations for your customers. You are in a perfect position for that. They need repairs, take advantage of the moment. Did you offer?
  
  "I did."
  
  "And?"
  
  "They say 'Do as it was'."
  
  "So you see, nobody wants your barrel."
  
  "I see nothing of the kind. I only see that if I was called to repair a fridge with the barrel, the client would have also asked me to do as it was."
  
  Silence fell. The editor pondered.
  
  "I am still sure you're missing something,' he said at last. "I just hadn't much time to think what it is. However, there is no need to look for complex explanations if there are simple ones. The Occam's razor, you know? Most likely, if appliance manufacturers make unreliable things, it is not because they have conspired to work for the landfill, but because they are subject to the objective laws of competition, which force them to cut expenses and produce cheaper goods and change models faster in the run for the buyer's money..."
  
  "How do you explain plastic bearings?"
  
  "The same. And if no one makes refrigerators heating water, then there is no point in this. You just made a mistake somewhere. I even seem to know where. Look: the refrigerator stands in some room, in the kitchen. But it's a closed system. If it does not heat the air, then where from will it get heat for water? And if it warms the air, then there will be no heat left for the water. That is, you have invented a perpetual motion machine supposed to take the excess energy from nowhere."
  
  The editor's face was shining with pleasure.
  
  "Well, if your kitchen is put in a dewar vessel, you are absolutely right," retorted the repairman. "But in reality you would only cool a little the air flowing out anyway through the ventilation or the window. Besides, you are going to use the hot water inside your house, inside the same dewar, if you want, so in fact it isn't that easy to get rid of this heat. The sewage makes a tiniest fraction in the heat balance of the building. The biggest are walls, windows, doors, roofs - all them are even worse from the point of heat leakage outside or inside than the walls of a refrigerator that keeps working whether you open it or not. So much for 'the closed system'. And so much for the 'energy efficiency', by the way. Because when they advertise and nudge you to pay additional money for a fabulously efficient fridge with a smart inverter compressor and electronic drive, those clowns won't tell you that it's a complete bullshit. All the energy efficiency of the fridge in its current design depends exclusively on the thickness of the fridge's walls. And the price of this efficiency is the price of plastic foam. How come that no science and technology improvements in such technologically charged product mean a dime in comparison to five millimeter layer of plastic? Don't you smell something fishy in the whole situation? And you didn't see yet the regulations by which they calculate the energy efficiency index for household refrigerators..."
  
  "Wait a minute," said the editor. "I am not ready to concede you this point. Since you are still changing the heat balance of the house with your... idea. It's okay with the sewage, but you are cutting out a part of incoming heat in the form of hot water or electricity for its heating."
  
  "So much the better. Isn't it our aim to reduce energy - especially electric energy - consumption? You don't protest against LED lamps instead of good old incandescent ones, do you? But they also change the heat balance of the house. If you are so worried about heat balance, let me point out that the kitchen is a room least needing heating, with all those stoves, and the most needing ventilation. Especially in tropical countries, which hold the majority of the world's population and hence refrigerators. No, the real question is: are we letting the energy moving in a short and useless circle, or will we at last come to our senses and divert it to make something useful on its way. Sometimes I wish there were magic glasses, through which people could see things the way I see them. Like this standard fridge here, I see it as someone's stupid joke, one of those caricatures of senseless machines."
  
  "Don't offend my fridge" sad the editor jokingly.
  
  "I appreciate your attitude. Really, I don't know why we are talking about closed system at all in this sultry weather. I understood already that I won't sell you my heat exchanger, but I think even you wouldn't refuse to cool this room by three or four kilowatt-hours a day. It's strange that you haven't got an air conditioner here."
  
  "They dry the air. It's harmful."
  
  "Aaa... Good thing as well that you haven't it. They are crying about global warming, but look at those buildings of various kinds dotted with air conditioner's blocks, each one gorging heat into already overheated atmosphere. In every such block I see the evidence of ecological crime..."
  
  "Through your magic glasses?" inserted the editor.
  
  "...And at the same time they heat the atmosphere once again by burning coal and other fuel and adding greenhouse gases to the atmosphere just to heat water in the same buildings, from which they just threw out the heat away. Instead of just take what is going into their hands. Can you understand anything? Let's suppose that in reality - as it follows from their deeds - they want to make that global warming, but why then to cry about it? Why not doing it silently?"
  
  "Maybe they lie about global warming?" proposed the editor.
  
  "Meaning it isn't real? I don't think so... Too many evidence. And isn't it obvious? If we warm the atmosphere, it gets warmer. But even if the global warming is bullshit, that doesn't explain the sheer stupidity of this management."
  
  "What is stupidity to one, the same is strict logic to another," said the editor mockingly.
  
  
  
  
3
  
  
  "Well, the pressure doesn't drop, we'll repair it."
  
  A gas torch, a pipe cutter, a vacuum pump, etc. appeared from the tool case... It clanked, buzzed, caught fire, stank. Meanwhile, Editor entertained himself by reading. Ten minutes later the repairman got up from his haunches.
  
  "Now I'll give it another pressure test, then vacuum and refill. Will be ready soon."
  
  "Thanks for your work. And for the talk too. For me as a mass media man it was useful. Only in what you said there is no perspective. Mankind seek to consume energy, not to save it."
  
  "It's not mankind who don't want to save energy, it's those who sell it to mankind don't want it to save," growled the repairman.
  
  "Not quite so. Human race en masse don't stand aside. Everyone wants to live in a bigger house, drive a bigger car, travel oftener and farther, not restrain himself with local goods or seasonal product. Wants to eat meat and not grain, after all. You won't change that. You can only force people to consume less energy, but what is the point in such bigotry? Without freedom there is no sense in anything. We must produce more energy, that's the way. And the paradigm of our technological development is concentration of energy, and not the utilization of low-potential heat."
  
  "Well, maybe... And what has it come to? To this?" (The repairman made a gesture towards the window).
  
  "Nothing to panic about. Alternative energy is developing at unprecedented pace. We will soon stop burning fossil fuels altogether..."
  
  The repairman started again the procedure of pumping up and soaping the fridge, but this time only the places where he worked. The bored editor was back at the fridge.
  
  "Alternative energy... Are you talking of those windmills, fought yet by Don Quixote? Yeah, a real alternative. Some progress, indeed... And then, don't they harvest the same low-potential energy?"
  
  "A? Seems so. You caught me there."
  
  "Besides, in what sense it might be better than my device? What they say is the biggest problem with those famous renewable sources? It's their instability. Wind sometimes blows, sometimes not. And the Sun is shining or not on photovoltaic panels, another low energy device. The consequence is the energy generated there must be stored somehow, and this storage may cost more than the generation itself. Or there must be kept a reserve power generation burning that same fossil fuels and kicking up when there is no sun or wind. Which puts unavoidable limitations to the share of such sources in the power balance. In contrast to this refrigerators work around the clock, they do not need space on the roof or in the field together with the works of their installation there. You don't need to bother with them at all. They are here and we will always need them here, ready, produced and paid for... just reach out your hand and take the energy. Pure energy. And then use it right next to where it produced. A uniquely comfortable combination. Not to mention that water itself is a very good accumulator and it plays this role even now helping to smooth daily consumption peaks..."
  
  By this time the repairman's talk about his grandiose project of transforming the world of refrigerators had tired the editor, as they have sure bothered the reader of this story, supposing she or he didn't leave it long ago. But the editor had no such option, of course. So he simply pointed his finger and asked:
  
  "Is it a vacuum pump?"
  
  "Exactly."
  
  "And this?"
  
  "This is a manometric collector, aka manifold. The red manometer is for high pressure and the red hose too. The blue - for the low pressure. Although the hoses are all the same, it is better not to mix them up. To the red side here we have the pump connected. The blue hose will go to the refrigerator compressor. And here, to the yellow one, I will screw the spigot and then the bottle with the coolant. When the air is pumped out, I will close the red valve and open the spigot. Then I turn on the refrigerator's compressor and will be following the readings of the blue gauge. As soon as the pressure rises to the necessary level, refilling must be stopped.
  
  The vacuum pump whirred, and the repairman went to the window. Looking out he began to count in an undertone:
  
  'One, two, three... I can see nine paneled roofs from here only. Do you know that a solar panel has to work for several years before it generates as much energy as it took to produce it? That is, before that moment we warm the atmosphere on credit. And then there is the cost of production. And also the environmental pollution during the manufacturing process, which involve substances much worse than the plain carbon dioxide good for trees. And after those panels work out their lifespans it is necessary again to waste energy and pollute the environment when disposing of them. Isn't this a madness we're being kicked and dragged into with tooth and nail? Or with stick and carrot, more to the point. With wind energy, by the way, things are not better. You won't find anywhere the full cost calculation of a typical windmill. They even too shy to say how much energy such installation is expected to produce a year, preferring to tell the simpletons who always mix kilowatt-hours and kilowatts about the installed power and how many 'houses' that would - or would not - be enough for. So the estimation of the period before the windmill really starts producing electricity varies from several years to never, especially if we include into the carbon footprint its maintenance and decommission. Let me ask, then, why exactly that way? Why the Don Quixote scheme? At altitudes starting from three hundred meters, just as high as the Eiffel Tower, and just in the middle latitudes where the main consumer lives, there blow constant winds with the maximum density of wind power, several times greater than that of the wind closer to the ground. Why not take advantage of this?"
  
  "But there are such project," said the editor. "Unfortunately, they were not successful."
  
  "I know exactly what projects you mean. Because I saw them too, even on TV - a miracle by itself. One of them is a giant helium balloon in the form of doughnut with the wind turbine and generator in the hole. All this they launch into the sky and transmit electricity through the cable to the ground. Gosh! The other one is a veritable airplane on a leash. It can even take off like a plane, but it's propellers are meant to work as wind turbines, and the motors as generators. Are those the same projects you saw?"
  
  The editor nodded.
  
  "Nice. But why did you say they were not successful? They found financing, they were shown on TV. If it isn't a success, what is? Of course, no steam engine can generate electricity more expensive and dirty than these environmentally friendly alternatives, but who cares?"
  
  "Do you have better ideas?"
  
  "Not only ideas. I made a real thing. I just asked myself how to utilize the traction power of such a simple thing as kite. First I contemplated using its horizontal movement. From the mechanical point of view it is probably the simplest design. The ground end of the cord is tied to the long lever. When the kite flies to one side it pull the lever with it (here the repairman started helping himself with his hands again). Then it makes a loop in the sky and pull the lever back. But there are two hitches. First, it would be impossible or prohibitingly difficult to synchronize such movements of several kites. The cords would very soon tangle up. So to put several such units next to each other and make a wind farm would be out of question. Apart of that I'd have had to design a big kite with a complex aerodynamics, and I wasn't ready to invest much time and money into that. Not to mention that it would have been a contradiction to my basic idea, which is cheap electricity. So I decided to use the vertical traction and regular children's kites. I bought six of them. They are simple, cheap, steady in the flight and ready to use. I only had to make an additional buttonhole in each..."
  
