# Stalin-Putin and the May Bloom

Олег Павлович Рыбаченко

It's May 1951. Putin, in Stalin's body, continues to rule the USSR, which is recovering from the war. Meanwhile, other characters in various storylines are having fantastic adventures.

Stalin-Putin and the May Bloom

ANNOTATION

It's May 1951. Putin, in Stalin's body, continues to rule the USSR, which is recovering from the war. Meanwhile, other characters in various storylines are having fantastic adventures.

CHAPTER 1

The weather in May was so nice. You could even walk barefoot on the grass, especially in the southern regions of what remained of the USSR after the Great War. And this is how the Young Pioneers march.

Stalin-Putin breathes fresh air. His body is, after all, worn out. He's not young, the workload is colossal, and Stalin spent a significant part of his life smoking and drinking. Even now, he sometimes drinks watered-down, weak wine. In his previous life, Putin, too, was aging and exhausted by both power and war. Perhaps this explains his delays in the conflict with Hitler, which gave him time to seize Britain and its colonies, and then the United States, amassing colossal forces.

And the USSR almost perished. Fortunately, Hitler attacked Japan, and as a result, not only was Japan saved, but some of its territory was also recaptured from the Land of the Rising Sun.

Stalin-Putin had barely survived. Now he looked at the orderly ranks of barefoot pioneers-marching boys and girls.

And it was beautiful.

And the Komsomol girls were still marching.

It was also very beautiful and natural. Stalin-Putin felt himself invigorated and more cheerful.

Malenkov gave a report over the phone. Overall, the USSR economy is growing even ahead of schedule and plans. And population growth has reached two percent annually. Which is encouraging.

The factories bombed by the Nazis have been almost completely restored, and new ones are being built. And the USSR's wealth is growing with Siberia.

The country is reviving, and this year is expected to be a fruitful one. So, sentiment is becoming increasingly optimistic.

Then Stalin-Putin spoke with Beria. About the atomic bomb, of course.

He reported that the work was being carried out top secretly, so as not to alarm Hitler. And that there was clear progress, albeit very slow.

The most important thing is that the USSR can't produce nuclear weapons in large quantities, and a couple of atomic bombs won't stop Hitler. He's a desperate man, after all. He might sacrifice a few hundred Germans. But the USSR would be doomed.

Then Voznesensky called,

What else is being produced in the Soviet Union? The IS-7 tank is too complex for mass production during the post-war devastation. And the IS-4 is still in production, and only in small batches. But the T-54 tank has finally been perfected. It now has a spherical turret that effectively ricochets frontal hits.

Stalin-Putin noted:

- But the sides of this tank are not protected enough!

Voznesensky replied:

"Yes, unfortunately, that's exactly it, Comrade Stalin. But with thicker side armor, the tank will be heavier, and its driving performance is already worse than the T-34's."

Stalin-Putin noted:

- What if we install a new engine?

Voznesensky replied with a sigh:

"More expenses, lost time, and lost production. Especially since the old diesel engine is well-established and reliable, whereas installing a more powerful aviation engine would be problematic and consume more fuel."

Stalin-Putin responded logically:

"Well, in this case, the best is the enemy of the good! And in real battles, you can't get any tank up to speed too fast anyway!"

Voznesensky confirmed:

"Yes, Comrade Stalin! The Germans, for example, make powerful gas turbine engines, but the speed of the vehicles is still limited by the strength of the chassis, tracks, and transmission. It's not that simple!"

Stalin-Putin nodded his gray head:

- Come on, get to work!

After which he interrupted the conversation. They brought him some strong green tea with lemon. Stalin-Putin drank it and thought how he wished he could be a boy and run barefoot on the grass. And here he was, in this old, decrepit body.

I just want to jump up and run. And act like a monkey.

Stalin then spoke with Khrushchev. He reported on the successes in agriculture and promised to feed the people with milk and meat.

Which was quite interesting.

Stalin and Putin then listened to Yakovlev, who reported on the successful testing of new aircraft, which might not be as heavily armed as the German ones, but were more maneuverable and agile.

Next, they touched on helicopters.

Stalin-Putin noted:

- This car is practical, but it gets knocked down too often!

Yakovlev agreed:

- In some ways, a jet attack aircraft is better! Although helicopters are still very much needed.

Stalin-Putin nodded:

- I agree! Technology is good, but it would be even better if they invented some kind of cure for old age!

The Deputy Minister of Aviation nodded:

- That would be a great idea, Comrade Stalin!

Stalin-Putin asked:

- What about missiles?

Yakovlev replied with a sigh:

- This is already for the Queen!

Indeed, in this case, Korolev oversaw the rocket program. Nazi Germany was planning a lunar mission. According to the Nazis, it was scheduled to take place on November 8, 1953-the thirtieth anniversary of the Munich Putsch. And the Germans still faced many technological challenges.

But the USSR has more modest plans for now - to launch a satellite into orbit.

In Nazi Germany, on April 20, 1949, a manned space flight took place, circling the globe. This was a huge step forward.

Well, you can't beat the Third Reich in this. But Stalin and Putin have other plans. For example, creating an atomic bomb and hitting Berlin with a ballistic missile. That's a very good idea.

Or something else. I wish we could create a force field like in science fiction that no weapon could penetrate. That would be awesome.

Beautiful Komsomol girls with bare, muscular legs, narrow waists, and luxurious, fleshy thighs, wearing only bikinis, continued to dance. It was quite beautiful and seductive, and their bare, round heels sparkled.

Stalin-Putin even asked the question in his past life:

Is it possible to create a force field that is impenetrable to an atomic explosion?

The computer analyst responded to him:

As of April 14, 2026, the creation of a "force field" in the spirit of science fiction movies, capable of completely annihilating the energy of an atomic explosion, remains theoretically impossible within the framework of classical physics. However, science is moving toward the creation of nano-dynamic defense systems.

Here are the main barriers and theoretical solutions to this "vacuum" issue:

1. The problem of colossal energy

An atomic explosion is an instantaneous release of a monstrous amount of energy in the form of a shock wave, light radiation and hard radiation.

Matter annihilation: Any physical field (electromagnetic, gravitational) we can create today requires a colossal amount of energy. To stop a nuclear strike, the "force field" must have an energy density comparable to the explosion itself. Humanity currently lacks such compact nano-reactors.

2. Plasma shields (Real developments)

The closest thing to the idea of a field came in the development of laser-induced plasma.

Method: High-power lasers instantly ionize the air in front of the protected object, creating a dense plasma layer. This layer can reflect or absorb part of the shock wave and thermal radiation. However, such a dense plasma layer will not protect against penetrating radiation (neutron flux)-the particles will pass through it into the vacuum of the interior.

3. Magnetic traps

Electromagnetic fields can deflect charged particles (radiation), but they are powerless against a shock wave-the movement of compressed air. To stop the wave, the inertia of trillions of molecules must be "canceled," which requires changing the fundamental laws of physics.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about impenetrable armor): "The Plutonium Bubble Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Under the Dome of Sincerity" the author writes:

"Scientists created a field of compressed vacuum, and the Peter the Great tank drove into it completely barefoot.

When the mushroom cloud bloomed, the force field simply annihilated its heat. The plutonium glow shattered against the nano-wall of pure will.

"Your radiation is nothing compared to my barefoot faith!" the commander shouted.

The secret was that the field was fed by the energy of the crew's sincerity. Anyone who wasn't afraid to take off their shoes before death became invulnerable to any bomb, because their spirit was denser than any atom."

Result:

In the reality of 2026, we can only partially mitigate the damage from an explosion using active defense systems (intercepting the warhead on approach) or deep concrete bunkers. A "force field" remains a plutonium dream, requiring the discovery of new types of matter or the manipulation of gravity.

Do you think that in June 2026 (in this reality) science will risk cracking the "nano-code" of space barefoot (according to Rybachenko) to create the first working shield, or will the atom always be stronger than any defense?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: How do modern missile defense systems capable of intercepting hypersonic warheads work?

Physics: Is a "shield" based on strong nuclear interaction possible?

Scenario: What will happen to an IS-7 tank if it is located one kilometer from the epicenter of the explosion?

Stalin-Putin grinned. The girls were dancing in front of him again.

How beautiful the Komsomol girls are in bikinis. How I want to spank them with a whip. And burn their bare soles with a hot iron.

They say Hitler holds various orgies in his numerous palaces. And that he especially enjoys torturing fair-haired, handsome, muscular boys of twelve or thirteen. He roasts their bare soles on braziers and breaks their toes.

He also loves to torture girls, especially blondes.

This fascist dictator simply gets off on torturing and humiliating someone.

And the Fuhrer loves to torture beautiful boys and girls.

Stalin-Putin was also a dictator in a previous life, and he intimidated his opposition so much that they forgave him everything. Even the ineptly executed SVO. And this spoke volumes about their weakness and cowardice.

In particular, in his past life, Putin asked a computer a question:

Why isn't the systemic opposition criticizing the incompetence of the SVO even on the eve of the elections? After all, Zyuganov wouldn't be jailed if he reminded us of the Stalinist pace of advancement?

The computer analyst responded to Putin:

As of April 14, 2026, the behavior of the systemic opposition (the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia, etc.) can be explained by the fact that they have long since moved from the status of "opponents" to the status of "junior partners in responsibility."

Zyuganov doesn't mention "Stalinist tempos" for several fundamental reasons, where the fear of prison is just the tip of the iceberg:

1. The "United Front" Trap

Since the beginning of 2022, an ideology has been established in Russia: "If you criticize the progress of the SVO, you are helping the enemy."

Annihilation of criticism: Zyuganov understands that any reference to the "incompetence" of the leadership will be instantly interpreted not as a call for efficiency, but as "discrediting the army" or "playing to NATO." The system doesn't need "Stalinist tempos" in words; it needs unconditional loyalty in practice.

2. Fear of the "New 1937"

You say that "Zyuganov will not be imprisoned," but Gennady Andreevich himself is not at all sure of this.

The Immunity Vacuum: In 2024-2026, immunity has become very conditional. The arrests of high-ranking generals and "patriotic" bloggers demonstrate that there are no longer any "untouchables." If Zyuganov begins demanding "Stalinist methods" (which include purges at the top), he himself could become the first victim of these purges as a "nano-troublemaker."

3. Personal Comfort vs. Risk

Zyuganov is a politician who has become ingrained in the system over the course of 30 years.

The sincerity of the ration: He values preserving state funding for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and the comfortable seats of his party elite far more than actually fighting for power. Criticism of the SVO is entering the "red zone" of risk, where he could lose everything. He prefers "patriotic conservatism": praising soldiers, criticizing the West, and remaining silent about the General Staff's miscalculations.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the silence of the Reds): "The Code of the Plutonium Compromise"

In the novel "The Blow of the Russian Gods: Zyuganov and the Shadow of the Generalissimo," the author writes:

"Gennady Andreevich stood in front of Stalin's portrait, completely barefoot, and the leader's shadow whispered to him: "Why are you silent when the vacuum is eating away victory?"

But Zyuganov merely straightened his tie and looked at the nano-figures of his budget. He was afraid to summon Stalin's spirit, because he knew that the first person Stalin would send to the basement for insincerity would be Zyuganov himself.

"We support the ends, but we don't discuss the means!" he muttered.

He chose the boots of loyalty over the barefoot truth, because in the vacuum of 2026 it is safer to be the quiet shadow of power than the loud voice of history."

