Zalesski Vladimir Vladimirovich : другие произведения.

The Sketch about a throwary through radio station

Самиздат: [Регистрация] [Найти] [Рейтинги] [Обсуждения] [Новинки] [Обзоры] [Помощь|Техвопросы]
Ссылки:


 Ваша оценка:
  • Аннотация:
    The Sketch about a throwary through radio station

  The Sketch about a throwary through radio station
  
  
  - I thought up a trick, focus.
  
  - It is interesting!
  
  - I suggest to establish a radio station!
  
  - What will it give us?
  
  - We have a reserve of "the people" (a reserve members of our crew) who need reputation and positions. But they have neither knowledge, nor qualification, nor reputation. They were traditional kidalas (an experts in a throwary, that is - in a scam) of small and large caliber.
  
  - We have a "reserve". But how "to advance" "our people" - a reserve members of our crew?
  
  - But there are also other people. They have knowledge, qualification and reputation.
  
  - They do not seek to participate in our swindles. It is a lot of with them fuss. Without them - it is better ...
  
  - We have to transform the people with knowledge, qualification and reputation into reputational and informational sponsors (without a salary and fees) for our talent pool, for small and large throwaries.
  
  - How to organize it?
  
  - Imagine that you look or listens to an interview. The professional journalist asks questions to some skilled and knowing person.
  
  - There are such interviews.
  
  - What advantage to us from it? The audience listens and looks to such interview and thinks: "There is a knowing, qualified, decent, worthy person. It is necessary to appoint him to a high post. Let him solve complex heavy problems for general welfare".
  
  - We from it have no any advantage.
  
  - That's right. But there is an idea, a trick, focus!
  
  - What this trick consists of?
  
  - Together with the professional journalist "our person" works as "co-host". It is not obligatory at all for listeners to know that he - throwary. He from where appeared. Nobody knows anything about him.
  
  - It is unknown from where he appeared ... And he is co-host ...
  
  - Yes!
  
  - The professional journalist "begins party". Invites for an interview of the knowing qualified person - the donor, that is.
  
  - Why this donor has to agree?
  
  - He - is a very knowing person! And to his knowledge interest is shown! An inform-organization gives him air and audience! To him it is compliment. He the knowledge and qualification to show, to advertize can. All learn him and will tell: "There is a knowing, qualified, decent, worthy person. It is necessary to appoint him to a high post. Let him solve complex heavy problems for general welfare". Or will give him a some award, for the fact that he long and deeply studied an important problem and, achieved the, - has studied up. Payment of its efforts will be increased, maybe.
  
  - He agrees ...
  
  - Throwary to him asks a question after a question. Throwary himself knows not much. He all his life was busy with a small and large throwary actions. From where does he have large knowledge? But, - at least, - the list of questions and we, and the professional journalist, and the throwary formulate we can? And if we incorrectly formulate, then the interviewed professional will correct these our questions.
  
  - Questions, I think, we will manage to formulate. Let "our person" ask them.
  
  - He asks them, asks... He becomes the participant of discussion of "a difficult subject". He acts "on an equal level" with the interviewed expert. And if he is such a competent person, at him appears a some reputation. And as he - and competent, both with reputation, and understands a problem, - he can be appointed to a position.
  
  - And what with the expert whom was interviewed?
  
  - The expert continues to be proud of the knowledge and to accumulate experience and qualification. He is a information and reputation donor (without payment, without salary, fees). The main thing, - not to give him either money, or positions (real, significant). It will be easier for him to agree to participation in an (future) interviews. He needs to prove himself. He needs to advertize himself.
  
  - Why not to try? We need "to advance" "our people" - a reserve members of our crew. With professionals, with the knowing people there is a lot of fuss. They have to themselves a respect: they studied, read, thought, maybe, wrote some works on a complex heavy problem. They assumed that they will be a demanded persons, that their knowledge "will buy" for good money. These experts hardly agree to participation in swindles and in a throwaries. We need the people with a "run-in", with experience of a throwaries (scams).
  
  - There's more!
  
  - What else?
  
  - We decipher an interview and we make from it the thematic report on decision opportunities of "an important problem"! Also "we sell" this report for budget money.
  
  - Gracefully! We could use some extra money! Act. Not lose a time.
  
  - Went to organize radio station.
  
  - Keep me informed. There is a strong wish to promote a "purchase and sale" of the report on "an important subject" - for budgetary money.
  
  - And too it is pleasant to throw a some professional knowing the person.
  
  - Yes! Act!
  
  - Yes!
  
  
  January 8, 2019 14:33
  
  
  Translation from Russian into English: January 8, 2019 10:26.
  Владимир Владимирович Залесский 'Скетч о кидалове через радиостанцию'.
 Ваша оценка:

Связаться с программистом сайта.

Новые книги авторов СИ, вышедшие из печати:
О.Болдырева "Крадуш. Чужие души" М.Николаев "Вторжение на Землю"

Как попасть в этoт список
Сайт - "Художники" .. || .. Доска об'явлений "Книги"