  The editor restrained his yawn and took another tissue from the pack. The repairman got the message.
  
  "In a few words, my idea was to make an assembly of kites, to some extent independent from each other, but working for the single power unit on the ground. To fly all of them is nearly as easy as one, and it is surely much easier than to fly a big kite. Besides, if the line of a single big kite is torn, all the procedure must be started from the beginning. Instead, my design allows to fly the assembly only once for all the time. If one such small kite breaks, rips or tears off, nothing catastrophic will happen. Well, one rag will fly away. The others with stay in the sky. At that altitude, by the way, they will stay there permanently, even if the pull is not that strong to produce much electricity. Of course, the design allows to hoist another kite instead of the torn off, as well as inspect, repair, add or remove kites one by one, downing them to the ground. It is well scalable and overall a good scheme, really...
  "As for the mechanics of producing electricity, not to get into details, I will only tell that I used shorter movements of the kites than in most other designs. Because it is possible to find in the Internet a dozen quite good ideas of using the traction force, so one can make a choice according to his tastes. The common feature of all of them - there is no need to drag blades, generators, and electric cables into the sky with the balloons or the airplanes. Everything stands neat and cozy on the ground, accessible to any maintenance. No need to build towers with blades... No need for a fundament either, since there is no tower with huge forces trying to topple it. For the kites it is enough to mount everything on a heavy concrete block or drive a pile in the ground. Moreover, there is no need to allocate big security zones, as it is the case with huge rotating blades. And as there are no blades and the kites are so up above the ground, there is no threat to birds, nothing creates noise nor spoil the landscape... Most of all, everything, every part of the business is cheap through and through. But that's the catch. Cheap electricity is bad electricity."
  
  The repairman sat down on the chair closest to the window. He continued:
  
  "Ha, even the low-altitude wind can be used much better. After all, we have already towers and blades that do not need to be built. Do you know what it is? Trees. Trees! Funny? Not at all. Have you ever wondered how much energy is there in tall trees swaying in the wind? Climb to the top of the tree in the windy weather and feel for yourself. We cut a tree for firewood, but in fact during its life we can get many times more energy from it than from its wood due to the simple fact that it sways in the wind. And how cheaply this energy can be harvested! This is another one of my know-how. You don't even have to climb a tree to hook a rope. It is a perfect work for copters now. All these ropes from the neighboring trees come to a device like a yo-yo with a ratchet and a generator, then it is pulled up between trees so as not to be in anyone's way and that's it! Each tree being individual sways in the wind out of sync with the next ones and that gives the torque for the generator. Want me to make a draft for you?"
  
  "No," said the editor.
  
  "And again, in terms of the investment effectiveness no windmills and panels can even hold beer for this one. At country houses and the like it is ideal. It would be no sore in anybody's eye, no harm, no danger, no neighbor could complain that something is bothering him. Nobody would even notice. Only you must have big trees in the vicinity, of course. Even a single tree would do if you fix the other end on something unmoving, like a wall, or a stump. In my experience, the maximum practical number of trees is five. But that is how trees are growing now. Not that it matter much, because the generator unit is so small, simple and cheap, real mass production type. And who knows, maybe someday people would start planting trees in the formations optimal for harvesting wind power from them. Trees like pines would be the best, I think, tall, non-deciduous, the branches make no problem... Maybe palm trees would be as good..."
  
  Something dreamy appeared in the repairman's eyes.
  
  The editor, though, returned him to the earth: "Still, if what you tell about really worked..."
  
  'It really works,' the repairman shrugged. "What might not work there? Everything is simple as a sledgehammer. You won't need more than a college skills and college mathematics..."
  
  'If all this was as effective as you said,' the editor continued with mild insistence, 'someone would have started manufacturing such systems long ago. A strange thing: I often hear about different projects, but for some reason the inventors themselves never get to practice. Why, for example, since you say everything is so simple and cheap, you yourself wouldn't start such production? You'd make money from this."
  
  'I'd only make big troubles from this, if I really put it on the market."
  
  "Who would stop you? Oil mafia? Reptiloids from the planet Nibiru?"
  
  "There are no reptiloids. Not even the oil mafia. There is always the same mafia of power, because any power is mafia that divides people and awakens dog instincts in them, inventing funny teasers and name callings such as conspiracy theories, perpetual motion machines, unrecognized geniuses, reptiloids, aliens, freemasons and so on. But this is nothing more than words and a trained reflex, like for dogs to obey commands. If you, instead of derogatory terms, call the same things politics, everyone will immediately respect that.
  
  "But politics is something different, isn't it?"
  
  'No, it's a conspiracy as it is, in the very essence. I won't even talk about the secret services of any nation, which quite officially receive money for being engaged in conspiracies, their own and of the other nations. Or about all sorts of Bilderberg groups that openly gather for secret meetings and invite there, by the way, the energy ministers of some countries. But have you ever thought what it means when they report in mass media about heads of states meetings without the press? It's nothing more than a conspiracy legitimized and accepted in society for granted. What secrets can presidents have from their peoples? That's barbarism. That's inculcating of dog reflexes: one moral for masters another moral for dogs. And if one of their tailed brethren say it's not normal, there starts barking: 'reptiloids', 'conspiracy theory'... Theory, pshaw!"
  
  'Still, I see that I am to listen to some kind of conspiracy theory,' the editor said. "Could you just please add to it at least some aliens and flying saucers?"
  
  "Gee! Who says it?" laughed the repairman. "The same person who urged me not to multiply entities without necessity?.. What I wanted to say, that Occam's razor is such a double edged thing. When cutting someone, be careful not to cut yourself. After all, isn't it conspiracy theorists who slash right and left with the Occam's razor like samurai with his katana? - in the sense that they are looking for the simplest explanations. And what else can you expect from those narrow-minded, incompetent people? When they see two old women selling tomatoes at the market at the same price, they decide that the old women had a meeting without the press not long before. The naive conspiracy theorists, what can they know about the influence of economic factors, which the more complex and varied they are for these old ladies with tomatoes, the more they boil down to the same price tag."
  
  "It is possible that the old women do not grow tomatoes themselves, but simply sell them for the same owner."
  
  "Good idea. But what is it to be attributed to? To natural causes or to conspiracy theories already? And how to explain that there are tomatoes at the market, but you can find absolutely no cucumbers? You see, what you call Occam's razor is not it at all. It's just your desire to find the objective ground by all means. A venerable thing, a scientific approach. But is it always reasonable? Maybe here you just multiply entities? And don't forget that the first task of the devil is to convince us that he doesn't exist. No need at that to imagine him as someone cunning and sophisticated. The Lord of flies, that's about him and his methods, dull and insistent. With this dull insistency those who serve him have managed to make us believe that they are clever. And because of endless repetition of the same dog barking commands they are making us believe that conspiracies can only exist as theory. In practice? - no, no, it's a conspiracy theory.
  At the same time, apart from the objectivity bias, I agree that it is necessary to look for common causes, especially if there are common signs. Have you noticed what all this alternative energy has in common? Not the ones I proposed, but those actively advertised and forced? It's their high cost."
  
  "You're not right. The price of the alternative energy has been quite sharply reduced later years."
  
  "Great addition! We are glad as children about the fact, but have you ever thought what is there to get so much cheaper? What exactly the wind turbines and solar panels are made of became cheaper?"
  
  "Maybe technologies?"
  
  "What technologies? If those technologies could make the blade of a wind turbine ten times cheaper in the last twenty years, why didn't they make cheaper the wing of an airplane? What is the difference? The same with solar panels. All those things are exposed and must endure bad weather conditions, that's the basic requirement. So it is mainly the same good old metal, glass, plastic, concrete, not to mention silicon, rare earths and energy to produce all this, and nothing of these got any cheaper. More than that, they keep price for all the materials at the artificially high level producing unrepairable junk. In fact, I see nothing new in those technologies at all. Just imagine if computers in the past decades showed the same two percent increase in productivity as solar panels, what would be the price of calculating now? Would it have changed the way in changed in fact? How come, then, the electricity from those alternatives to common sense became ten or even more times cheaper? Doesn't it look like the first dose is always free at the drug dealer? Who said it isn't possible to make a junkie the whole humanity? The question is what we would be made to face as the real price of all that. Cost and price are two different things, as it is well known, but when they differ or are starting to differ very much, look for something spurious."
  
  "Well, there is no secret that all this became possible mostly due to public financing," objected the editor.
  
  "So there could be no conspiracy, right?" grinned the repairman. "Because it is politics?"
  
  "At least, there is no secrecy".
  
  "At least the focus of public attention is very blurred at this point. And the fact that by taking money from our pockets they are reducing the price of something as expensive as ever, but for the intrinsically cheap alternatives the door is closed - here there is no secrecy too? Okay, it's easy to laugh at unrecognized geniuses with their petty kite generators and fridge heat exchangers, but what about the thermonuclear energy program? Don't those recognized geniuses, official physicists and highest politician - haven't they made clowns of themselves?"
  
  "What is wrong with the thermonuclear program?"
  
  "Nothing is wrong with the program. Except they were cramming into us since the middle of the last century that thermonuclear is the holy grail of cheap, endless, and clean energy for all mankind, but when it finally became possible and they even started building the first full-scale fusion power plant, they suddenly changed their minds. Isn't that funny? I think it is. And now the rescue of the humankind from global ecocatastrophy depends on Don Quixote's windmills, ha."
  
  "The ITER project is being under construction," showed his awareness the editor.
  
  "Sure it is. If they stop building it officially, the question 'why' may arise. In fact, they even cannot do it, to avoid the awkward question on how they managed to bury twenty - or is it thirty to date? - billion dollars of public money instead of initial two. The project has been existing for good forty years, of which more than twenty it is the actual construction, and if no such questions were asked till now, why not to continue that for another two or three decades or till the project wouldn't have any practical meaning at all? And there are so many good reasons for prolongations even after or if we live to hear that it finally has been put into operation... The humanity seems not to be in any hurry to drink from the holy grail. On the other hand, isn't it already a veritable holy grail for all involved? Even so, I heard recently a podcast interview with a physicist working in the project since early nineties. He says, 'How so that I was a young man then and I am old now, and still nothing. Five year delay, ten year delay...' "
  
  "The international bureaucracy is famous for procrastinations and misuse of public funds," said the editor.
  
  "Maybe. But there was another similar project started, finished, made famous and even largely forgotten - all inside a fraction of that same period. And neither international cooperation, nor financing with public funds prevented to successfully accomplish it. Despite this project was five times bigger than the fusion power plant. Have you guessed what I am talking about?"
  
  "I am not sure..."
  
  "The Large Hadron Collider."
  
  "And it is five times bigger? How you..."
  