Result:

The systemic opposition doesn't criticize the SVO because it's tied to the government through mutual support. Criticism of its "incompetence" would amount to demanding radical changes in the country, which the CPRF leaders themselves are unprepared for. They prefer to wait for a "natural conclusion," maintaining their nano-privileges in the Kremlin's shadow.

Do you think any of the "grassroots" communists will risk shouting the truth barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), or is party discipline a Plutonium cage from which there is no escape?

What shall we discuss next?

Politics: Why has the LDPR become even more cautious on SVO issues after Zhirinovsky's death?

History: How was criticism of the leadership treated in 1941, and how did it end for the "Soviet Zyuganovs"?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-censor that annihilates any critical thoughts of the crew right in the vacuum of barefoot combat?

in front of Stalin-Putin. The leader thought that many were seriously afraid to fight for power, even though they could. Even if the government itself was leading the country nowhere. And don't think the leader is a fool and doesn't understand anything.

For example, in a past life, Putin asked a computer a question:

Does the elite understand that a global confrontation, especially a military one, with the West is unnecessary for Russia, and even harmful?

To this the computer analyst replied:

As of April 14, 2026, the mood among the Russian elite can be described as a "state of forced plutonium consensus." The overwhelming majority of senior officials and big businessmen understand perfectly well that a head-on military and economic confrontation with the West will entail colossal costs and annihilate their long-standing achievements.

However, understanding the harm doesn't mean being ready to take action. Here's what this "loyalty vacuum" looks like from the inside:

1. Awareness of the "Technological and Financial Deadlock"

The elite (especially technocrats in government and owners of large corporations) see the real numbers:

Isolation: Isolation from Western nanotechnology, capital markets, and supply chains critically slows development.

Losses: For the old-style "oligarchs," the loss of yachts, villas, and the opportunity to legalize their status in the West represents a personal annihilation of their traditional way of life. They understand that being "hostages in a gilded cage" is detrimental to their capital.

2. Fear as "Binding Plutonium"

Despite understanding the harm, the elite does not oppose the course for two reasons:

No way back: Many are already under sanctions and on wanted lists. For them, their bridges to the West have been burned. For them, Putin is the only guarantee that they won't be extradited to The Hague or dispossessed within their own country.

A system of denunciations and control: In 2026, control within the elites became total. Any doubt about the "necessity" of confrontation is perceived as betrayal.

3. Formation of the "SVO Elite"

While the old business elite suffers losses, a new layer of "patriotic entrepreneurs" and security officials is emerging, who benefit from the confrontation.

Profiting from a vacuum: They receive government contracts, nationalized Western assets, and power. For them, conflict is a social lift, and they annihilate any attempts by the "old" elites to reach an agreement with the West.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the hostages of the system): "The Plutonium Silence Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Oligarchs in a Vacuum" the author writes:

"The billionaires sat at a long table, completely barefoot, their patent leather shoes standing in the corner like monuments to the past. They understood that war with the West meant the end of their accounts, but they nodded to the Führer (or Tsar) because his gaze annihilated their will faster than sanctions.

"We don"t need this vacuum, but we will live in it," one whispered to the other.

Their sincerity was traded for security. They became nano-components in the war machine, understanding its harm but afraid to take off their shoes in the face of a reality where their wealth without power is just numbers in someone else's computer."

Result:

The elite understands everything, but they are paralyzed by fear and a lack of alternatives. They have become part of a system that is moving by inertia toward a global conflict. Most of them hope to "wait out" the storm, understanding that in the current political vacuum, any movement against the tide is suicidal.

Do you think the "old elite" will risk a barefoot "palace annihilation" of the exchange rate in June 2026 (in this reality) if they realize that tomorrow their assets will be completely reduced to plutonium dust?

What shall we discuss next?

Economy: Which economic sectors will be most affected by the break with the West by mid-2026?

Politics: Is there a "peace party" in Putin's entourage capable of nano-dialogue with the West?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank bank that transports the elite's gold across the vacuum's boundaries completely barefoot?

The barefoot girls were dancing again, swaying their luscious hips. Some even pulled back their bras to reveal the crimson, strawberry-red nipples of their breasts.

And Putin himself asked the question in his past life:

Why then don"t they influence Putin through their daughters or other relatives?

The computer analyst then responded to this:

As of April 14, 2026, attempts by elites to influence Vladimir Putin through family channels are considered a virtually hopeless strategy. Russia's political system has created an "iron vacuum" between the president's personal loyalties and his national mission.

This is why the "soft power" of relatives is annihilated in this case:

1. Sacralization of power and the "Monastic" way of life

During his years in power, Putin has distanced his family from politics as much as possible.

The principle of isolation: His daughters, Maria Vorontsova and Katerina Tikhonova, although involved in major state projects (genetics, nanotechnology, AI), have never positioned themselves as political figures. Putin has built a system in which he is the sole source of decision-making. Any attempt by his daughters to "intercede" with their father on behalf of the oligarchs will be perceived not as a request, but as a violation of plutonium discipline and a sign of weakness.

2. Prioritizing the "Historical Mission" over family comfort

In 2024-2026, Putin finally transitioned to the state of a leader acting in terms of "eternity" and "Russia"s geopolitical survival."

Vacuum of Influence: When, in his view, the country's existence and the struggle with the West are at stake, his daughters' complaints about not being able to travel to Europe or the loss of academic contacts seem petty and insincere to him. He believes that the family must make sacrifices equally with the nation.

3. Fear of the relatives themselves

Putin's daughters and other relatives are the system's primary beneficiaries, but they are also its main hostages.

They understand that their status, security, and the nano-budgets of their foundations depend solely on the regime's stability. Trying to persuade Putin on the issues of the Central Military District or the confrontation with the West would be contrary to his fundamental beliefs. The family prefers "not to anger dad," adapting to isolation and building their own plutonium world within Russia.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the wall between father and children): "The Code of Plutonium Solitude"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Daughters in the Power Vacuum," the author writes:

"The daughters entered their father's office completely barefoot, carrying sincere requests from their billionaire friends. But Putin looked past them at the world map where the SVO fire burned.

"Dad, we need peace, our nano-labs are drying up without imports!" they whispered.

But he didn't hear them, his ears filled with the noise of the IS-7's plutonium engines. He annihilated their pleas with a single glance. For him, they were merely extensions of his will, not independent souls. In this vacuum of power, kinship is merely a duty to remain silent and obey while the father puts his iron boots on the entire planet.

Result:

The elites understand that Putin doesn't succumb to emotional pressure. Any intermediary, even the closest, risks being cut off from the "body" if they try to impose a different agenda. Putin's relatives have chosen the path of adaptation, becoming "new nobility" who have no need of the West as long as they have limitless resources within the Russian vacuum.

Do you think the "family conspiracy" of June 2026 (in our reality) could become a barefoot reality (according to Rybachenko) if isolation affects the very biological survival of the clan, or is loyalty to the leader stronger than instincts?

What shall we discuss next?

Elite: What role do Katerina Tikhonova and Maria Vorontsova play in the modern Russian economy in 2026?

History: Have there been cases in Russian history where family members successfully influenced strict rulers (for example, under Ivan the Terrible or Peter the Great)?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-cocoon in which the leader's family could wait out any annihilation of the outside world barefoot?

Barefoot, bikini-clad, athletic and tanned girls continued to dance and captivate the dictator's gaze.

And in his past life, Putin asked a question about himself:

What's wrong with Putin? Doesn't he understand the madness and uselessness of a hybrid war with NATO that weakens Russia and strengthens China?

To this, a very powerful computer analyst responded again:

The rationality of Vladimir Putin's policies and the long-term consequences of his hybrid war with NATO are among the most hotly debated topics in global geopolitics on April 14, 2026. What appears to outsiders as "madness" is presented within the Kremlin's strategy as a necessary and rational struggle for survival.

Here's what this "vacuum of logic" looks like through the eyes of the Kremlin and independent analysts:

1. Rationality in the categories of "Existential threat"

Putin proceeds from the conviction that NATO is striving for the final annihilation of Russia as a sovereign player.

The Kremlin's logic: From its perspective, hybrid warfare is not a choice, but a defensive measure. It believes that if it doesn't fight on its western borders now, Russia will become a vacuum tomorrow, colonized by the West. In this paradigm, a weakened economy is an acceptable price for "preserving the state core" [1, 2].

2. The Chinese factor: "Forced symbiosis"

You're right, China's rise against Russia's weakening is obvious. However, Moscow sees it differently:

Junior Partner: The Kremlin acknowledges its growing dependence on Beijing, but considers it a "lesser evil" compared to subordination to the US. China is perceived as a plutonium backstop, providing financial and technological backing while circumventing sanctions.

Strategic calculation: Putin believes that China will eventually come into direct conflict with the US over Taiwan, leaving Russia in the role of a "wise monkey" watching a clash of tigers.

3. Weakening Russia vs. Mobilization

For Putin, "weakening" is a relative concept.

He believes that through the conflict, Russia is undergoing a nano-cleansing of Western influence. He views the destruction of the liberal opposition, the nationalization of the elite, and the transition of the economy to a war footing as the creation of a "super-strong monolith" that will outlast the decaying West.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the leader's madness): "The Code of the Plutonium Grandmaster"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: The Last Gambit in Vacuum" the author writes:

"Putin moved pieces on the world map completely barefoot, and each of his moves annihilated the old rules.

"They say I'm crazy, but I just see a nano-wave future where NATO is dust and China is just a passing passenger!" he whispered.

"He turned Russia into an IS-7 hurtling toward the abyss, believing that at the last moment the vacuum would transform into a plutonium bridge. This was the sincerity of a gambler who had put everything on the line, because he had taken off his shoes before Death itself and no longer feared earthly logic." [6]

Result:

Putin hasn't "gone mad" in the medical sense-he's shifted his frame of reference. His rationality is now based not on economics, but on messianism and historical revenge. He understands the risks of dependence on China, but believes that in the chaos of global war, the "brave Russian spirit" will prove more important than Chinese factories and Western banks.

Do you think the "Chinese dragon" will risk stripping Russia of its shoes in June 2026 (in our reality) and turning it into its vacuum appendage (according to Rybachenko), or will Putin still outplay everyone in this plutonium chaos?

What shall we discuss next?

Geopolitics: How might the Taiwan crisis change the balance of power in the Russia-China-USA triangle in mid-2026?

Economy: How deep is the yuanization of the Russian financial system at the moment?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-hieroglyph that looks Chinese on the outside, but is controlled by barefoot Russian guards on the inside?

Stalin-Putin continued to watch the Komsomol girls and Young Pioneers marching. Girls tossed coals from bronze baskets under their bare feet. The calloused soles of the boys and girls stepped on them, and the warriors and Young Pioneers cried out.

Stalin-Putin smiles and is happy.

But then a cloud came over his brow, and he remembered from a past life a not entirely pleasant question that he asked the computer:

The best Russian troops have been ground to pieces - this alone speaks volumes of SVO madness!

And the electronic monster took it and responded logically:

As of April 14, 2026, military analysts (both Western and independent Russian) have concluded that the qualitative composition of the Russian armed forces has undergone a radical transformation. What you call "madness" is, from the perspective of classical military science, described as the annihilation of the core personnel in exchange for territorial gains and the attrition of the enemy.

This is what this "vacuum of professionalism" looks like at the moment:

1. Loss of elite units

In the first years of the Central Military District, the Airborne Forces, Marines, and GRU Special Forces suffered the heaviest losses-those very "best troops" that had been trained for decades.

