Zalesski Vladimir Vladimirovich : другие произведения.

Additional details regarding the Uttarakhand disaster (7 February 2021). The note

Самиздат: [Регистрация] [Найти] [Рейтинги] [Обсуждения] [Новинки] [Обзоры] [Помощь|Техвопросы]
Ссылки:


 Ваша оценка:
  • Аннотация:
    Additional details regarding the Uttarakhand disaster (7 February 2021). The note.

  Additional details regarding the Uttarakhand disaster (7 February 2021). The note.
  
  
  TIMESOFINDIA.COM had published material:
  
  'The Uttarakhand's Chamoli disaster: What we know so far. TIMESOFINDIA.COM . Feb 8, 2021, 18:52 IST "
  
  'The maximum level at the Tapovan barrage is 1803 meters, but, according to reports, the water level crossed 1808 meters, which led to breakage. By the time the water reached Joshimath, its level had touched 1388 meters, breaching all records. During the flash floods in the state in 2013, the highest water level at Joshimath was 1385.54 metres, experts said "
  
  So, the height of the supposed wave was 85 meters (1388 - 1803 = 85).
  
  The beginning of the natural disaster - February 7, 2021, 10: 00-10: 15 local time (hereinafter).
  
  26 km (the approximate distance from the site of the starting of catastrophe to the location of the power plant in the Joshimatha region, the wave passed in 15-30 minutes (the destruction of the power plant - at about 10:30).
  
  Consequently, the wave speed: from 50 to 100 km per hour.
  
  There are also reflections, for example: "With temperatures in the hills of Utttarkhand's Chamoli district dropping to below zero in the month of February, why did the glacier break off now? According to Manish Mehta, senior scientist at Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, 'This is an anomaly. In winter, glaciers remain firmly frozen. Even walls of glacial lakes are tightly bound. A flood of this sort in this season is usually caused by an avalanche or landslide. Neither seems to be the case here.'
  
  Or considerations like this:
  
  'Conservationist and Magsaysay awards winner Rajendra Singh, also known as the 'waterman of India' said, 'No dams should be constructed on river Alaknanda, Bhagirathi and Mandakini as there are very steep slopes in the area and is an extremely eco-sensitive zone. However, rampant construction continues due to which the disaster was inevitable. This was a manmade disaster.'"
  
  Another material (TIMESOFINDIA) tells that the fish before the disaster (from about 09:00) behaved in a completely unusual way - apparently, they had foresaw a disaster ... (Did fish sense the oncoming deluge?
  Kautilya Singh & Shivani Azad | TNN | Updated: Feb 10, 2021, 13:52 IST)(https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/did-fish-sense -the-oncoming-deluge / articleshow / 80778754.cms)
  
  
  [MCMXСIX. Two years - after the solution of the Bureya problem. A historical essay. - 8 February 2021.
  
  MMVI. On the issue of the incident in India (in Uttarakhand) on February 7, 2021. A note. - February 12, 2021.
  
  MMXIII. An army of miniature satellites and the miniature doses of information on the Uttarakhand incident (February 7, 2021). A brief review. - February 16, 2021.
  
  MMXV. A development of tourism in Uttarakhand and on Lake Baikal. The note. - February 17, 2021.].
  
  
  February 23, 2021 21:24
  
  
  Translation from Russian into English: February 24, 2021 07:59.
  Владимир Владимирович Залесский 'Дополнительные детали относительно катастрофы в Уттаракханде (7 февраля 2021 г.). Заметка'.
 Ваша оценка:

Связаться с программистом сайта.

Новые книги авторов СИ, вышедшие из печати:
О.Болдырева "Крадуш. Чужие души" М.Николаев "Вторжение на Землю"

Как попасть в этoт список
Сайт - "Художники" .. || .. Доска об'явлений "Книги"