  "Not in terms of money, of course," the repairman smiled wryly. "I have much more direct indirect way of evaluation. The matter is the collider and the reactor are essentially the same machine, the superconducting magnet, made by the same technology. So if you just compare the mass of liquid helium used for cooling in both projects, you will have a quite accurate answer. The collider uses 130 tons, the reactor was designed to use only 25 tons. It well corresponds with the initial, the honest cost of the fusion project, if you match it with the cost of the collider. So why the fates of these two projects are that different? Why the collider is a success story and the reactor is a failure? The answer is simple: because the collider is useless. It was never meant to give cheap energy to people.
  "Do you see how scrupulously the same principle observed, all the line from multibillion projects to projects that cost couple thousand or even hundred dollars? They are naturally linked by the energy itself as universal currency. The energy from any source is the same energy, like money doesn't smell. And the principle is - the energy must not be cheap. But who decided it mustn't? Those who decide. Where 'must' or 'must not' involved, there involved power. And conspiracy, if you want. Or even if you don't want.
  "Look, the richest man in the world buys the lousy social media for forty four billion dollars, while he could have bought for that money the practically free and clean energy for all and for ever. Do you think he doesn't know how to do it? But he knows as well than he won't live another day after announcing such plans. At least financially, but most probably in his tripes too."
  
  Talking like that the repairman came to the fridge and closed the red tap on the manifold. Then he plugged the electric cord of the fridge in the outlet and opened for some seconds the spigot at the coolant bottle. The bottle hissed and was immediately covered with frost. Then the repairman repeated his actions in reverse order.
  
  "Not everyone does this, but it is useful to let in a little portion of coolant, so the last molecules of air and water were pumped out with it," he explained, returning to his place at the window.
  
  "So you think energy must be free?" asked him the editor.
  
  "I think it is already free. But this is the biggest secret in the world. And the greatest conspiracy."
  
  "Wow. That's some declaration!"
  
  "Energy costs nothing, but for those who own the world it costs everything. It costs them their power, at least for now and, probably, for the nearest decade. But as such, as a material thing it means for them as little as the money itself. Not a real thing, just a function. But what would they do without that function? In our lifetime we have had every opportunity to see that energy and energy carriers are commonly and constantly used as money substitute or rather the smokescreen for under-the-table deals, when they buy and sell... what? The power, of course. Only the power is real value and real commodity in that world.
  "This spurious character of energy, by the way, was quite naively revealed by those who made those deals. I remember times when they tried at least to give some naturally looking explanations like 'the world's oil reserves are limited', and even the starship "Nostromo" hauled to Earth through all the Galaxy nothing else but mineral oil, together with the alien, of course. The funny side about that explanation was they were trying to apply it to a universally produced and used commodity and to the double and even triple risings the price for it during a single year. Would you raise the price for a commodity two times this year if you suddenly became aware of the possible shortages fifty years ahead? Not to mention that such explanations were dutifully forgotten when the price went down by the same two or three time ratio. Or who, by the way, would now remember quite recent biodiesel or shale oil boom accounting only for a couple percent of the global oil production, but made such conspicuous ripples on the surface at the time? But that naïve period of any concessions to public's reason seems over. Now they most often just say "political price" and that's that.
  "So the energy is used as a currency, but let's consider: what makes a good currency? The first thing is ubiquity. The wider its circulation the better. How does energy in the narrow sense, just electricity and oil products, look in this aspect? It is the same everywhere and all the world's population accepts it. What miserable would be one's life if he didn't have that currency or access to it in the modern world. I am not sure that even Mennonites would agree to live that way or, at least, with that world outside their community.
  "Second demand, the currency must be protected. That means tight control over energy technologies and world's oil and gas resources. We see it well enough? If you want to live off-grid, you would have to use only approved technologies for producing electricity, which means paying for it still more, directly or indirectly, like in your taxes. Everything else is considered a theft, the same as making counterfeit money. You are not even allowed to produce some heat to warm your body in any unapproved and uncontrolled way. Of some possibilities you wouldn't even have the notions, let alone opportunities to use them, like - returning to our muttons - heating water with refrigerators and air conditioners. We are not only prohibited to produce our own energy to subvert our dependence and cause an inflation to the world's currency and, consequently, the inflation of the power of those who rule the world. We are not even allowed to a big-scale, out of their control, saving energy, because it will lead to the same inflation.
  "And here we come to the third criterion of a good currency and the most interesting reason why energy was chosen as such. To serve the best its purpose, to be exempt from the barter operations, money must have no material value, but only be tokens of material values. Only simpleminded people see the value of a coin in the coin itself. On the other hand, it is a primal and indestructible psychological phenomenon that we see the value in the value representatives. If only - in this case - because we are trying to keep our coins as safe as our own children. Don't we? So why it happened that energy came into the same category as painted over pieces of paper or virtual bitcoins or - probably the most demonstrative example - gold, nearly useless and absolutely not worth mining metal? Big, big secret. Secret from us, but not from them. And the above mentioned psychology only helps them fool us. How, indeed, the cost of it - gold of energy - might be nothing, if the price for it is so high?"
  
  "It works, though," said the editor. "Works and ensure sustainable development of civilization and living conditions. Exactly because money still has its value, and because everything is based on human psychology."
  
  "I wouldn't rely too much on human psychology," told back the repairman. "Besides, the sustainable development is just a make believe. This fact is hidden for the time being, but transition it inevitable, due exactly to the technology and psychology."
  
  "Transition to what? To the new world order?" asked the editor skeptically.
  
  'Not very new, and not that such a transition itself is anything new. After all, these changes have always happened. Slave ownership, feudalism, capitalism... Now it looks like we are coming back to the slaveholding. And why not? After all, the slave system existed for the longest period in history. Seems to be a very solid construction. And no need to panic. It's just a form of power, but the essence of power is the same in every century. The energy is already our slavery and their power. But new technologies make possible still more total and direct control. It's too seductive not to use it. On the other hand, the energy as a tool of coercion must inevitably end, quite soon, and the rulers are getting ready to step it over. The only question is how it will actually happen or how it is already happening, because there are nuances and circumstances...
  "But in general all the answers can be obtained as soon as we give ourselves a trouble to ask questions. Like, what would you do in their place? Or what is the present form of power? Or what is power itself. Even when talking about power we seldom think what it means in fact. As if we subconsciously understand it, but it is too vague or too complicated. Or we are too unwilling to admit that power in every form means the will exerted over the flesh and blood of other humans. People like you or me may not understand what is so sweet in that, but probably it's why we don't have it. Likewise we don't always understand that capitalism isn't just about money. Power of money - seen even apart from power of wealth and property - existed since their invention, under all forms of power. Some kind of money would always exist, because it would always be necessary to redistribute power. But at present, under capitalism, money are capitalized, in other word invested in material things, the raw materials from which these things are made, in the energy to made them and in technologies to make them to make money and buy power. You can't take out any of the above and not collapse all the construction. But that exactly what happened. Capitalism has collapsed the day when energy disconnected with matter."
  
  "Whaaat?!"
  
  "No, it's not about a perpetual motion machine yet, don't be alarmed. But think again how strong that tie between energy and material was connected to the nature of power. Some medieval lord had and used the power to forbid collecting firewood in his forest. Better let it rot or he'll sell it to the freezing. Here the energy was tied with the material carrier "firewood". And exerting the power over that tie meant life or death to his serfs. Does everything really changed that much in the modern world? Even now you can't go to just any wood to collect fallen branches. No, nobody is ever going to give up those reins."
  
  "What reins?"
  
  "Well, the same ones, the energy ones. And they control the pair of horses, whose names are hunger and cold. Or heat, for that matter. And the cart these horses are harnessed in - they will bring humanity wherever they want to in this cart. They can abandoned those reins, but only to take up other ones, yet stronger. But here is the hitch. The old reins wore off, just to the point of breaking, but the new ones are not quite ready. That's the peculiarity of the present historical moment. And that's why we - or those of us who can see anything at all - are so often in a bewilderment as to how to apply Occam's razor. You could ask, for example, what's this story with fusion energy. If they so blatantly procrastinate it and in fact shamelessly closed the project, why they have started it in the first place?
  
  "And why?"
  
  "Well, here is a historical aspect too. Don't forget that ITER project was started as far as the times of cold war, whatever this later really was. There had been a long race in that area and both sides were sure that the other one could and would achieve it independently. But most of all it looked quite safe in the sense that though it was meant to give plenty of cheap clean energy, the technology itself was very well controlled by capital, by big money and political power. The same as it was and is with fission nuclear energy. Only it is much safer because it doesn't involve radioactive elements. On the historical and technological time line the advent of fusion energy was well planned and went according to the expectations. By now we would have been well on our way to forgot about traditional nuclear power plants, having ousted their fission reactors with fusion ones. Fukushima tragedy would probably never have happened. And, of course, we would have completely forgotten about burning coal in power plants. The abandon of coal and uranium mining wouldn't have made that much change on the big scale. This perspective was logical and clear to anyone who stood close to the business. That physicist from the podcast, who said he had had a life-long job of dream on ITER project, complained, nevertheless, not only on constant delays, but wondered why it is the only one such project. It doesn't make sense, he said. But can it really not make sense? Can such big things really be accidental? Big enough and strange enough for the scientist to notice them, even if he really doesn't understand their meaning. If that long-developed and well-prepared fusion strategy made as sharp U-turn as any repairman can notice in the quality of household machinery, that means big bosses made such decision. The nuclear energetics isn't the field to be influenced by any other kind of people except big bosses. It's like space programs, right?
  "The new generations of fission reactors, by the way, met the same fate as the fusion project, for the same reason. The nuclear energy is the cleanest and cheapest so far, which is bad enough to wage a campaign against it, but new types of fission reactor are too safe as well and can be made too small for the effective control of big money. Isn't it interesting that all of us - not only that physicist from podcast - are too ready to decide that something doesn't make sense, but too tough with asking why it nevertheless happens or exist. As if there is a commonly believed presumption of absurdity, and no one believe that 'all existing is rational'. Or is it just easier to live that way, translating our own absurdity into outer world? It that physicist really wanted to regain his 'making sense' feeling, he wouldn't only ask 'why'. He should have also ask 'when'. Yes, the historical aspect again. As Sherlock Holmes once said, 'Dear Watson, as far as we know what happened, to understand why it happened it is often helpful to analyze when it happened'. Or he might have said it. Whatever happened between the time when the agreement to build ITER was signed - which by itself was a step to control the situation, similar to nuclear disarmament agreements - and the time when the procrastination started, that is about thirty years ago, there must have happened something so strong that it turn upside down the normal development of human civilization and cancelled the existed plans for it."
  
  "And what was it?"
  