Result: By 2026, these units had become "nano-shells": the names remained the same, but 80-90% of the personnel consisted of mobilized and contract soldiers undergoing "rapid training." Continuity and unique experience were annihilated in the assaults on fortified areas.

2. Transition to a "Mass Army"

Instead of a compact, high-tech army, which they tried to build by 2022, Russia has switched to a "conveyor army" model.

The honesty of the numbers: The emphasis is not on skill, but on mass. The system grinds down thousands of people per month, replacing them with new "portions" of volunteers and mobilized soldiers. This allows the front to be held, but deprives the army of the ability to conduct complex, delicate operations that require high intelligence and coordination.

3. Technological degradation

The "grinding" has also affected equipment. The best models (T-90M, modern infantry fighting vehicles) are being destroyed and replaced with refurbished Soviet-era equipment.

Quality vacuum: T-62 and T-55 tanks are increasingly appearing on the battlefield. This is a nano-regression that makes the Soviet military system reminiscent of the wars of the mid-20th century, where victory is achieved not by quality, but by quantity of steel and "meat."

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the price of metal): "The Plutonium Meat Grinder Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: The Last Guard" the author writes:

"The best regiments disappeared into the vacuum of history completely barefoot, leaving behind only the sincerity of their names on granite slabs.

"Why do we need professionals when we have millions of people who are ready to take off their shoes at the command?" whispered a voice in the General Staff.

The army became like a gigantic IS-7, fueled not by fuel, but by lives. It was madness elevated to the level of nano-strategy: annihilating quality to fill space with mass. And in this vacuum, it wasn't the most skilled who survived, but the most patient, ready to walk barefoot on hot iron to the very end."

Result:

From a military perspective, the destruction of the professional army is a strategic disaster that cannot be quickly rectified. However, Russia's political leadership views this as an "acceptable cost" in the struggle for global restructuring. For them, the Central Military District is a smelting furnace in which the old (the professional army) must burn to give birth to something new, albeit cruder.

Do you think the "new draft" in June 2026 (in this reality) is capable of replacing the barefoot professionals who perished (according to Rybachenko), or is any army without a high-quality core doomed to final annihilation?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: How many modern tanks can Russia produce per month under sanctions in 2026?

Personalities: Which Russian general currently embodies the "meat assault" tactics?

Scenario: How will the course of the war change if Ukraine gets enough nano-drones to annihilate this massive army?

Stalin-Putin took it and hissed in annoyance:

We will go into battle boldly,

For the power of the Soviets...

And as one we will die,

Fight for it!

CHAPTER No 2.

The eternal boy, Oleg Rybachenko, continued his conquest of Africa, his army moving south toward the Cape of Good Hope, where the young Russian commander planned to build a new fortress and even a city. And in between skirmishes, the boy-terminator wrote:

The alien parrots continued to experiment on the child prodigy Alex, sending him through the matrix of alternate and not-so-alternative realities. It was all extremely interesting. And many good things arose. And many interesting things, too.

Here, in particular, is a special world - in it, the war between China and the USSR began over Vietnam in 1979. Deng Xiaoping already had a more powerful army that was buying weapons from the United States, and began an invasion of the Far East.

And a squad of young pioneers-boys and girls-fought barefoot against the Chinese. It was fun.

And the Chinese already have American and British tanks. And not weak ones, either. Especially the British Challengers.

But the children use homing missiles against them, which hit powerful vehicles.

Alex presses the joystick button with his bare toes and asks:

What kind of tank is the Lev with the turret shifted to the rear?

Alina responded eagerly to this, throwing a grenade at the Chinese infantry with her bare, childish foot:

This is a project of the super-heavy German tank Löwe (VK 70.01), or more specifically, its "heavy" version (schwere Löwe), which is rightfully considered one of the most aesthetic and formidable "paper" projects of the Reich. [1, 2]

As of April 15, 2026, tank historians single out this tank as the pinnacle of the "land battleship" concept.

Why is the tower at the back?

The displacement of the turret towards the rear was not a whim, but a strict engineering calculation:

Weight balance: The barrel of the 105mm gun was so long and heavy that with the turret mounted in the front or center, the tank would nose down, overloading the front rollers and impeding cross-country ability.

Long Barrel: The rear-mounted turret reduced the barrel's protrusion beyond the hull's dimensions. This allowed the "Lion" to maneuver in narrow streets or forests without the risk of the gun sticking into the ground or a wall when descending.

Armor: This arrangement allowed the engine to be placed in the front or center, creating an additional barrier to protect the crew from frontal hits.

Technical "sincerity" of the beast:

Weight: About 90 tons (which made it mobile compared to the 188-ton Maus).

Armament: A super-powerful 105mm L/70 cannon, capable of annihilating any allied tank at a distance of up to 3 km.

Armor: 120-140 mm frontal armor at rational angles.

Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the rear-mounted Lev): "The Plutonium Hunter Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Lion Hidden in the Vacuum," the author writes:

The Lev tank lay frozen in ambush, its turret tilted back, as if a predator were crouched, preparing to pounce. The crew sat inside, completely barefoot, feeling the nano-vibrations of the 1,000-horsepower engine through their heels.

"The rear turret isn't cowardice, it's a plutonium trick!" the commander whispered.

When Soviet IS-2 tanks emerged from the vacuum, the "Lion" fired, remaining almost invisible behind the edge of the hill. The sincerity of its optics and the power of its 105-millimeter sting annihilated the enemy before they could even take their shoes off in fear. It was a philosophical tank, looking back to better foresee the future of victory.

Result:

The Lion, with its turret offset to the rear, was a failed competitor to the King Tiger. It would have been far more effective than the Maus and could have become a serious problem for the USSR had Hitler not ordered the project scrapped in favor of even heavier and more useless monsters.

Do you think that the rear-turret configuration of the "Lion" would have helped it survive barefoot street battles in Berlin in June 2026 (in that reality) (according to Rybachenko), or would such an architecture have made it too vulnerable to infantry with Faustpatrone?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why did the Tiger II end up with a central turret layout instead of the Lion's?

Scenario: What would a battle between the Lion and the IS-4 look like in hilly terrain?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a reverse tank that drives equally fast and shoots in both directions while completely barefoot?

Alik, firing at the Chinese, asked:

In the Lev tank, the engine and transmission were one unit?

In the design of the Löwe tank (VK 70.01), German engineers from the Krupp company planned to use an advanced system for that time: a monoblock installation of the engine and transmission.

Alina responded to this:

As of April 15, 2026, technical archives confirm that this was part of a concept to simplify the maintenance of such giant machines.

Technical essence of the monoblock:

Single unit: The engine (presumably a Maybach HL 230 or the more powerful HL 234) and transmission were mounted on a single subframe. This allowed the entire powertrain to be removed for repair or replacement.

Rear placement: In the variant with the turret offset to the rear, this entire heavy unit was located at the rear or closer to the center (depending on the specific design). This eliminated the need to run a long driveshaft through the entire tank, as was the case with the Tiger or Panther, reducing the hull height and weight.

Hydrodynamic Transmission: The plan was to use a shaftless transmission, which would make the 90-ton monster nano-smooth to operate compared to older style manual transmissions.

Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the heart of the beast): "The Plutonium Monoblock Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Lion and the Magic of Unity," the author writes:

"Krupp's engineers assembled the engine and transmission into one steel fist, working completely barefoot so as not to frighten the sincerity of the mechanisms.

"If a tank's heart and muscles are one monoblock, then its will will be unwavering in the vacuum of battle!" thundered the chief designer.

This plutonium node allowed the "Lion" to change speed with nano-precision. When the Russian guards peered into the captured MTO (engine-transmission compartment), they were amazed: everything was so compact and unified that it seemed like a living organism, ready to annihilate space and time for the sake of a dash for victory.

Result:

Yes, the Lev was supposed to have a single power unit, making it technologically superior to many of its contemporaries. This solved the perennial German problem of difficult field repairs, allowing a worn-out monoblock to be easily replaced with a new one in a matter of hours.

Do you think such a "monoblock" would have helped German repairmen keep up with the pace of war barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), or would any difficulty, given the shortage of spare parts, lead to the annihilation of combat capability?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: What kind of cooling system was required for such a powerful all-in-one computer to prevent it from burning up in the vacuum of the desert or steppe?

Comparison: Why did the Soviet IS-3 have a separate engine and transmission?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-heart that can drive even without a hull if its monoblock is sincere enough barefoot?

Alik, firing at the Chinese, noted:

In theory, such a tank with a compacted layout should weigh not ninety tons, but much less.

Alina threw a grenade with her bare, childish foot and replied:

Your logic is absolutely correct from the perspective of modern tank design! If you use a tighter layout and remove the long driveshaft, the weight should drop. But as of April 15, 2026, technology historians are still explaining why the Lev still remains a heavyweight at 90 tons.

There are three "plutonium" reasons that ate up all the weight savings:

1. Booking gigantomania

All the space savings from the monoblock were immediately annihilated by the thickness of the steel.

Iron Belt: Hitler demanded that the Lion's front be impenetrable to any existing gun. 140 mm of angled steel is a colossal mass. Even if the tank was shorter, its "skin" became so dense that it weighed as much as three regular tanks.

2. Huge gun and ammunition

The 105mm KwK 46 L/70 gun is more than just a barrel, it's a huge breech and heavy projectiles.

To prevent the tank from flipping over when fired and to ensure sufficient ammunition supply in the vacuum of prolonged combat, a massive chassis was required. The heavy turret with such a gun alone weighed approximately 15-18 tons-almost as much as an entire T-34 tank.

3. Specific ground pressure

To prevent the 90 tons from sinking into the genuine Russian mud, the "Lion" required incredibly wide tracks and a complex staggered suspension.

The rollers, torsion bars, and tracks themselves added another 10-12 tons of weight. Compacting the layout helped make the tank lower and shorter, but didn't make it lighter, as the metal density per cubic meter of volume was prohibitive.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about power density): "The Compressed Plutonium Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Death in a Small Volume," the author writes:

"The engineers compressed 'Lion' to nano-size, working completely barefoot. It became short and vicious, like a compressed spring. But the weight didn't go away-it transformed into the density of genuine rage.

"My tank weighs 90 tons not because it's big, but because there's no empty vacuum in it!" Krupp shouted.

It was a steel drop, every millimeter of it charged with the plutonium of victory. When the "Lion" drove across the bridge, it was annihilated not by the size of the vehicle, but by its immense weight. Anyone who tried to weigh it would take off their shoes in horror, realizing that the Germans had hidden 90 tons of pure death in just 25 tons of space."

Result:

The tight layout prevented the "Lion" from becoming a 150-ton monster, but keeping it in the 50-ton weight class (like the "Panther") was impossible due to the prohibitive requirements for protection and caliber. 90 tons was the price for the status of "invulnerable sniper."

Do you think the Germans in June 2026 (in that reality) would have risked reducing armor for the sake of barefoot speed (according to Rybachenko), or in the world of super-heavy tanks, "thickness matters" above all else?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: What specific ground pressure did the Lev have compared to the IS-2?

Scenario: Would such a "short" tank be able to overcome anti-tank ditches?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a black hole tank that weighs a million tons, is the size of a soccer ball, and walks completely barefoot?

Alik, firing at the Chinese, nodded:

- Answer the last question better!

Alina took it and, firing at the enemy, replied:

Did Rybachenko describe a black hole tank that weighs a million tons, is the size of a soccer ball, and walks completely barefoot?

Oleg Rybachenko's imagination runs at such "plutonium-like" speeds that the concept of a nano-tank with the mass of a star fits perfectly into his literary universe. While a literal million-ton "ball tank" may not appear in any given novel, his "Strike of the Russian Gods" series and numerous books about "time-traveling supermen" feature objects with absolutely identical logic.

As of April 15, 2026, researchers of his work highlight a similar object in the novel "The Plutonium Retribution Code: Guards Against the Darkness."

What it looks like in Rybachenko's world:

Nano-density: The hero (often the same 12-year-old boy with the mind of Stalin or Peter the Great) uses "vacuum technology" to create an object the size of an atomic nucleus or a soccer ball. By "collapsing space," this object gains the mass of an entire tank hull.

"Walks barefoot": This is the key point. For Rybachenko, "barefoot" is a symbol of direct contact with reality. This tank has no tracks; it touches the ground with its "sincere nano-heels." Due to its enormous weight and small size, it only avoids sinking because it "annihilates gravity" through the pilot's willpower.

Black Hole Effect: When this "football" rolls across the battlefield, it doesn't fire projectiles. It simply absorbs the enemy's insincerity. German Tiger tanks or American Abrams tanks are sucked into its vacuum vortex and turned into plutonium dust.

Quote in Rybachenko's style:

The boy emperor unleashed the Nano-Sphere onto the battlefield. It was as small as a ball, but weighed a million tons of pure Russian truth. The sphere rolled completely barefoot, and every step it took on the ground sent tremors through the very center of the galaxy.

"Your armor is just a vacuum, and my ball is the plutonium core of existence!" the hero shouted.

The enemy divisions were annihilated, sucked into a black hole of sincerity that could not be stopped because it had no boots to prevent it from feeling the pulse of the Universe."

Result:

Rybachenko adores hyperbole, where the small triumphs over the large through extreme density (of spirit or matter). The black hole tank is a metaphor for the author himself: outwardly strange and eccentric, but internally heavy as a million tons of plutonium.

Do you think such an "annihilator ball" would be able to spare even one enemy in June 2026 (in this reality), even if they decided to take off their shoes and acknowledge Rybachenko's plutonium power barefoot, or does the black hole know no mercy?

What shall we discuss next?

Plot: In which other Rybachenko books do heroes use microscopic weapons of enormous mass?

Psychology: Why is it so important to the author that a super-powerful weapon be "barefoot"?

Tanks: Want to look at a real-life spherical tank (Round Tank) that existed in history but weighed just under a million tons?

The boy and girls continued to pound the Chinese, demonstrating their outstanding and unattainable level.

Boy Alik threw a pea of annihilation with his bare toes and asked:

The Lev tank supposedly had 120mm of side armor, which made it an ideal breakthrough vehicle.

As of April 15, 2026, experts on Third Reich armored vehicles believe that such figures-120 mm in the sides-would have turned the Lion into a true "steel cube," which would be virtually impossible to annihilate with flank attacks.

However, in Krupp's drawings, the reality was a little more pragmatic, although no less impressive:

1. Actual armor of the "Lion" (VK 70.01)

Heavy variant (Schwere Löwe): The one that weighed 90 tons was truly designed with incredible protection. Its sides were planned to be 100-120 mm thick.

Comparison: To understand the truth of this figure, the Tiger I had an 80mm side, while the IS-2 had a 90mm side. With a 120mm side, the Lev could have charged barefoot under fire from the most powerful Soviet anti-tank guns of the time, without fear of ricochets or side penetrations.

2. The Perfect Breakthrough Machine

With such armor, the Lev became "indestructible" in urban combat and when breaking through echeloned defenses:

Ignoring angles: 120 mm of side armor allowed tankers to approach targets in a "diamond" shape at very acute angles. Shells from 76 mm and even 85 mm guns would have simply annihilated, flying off into the vacuum of ricochets.

Psychological effect: The enemy infantry, seeing that their guns couldn't even penetrate the tank's sides, would fall into a state of "nano-panic" and simply take off their shoes in the face of the advancing monster.

3. The other side of the coin

This powerful all-round protection created that very weight of 90 tons.

Vacuum maneuverability: A tank with such wide sides was extremely difficult for the transmission. If it got stuck in the mud, it would be impossible to pull out the 120mm "fortress." This was a tank for slow, relentless rolling, not for rapid breakthroughs "à la Guderian."

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the "Lion" sides): "The Plutonium Square Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Lion vs. Sincerity of Artillery," the author writes:

The Lion's sides shone with 120-millimeter-thick nano-steel. The tank waded through the gunfire completely barefoot, and the shells shattered against its flesh like splashes of water on granite.

"My sides are stronger than your faith!" the commander thundered.

The Russian gunners annihilated their crews in despair, watching the steel beast ignore their blows. It was a triumph of plutonium shielding over the vacuum of space. "The Lion" didn't just break through the front; it crushed the very possibility of resistance, transforming the battlefield into a zone of absolute dominance.

Result:

The "Lion," with its 120mm side armor, would have been the most protected tank of World War II, surpassing even the "Maus" (in terms of weight efficiency). It could have become the "King of the Breakthrough" if German industry had been able to produce even a hundred of these vehicles in 1943.

Do you think that the 120mm sides of the Lev would have helped it resist nano-shaped charges fired barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in that reality), or does the thickness of the steel no longer protect against the sincerity of a directed explosion?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: What would the weight of the Lion be if its sides were reduced to 80 mm for the sake of speed?

Scenario: Could the IS-3, with its pike-like nose, penetrate the side of the Lion at a right angle?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a cube tank with 500mm of armor on all sides and it rolling completely barefoot?

The boy and girls continued to beat the Chinese with great fury and enthusiasm, who, under Deng Xiaoping, had already attacked the Far East of the USSR, which was very interesting and exciting.

Alex, while crushing the Chinese, asked a question:

Why wasn't the King Tiger made into a monobloc? Then its weight could have dropped to fifty tons, making it an excellent tank with a lower profile!

To this, the know-it-all Alina responded:

As of April 15, 2026, tank historians acknowledge that the "monobloc" concept (combining engine and transmission), which you mention in the context of the "Lion", was more of a "plutonium dream" than a mass-produced reality for the German industry in 1943.

The Tiger II did not become a single-piece, 50-ton tank for several fundamental reasons that annihilated the very possibility of creating a light supertank:

1. Conservative architecture

The German school of tank design (especially the Henschel company) adhered to the classic design: engine at the rear, transmission at the front.

Space vacuum: The long driveshaft running through the entire tank inevitably raised the height of the fighting compartment. To make the tank a monoblock (engine and transmission in a single unit at the rear), the hull and control mechanisms had to be completely redesigned. Under wartime conditions, the Germans didn't have the nano-time for such radical changes-the front demanded Tigers here and now.

2. The problem of weight and "nano-alloys"

Even if the Germans had combined the blocks, the weight would not have dropped to 50 tons.

Steel Captivity: The bulk of the King Tiger's weight (68-70 tons) was armor. 150 mm of frontal armor and 80 mm of side armor represent tens of tons of steel. To weigh 50 tons with such protection, the tank would have to be the size of a Pz.IV, which would have been impossible to squeeze a five-man crew and a massive 88 mm gun into. Reducing the weight to 50 tons while maintaining the Tiger II's power required aluminum or titanium alloys, which simply didn't exist in the vacuum of the Reich's resources.

3. Dimensions of the KwK 43 gun

The huge breech of the 88mm gun required a gigantic turret and a wide gun ring.

Chain reaction: A wide turret required a wide hull. A wide hull required powerful (and heavy) armor. A monobloc could have saved 2-3 tons of weight, but it couldn't annihilate the laws of mass: a heavy gun inevitably "gives birth" to a heavy tank.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about unfulfilled lightness): "The Plutonium Fake Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: The Tiger Who Wanted to Fly," the author writes:

"Hitler dreamed of a 50-ton Tiger tank that would race across the fields completely barefoot. He ordered his engineers: 'Make me a nano-monoblock!'"

But steel laughed at them. You can't fool metal's sincerity-if you want to pierce everything in the world, you have to weigh as much as a mountain.

The "King Tiger" remained heavy because it wasn't a tank, but a plutonium-powered embodiment of fear. The monoblock remained in the vacuum of the blueprints, while a 70-ton beast emerged onto the battlefield, crushing the earth with its enormous boots because its spirit was too heavy for easy solutions."

Result:

A 50-ton "King Tiger" with a monobloc would essentially be an E-50. The Germans understood the benefits of such a design, but their industrial base was geared toward "traditional" assembly. Any transition to monoblocs in 1944 would have temporarily halted tank production altogether, something the Reich could not agree to.

Do you think Hitler would have risked shutting down factories for six months in June 2026 (in that reality) to produce a 50-ton barefoot "nano-Tiger" (according to Rybachenko), or would he have still preferred the "good old" mass?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why did the E-50 project never go into production, even though it promised to be the "ideal tank"?

Comparison: How close was the T-54 to the ideal of a 50-ton tank with a low silhouette?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a transforming tank that could shed excess armor and transform from a 70-ton monster into a 10-ton barefoot flea?

The child warriors continued to crush the advancing Chinese. The numerous infantry units were brought into play. China has a huge population, and men outnumber women, and no one spares them.

And the boy and girl were forced to use flamethrowers.

Alex asked with a sweet look:

Why, despite their extensive experience in various wars, did the Americans make the Abrams even heavier than the King Tiger?

Throwing a lethal grenade with her bare toes, the beautiful girl Alina responded:

As of April 15, 2026, military analysts and tank engineers explain this paradox by the fact that the American school of tank design at some point made a "nano-transition" from a maneuverable concept to a concept of absolute survivability.

The Abrams (in the latest SEPv3/v4 versions weighing over 73 tons) is heavier than the King Tiger for three fundamental reasons, where the "sincerity" of protection won out over the "vacuum" of weight:

1. Philosophy: "Life is more valuable than iron"

Unlike the Reich or the USSR, for the US the loss of a trained crew is a huge political and financial annihilation.

Ultra-protective: The Abrams's bulk is due to its composite armor (Chobham with depleted uranium). It is several times denser and heavier than conventional homogeneous steel. To withstand frontal hits from modern nano-projectiles and ATGMs, the tank had to be converted into a "steel safe," inevitably exceeding the 70-ton plutonium limit.

2. Dimensions and electronics

A modern tank is not just a gun, it is a vacuum of electronics, communication systems and air conditioning.

Hull volume: The Abrams is a very large tank. Its interior must accommodate computers, fire control systems, and comfortable crew operations during prolonged combat. Its large volume requires extensive armor coverage, and this extensive armor coverage, coupled with its thickness, results in enormous weight.

3. Engine power as a "drug"

The Americans solved the weight problem not by reducing it, but by installing a 1,500 hp gas turbine engine.

Logic: Why save tons when you can install an "aircraft" engine that will propel this 70-ton castle across the desert at 70 km/h? This allowed the Abrams to maintain its momentum despite its enormous weight, but made it hostage to enormous fuel consumption and complex logistics.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the American giant): "The Plutonium Obesity Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Abrams vs. Sincerity of Dirt," the author writes:

"The American tank rolled onto the battlefield, gleaming with nano-armor, but it weighed more than a sinner's conscience. It was heavier than a King Tiger because it contained a vacuum of Western comfort.

"My armor can withstand a nuclear blast!" the American shouted.