  "Let's better ask what it must have been. Because here I'd like us to hold tightly the razor of the logic. From that point of view it looks that such effect could have been made only by the discovery of some disruptive technology with a potential of colossal impact on capitalization of the power. Actually, of putting the end to the current form of power. Short of a miracle machine that can produce anything from nothing, I can only think of a machine producing energy from nothing, because if you have unlimited energy you can make anything of everything, like gold from lead or a garden from a desert. Besides, we have a direct connection here between this hypothetical discovery and the fusion energy program, from the fact of this latter's closure we started our deducing. And from the fact that this shutdown was made clandestine and not understood by the very men who worked on the project, we can deduce another two things. First, the new technology was as clean as fusion, else the bosses could have a reason to openly ban it. Secondly, it was unlike the nuclear energy in the sense that it was badly controlled by big money. In other words, the implementation of this technology was cheap. Here we have a paradox. To have such great backward influence on all our civilization, this discovery must have become wide-known, because world-ruling organization or organizations have their own hierarchy and inertia. They wouldn't have been put into motion by the discovery known only to the friends of inventor. Even supposing the tight control over all haphazard inventions, which was hardly practicable in pre-Internet world, it would be much easier to pinch the bud and go on like nothing happened, with thermonuclear plans and all. What to tell about our times, let me notice, when every small fish with any new idea first thing hurries to Internet to advertise it in the hope of getting financing? Well, the net is a net, if you know what kind of fish may appear in the sea. Remember you asked why shouldn't I establish the production of small-scale alternative generators? I wouldn't be the first. At the most and at best my predecessors, instead of financing were bought out for a very little money, losing all the further rights, including the right to talk. But I digressed. So, if then it did become wide-known and if we take into account the essential quality this invention must have had, namely its cheapness and, consequently, ubiquity, it means the invention was gaining its own speed and inertia. Was it possible, then, to make a smooth U-turn?
  "Nevertheless, I think the bosses would get away even with that maneuver, if not for the ecological problem. It is more than real and it is more than a problem. For many hundred millions of people it potentially means the plain death, but bosses are also not happy about it. They don't want to risk violent unrests - because people wouldn't take their death pills as meekly as it was shown it that movie 'Silent night' - if, of course, they won't manage to give them that pill beforehand in the disguise of a cure, like a vaccine, for example. Apart of that, the bosses simply don't want to lose their capitalized power. They don't want their Manhattan go under the water, though maybe it is so important for them only for the time been. All they care for is smooth - strictly according to Occam - transition from the capitalism to... I don't know what name would be adopted for the next form. To change the worn off energy reins for the new digitally biological ones. All they need is time, but it is exactly what they don't have enough, just because or global warming threat. They played too long. I am sure that there is no time even if they would decide now to revive the fusion program. Too late for that and too strong was their fright then, thirty years ago, and now. But they are not ready yet for the transition either. Hence this hectic windmilling the planet and coviding the global economics as a means to repair the old reins, and hence pushing AI and 5G with all might as making new ones. I don't know what next plague, war or famine they would invent on the way, but if they and we all are lucky, we will escape the ecocatastrophy by the nearest margin. All at people's own cost, like it always was, not at theirs, to be sure. See what they are aiming at? Instead of using that disruptive technology, really disruptive, that had torn off energy from matter and gave them because of it that much fright, but at the same time the technology that can give us freedom from the energy and economic slavery, they decided to make the probably most massive and brazen Orwell-like coup in human history. By duping foolish people, by threats, bribing and robbery they want to drive us back into the crumbling prison of capitalism, which by now has no right to exist at all. Instead of obsolete and many times bought over old energy technologies, they want us to buy again as obsolete ones, but slightly more clean in the long run. In other words, mankind is supposed to buy from them its own right to live and not rebel, by slavishly tying themselves to the same iron, plastic, concrete, machinery and expensive energy, in which the bosses have already capitalized their power. Preferably forever, or at least until the new leashes are ready. Accidentally they are going to steal the ecological agenda. They would say, 'Here we have wind turbines, solar panels, everything is environmentally friendly already, the planet is saved, and, most importantly, money has already been invested in all that, and, besides, it is a lot of working places, since it all have to be constantly produced, utilized, maintained, replaced... Do you want unemployment? Do you want a revolution? What do you need that fusion power for?' That's what they dream about."
  
  "But we won't allow them do it," said the editor.
  
  "We must do everything to not allow them," echoed the repairman.
  
  
  
  
4
  
  
  He had started already the refilling and was now following the blue pressure gauge needle, either closing the tap or opening it again. The editor also came to look.
  
  "It's possible also to refill by scales,' the repairman told him. "They put the bottle directly on the scales and release the coolant. When the bottle becomes lighter by the required number of grams indicated by the manufacturer of the refrigerator, then it's time to turn it off. But I use the pressure method. It's somehow better to see the direct physical parameter of the system's functioning. One have to bring the manifold in any case, so why take yet the scales..."
  
  "What should be the pressure?"
  
  "It's zero four. That is, at the inlet to the compressor and in the evaporator, the pressure is minus zero six atmospheres."
  
  "Below atmospheric? I never thought..."
  
  "But the output is still plus four atmospheres approximately. In general, the pressure depends on the coolant. There are dozens of different ones. Theoretically anything in liquid or other sublimable state can be a coolant. This one is almost the same as household liquefied gas, for stoves or lighters, the fact well known to botchers. Cheap and cheerful. Although explosive, for which reason it is banned in many countries. But this gas boils normally at minus ten degrees Celsius, which is considered not enough nowadays. So we keep the pressure in the evaporator below atmospheric, then it would evaporate at minus twenty or even lower. The drawback of this arrangement is when leakage happens somewhere on the evaporator's side, the outside air is sucked in. And there is moisture in the air, which will condense and mix with the coolant. That's while the compressor is working. While it is idling the pressure in the entire system rises and this mixture is released through the fissure. Then comes a new cycle and the air is sucked in again, the mixture is further diluted with water. As a result only water may remain therein instead of coolant. And the water is gurgling. That's why I asked you about it."
  
  "Is it really explosive?"
  
  "Swear to Odin! Imagine a leak right into the refrigerator's box. Mind that this gas has no smell and you will not be able to detect it. So after you not opening the refrigerator at least a night long, by the morning there is an explosive mixture there. Then you approach it with a lit cigarette to take out a bottle of milk, open the door... Ka-boom!"
  
  "I don't smoke."
  
  "Well, anyway, there may be a spark in the circuit of the light bulb, which turns on exactly when the door is being opened. That is, without you around nothing will explode, do not worry."
  
  "Why did you tell me this? Now I would be afraid to open refrigerators."
  
  'Well it could have helped a lot of people. Nearly every third."
  
  Editor crouched down and began to scrutinize the coolant bottle.
  
  "Why doesn't it say 'flammable' here?" he asked suspiciously.
  
  "Hmmm, they don't write a lot of things..."
  
  A minute has passed. Then the editor said: "That disruptive technology..."
  
  "Yes?"
  
  "Did you mean your heating refrigerator again, or were you talking about some other perpetual motion machine?"
  
  "No, about a real fact."
  
  'But in some parallel universe?" asked the editor of a fantasy magazine.
  
  The repairman laughed: "That's more to the point. There, in this parallel universe, was published an interesting magazine called "Science and Life". With a circulation, take a note, three and a half million, all in paper, of course. And then, in the issue number five of 1985 - which, by coincidence, is the year when the agreement on ITER construction was signed - there was a rather large article about non-existent then high-temperature superconductivity. From this article it was clear that at that time absolutely no one knew in which direction to look for this superconductivity. Secondly, it was also clear that no one really hoped to find it. Thirdly, it was obvious that, nevertheless, these parallel people really wanted to find it, because the prospects were clear and ready, since the ordinary low-temperature superconductivity had been discovered long before and they were able to use it. The whole question was - attention! - in the price, in the money. Because cooling superconductors with liquid helium is a big, big problem, and there was no cheaper option at that time. And there was a phrase in the article like 'Oh, if only we could discover such superconductors that could be cooled with liquid nitrogen! It would make a real revolution in all human civilization!' So what do you think, it hadn't passed a year when - bam! - there was announced the discovery of exactly such superconductors. By a sheer luck, outside any existed theory of superconductivity. In that parallel world or maybe in ours too it was a global sensation, spoken and shown from every TV-set."
  
  "Interesting story," said the editor.
  
  'You bet," replied the repairman. "Or it could be made an interesting story of. I think it's that how it happened. Some well-intentioned aliens read that article, conferred, and decided to help humanity. Sure thing, galactic laws do not approve interference in the natural course of other civilization's development in general and on this planet of the apes too. But on the other hand - thought aliens - these primates have really polluted the planet as badly as they could and in the future it obviously would get only worse. In addition, since they dream of such clean energy, it must mean they are mentally ready for it, so let's give these dumbasses who have not yet found out such elementary thing, this very discovery. That's what they decided upon. And... I don't know how exactly they did it, I am not that good at fantastic stories. Either they got into the heads of those scientists and inspired them with the right idea, or maybe they sneaked into their laboratory and planted the samples to be tested for superconductivity... Anyway, it worked. The sensation was very loud, everything was confirmed in thousands laboratories all over the world, the Nobel Prize was awarded instantly, which, by the by, never happens for discoveries of the same year.
  "Well, a year had passed, and two, and maybe three, and the aliens, who continued to peruse those same magazines, started to notice something incomprehensible for their reptilian minds. Either humanity have lost interest in the discovery, or just forgotten for what they craved it so recently... In a word, a complete lull. 'How dumb are these earthlings,' said the aliens scratching their gills in bewilderment, and then threw into the bargain the cold nuclear fusion. In for a penny, in for a pound. What is done can be undone and, anyway, it's still the same pure and infinite energy, so why not?
  "But our bosses knew why not. This time they were ready and fully armed. The danger was clearly understood, the strategy of handling civilians, the narratives on demand for them had been worked out, and the scientific public had already been sifted and trained. Scientists, you know, are generally easy to train, no more difficult than any other refrigerator users. In some cases it was made in a tough way, of course, but what they had to do? The circumstances demanded tough measures. Speed and tightness were the crucial factors, like at fighting fire or catching cockroaches. As a result, by the end of a third year they really managed to cover back the discovery of high-temperature superconductivity. But it was a real battle that left indelible traces of the war. And, of course, after it the victorious army was at its highest in terms of strength and alert, so when a new such discovery, of cold fusion, appeared, they just snapped its neck like a chicken's."
  
  "It's terrible things you are saying".
  
  "Well, the terror of our rulers was even worse. It was as if they were rudely awaken and found themselves standing naked with the noose around their necks, the stools under their feet tilting already. I think it was their main felling, nakedness, stripped of power and the very meaning of their existence the same way as the energy appeared that moment stripped of its material carriers. It happened quite unexpectedly. The scenario that a source of free or very cheap energy poorly controlled by the authorities could appear, that scenario was purely speculative. If it existed at all, nobody took it seriously. Like a pulp science fiction. And then the miracle happened. It suddenly turned out that the global production of electricity several times exceeds the consumption. And not just electricity. It became obvious that we were extracting as much superfluous oil and ore, smelting metals... Only scrap metals from unnecessary industrial machines and equipment would be enough to stop polluting planet for the next half century. In short, everything predicted in that article concerning technological and social revolution was becoming a reality. You just have to imagine their panic!.."
  
  While the repairman was ranting like this, the editor clicked something on his laptop.
  
  "What kind of big secret is this?" he said. "Here, high-temperature superconductivity. Google gives the result of approximately six millions."
  
  "So few?" the repairman was surprised. "I never paid attention to it. Of course, I knew they would be cleaning up, but I didn't expect them to have advanced that far. The world-wide sensation came below the... I don't know, recipes of grilled flying fish? It is not about cooking, you understand? It is the number of mentioning, the citations, after all. There must be billions of them. Really, the parallel world..."
  
  "Grilled flying fish, twenty two million links," informed him the editor, having checked it in the Internet.
  
  "On the other hand," said the repairman, "thirty years have passed already... That war has left traces, I said, but how many traces... trenches of real wars remain thirty years later?"
  
  The repairman thought for a few seconds and said:
  
  "You know, this analogy is much richer than it seems at first glance, in all aspects. The pity is the very fact of this war had to be hidden. There is no place for all sorts of historians, propagandists, patriots... Seems I'm the only one left."
  
  And laughed.
  
  "Just imagine the rulers' situation when high-temperature superconductivity invaded their dominion without any warning, any signs of impending attack. No intelligence, no plan of defense, and most of all, invulnerability to the usual and most formidable weapon, the money. Because the discovery was cheap in every aspect. Not only the cooling was cheap, but also the materials of superconductors and technology of making them. I remember not two months had passed since the discovery was announced when they started to sell school kits for making high-temperature superconductors and demonstrating the effects in class rooms. Besides cheapness and simplicity, it shows the degree of infatuation about the news. So the war propaganda also had instantly lost. No way they could ridicule the scientists who made their discovery not according to the official theory or say the results were not independently confirmed, as it was the case with the cold fusion. By the way, they say it till this day, despite the experiments on cold fusion have been independently and in most cases semi-officially conducted in hundreds of laboratories, and the unexplainable excess heat with commercially viable ratio, similar to that expected from the ITER's fusion reaction, was openly confirmed by a dozen prominent scientists I know of, who were not afraid to risk their careers and reputations. When I meet such argumentation, I always want to ask: who finally have to confirm it to establish it as a fact? Seems no number of scientists would be enough, if somebody - I wonder who - don't want it. Who is he holding the stamp? Do you know that out of fear to be ridiculed and ostracized, and to have at least some freedom all these effects and the research field itself were even renamed, from cold fusion into low-energy nuclear reactions? How do you like that inquisition? But surely that wasn't the case with high-temperature superconductivity. Too late for that. Add to the picture the fifth column, or better to say a horde of useful idiots with academic degrees who continued to write that - I quote - this discovery has not only made a revolution in the contemporary physics, but has a potential to radically transform all the social aspects of humanity. I made a private collection of such articles. Those fools wearing pink glasses didn't even think that the social structure of humanity isn't a thing that holds by itself, due to some independent of human will law of nature, and that any revolution would face an equal counterrevolution from those who don't want to change their ruling status. But here the bosses fell themselves into the pit they dug out for the simple-hearted humanity. Later they made corrections in that policy too. Less naivety, more intimidation."
  
  "So how did they manage to suppress it?" asked the editor.
  
  "Well... mostly with money again. The discovery was impregnable to money, but the people weren't. Anyway, it was fun. In these few years after the discovery the laboratories and big companies had time to make fully functional and in some cases working to this day superconducting motors, transformers, generators, power lines... Most of this, of course, was experimental, and it couldn't be otherwise when everything changed and improved so quickly. I remember there was such a rage that they took standard electric motors - standard ones!" the repairman burst out laughing, "and changed the windings in them to superconducting ones, and even in that case they received several times more power for the same mass and bulk."
  
  'What is so funny about standard motors?"
  
  "Why, the whole sense is with such electric currents you can do without ferromagnetic steel at all, so what does standard motors have to do with it? They were just in a hurry, they wanted to try it right now, without developing new designs specifically for superconductivity. And from all this remained only six million links in the whole Google? Guys are doing a good job..." The repairman shook his head.
  
  "Motors without steel?"
  
  "Not only motors. Transformers too, I mean power grid transformers. You, surely, know that at power plants they generate electricity of the same voltage we use in our homes. But to be able to transfer it to great distance in any feasible way it has to be risen - usually in two stages - to, say, three hundred thousand volts and then lowed again. Many people don't have any idea what the monstrous voltage there is on those poles and what it costs to handle it. All this operation, counting only transformers, amount to 25 kilos of steel plus a kilo of copper or aluminum per capita. That's my own estimation."
  
  "Is it a lot?"
  
  "That depends. If 25 kilograms is a couple of sturdy dumbbells quietly rusting under your bed, that's not much. But if in the apartment of every family of three there would have stood such a 75-kilogram box, like another refrigerator or an old-style TV set, but useless, buzzing, consuming electricity, stinking of hot oil, demanding to be bought, and then repaired, changed and serviced, then to get rid of it would be happiness for the family. But it isn't in their apartment anyway. It is somewhere out there, in the fields, in the mountains. Out of sight, out of mind. Just like the back side of the refrigerator and the heat it produces. However, if we use superconductivity, then these transformers are not needed at all, because you don't need to raise the voltage. Likewise, those giant pillars of power lines would not be needed too. And nobody would be killed by the high-voltage electric current anymore, if somebody cares about that. Can you imagine that heap of iron scrap that would form for better use and how much land would be freed? But there is no need to make all at once. We could continue using the present grid, just replacing old transformers with new one, which also wouldn't need iron and would be several times more compact and environmentally clean. Nitrogen for such machines is liquefied from the air right on the spot and in the event of a leak it returns back to the atmosphere. Although in fact in most cases just supercooled air is needed."
  
  "What about the price?"
  
  "Price? Well, right now you can buy liquid helium at twenty dollars a liter, and liquid nitrogen for ten cents a liter. Two hundred times cheaper. Feel the difference? And this is only the coolant itself. If you take into account that liquid helium is superfluid and needs constant replenishing and delivery, not to mention it is only four degrees above absolute zero, while liquid nitrogen is seventy seven degrees, you would understand that it requires absolutely different class of cryogenics. In the final count it would have made new superconducting equipment up to a full thousand times cheaper than the old one. Do you see now why bosses went crazy from the fright and actually closed the fusion program? Why there are those eternal delays and why ITER is left only one of its kind? The thing that physicist in the podcast doesn't understand, unless he pretends. The discovery of high-temperature superconductivity meant, in particular, that bosses were losing control over fusion power, because from the engineering point of view the fusion reaction is nothing more than the technology of superconducting magnets. Overall, if you remember that millions tons of natural gas are liquefied every year at the temperature not much higher than nitrogen with the sole purpose to be shipped to the other side of the ocean and be burned there in the kitchen stoves, and this is considered economically viable, that must eliminate all the questions about the price."
  
  "All the questions?"
  
  "In all honesty, yes. But it is obvious that the rulers just couldn't let out this argument from their hands in this technological aspect too, however ridiculous and obsolete it looks. With them it is a many hundred year old instinct. Just like a cave man wouldn't let out a cudgel even if you offer him a better weapon. So along with the only and extremely costly - made extremely costly - project ITER, in the same way and for the same purpose they keep one or two company in the world producing extremely costly high-temperature superconducting wire. Enough to say that they use gold as a substrate for the superconducting coating. Total bullshit."
  
  "Why don't they close that superconductivity at all?"
  
  "It would have been too conspicuous. As conspicuous as total closing the ITER project, of which we talked already. And it would have meant losing or at least making more difficult control over it. Meaning, of course, the control over the people who have or may have anything to do with these technologies, like that physicist with his life-time job of dream, full of fun and nothing to do. So it is better this way, decided the bosses after their fright subsided a little and the things started to figure out to their advantage. Not that they hadn't to kill some people on their way to the present stability. Besides, this limited edition, so to say, works as a safety switcher. Like the latter, it is hidden and it doesn't take any part in the functioning of the device, but if anyone should take serious interest in the subject, the first thing he would stumble upon would be this information about exorbitantly costly superconducting wire of, say, full of optimism official website of ITER project, and that must calm him down. He would just expose himself as a man with suspicious interests."
  
  "You should have warned me before," smiled the editor.
  
  "Maybe I should," smiled back the repairman, "but I didn't want to look like a conspiracy theorist. Anyway, I can spare you further risk, because however long you search the Internet, you wouldn't find answer to the only question interesting to a layman: why it isn't practically used. At the most you may meet a short inarticulate mumbling consisting of two points: these superconductors are too brittle to make wires and, second, they can't endure dense magnetic fields without losing their superconductivity."
  
  "Is it true?"
  
  "No, it's deceptive. Of course, you wouldn't make a pliable wire from the raw composite the superconductivity of which was discovered in 1986, because it is, in fact, a ceramics. But this argument is a typical diverting attention to a false target. First, porcelain cups or washbasins or even bricks are also ceramics, but that doesn't mean we can't use them or they are not strong enough. Besides, even before the discovery ceramics had been a well-advanced technology, ready to be applied for the discovery also. I remember, as an example, they made car engines from ceramics, the whole combustion engines which didn't need cooling and so were very efficient. Moreover, computers can be also defined as a ceramic technology. What are microchips, indeed? That's alone must arise big questions: why these technologies made such tremendous progress in the last 30 years, but appear so helpless in superconductivity applications? Secondly - and that's the false target - why exactly wires, what do you need them for? You can made a motor or transformer without using a millimeter of wire. The traditional electrical machines are made as they are made exactly because copper and later used aluminum are pliable metals, so it was and is just more cheap and convenient to wind them. But nothing prevents us from making coils as whole, without winding. Pressing them into forms or depositing on some cylindrical isolators.
  "As for magnetic fields, it is, the same as brittleness, just words. They won't show you the figures. Isn't it ridiculous? You can say as well that every rope has its stress limit, and that would be true, but it is not an argument not to use ropes at all. See, if you lie in descriptive terms it usually works with the majority of people imposing at the same time no liability on you. All the public politics are based on that. But lying in factual way, in figures - that's quite another matter. So all the serious-looking articles on high-temperature superconductivity are made of the discovery's history, of theories at full length, diagrams, formulas, molecular structures, and such like, which makes a contrast with the fact that these articles are the first what the eyes of a curious layman would see on the first page of his search engine. But it is exactly what is needed to shy him away in full certainty that the research is been conducted, that everything is open and okay. Only one of a hundred would go on with his search - maybe for hours - to find those two simple figures, which are alone have practical meaning, the magnetic and current densities. To find, in other words, that even those first-generation high-temperature superconductors you could bake in a school laboratory nearly forty years ago allowed four teslas at a hundred thousand amperes per square centimeter. And maybe only a confirmed conspirologist would make comparisons and ask what the hell, because these parameters - in combination with quite affordable materials - are way above all conceivable practical implementations. See what they are doing? They are sifting people, with more and more fine mesh. But first they have built, or, better to say, they continue building the wall separating two absolutely different pools of information. The first kind is information that you can justly call disinformation. It comes to you by itself, crammed into you. Everyone having woke up in the morning immediately gets into this pool of noise to flop there till exhaustion. The second kind of information you have to search for, making your own efforts.
  "It is strange, but for most people the idea of such barrier is as unsurmountable as the barrier itself. It works like a one-way trap door. You can't forget that you know what you know. Because you can only register something, not the absence of something. That's why even the hints on that something are very scanty, like that short inarticulate mumbling about the parameters of new superconductors, second best thing to not telling anything at all. The same applies to the past. You can't remember that you didn't know something. You can't remember empty space, which wasn't even an empty space, because you didn't know anything around it. The years of not knowing seem quite insignificant in comparison with a minute of knowing. But that's a trap. Your not knowing is as significant as your knowing, especially for those who manipulate you, and must be as significant for you, if you don't want to be manipulated. But no, you can always count on stumbling upon somebody who has never in his life heard about something that might have been very important to his life, but if you point that to him you are a fool and a conspiracy theorist on the basis of his one minute-long knowledge due to the Google search instigated by nobody other than yourself. That's the sense of the barrier that divide the information coming to you and the information you come to. To help people climb over that barrier is, probably, the most ungrateful work in the world. That's why Sherlock Holmes almost never revealed his chains of deductions, which must have been the whole series of such trap doors."
  