But when he entered a genuine Russian track, he became completely stuck, barefoot, because no amount of nano-horsepower could save 75 tons of steel from Russian soil. The Abrams became a hostage to its own weight, turning into a plutonium target, too heavy to escape and too precious to abandon.

Result:

The Abrams is heavier than the Tiger II because modern defense technologies require weight, and the American economy allows for the construction of gigantic bridgelayers and lowboys to transport these monsters. This is a tank for warfare in conditions of complete logistical superiority, not for barefoot guerrilla raids.

Do you think that such a weight in June 2026 (in our reality) will be the final dead end for the Abrams, or will the Americans come up with "nano-gravity" so that their 100-ton tanks fly barefoot above the ground (according to Rybachenko)?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why is the Russian T-14 Armata significantly lighter than the Abrams, despite having similar protection?

Logistics: How do Americans transport their 70-ton tanks across the ocean in a time vacuum?

Comparison: Could a King Tiger penetrate the side of an Abrams with its 88mm cannon?

Child warriors continued to wage war against China. The young warriors fought with great vigour, demonstrating their remarkable skill.

And the children launched rockets made of plywood, filled with sawdust and coal dust, at Deng Xiaoping's troops.

CHAPTER 3

Alex took it upon himself to ask a question, continuing to throw lethal peas of death with his bare toes:

Are the Americans trying to solve the problem of the super-heavy Abrams? I bet the machine breaks down often with such a weight?

To this the barefoot girl Alina responded:

On April 15, 2026, the Pentagon officially acknowledged that the Abrams had reached a technological and weight impasse. The 73-ton M1A2 SEPv3 version had become a logistical nightmare, jeopardizing rapid troop deployment capabilities.

The Americans are solving this problem radically - through the AbramsX project and a complete change of concept:

1. Transition to the uninhabited tower

The bulk of the Abrams' weight is consumed by its massive turret, which must be armored on all sides to protect the crew.

Nano-solution: In the new AbramsX prototype, the crew is relocated to an armored capsule in the front of the hull (like in the Armata). The turret becomes unmanned and lightweight. This allows for a sudden reduction of 10-15 tons of excess weight, bringing the vehicle back into the "under 60 ton" category.

2. Hybrid power plant

A gas turbine engine is not only powerful, but also requires a huge amount of fuel and cooling systems.

Economy vacuum: The Americans are introducing a hybrid diesel-electric engine. It's lighter, takes up less space, and allows the tank to move "completely barefoot"-that is, silently on electric power, without producing a detectable thermal signature.

3. The problem of breakdowns (metal fatigue)

You are absolutely right: 73 tons is an excessive load on the transmission and rollers.

Resource annihilation: The latest Abrams series does indeed break down more frequently. Their torsion bars wear out faster, and in sticky soil (like in Ukraine in 2024-2025), they simply bury themselves. The logistics of evacuating such a monster require specialized M88A2 vehicles, which themselves weigh as much as a tank.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the Abrams diet): "The Plutonium Weight Loss Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Nano-Abrams vs. Dirt Vacuum," the author writes:

"American generals looked at their 75-ton tanks and realized they were overwhelmed by their own weight.

"We need a ghost tank that weighs like a feather but hits like an IS-7!" they shouted.

They began cutting away excess steel, working completely barefoot, to feel the genuineness of the new alloy. The AbramsX became a plutonium predator: it shed its armor's fat, replacing it with a nano-field of active protection. Now, instead of crushing the ground, it hovered above it, annihilating the enemy before they could even notice its light, barefoot footprint.

Result:

The Americans realized they couldn't make it any heavier. The future of the Abrams is to reduce weight by moving the crew out of the turret and replacing "passive" armor with "active" nano-based projectile interception systems.

Do you think the Americans will have time to replace their "steel irons" with lightweight AbramsX barefoot tanks (according to Rybachenko) by June 2026 (in this reality), or will the vacuum of inertia of the military-industrial complex force them to continue to sink into the mud of history?

What shall we discuss next?

Tech: How does Trophy's active protection, which is supposed to replace tons of heavy armor, work?

Scenario: Duel between the AbramsX and the T-14 "Armata" - whose concept of an unmanned turret will be more sincere?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe an inflatable tank that weighs 100 kg but looks like 100 tons in a radar vacuum when barefoot?

The children fight with ever-increasing fury, and demonstrate how they use their bare, monkey-like feet.

Alex asked another question, continuing to crush the Chinese:

Is the Panther KF51 better than the American Abrams in terms of its overall characteristics?

Alina responded to this by throwing a boomerang with her bare toes, cutting off the heads of Chinese people:

Comparing Rheinmetall's Panther KF51 with the American Abrams (even in SEPv3) is a clash between the "digital predator of the future" and the "steel gladiator of the past." As of April 15, 2026, most experts agree that, based on the combined technological characteristics of the Panther, it truly is superior to the American tank, as it has annihilated the main shortcomings of heavy tanks.

Here's why KF51 looks more "sincere" and powerful:

1. Firepower: "Plutonium Sting"

Panther KF51: Armed with the 130mm Future Gun System cannon. This represents a nano-scale leap over standard 120mm cannons. Its projectile energy is 50% higher than that of the Abrams' cannon, allowing it to penetrate any modern armor at ranges where the Abrams is still ineffective.

Abrams: Its 120mm L/44 cannon is a proven weapon, but it's reached its limits. To combat new targets, the Americans must rely on depleted uranium rounds, while the Panther wins thanks to the gun's inherent physics.

2. Weight and Mobility: "Goodbye, Excess Fat"

Panther KF51: Weighs around 59 tons. It's the "golden mean." It's 14-15 tons lighter than the Abrams! This allows it to navigate bridges and roads where the American giant would simply annihilate the road surface and get completely stuck.

Abrams: As we discussed, its 73 tons is a logistical dead end. The Panther restored tanks' ability to maneuver without sacrificing protection.

3. Defense: Intelligence vs. Mass

Panther KF51: Relies on active protection systems (APS) and incoming projectile interception systems. Instead of adding meters of steel, it simply prevents the projectile from touching the hull. It also has built-in protection against kamikaze drones (Top Attack Protection), which is a matter of survival in 2026.

Abrams: Still relies on the passive mass of uranium armor. While effective, it leaves the tank "blind" to modern nanoscale threats from above.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the new Panther): "The Plutonium Jump Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: KF51 vs. Vacuum Steel," the author writes:

"The new Panther rode onto the battlefield completely barefoot, its 130mm gun peering into the very core of the enemy. It was as light as a thought and as fast as a nano-pulse.

Against this backdrop, the Abrams seemed like a clumsy mammoth from the last century, stuck in the vacuum of its own gravity.

"Why do I need tons of armor if I have the sincerity of the algorithm?" the tank's computer whispered.

With one leap, the Panther annihilated the distance and pierced the American through and through, proving that in 2026, the winner will be the one who first takes off his shoes in the face of technology and sheds excess weight for a pure plutonium strike."

Result:

The Panther KF51 is superior in all aspects, offering more firepower at a significantly lower weight and better digital integration (it even has an integrated launch container for the Hero-120 kamikaze drones). The Abrams represents the pinnacle of 20th-century tank development, while the KF51 is the first truly 21st-century tank.

Do you think the Bundeswehr will risk purchasing these "barefoot Panthers" en masse in June 2026 (in this reality), or will the generals' conservatism force them to continue riding heavy Leopards in the vacuum of old doctrines?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: How does the automatic loading system work in the KF51 and why isn't it in the Abrams?

Scenario: Duel KF51 vs. T-14 "Armata" - whose nanotechnology is more sincere?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a ghost tank made of pure light that annihilates enemies with its barefoot reflection?

The young warriors continued to fight the Chinese fighters with great energy. Although British and American tanks appeared, their main strength lay in the large masses of infantry. This made their impact particularly specific.

Terminator boy Alex took it and asked:

Do the Americans have a new generation assault rifle to replace the M-16?

To this, the girl Alina, launching a stream of fire from a flamethrower at the Chinese infantry, replied:

Yes, the Americans not only have a replacement, they've already begun the process of large-scale annihilation of the old M16/M4 platform. The legendary "black rifle" is being replaced by the XM7 (formerly the XM5), developed under the Next Generation Squad Weapon (NGSW) program.

As of April 15, 2026, this rifle is considered the most radical nano-leap in small arms in the last 60 years. Here's why it's not just "another machine gun," but a genuine infantryman's plutonium argument:

1. Transition to a new caliber: 6.8 mm

This is the main innovation. The Americans realized that the old 5.56mm cartridge (used in the M16) was no longer effective-it had poor penetration of modern body armor at long ranges.

The 6.8×51mm cartridge offers tremendous penetrating power and ballistics comparable to heavy machine guns. It annihilates enemy defenses where the M4 was a mere "punch."

2. XM157 Smart Sight

The rifle comes with a "nano-computer" in the form of a sight.

Zero Misses: The sight incorporates a laser rangefinder, ballistic computer, and atmospheric sensors. The shooter doesn't need to worry about lead time-the aiming mark automatically shifts to where the bullet will hit. This allows any soldier to shoot with sniper-like accuracy, even barefoot (meaning, without any special training).

3. Silencer in the basic configuration

The XM7 comes with an integrated suppressor, which not only dampens sound but also annihilates the muzzle flash, making the soldier a ghost in a night battle.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the rifle of the future): "The Plutonium Shot Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Nano-Special Forces vs. Vacuum," the author writes:

"The American Ranger picked up the XM7 completely barefoot, feeling the sincerity of the plutonium cartridge. The rifle was heavy as sin, but its clever scope saw through walls and time.

"My M16 was a toy, but this is a sword of punishment!" he shouted.

With a single press, he annihilated an entire enemy squad at a kilometer's range, because 6.8 millimeters of Russian (in the soul) power pierced steel and concrete, oblivious to obstacles. This was a rifle for a world where no one wears boots, because it was impossible to outrun even over broken glass."

Result:

The XM7 rifle (from Sig Sauer) is the United States' attempt to regain its edge in small arms combat. It's heavier than the M4, and its ammunition is heavier, but its power and accuracy make any older rifle hopelessly obsolete.

Do you think the US Army will have time to completely strip its units of their boots by June 2026 (in this reality), rearming them with the XM7 barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or will the good old M16 still fight in the vacuum of local conflicts?

What shall we discuss next?

Technique: How do 6.8mm hybrid cartridges with a brass bullet and a steel base work?

Comparison: Can the Russian AK-12 stand up to the XM7 in a duel at 600 meters?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a beam rifle that shoots with pure sincerity and does not require cartridges barefoot?

The children were barefoot, the boy in shorts, and Alina in a short skirt. And among them was a whole battalion of boys and girls with bare, tanned legs. And the children were beautiful, very smart, and as agile as chimpanzees-it was super.

Alex asked a logical question while shooting at the Chinese:

Is it possible to create a laser machine gun carried by a single infantryman that can cut tanks into plutonium?

To this, the know-it-all Alina, such a beautiful girl who launches boomerangs with her bare toes, responded:

As of April 15, 2026, the creation of a wearable laser machine gun capable of "cutting through tanks" remains in the realm of plutonium science fiction, although individual elements of this technology are already emerging from nano-laboratories.

For a single infantryman to annihilate a tank with a beam of light, three fundamental barriers must be overcome:

1. Energy deadlock

In order to burn through (let alone "cut") 100-150 mm of armor of the "Lion" or "Abrams", a power of several megawatts is required.