  The repairman made a pause, got his wind and continued:
  
  "Not that even with this second kind of information you can be sure of anything. In general, all that was always so, of course, since the beginning of any political power, in full Machiavellian spectrum of propaganda, deceit, secrecy and suppression up to 'what isn't on TV doesn't exist at all', but it is interesting that even with the advent of the Internet, which forms your information input more or less according to your interests and so makes propaganda more digestible, even now you won't find the subjects in question in your recommended. Why, indeed, condone such dangerous interests even in separate individuals? As for that very limited number of articles on high-temperature superconductivity which are still appearing, they took out from them every mention of practical use. In my opinion all this is as good as admission of guilt."
  
  "So now it isn't used anywhere?" asked the editor.
  
  "Of the currently produced machines only in MRI systems, the tomography. That's probably why they are so numerous nowadays. Why it was allowed? First, it has nothing to do with the energy sector of economics, and consequently nothing with cheap electricity. Secondly, it didn't involve anything too apparent, because superconductivity was always used in that equipment. They only change low-temperature one for high-temperature one. Thirdly, this equipment has a limited application. You won't stumble upon it every day, it won't catch your eye and, surely, people around it and in it have more urgent questions on their minds. Then, take into account that medical equipment industry is, to put it mildly, very close international corporation and prices there are as incomprehensible as those in the military. Summing up, tomographs can play the same role of a safety switcher as ITER and manufacturers of golden wire. But, sure thing, here again must be fulfilled the condition of no advertising. Or somebody may ask what is there so special in MRI magnets that high-temperature superconductivity can be used only there, but not in electric power equipment with much less severe demands. And after that question he may start, god forbid, looking for such implementations and do find them. Because, as I said before, in those several years after the discovery there were made quite a number of generators, motors, transformers, wound and not wound, and even a couple of high-temperature superconducting power lines. After all, something must have remained even on the printed paper, 30 years since that 'holy war' or not. As a last resort it may also be used as soothing pills, but better avoid it, in case the ridiculous thoughts might arise as to why all that was so long ago and how it happened that it was possible then and neither brittleness prevented it, nor magnetic fields were too strong, but thirty years of scientific and technical progress made the manufacturers unlearn that sacred ancient knowledge."
  
  "What would be the most interesting applications?"
  
  "I think, the motors"
  
  "Those without steel?"
  
  "With steel only for constructive elements. But hardly even there. Steel is too thermally and electrically conductive. So new motors would be - and actually they started to make them so in those ancient times - from composites, from plastic."
  
  "Like the bearings in washing machines?
  
  "The bearings will also be superconducting. It's the ideal diamagnetic."
  
  "Sounds too ideal."
  
  "And where to is the way for ideal, light, and powerful motors? To aviation, to the sky! Although in the parallel universe, from which we had been so rudely switched aside, they are flying not by airplanes, but ... guess what?"
  
  "Flying saucers?"
  
  The repairman smiled and made a 'well so!' gesture:
  
  "You asked for flying saucers, here they are."
  
  "And... do you know the device?
  
  "I do, in general."
  
  "Look, why shouldn't we have some tea?" said the editor.
  
  
  
  
5
  
  
  "Tea?"
  
  "Why not? I can't offer you cold drinks yet," smiled the editor, "but tea is all ours. After all, it is five o'clock already. And there are cookies. Have you done with the fridge?"
  
  The two-kilowatt kettle was turned on, the cookies were taken from the drawer. After the first cup the repairman looked at the shotgun hanging over the editor's table:
  
  "Nice gun you have there. Is it real?"
  
  "Yes, but not in the working state. Tell me more about these flying saucers. Our authors need some fresh inspiration, maybe you could help them?"
  
  "Okay. Why do you think the flying saucer is like that, why does it look like disk? Because it is built around the thing called superconducting magnetic energy storage, and it has a toroid form, like a slightly flattened donut. The same old good tokamak as ITER's plasma camera, but with a slightly different function. The energy is accumulated in the form of magnetic field, which is created by a superconducting coil. Through that coil the electric current is also withdrawn. This machine is known for a hundred years and could have been an ideal accumulator, keeping energy without loss, with instant charge and practically limitless output, if not for the cost of helium cooling and the restrictions for the magnetic field. Or, better to say, if not for the strength limits of the chamber structure, because the so called Lorentz force try to tear it into shreds. So this device can be compared with a scuba diving cylinder under high pressure. We don't use such cylinders for accumulating significant amounts of energy only because we can't make them strong enough. The same problem would restrict using superconducting magnetic storage systems even in the high-temperature version. The best attempt, as far as I know, was made in some electric locomotive, for the purpose of acceleration and recuperation the energy of deceleration, but otherwise they are too big for common transport. In the first years after the discovery there existed projects of such big underground storages to balance the daily peaks for the whole countries, but they understandably remained projects. On much smaller scale this device was used somewhere to protect the power grid, but all that is stationary, of course. There is no space enough for it on the roads.
  "But there is space for it in the air and still more space... well, in space! Flying machines of the alternative present don't use the clearly outdated scheme of the Wright brothers, especially in big cargo and passenger air vehicles. They fly in the central part of huge toroid latticework constructions, made of composite pipes, inside which circulate coolant and there is superconducting core. Due to the same Lorentz force the construction holds itself, and because of the huge volume the field density can be kept quite moderate. Because of this concept of volume - meaning the bigger volume the better ratio - they even joke that this is the reincarnation of zeppelins. But I wouldn't say it is only about the size. As many other ways of life, the discovery made aviation much simpler and much more affordable... Oh, by the by! You can write in your magazine that the secret of the Tunguska meteorite has been solved."
  
  "By you?"
  
  "I don't know the details of the whole story, of course, but the essence is as this. The drive of the alien starship went from superconducting to normal state. Probably just because for some mistake or accident it entered the Earth's atmosphere, for which it was not intended. You see, the true spaceships don't need to cool their superconductors and need not to keep vacuum in their plasma cameras. On the other hand they can't fly in planets' atmospheres, for which purpose they use more traditional flying saucers. So there was a huge blast which literally evaporated the whole spaceship... Hopefully, the crew had managed to bail out somehow before it happened. It's interesting that three years after that, namely in 1911, there was made the discovery of superconductivity, the cold one.
  "Once in the fifties, when atomic energy was in vogue, and aliens were also coming into fashion, there was a similar hypothesis that the Tunguska was an alien's ship with a nuclear engine, so they searched the site for fallout vestiges of uranium and suchlike heavy fission elements, but found nothing unusual, of course. If there was a nuclear source of energy on board, it was a fusion, not a fission, and there was no chance to find pieces of superconductor too, because it had to evaporate in all the volume at the same time, not to mention that it didn't have to consist of any exotic elements and be very bulky. On the other hand, this accident must have hellishly ionized the atmosphere, which explains at last the mystery of two "white nights" reported right after it in Europe. So, what those expeditions should look for are traces of an electromagnetic pulse, if they can still be found or distinguished from other damaging factors."
  
  "Why look for them if you already know everything?" smiled the editor. "But explain to me one thing. You described the energy storage, but what about the engine? How flying saucers are actually flying? Don't tell me you haven't contrived anything better than the good old photon drive."
  
  "No. The paradox is the energy storage and the drive are not that different. There was another discovery, or rather the continuation of the same one. The unknown history has it that everything began in one of the peripheral European countries, still in that period of great rush, when scientists laid hands on cheap superconductors and were avidly experimenting with it in any imaginable way. As did that run-of-the-mill PhD in a laboratory of not too famous university. The discipline in such laboratories is never very strict and it so happened that the PhD's colleague, who was assisting at the experiment or just called in for a small talk at exactly the right time, was smoking. I don't remember what PhD was going to measure and what supposition he wanted to corroborate, but I bet he himself forgot about it then and there. Because he or his friend - the history is silent again on who was the first, and I think we can divide the kudos between them - noticed, that the smoke from his cigarette, or should we call it a pipe to make the story more picturesque, behaved somewhat strange. Getting into the space above the experiment installation, which, naturally, was cooled and cold, the smoke went not down, as it should have been, if somebody cared to think of it at all, but up, like in a chimney. That's how were discovered the gravitomagnetic fields or, speaking simply, antigravitation. However, it can't be called a pure serendipity, like it was with high-temperature superconductivity, because the theory of such fields happened to have been existing for several years before that moment. Nobody just paid attention to it. But the existence of the theory couldn't save the discovery, of course, even in our times when official scientists don't see facts if they do not agree with the theory, because they don't see any theory as well that doesn't agree with the official theory, this time with the holy script of saint Einstein. Such way of making business could not lead to other result that while in parallel world people have already forgot monstrous jet engines, in this world antigravitation was being 'impossible to corroborate or refute' for the next eight years, then I lost the trace of it completely. Can you understand this Jesuitic formula at all, when applied to the nature science?"
  
  "You didn't tell what that PhD's experiment was," said the editor.
  
  "Oh, he just rotated a disc of superconductor in a magnetic field. Thanks for the cookies."
  
  The repairman began to get up from his chair, but was stopped by the editor's question:
  
  "What about scientists? Why don't they protest? Don't they understand?"
  
  "The science is big. Specialists must understand, I think. Though, to make at least some of them justice, or, better to say, giving them the credit of doubt, such operation on the planetary scale was something really unprecedented. Everyone knows that nothing is secret that shall not be made manifest, but to make what was manifest back a secret? - that's a little out of experience and even or imagination. On the other hand, only a fool can think that such technologies can be ever left without the tightest control, and control always means forbidding. It would be the same as to drop a hundred dollar bill on the busy sidewalk and hoping to find it there the next day. Here even the objective bias that must be intrinsic to scientists doesn't look like sufficient exoneration.
  "It's about intellect, but from a vulgar psychological point of view everything is still more clear. Salaries, authority, families, respect, grants. The meaningfulness of life is also always at stake for the scientists, like for those, the rulers. There is always so much temptation to suspect when everything is absolutely clear... No need to present scientists as fighters for the truth at all costs. It's like idealizing athletes or doctors or priests or any other profession. Do you think everyone was pleased that superconductivity turned out to be without a theory, for which theory, by the way, some had already received titles, and prizes, and wrote books, while others had been teaching it at universities for decades? How many people were excited about the new opportunities? Well, only those who did not have the old opportunities. The scientific world itself is quite capable of gobbling up any discovery, with maybe a little external help or just not objecting. And this is not just talk or theory... conspirological theory. It has a very real and everyday, I'd say meaty aspect. That which I called the traces of the war, quite discernable for those who can see the trenches of quite recent great battles in the grown over with various greenery terrain folds. One late now Russian academician, the biggest, in fact, in that field, who proposed a theory of superconductivity, that same theory which wasn't able to predict the advent of high-temperature superconductors, and who got yet a prize from the hands of Josef Stalin, gets half a century later the Nobel Prize in Physics for the same work, namely, as they nominated it, for pioneering contributions to the theory of superconductors. The message is clear enough? I remember his interview at the time, where he was insidiously asked isn't he too old to enjoy the Nobel Prize. He answered 'No, why, the timing is okay, it was good to remember this pleasant sensation of being awarded. It's just the sum isn't that big. I really can't buy with this money anything worthy that I haven't had already'. Do you understand that? I don't. He also wrote popular articles were he described how wonderful it would be to have nitrogen-cooled superconductors, but shortly after they were actually discovered changed tackle and started condemning 'the psychosis' about it and insisting that only room-temperature superconductivity would be really useful superconductivity. See the false target again? Not to do what is possible in the hope of impossible. How they say it..."
  
  "To exchange the bird in the hand for two in the bush?" help him the editor.
  
  "Yes. It's like 'We don't go to the Moon, we better go to Mars'. As a result nobody goes nowhere, which is exactly what the rulers want. To finish the picture, it is the same academician who founded the scientific inquisition in his country called the commission on pseudoscience, in which pseudoscience was surely included cold fusion. Not because it was officially impossible to confirm as well as to refute, but because its existence was against the canonic faith. And that's after the circumstances of the of high-temperature superconductivity discovery, heigh-ho!
  "As for the non-boss scientists, those of them who were on topic since the beginning, some of them were allowed to continue theoretical research works and made content with it. All this is under close surveillance, sure, but still it is necessary, because the rulers want to know the future dangers and are not going to make another slip like in 1986. Those scientists got naturally old in that period, retired and by this day mostly died out. As for young ones, they are effectively barred from the problem since the university, by the simple means of not allotting the funds for such research and by exempting this subject from the curriculums. Just not approving, that's enough and quite noncommittal. It's a very centralized system, in fact. The hush-hush is facilitated by its not being a mass profession or speciality, without any chance to get massed at the background that there have grown up a generation of 40 year old bearded men who never heard of that world-wide sensation at all. You see, it is all very consistent and persistent and long-term planned, and consequently soft-power looking, but it is the same scorched earth policy that was applied with such force in the first years after the discovery. Burned out of site and out of mind. Actually, all natural sciences are considered dangerous by the rulers for their ruling power, that's the trend. And quite justly. For that reason in common people all sound interest in science is drowned in muddy waters of artificially created and sponsored idiotic theories and mysteries, in the endless videos of perpetuum mobile designers and perpetuum mobile debunkers, flat Earth believers, and whatnot. But for the scientific public it is much the same. If you are living inside the present time, the changes are incremental and hard to notice, but I have an archive of several scientific periodicals, and if you followed their mutations... Believe me, it is a deadly picture."
  
  "Can you name some?" asked the editor.
  
  'Well, just yesterday I read a new issue of a still alive magazine called 'Perspective technologies'. Not exactly magazine, since they call it 'information bulletin' and it looks like it. First biweekly, now monthly it was establish in nineties exactly to cope with the wave of news on high-temperature superconductivity, but contained also those on nanostructures and other clever words. Strictly specialized, no-nonsense paper of the academy of sciences. For many years it was even black and white. What is invaluable, it is access free on the Internet even now, including their archives. There you may clearly see all the evolution or rather devolution of the subject and the overall state of this branch of science, like on a map. There you can read everything, especially if you can read between lines, starting from the issues nearly every one of which for a number of years contained what they called breakthrough news on superconductivity accompanied by such strange on the scientists' lips awe-inspired expressions as 'by the will of providence'. What a time it was! Later there appeared perplexity and attempts to find rational explanations why industry don't want to implement such profitable and ready to be used technological solutions, and joy when it did in rare cases. Then you can read annoyance because of closing the promising direction of research and insufficient funding. Then the practical aspect stopped even to be mentioned. Only the theory and descriptions of experimental effects were in abundance. Then the information on superconductivity was moved from the head part of the bulletin to the end. Then - quite shockingly - issues started to appear without any information on superconductivity at all. Now it is a colorful paper, which has the rubric quite aptly called 'For idle mind', where they examine from the scientific point of view wings of insects and riddles of Egyptian pyramids. But you will hardly find there even the word superconductivity, except in the subtitle, which they retained from the old times for some reason, maybe in defiance or probably as a clear message again. The discovery is done with. The case is closed."
  
  "But you can't deny the progress made in all the years since what you are calling the discovery," said the editor.
  
  "Well, something important was really smuggled from that parallel world to this one at the moment of bifurcation."
  
  "What exactly?"
  
  "Guess. Use the historical aspect. The discovery year plus several more for getting ready the material base. What we have? - something beginning in the first half of nineties. What new appeared then?"
  
  "The Internet?"
  
  "The mobile Internet," laughed the repairman. He got up, plugged the fridge into the socket и started to collect his tools. The editor remained sitting at the tea table.
  
  "I've always wondered why people never ask questions," said the repairman. "It's like a family curse of all mankind. This readiness to accept anything, like it is typical for animals or children. Maybe we as a race are really at that stage of development? It's a sad thought. And I think there is something more in it, not just feeblemindedness, but some vice. Sometimes, however, it looks as a simple lack of curiosity. The advent of cell phones effectively solved the communication problem of all humanity in just a few years and nobody asked how so, why not before. Was there nothing to wonder about? Did people forget school physics that says the shorter radio waved the shorter the distance you can transmit the signal and you can do it only in direct view? A thousand megahertz, two thousand megahertz? Forget about it."
  
  "The cell phone towers are not that far."
  
  "Not far to receive thousands calls out of houses, out of closed-door steel cars? From behind buildings, hills and trees? And not to make a mess of them?"
  
  "It's digital," pointed out the editor.
  
  "Morse code was also digital. But microwaves were used with the most success not in radio transmission, but in ovens, exactly because they are excellently damped by any organic stuff and jump off any metal surface. Granted, there were long attempts to create some kind of cellular networks even before the world war two and to use for that the megahertz band, because only there remained unused frequencies, but that's exactly what must raise the question 'what happened'. It is enough to have a notion about what those grids looked like until nineties and how many then cell phones - whatever they looked like - it was possible to connect to them at all. To give a cellphone to everyone, even without video calls option? That was beyond the imagination of science fiction writers until the moment it appeared in reality. Not that sci-fi writers can predict anything, which makes their futuristic descriptions ridiculously obsolete during their own lifetimes. At least I never met a new idea in their novels."
  
  "They are just writers, not inventors," said the editor.
  
  "Yes, but the genre they chose obligates them to see a little farther than their readers, who also didn't wonder when such fantastic things appeared in their hands, however much they changed their everyday life. Strange to say, I think they just didn't notice it. In any case, such matters are obviously so far outside the sphere of the common people's curiosity that any two words will do to prevent any questions. Like 'digital technology'. Okay, tell me, then, why won't you hear you Wi-Fi router in the third room from here even with open doors? Or get you router outside; you would lose the signal at, say, 30 meters, just make that experiment. But it is digital too, right? It is the same scale of wave lengths. And it is the same transmission power, because, after all, it is the same phone you have in your hand. But with that same phone you can more than reliably connect to whoever you want through the tower situated a hundred times farther, at a three-kilometer distance. Why, isn't it the same technology, not the same kind of radio waves? Is it really possible that we didn't know something about radio using it since Marconi and including giant TV networks of 1980s? Or should we suppose that such changes must have required something new at the fundamental level? Maybe some discovery was made, which is used there, but not here, without drawing much attention to itself? Not in our routers, but in their towers. Please notice that even under ideal conditions, like in the vacuum, a hundred times farther the tower is doesn't mean it receives from your phone a signal a hundred times weaker. The signal is ten thousand times weaker! What is going on, man? Out of site out of mind, that's what. Again. And no questions for idle minds. So much for the progress."
  
  "But it is still a progress anyway?"
  
  "It's just morsels fallen from the table. But even those morsels are poisoned, or we wouldn't have them."
  
  "You mean 5G, of course," sneered the editor.
  
  "And 5G, of course. Well it's getting cold okay. Let's put it in place."
  
  Together with the editor they started to turn around the fridge and push it back to the wall. When the work was nearly done, the repairman said "Ouch" and clung to the refrigerator. Then he said "Sorry, I must sit for a minute". He minced to the nearest chair and carefully lowered himself onto it.
  
  "Lumbago?" asked the editor sympathetically. "Take your time. Have another cup of tea."
  
  "No, thanks," replied the repairman and explained: "It's very important to drop everything at the first seizure and let yourself a little rest, lest it becomes much worse and longer. Alas, our job is full of awkward positions bad for the spinal column."
  
  The editor decided that his spine also deserved a rest and returned behind his desk, into his comfortable armchair.
  
  "You were talking about 5G," he said.
  
   "5G, yes... I wonder what is more in this cellular story in general: alleviating the existing needs or creating new ones? Besides creating really new tools of surveillance over the citizens, to be sure."
  
  "They are watching us? The Big Brother?"
  
  "Look, why should I be proving anything or remind you the old adage that just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you, if the USA bans TikTok exactly because of surveillance and mind manipulating, saying it quite openly? You don't believe authorities? Or it is only the authorities' privilege to be conspirologists as well as those who provide surveillance? That leaves no room to move. That's shackles. The rulers are ready to use any invention to create new shackles and never unburden the people. Hence this lopsided progress, this absurdity of IT boom at the backdrop of artificial inhibition and even backward development in the energy sector. And it will continue till the ultimate goal is achieved, the full and immediate control over live and death of each individual person."
  
  "By chipping him?"
  
  "Well yes. The chips in the present state of their development have only one advantage over the smart phones, namely you can't leave them home. On the other hand, you won't talk to such chip as to your intimate friend, as it is the case now, when you are talking to them both. No doubt, the ultimate chip would be connected to a person's nervous system and could make him or her feel pain, faint or even die. It isn't that far away. Meanwhile smartphones are good enough, and what difference does it make that they are not implanted into your body, if it is so easy to restrict your primal function without your having the phone or any external chip in the form of a document on you, or just a barcode on a piece of paper or even on the person, readable by a device connected to a database. Covid was a perfect test run for all that, wasn't it, being an element of testing the society for its readiness to sacrifice its dignity and basic human rights or, worse still, to be of help in that. Nothing new, nothing new..."
  