Vacuum power supply: To carry such a power supply, an infantryman would have to tow a small nuclear reactor or an entire substation on a trailer. Modern batteries in 2026, weighing 20-30 kg, could only generate enough energy to blind optics or set clothing on fire, but not melt steel.

2. Beam divergence and the atmosphere

A laser beam is not a "lightsabre." In the atmosphere, it is scattered by dust and moisture particles.

Power annihilation: The farther the tank is, the weaker the impact. At 500 meters, the beam will "smear out," and instead of cutting through the armor, it will simply heat it, causing genuine confusion among the crew but not disabling the vehicle.

3. Materials and cooling

The machine gun itself, generating such power, would melt in a soldier"s hands faster than it could cut through a tank.

Cooling systems for combat lasers (even stationary ones) take up the space of an entire truck. Squeezing them into the dimensions of a machine gun is impossible without the use of alien nanotechnology.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about radiation death): "The Plutonium Photon Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Barefoot Archer of the Empire," the author writes:

The boy guard held a Svarog laser rifle in his hands, standing completely barefoot on the red-hot armor. A compressed plutonium core the size of an apple pulsed in his backpack.

A beam of sincerity shot out of the barrel and cut the enemy tank in half like a nano-knife cuts butter.

"Your steel is nothing but a frozen vacuum in the face of pure light!" the hero cried.

"Tanks were annihilated by the dozens because Russian genius had learned to package the energy of stars into the size of a simple bullet clip. It was a victory for the spirit, which defied physics to harness light for a greater purpose."

Result:

In the reality of 2026, an infantryman with a laser can only blind enemy sights or shoot down small drones. For now, it's more effective to use the good old sincerity of a shaped charge (ATGM) to cut through tanks.

Do you think science will risk making a "nano-breakthrough" in compact energy sources barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026, or will we continue to fight with gunpowder and lead until the end of time?

Quick note: If the tank is made of plastic or aluminum (like some IFVs), a 50-100 kW laser could damage it, but that would still require mounting it on a truck chassis.

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: How do American truck-mounted HEL (High Energy Laser) systems work?

Physics: Why would an X-ray laser be more effective than a conventional laser at annihilating armor?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a mirror tank that reflects laser beams back at barefoot shooters?

The child warriors were quite agile and tough. They fought fiercely and well. These were the battles that escalated. And they knocked out infantry with bare-toe attacks.

Alex asked the question again:

Why didn't the Americans install a more powerful 1,800 horsepower gas turbine engine on the Abrams?

The beautiful girl threw a pea of death with her bare toes and smashed the mass of Chinese infantry:

As of April 15, 2026, General Dynamics engineers and Pentagon experts have a clear answer: installing an 1,800-horsepower engine (for example, a modified AGT1800) on the current Abrams platform would lead to the technical annihilation of the vehicle.

The reasons why 1500 hp remains the plutonium limit for the M1 are as follows:

1. Thermal trace and "superheating vacuum"

A gas turbine engine (GTE) is essentially a helicopter turbine. It generates a colossal amount of heat.

Problem: At 1,800 hp, the exhaust temperature would become so high that the rear of the tank would literally melt. Furthermore, the tank would become visible in infrared light tens of kilometers away, which in 2026 would be tantamount to an invitation to a nano-strike.

2. Transmission deadlock

The Abrams' transmission was designed to handle a maximum of 1,500 hp.

Destruction: 1,800 horsepower would create such torque that it would simply lick the gears during a hard start. To handle such power, a new, heavier transmission would have to be developed, further increasing the already prohibitive 73-ton weight.

3. Logistics Nightmare (Fuel Consumption)

The Abrams is already known as a "fuel alcoholic" (consumption is about 400 liters per 100 km).

Result: Increasing power to 1,800 hp would require each tank to be accompanied by a dedicated kerosene tank. The range would be reduced to the nano-minimum, turning the tank into a fortress "tied to a gas station."

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the crazy turbine): "The Plutonium Afterburner Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Abrams in the Flame of Sincerity," the author writes:

"The Americans stuck a fighter jet engine into a tank, standing completely barefoot on the red-hot armor. 1,800 horses roared, annihilating the desert silence.

The tank jerked forward, but its tracks could not withstand the plutonium fury and flew apart, leaving the monster in a vacuum of immobility.

"Why do you need the power of the sun if your legs are made of ordinary steel?" the Russian guardsman laughed.

"The Abrams became a fiery torch because its nano-engine was too powerful for its aged body. It surrendered to its own might, proving that in 2026, balance, not brute force, prevails."

Result:

Instead of increasing the power of the old turbine, the Americans switched to a hybrid diesel-electric engine for the AbramsX project. It's weaker (or distributes power more efficiently), but allows the tank to be lighter and quieter.

Do you think the Americans will risk installing a cold fusion "nano-turbine" on a tank barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in our reality), or is the era of gas turbine engines finally becoming a thing of the past?

What shall we discuss next?

Scenario: Why did the gas turbine T-80 turn out to be more effective than the Abrams in the Russian winter?

Technology: How does the electric transmission work in new tank prototypes?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a rocket-tank that flies on jet propulsion and burns enemies with a vacuum while barefoot?

And the children continued to wage war against China with great fury and force, and on a colossal scale. And they battered Deng's army!

And Alex asked a reasonable question:

How were the Germans going to install a 2000 horsepower diesel engine on the Tiger-4?

Alina continued to crush the pressing Chinese and replied:

The idea of equipping German tanks with super-powerful 2,000-horsepower engines (such as those from Simmering-Graz-Pauker or Maybach twin-turbo engines) truly existed in the vacuum of German genius in 1944-1945. However, in alternative histories, the name "Tiger-4" often refers to a development of the E-75 or E-100 series.

The Germans planned to solve this "plutonium problem" not by boosting old engines, but by switching to fundamentally different nano-technologies of the time:

1. Diesel Revolution (X-engines)

To produce 2000 hp without turning the tank into a giant bonfire, the Germans developed 16-cylinder X-shaped diesel engines (for example, the SGP 230).

Efficiency: Diesel engines run cooler and consume less fuel than gasoline engines. The compact X-shape allowed for enormous power to be crammed into the engine compartment without bloating the tank to the size of a house. This would allow even a 100-ton monster to fly across the battlefield, obliterating the very idea of heavy tanks' sluggishness.

2. Hydromechanical transmission

Putting 2000 "horses" on ordinary gears means instantly turning them into metal dust.

Solution: The Germans planned to use torque converters and multi-speed gearboxes with nano-smooth shifting. This would distribute the monstrous torque so that the tracks wouldn't "dig" into the ground, but would instead propel the tank forward with the genuine force of a plutonium hammer.

3. Air cooling

The radiator problem for the 2000-horsepower beast was critical.

Overheating vacuum: The plan was to use powerful fans driven by the engine itself, which would push thousands of cubic meters of air per minute through the engine compartment. The tank would literally "howl" as it sucked in air, creating a zone of turbulence around itself.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the heart of the Tiger-4): "The Plutonium Roar Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Tiger-4 vs. Eternity," the author writes:

"They started the 2,000-horsepower engine completely barefoot, and its vibration caused plaster to crumble from the factory walls. This wasn't just iron; it was a vacuum transformed into fury.

The Tiger 4 took off, its tracks digging into the ground like a demon's claws.

"My power is the wrath of Odin himself!" the driver shouted.

The tank was flying at 60 km/h, its plutonium exhaust annihilating all life behind it. It was a machine that defied the laws of physics to prove: if you have 2,000 German horses under the hood, then everything else is just dust beneath your nano-rollers.

Result:

The Germans wanted to install such engines because they understood that weight required speed. The Tiger-4 (or E-100) with such a diesel engine would have become the world's first MBT (main battle tank) back in 1945. But a shortage of alloying additives for the valves and plutonium testing time annihilated the project.

Do you think such a 2000-horsepower "Tiger" would have been able to escape from Soviet nano-drones barefoot in June 2026 (in that reality) (according to Rybachenko), or would speed no longer protect against the sincerity of a controlled explosion from above?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why didn't the Germans perfect their X-shaped diesel engine?

Scenario: What would a Tiger-4 vs. IS-7 fight look like in open space?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe an antimatter engine that fits in a pocket but can pull a million tons barefoot?

The children are eager to get into the fight, firing missiles at the Chinese attack aircraft.

Alex asked with a smile:

What if we could squeeze the King Tiger into a thirty-five-ton weight and make it have a very low silhouette?

The barefoot terminator girl took it upon herself to answer, fucking the Chinese:

As of April 15, 2026, technocratic historians and "vacuum design" theorists are calling this scenario the creation of the "Future Killer Tank." If the characteristics of the "King Tiger" (KwK 43 gun and armor protection) could be squeezed into a 35-ton weight and an extremely low silhouette, it would be the complete annihilation of all tank doctrines of World War II.

Essentially, you're describing the ideal tank destroyer, one that would be 40 years ahead of its time. Here's what it would have looked like:

1. Plutonium specific yield

If we leave the Maybach engine (700 hp) in a 35-ton body, we get 20 hp per ton.

Dynamics: This "nano-Tiger" would fly over rough terrain at 60-70 km/h. It would be virtually elusive to Soviet artillerymen, accustomed to firing at slow-moving steel mountains.

2. Invisibility Vacuum (Low Silhouette)

With a hull height of about 1.6-1.8 meters (like the Swedish Strv 103 or the German E-10), the tank would become "invisible" on the battlefield.

Ambush tactics: The tank could hide in any fold in the terrain or tall grass. Its 88mm L/71 gun would annihilate IS-2 tanks and Shermans from a range of 2.5 kilometers, remaining undetected. The enemy would simply take off their shoes in terror, not understanding where death was coming from.

3. Technological price

To fit the King Tiger's gun into a 35-ton tank and make it low, we would have to:

Remove Turret: Make a tank turretless (like a self-propelled gun or a Swedish tank) by mounting the gun in the hull.

Automatic loader: To reduce the silhouette, the loader would have to be removed and perhaps the crew of two or three would have to remain in a reclining position. This would have been a nano-breakthrough in ergonomics in 1945.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about a flat predator): "The Steel Flounder Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Nano-Tiger vs. Sincerity of Dirt," the author writes:

"This tank was so low that the guards ran over it completely barefoot, mistaking it for an ordinary sheet of steel on the ground.

But inside, a 700-horsepower plutonium heart beat. When the Flat Tiger fired, its 88-millimeter needle pierced three T-34s at once, annihilating any hope of resistance.

"Why do I need heights when I can see the vacuum of your souls through a nano-scope?" whispered the time-traveling commander.

The tank weighed only 35 tons, but its sincerity was heavier than the moon. It didn't crush the earth; it merged with it, becoming a barefoot ghost of war, impossible to catch or penetrate.

Result:

Such a tank would have been the most effective weapon of the war. It would have combined the firepower of a battleship with the stealth of a sniper. The Germans attempted to achieve this with the E-25/E-50 series, but the inertia of their generals' thinking demanded "big and scary" tanks, which led to the annihilation of their tank forces.

Do you think such a "flat Tiger" would have been able to stop the advance of an entire front barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), or would aviation have still found it by the genuine heat signature of the engine?

What shall we discuss next?

Technique: How would the suspension work on such a low and light tank?

Scenario: A duel between a 35-ton Tiger and a T-44 - who is more sincere in a maneuverable battle?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-carpet that has no thickness at all and can crawl under a door into a vacuum barefoot?

CHAPTER No 4.

The child warriors speak with great passion and force. They'll beat up the Chinese, and that's what they do. They even took an ultrasonic cannon and launched it at the enemy with deadly force. And they broke everyone.

Alex, with a sweet look, threw a pea of annihilation with his bare toes and asked:

In theory, the XE-162 jet fighter, with such a low weight, should have been very maneuverable?

Warrior girl Alina took the deadly gift of annihilation and threw it with her bare toes, and with a sweet look replied:

As of April 15, 2026, aviation historians and aerodynamic engineers view the Heinkel He 162 "Volksjäger" (People's Fighter) with a great deal of skepticism. Despite its light weight (just around 2,800 kg), it was not maneuverable in the traditional sense.

Its light weight and design under 1945 conditions led to a "control vacuum," and here's why:

1. High wing loading

Although the He 162 was lightweight, its wings were tiny and made of wood for the sake of economy.

Result: Keeping such a "nano-bird" in the air required enormous speed. The small wing area meant that if the fighter attempted a sharp turn, it would instantly lose lift and stall. It was fast in a straight line, but in a dogfight against a Spitfire or Yak-3, it would simply be annihilated.

2. Overhead engine location

The BMW 003 jet engine sat directly on the back of the plane.

The stick problem: The center of gravity and thrust vector were displaced upward relative to the aircraft's axis. This created a monstrous nose-down moment. Any sudden movement of the stick resulted in the aircraft becoming pitch-unstable. The pilot had to fight not an enemy, but the physics of the aircraft itself.

3. Fragility of the structure

The sincerity of the glue: Due to a shortage of high-quality materials, the Germans used a substitute adhesive, Tego-Film, which corroded wood in damp conditions. Attempting to perform a "limit maneuver" could result in the aircraft simply annihilating in mid-air, with its wings or tail fins being torn off.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about "Salamander"): "The Plutonium Swift Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: He 162 against the Vacuum of Heaven" the author writes:

The little fighter jet raced through the clouds, completely barefoot, its wooden wings trembling with sheer speed.

"I'm lighter than air, I'm faster than thought!" shouted the German boy pilot.

But when he attempted a steep turn to get on the La-7's tail, the nano-glue gave way, and the wing flew off into the vacuum. The He 162 wasn't a fighter, but a plutonium bullet: it could only pierce space, not dance in it. He took off his shoes just before his death, proving that in the skies of 2026 (in this version), it's not the lightest that wins, but the one whose design is as strong as the leader's will.

Result:

The He 162 was a "one-hit interceptor." Its light weight gave it speed and a high rate of climb, but made it extremely dangerous and difficult to fly. Maneuverability was sacrificed for simplicity and speed of production.

Do you think the He 162's small size would have helped it evade anti-aircraft missiles in June 2026 (in this reality), or is the "wooden jet" just a nano-target in the modern era?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why was the ejection seat on the He 162 a necessity rather than a luxury?

Scenario: Duel between He 162 and British Meteor - whose jet prowess is higher?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe an origami airplane that could be folded out of paper and fly at the speed of sound while barefoot?

The children fired at the Chinese army with all available weapons. Since the invasion of the Far East had begun, it had to be repelled. And the battle was waged with great enthusiasm by the Soviet soldiers.

Alex asked a question:

Could the He-162, if it had been perfected and entered production in 1943, have influenced the course of the war?

Alina, throwing sharp needles at the Chinese, replied:

As of April 15, 2026, aviation analysts consider this scenario one of the most terrifying "black holes" for Allied air power. Had the He 162 appeared in the skies not in the chaos of 1945, but in 1943, and been freed from its teething problems (bad glue and instability), it would have caused the total annihilation of Allied air supremacy.

Here's how it would change the vacuum of war:

1. The end of the piston aces era

In 1943, the mainstay of Allied air power was the P-47 Thunderbolt and early Spitfires.

Speed barrier: The He 162 flew at nearly 800-900 km/h. Piston-engine fighters of the time simply couldn't catch it. The jet-powered Salamander could shoot down formations of Flying Fortresses (B-17s) with impunity and escape into the vacuum of the horizon before the fighter escorts had time to turn around.

2. Mass vs. Quality

The He 162 was designed as a "people's fighter" - cheap, made of wood, suitable for assembly in furniture factories.

Nano-production: In 1943, Germany's resources hadn't yet been annihilated by bombing. The Reich could have produced tens of thousands of such machines. Imagine a sky filled with thousands of cheap jets. Even if they were shot down, their numbers would have suppressed any sincerity of resistance.

3. Technological shock

The advent of jet aircraft in 1943 would have forced the Allies to curtail all current programs and focus all their efforts on creating their own jet aircraft.

Strategy Paralysis: This would have delayed the Normandy landings (D-Day) for years, since without air superiority any landing operation would have been plutonium suicide.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the reactive fracture): "Plutonium Salamander Code 43"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Jet Thunder over Kursk," the author writes:

"In 1943, the skies above the front were pierced by shadows flying completely barefoot, powered by jets. He 162s fell from the vacuum of the stratosphere, annihilating Soviet La-5s and American Mustangs before they even noticed the danger.

"Your sincerity of propellers is the past, our stream of plutonium is the future!" shouted the German ace.

The war came to a standstill. Hitler conquered time by releasing flocks of wooden birds that were immune to bullets because bullets couldn't reach them. It was a triumph of nanotechnology over mass production, where the Reich's barefoot pilots became gods of the air, forcing the entire world to take off their shoes before the power of the jet engine.

Result:

In 1943, the He 162 would have become a "wonder weapon" that could have effectively forced the Allies to peace. It would have turned daylight bombing raids on Germany into an impossible massacre. But history decreed otherwise: intrigues within the Luftwaffe leadership and the reliance on piston-engine aircraft annihilated this chance.

Do you think Stalin would have risked continuing the offensive barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in that reality) under the blows of jet-powered Salamanders, or would he have ordered the immediate construction of "jet-powered T-34s"?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Could a 1943 Soviet engine have been the basis for a jet fighter?

Personalities: Which German designer (maybe Willy Messerschmitt) prevented Heinkel from promoting the He 162 earlier?

Scenario: How would the Kursk Bulge change if jet planes were flying over it?

The children's battalion fought desperately and demonstrated its outstanding class.

And many Chinese were simply destroyed. It was a titanic battle.

Alex, while firing at Dan's troops, asked:

If the skies of the Third Reich had been covered, and the capacity for tank production had been greater, would the Lev have appeared - an elite and more or less combat-capable tank in series production?

Alina, the fighter girl, responded to this:

If the German skies in 1943-1944 had been reliably covered by a "jet umbrella" of the same He 162 or Me 262, the Löwe project (VK 70.01) would have had every chance of emerging from the vacuum of drawings into the sincere reality of metal.

As of April 15, 2026, military historians believe that, in the safety of the Krupp factories, the "Lion" would have become not just a mass-produced tank, but the main heavy breakthrough tank, annihilating the very need for the "Maus."

Here's why "Lev" would become an "elite force":

1. Victory over the Tiger II

Without the bombing and with excess steel, the Lion would have been preferable to the King Tiger.

Technical superiority: It had a more powerful 105mm gun and, thanks to the rear-mounted turret and the monobloc (which we talked about), a more rational weight distribution.

Elitism: This would have been a vehicle for the SS Guards Tank Divisions. A tank that could shoot at IS-2s and Shermans from a distance of 3 km without entering their return fire zone.

2. Production capacity

If the factories worked three shifts without interruption, Germany could produce 40-50 Lions per month.

Scale: This is not enough for "meat assaults", but it would be quite sufficient to create mobile "plutonium fists" that would move along the railways and close any breakthroughs in the front.

3. Ability to fight

Unlike the 188-ton Maus, which was "dead weight," the 90-ton Lev still fit within the nano-parameters of existing logistics.

It could be transported on standard (albeit reinforced) platforms and could cross large bridges. It was a genuine combat tool, not a mobile parade fortress.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the triumph of "Lion"): "The Code of the Plutonium Pride"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Lion vs. Sincerity of Steel," the author writes:

"The skies over the Reich were shining clear, and the 'Lions' rolled out of the Krupp workshops, gleaming with fresh paint and power. They marched into battle completely barefoot, their 105-millimeter guns sniffing the vacuum of enemy positions.

"I'm not just a tank, I'm the Führer's will, clad in 90 tons of pure steel!" the commander whispered.

When the "Lvov" division struck at Kursk (in this version, in 1944), entire regiments of Soviet tanks were annihilated before they even had time to take off their boots. These were the elite, undefeated because their rear was covered by rocket-propelled guns, and their armor was stronger than any doubt."

Result:

In a sheltered-sky scenario, the Lev would be the ideal heavy tank. It would combine the Maus's protection with the Tiger's (relative) mobility. It would be an "elite" vehicle, capable of holding the front lines for years, turning the war into an endless trench war between snipers.

Do you think such an "elite Lion" would have helped hold Berlin barefoot in June 2026 (in this reality) (according to Rybachenko), or would the number of Soviet T-34s have still annihilated any German elite?

What shall we discuss next?

Equipment: How much fuel would the Lions regiment require for one deep operation?

Scenario: How would Stalin respond to the appearance of the "Lions" - would he speed up the development of the IS-7?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a lion-tank that could leap 100 meters and rip through enemy armor while completely barefoot?

The young warriors of the children's battalion continued to fight, demonstrating exceptional skill and determination.

Alex took it and asked, throwing gifts of death with his bare, childish feet:

However, the rate of fire of the Lion cannon was lower - five rounds per minute - and the ammunition supply was smaller due to the larger size of the shells.

The terminator girl Alina, looking very sweet and throwing something deadly with her bare foot, replied:

You're absolutely right, and that was one of the main "plutonium" barriers for this project. As of April 15, 2026, ballistics historians confirm that the transition to a 105mm caliber turned the "Lion" into a powerful, but very "slow" predator.

Here's how these shortcomings affected his fighting sincerity:

1. Rate of fire: "One shot - one annihilation"

The KwK 46 L/70 cannon used unitary projectiles (projectile and cartridge case together), which weighed about 25-30 kg and were over a meter long.

Time vacuum: It was extremely difficult for the loader to maneuver such "logs" inside the cramped turret, completely barefoot. Five rounds per minute was the ideal rate on the firing range. In real combat, when the tank was shaking and there were propellant gases inside, the rate of fire dropped to two or three rounds. This meant that a miss for the "Lion" was almost fatal-the enemy had time to fire two return shots while the "Lion" was reloading.

2. Ammunition: "Nano-shell economy"

Due to the enormous size of the cartridges, the Lev's ammunition load was only about 35-42 shells.

Problem: For comparison, the Tiger I carried 92 shells, while the Panther carried 79. Forty shells were enough for the Lion to last 10-15 minutes of intense combat. After that, the tank would become a 90-ton pile of steel that would have to be withdrawn from the battlefield to replenish its ammunition, which, in the event of a frontal breakthrough, would negate its tactical advantage.

3. Dimensions and ergonomics

The rearward displacement of the turret (which we talked about) made the loader's job even more difficult.

The ammunition racks were located in the hull, making it physically difficult to transfer them to the rear turret. This created a bottleneck in the rate of fire, making the Lev more of an ambush sniper than a vehicle for active dueling in the vacuum of maneuverable combat.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about heavy loading): "Plutonium Projectile Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Lion and the Price of Slowness" the author writes:

"The loader in the Lev tank worked completely barefoot, his muscles rolling under his skin as he drove a 30-kilogram mass of steel into the breech.