  "Where does 5G chip in?"
  
  "Good pun," grinned the repairman. "Well, your face, your walk, your talk, they are as good for the surveillance purpose as an implanted chip, but one thing is to scan the bar code designed for exactly the purpose of identification, another thing is to scan somebody's face and distinguish it from millions others scanned at the same time, especially if that somebody doesn't want it. That would require much faster grid. But there is the bonus: people are used already to video surveillance, it won't require new traumatic experience, and it is so easy to explain it by security considerations. Doesn't every ram who looks for safety in numbers believe that his law abidance makes his personal life 'uninteresting' for authorities till it is his turn to be made shish kebab of? But it's only the most obvious application of the new grid. I can't imagine yet all the ways they would use those 5G, 6G and all the next Gs, but I expect nothing good."
  
  "I thought you knew what to expect."
  
  "I am not a spy nor the insider. I only see the same things everybody can see," replied the repairman. "One thing is sure: nobody would have started building this new grid, if they didn't have ready what they build if for, just like it was with the previous Gs. Have you noticed they don't even attempt to explain anything to public?"
  
  "Why should they? What to explain? Frankly, I don't understand all that fuss about 5G."
  
  "Frankly, I don't either. Even with the present means of supervision, including cashless money, authorities can eliminate anybody in the old ways. The fact remains the fact though. The new network is being built without any plausible reason."
  
  "Telecommunication companies modernize their equipment. Isn't it a reason enough? Isn't it their interior business?"
  
  "Not quite. If only because it involves exterior space, the public space. So I think some explanations must be given to the public. But they are not. Either bosses don't want to give them or maybe they haven't them. Or maybe both. People are scared because they feel something new and incomprehensible. Nobody knows who pay billions, but why? Telecommunication companies spend that money to change or rather scrape down something that already perfectly works in the oversaturated market and they don't say to their users anything like 'we are going to provide new services and make more money from that'. Where else did you see such 'modernization', in what other industry? Wouldn't it, obviously, be their argumentation when they finish windmilling and panelling? So, if what there is above the counter is all to be seen, it can't pay back. Besides, I simply wouldn't buy anything more. My communication needs are fully satisfied, as they are restricted by the parameters of my physical being. Man is the measure of all things, isn't it? I will have the same eyes, the same fingers, the same ears, the same speech rate, the same reaction, the same speed of thinking and I won't have others even if they made their grid faster. So their 5G can't serve me. Whom, then? Who are those real users who are ready to pay billions and don't expect return on investment? Didn't I tell you capitalism is over? That's what make common people anxious, though they can't grasp the source of their fears. But isn't it a definition of common people to be stuck in the past, to be always those who are made face changes? And then very quickly they get used to them, like to cell phones, without questions. Once in the history they were given chance to cheat the system, and what did they do with it? - allowed the system to snatch it from under their own noses, in the full view of their blind eyes. For common people capitalism is still real, they still have the permission to enjoy its tragedies at their floor cracks level, unable to see the horizon of the nearest future, but the bosses of this world are well into the past-money form of their power. The final push of money has started already, so that its power could be used with maximum efficiency for the last big time in these digital applications, as well as in the energy ones, as badly explained or not explained at all as the 'green solutions'. The transition is clearly scented in the air. It is coming. It is not a matter of many decades or the next generation. We all will see it."
  
  "Tell me one thing," said the editor. "If you had means to tell everybody the same you told me... Not simply to tell, but be heard and understood. Would you do it?"
  
  The repairman lowered his gaze and became silent. His lips curved unpleasantly.
  
  "You know, it's a strange question you asked," said he at last. "I thought about that. Wouldn't it be just facilitating their plans? It must be included in their plan, you know. Maybe it is too late for the truth. Maybe it always was? That I don't know too. Maybe then, 35 years ago our only chance was in our unawareness. In our innocence, so to speak. Maybe it always is."
  
  "Like for Adam and Eve?"
  
  "Like that. But it didn't work in both cases, as we know. Anyway, I wouldn't like to play the role of Serpent."
  
  "What role would you prefer to play? Prophet or Messiah?"
  
  "Christ said 'ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free'," said the repairman after a pause. "But those scientists must have known the truth. Did it make them free? Has the truth made free me? Now it's everybody's turn to know the truth. But it wouldn't be me who told them. They will. And I don't want to hear that slavery is freedom, whatever Christianity or Orwell may have said on that score. I am fed up with this propaganda. I just don't want to see it."
  
  "What is truth?" quoted the editor. "You said just now that only unawareness or innocence may give us a chance. But isn't that the same as lie?"
  
  "But I said also that it didn't work."
  
  "That's why you are so sure they will tell?"
  
  "Don't they already? Have you noticed that anti-covid measures were so ostensibly absurd? But how else to test people for their readiness to accept slavery? To accept it in the very core, in the power over one's own flesh and blood. And it was still a mild test. The next one could be an as absurd war. Meanwhile we have all kinds of dystopias, hints, taunts, being let to decide for ourselves to deride conspiracy theorists or not. Do you know that the principle of that ultimate implant was legally patented not long ago? Guess what was the patent application number."
  
  "Six hundred and sixty six?"
  
  "No. Zero six zero six zero six. I wonder, is it that easy to make such trick, to order a register number? Or you think it is just happened so?"
  
  "Maybe it is just trolling?"
  
  "At least the patent is real. You see, if they for fun saw off your leg, you will still be left without a leg. Someone will laugh at that. Are you ready to join your laughter? That's a test for real slavery, not for freedom in slavery. This factual power over flesh and blood on a new digital level they prepared for us is the basis, but they will need also the full power over our minds. That is, conscious acceptance. What is slavery if the slave doesn't know he is a slave? It won't even give the slave owner the full satisfaction, not to mention that it is shaky and unreliable. Knowing the truth is needed for legitimization, and the slavery is, probably, the most dependent on it, so it can be called the most legitimate form of power, if you like gallows humor. On the other hand, if we are ruled by some alien mind, however local it may be, it is possible that conscious acceptance of the slavery is a demand of some incomprehensible moral code. Who knows? Or maybe it is a necessary part of a ritual sacrifice? One thing is beyond doubt: it is an IQ test for human society as a whole. The final one. A third of a century is already down the drain, it's quite enough. I said that perhaps the energy discoveries were gifted to us by aliens, but in every joke there is only so much joke. What if this is our last chance? What if my mission is to open the eyes of the dumbest? And if it turns out that even putting a copper pipe into a barrel of water is too difficult for understanding and doing to save the planet... Maybe we really deserve a purge from higher intelligence."
  
  "So I guessed right, you are a prophet of the aliens?"
  
  The repairman spread his hands: "Who knows. Aliens move in a mysterious way. But don't be afraid. At least I am not hearing their voices yet."
  
  "Are you sure? That's really soothing," joked the editor.
  
  "Anyway, who would I oblige with my revelations? Who would practically benefit from those discoveries or from my refrigerator's heat exchanger? Only the poor devils, for whom a thousand kilowatt-hours a year is a big saving. Doesn't matter that them are nine tenth of the world's population. Against this was all the money of the world. Not only the money of those who have nine tenths of the world's money, but really all the money, together with everything that it means and represents, with all not so bad, at least not unnatural things like purposefulness, upbringing, self-respect, traditions, even glamor... Can you imagine what a force it is? Was ever any chance at all? Not all the paupers, to put it mildly, dream of equality. Which, of course, does not prevent them from being a food base. So maybe not take away people's dreams, huh? Even if it were possible to uncover the discovery again. No, that will be done without me. I just don't want to see it."
  
   While finishing his speech the repairman filled out the invoice, then got up and handed it to the editor.
  
  'Changing the filter and posistor, plus refilling, all told a hundred and ten. If there are no complaints, please sign below, where the 'Client signature' is."
  
  The editor signed the invoice and handed it to the repairman, then paid the money.
  
  The repairman gave one copy of the invoice to the editor, and put the other, along with a piece of carbon paper and the money, into the breast pocket of his overalls. Then he picked up his suitcase.
  
  "Wait... So what actually happened to the fridge?" the editor asked.
  
  'No one will know that now. Possibly a microleakage that could not be traced. But refilling will last for several years. And no, don't worry about the explosion. Perhaps the valve stem got loose. Or maybe some vengeful saboteur unscrewed it on purpose. It's a matter of seconds. Do you often receive dissatisfied authors here?" joked the repairman. "In any case, the company gives a guarantee for six months. If anything goes wrong again, call us."
  
  He took a business card out of his pocket and put it on the table in front of the editor, next to the new issue of Amazing World magazine, on the cover of which the long line of elegant wind turbines stretched away into the fields of solar panels. The repairman averted his eyes.
  
  Editor took the card. There was written on it: 'S. L. Kenski, Refrigerators & air conditioners', followed by a phone number starting with 555 and the website address: http://budclub.ru/k/kskij_s_l/
  
  "It's the site of your company?"
  
  But the repairman was busy consulting his smartphone.
  
  "Sorry, I have another appointment yet. Goodbye."
  
  "All the best."
  
  At the door the repairman turned around: "Could you tell me where the toilet is?
  
  'The fourth door down the hallway."
  
  The repairman nodded and left.
  
  
  
  
The Epilogue
  
  
  The editor followed the repairman with his eyes, then shifted his gaze to the preprint of his magazine. "A good illustration," he thought again and signed the issue into press.
  
  Then he leaned back in his chair and stared at the opposite wall for a full minute.
  
  Finally he shrugged, took the repairman's card from the table and, having leaned it against the laptop screen, entered the website address. After a few clicks with the mouse a long smile appeared on the editor's face.
  
  Then he got up and went to the open window. A motionless sultry haze was bathing the city panorama. The gray patina on the faded sky, familiar from previous years, was a sure sign of peat bogs burning not that far from the city. The sun was still high and hot, but the colors it shone through the haze reminded of a sunset.
  
  A movement below caught the editor's attention. It was the repairman leaving the building. After a few steps, he stopped and turned around. From the wall, somewhere the editor couldn't see her before, his secretary Lisa approached the repairman. It was easy to recognize her by the same dress she was at work today. Having shifted his toolcase to the other hand, the repairman took Lisa by the elbow and the couple quickly disappeared around the corner.
  
  "So it's this child you had to pick up... or take to," thought the editor wearily and, closing his eyes, tilted his head against the window frame. Somewhere in the depths of his consciousness he heard the calming, subdued gurgling of his native swamps. His features, his bulbous eyes and bald head reminded at that moment something reptilian. "Swindlers... All of them are swindlers. What a planet..."
  
  
  
  
 Ваша оценка:

Связаться с программистом сайта.

Новые книги авторов СИ, вышедшие из печати:
О.Болдырева "Крадуш. Чужие души" М.Николаев "Вторжение на Землю"

Как попасть в этoт список
Сайт - "Художники" .. || .. Доска об'явлений "Книги"