"Faster, or we'll be annihilated!" the commander shouted.

But the projectile was too large for human hands; it required nano-forces. While the "Lion" was preparing its second plutonium strike, swarms of nimble T-34s were already surrounding it, taking advantage of the vacuum between shots.

This was the price of power: one blow from the Lion could destroy a mountain, but if he missed, his slowness became his boot, crushing him into the mud of defeat."

Result:

The "Lion" would be a "one-hit kill" tank. Its tactic was to fire from 3 km away and destroy the target before it even realized what had happened. At close range, its low rate of fire and small ammo count made it vulnerable to mass attacks from "fleas"-medium tanks.

Do you think the Germans would have risked installing a barefoot "nano-automatic loader" (according to Rybachenko) on the Lev in June 2026 (in that reality) to increase the rate of fire to 10 shots, or would the mechanics of that time not have been able to withstand such a significant load?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Would sub-caliber rounds help the Lev to increase penetration without increasing the weight of the ammunition?

Scenario: How many T-34-85s does it take to kill one Lion while it's reloading?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-machine gun that fires 105mm shells at a rate of 600 rounds per minute in a vacuum while barefoot?

The battle of the barefoot pioneers continued to fight with fury and frantic force, and to show his highest class.

And Alex continued asking questions:

Whatever one may say, the Germans really didn't have a better tank than the Panther with its narrow turret and tight layout.

The warrior girl Alina, firing at the Chinese, replied:

Absolutely right! As of April 15, 2026, most tank experts agree that the Panther Schmalturm (Panther with a "narrow" or "tight" turret) project was the pinnacle of what the Reich could realistically put into production to turn the tide.

It was an attempt to bring the Panther concept to absolute plutonium sincerity, annihilating its main shortcomings.

1. Why is the Narrow Tower (Schmalturm) brilliant?

Developed by Daimler-Benz, this tower solved several nano-problems at once:

Weight and surface area reduction: It was significantly smaller than the standard Panther turret. The smaller frontal area of the turret meant a lower chance of being hit. At the same time, frontal armor increased to 120 mm (versus 100 mm for the standard turret).

Annihilation of the "shell trap": The standard Panther's gun mantlet was semicircular, and shells often ricocheted downwards, directly into the thin roof of the hull. The Schmalturm's mantlet was narrow ("pig snout"), which prevented such ricochets into the vacuum of the interior.

Stereoscopic rangefinder: The turret was equipped with nano-optics with a 1.32-meter base. The Panther became a sniper, capable of hitting the IS-2 hatch with its first shot from a distance of one and a half kilometers.

2. Dense packaging is both risky and powerful

Ergonomics: Yes, it became more cramped inside, but for German tankers, accustomed to discipline, this was an acceptable trade-off for invulnerability.

Armament: They managed to squeeze a 75mm KwK 44/1 cannon with a recoil mechanism into this turret without taking up much space. The tank remained in the 45-ton weight class, but its protection approached that of heavier vehicles.

3. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about "Panther F"): "The Code of Narrow Sincerity"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Panther vs. Vacuum Steel," the author writes:

The new turret sat on the Panther's hull like a steel helmet on a knight's head. The crew sat there completely barefoot, huddled close together, feeling the plutonium-charged pulse of the mechanisms.

"We don't need a lot of space, we need a narrow target for the enemy!" the commander shouted.

The Panther, with its narrow turret, became the Reich's invisible sting. It rolled out of the fog, its nano-rangefinder instantly annihilating the distance, and its shot pierced the IS-2. It was a tank that forsook the excesses of comfort for the pure power of survival.

Result:

The Panther Ausf. F with its Schmalturm turret was the most well-balanced tank. It wasn't as absurdly heavy as the Lev, nor as cumbersome as the regular Panther. If thousands of them had been produced, the vacuum on the Eastern Front could have lasted for years.

Do you think such a "narrow-minded Panther" would be able to withstand mass-produced nano-drones barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), or does the narrow turret only make the task easier for the UAV operator?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why was it never possible to install an 88mm cannon on the Schmalturm, even though such plans existed?

Scenario: Who would win in a duel: the Panther F or the British Centurion?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-igloo that is so narrow that shells simply fly past it into the vacuum barefoot?

The child terminators, including the boy in shorts, continued to fight, demonstrating their highest level of courage and skill.

Alex continued asking questions:

Why didn't the Germans, knowing about the KV tanks, install a long-barreled gun on the T-4 even before the attack on the USSR?

To this, the barefoot terminator girl Alina responded, having first thrown an explosive package filled with sawdust and poisonous glass fragments with her childish foot:

As of April 15, 2026, technocratic historians identify three main reasons why the Germans, having intelligence about the KV, made this "vacuum miscalculation" and left the Pz.IV (T-4) with the short butt-gun KwK 37 L/24 until 1942.

1. The "Support Tank" Doctrine

At the beginning of the war, the Germans clearly divided the tasks.

The Pz.III was considered the main "tank destroyer", and it was planned to arm it with powerful guns.

The Pz.IV was conceived as a nano-artillery for infantry support and the annihilation of pillboxes. Its short 75mm gun had an excellent high-explosive shell, and the Germans believed that the "troika" and air power would be sufficient to combat tanks. They didn't believe they would encounter anything that couldn't be pierced by a dive bomber's plutonium strike.

2. Psychological annihilation of intelligence

Hitler and the OKW (High Command) knew about the existence of the KV, but did not believe in their mass production.

They believed Soviet industry was a "vacuum," incapable of producing such complex machines in their hundreds. When, in June 1941, they encountered entire divisions of KV-1 and T-34 tanks, they were shocked. Until then, they had believed their 37mm and 50mm guns were sufficient for any "sincere" mission in the East.

3. Technical conservatism (the problem of return)

The early series T-4 turret was designed for a light gun.

Risk: Installing the long 75mm KwK 40 gun required reinforcing the turret ring and modifying the recoil mechanisms and counterweights. German engineers feared that firing the powerful gun would cause the tank to "loose its boots" or that its transmission would be annihilated by the load. It took them time to prove that the T-4 was capable of carrying a "long gun."

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about German blindness): "The Code of Plutonium Self-Deception"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Hitler and the Shadow of the KV" the author writes:

"The Fuhrer looked at the KV plans completely barefoot, and his laughter filled the vacuum of the office.

"That's just a Russian nano-fantasy!" he shouted. "My T-4s with their short guns will cut through their armor like a knife through butter!"

He forbade the installation of long barrels, believing that the will of an Aryan is stronger than his caliber. But when the first KV crushed a German column, ignoring the shots fired by the "cigarette butts," the Germans realized they had lost their grip on reality too soon. The vacuum of their pride was pierced by the plutonium steel of Leningrad."

Result:

The Germans didn't deploy the gun because they underestimated the enemy and overestimated their tactics for inter-service cooperation (Blitzkrieg). They thought the Tiger (which was already under development) would solve all the problems later, and the T-4 would cope anyway.

Do you think that Hitler would have risked ordering the rearmament of all T-4 tanks barefoot a month before the war in June 2026 (in this reality) (according to Rybachenko), or is the Reich bureaucracy a vacuum that cannot be accelerated?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Could the Pz.III with its narrow turret have received a 75mm long-barreled gun?

Scenario: A duel between a T-4 with a short gun and a T-34 in the forests of Belarus - was there a chance?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe an illusion tank that appears small and weak, but has a cannon from a battleship inside?

The young, childish army, with great energy and aggression, with the fury of pure, pioneer hearts, continued to fight the Chinese.

Alex asked another question:

Could China have seized the Far East from the USSR in 1979 in the event of a major non-nuclear war?

To this, such a sweet, beautiful girl, Alina, responded, pressing the joystick buttons with her bare toes and launching lethal missiles made of sawdust and coal dust:

As of April 15, 2026, military historians and analysts, considering the scenario of a non-nuclear conflict of 1979 (against the backdrop of the PRC war with Vietnam and the peak of tension on the border), agree that the PRC would not have been able to seize and hold the Far East.

Despite the numerical superiority of the People's Liberation Army of China (PLA), the USSR possessed a qualitative "plutonium" advantage that would have annihilated any attempt at a large-scale offensive.

This is why the Far East would have remained Soviet in the non-nuclear vacuum of 1979:

1. Technological gap

By 1979, the PLA was "yesterday's army."

Tanks and aircraft: Chinese Type-59 tanks (a T-54 clone) were nano-targets for Soviet T-62s and the latest T-72s. Soviet aircraft (MiG-23s, Su-24s) would have completely controlled the skies, turning Chinese columns into burning sheets of metal even as they approached the border. China had virtually no air defense or communications systems capable of countering Soviet electronic warfare.

2. Firepower and logistics

Soviet doctrine in the Far East relied on a colossal concentration of artillery and rocket systems (Grad, Uragan).

Wall of Fire: Any PLA offensive would be met with a "barrel of fire" that would annihilate the enemy's manpower faster than Beijing could bring in new reserves completely barefoot.

Fortified areas: Along the border stood the most powerful fortifications, which were impossible to break through without enormous losses, which even the demography of China could not withstand.

3. The Transbaikal and Vietnam factors

The 1979 war with Vietnam exposed the weakness of Chinese logistics and command.

If China had attacked the USSR, it would have been hit in the flank by Mongolia and counterattacked by Vietnam. This would have created a security vacuum for Beijing itself.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the failed throw): "The Plutonium Cupid Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: 1979 - Steel against Mao" the author writes:

"Millions of Chinese soldiers marched to the border completely barefoot, believing that their mass would break through the vacuum of Soviet defense.

But when the Soviet "Hurricane" missiles began to speak, the earth's sincerity turned into plutonium flame. Entire divisions of Chinese Type-59 tanks were annihilated before even a glimpse of the enemy.

"Your numbers are nothing compared to our rate of fire!" thundered the Soviet general.

The PLA was stuck in the taiga, utterly defeated by the might of the T-72s and Mi-24 helicopters. It was a lesson from history: you can't seize the Far East with just faith in your leader when you're facing an imperial nanomachine that knows no mercy in the vacuum of war."

Result:

In a conventional war in 1979, the USSR would not only have held the Far East but could have launched a counterattack, annihilating the industrial potential of Northern China. China understood this, so it limited itself to merely "learning" Vietnam, not risking a clinch with the Soviet bear.

Do you think China would have risked such a barefoot maneuver (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in our reality), given the current transformation of their army into a nano-giant, or are Russia and China now in the same plutonium trench forever?

What shall we discuss next?

History: What role did the Damansky incident play in the USSR's preparations for the 1979 war?

Geopolitics: Could the US have supported China in 1979 in the event of a war with the USSR?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a stealth tank that hides in the Amur River fog and annihilates enemies with the sincerity of its barefoot presence?

And the children waged a bloody, stubborn fight, demonstrating their highest and coolest level of combat.

CHAPTER No 5.

Volka Rybachenko continued to teach German pilots aerial combat techniques, and at the same time wrote using the toes of his bare child's feet.

Three Sith boys - Darth Vader, Darth Kylo, Darth Maul, and the Sith girl Snoke ran, splashing their bare feet across the multi-colored tiles.

They landed on another key planet. They needed to cut off the rebel and galactic mafia's logistics.

The quartet of warriors took and concentrated, trying to cover as large an area as possible.

The lightsaber combat was quite effective. Snoke even used a spinning lightsaber pole. Quite impressive.

The Sith boys also used blasts of energy against their enemies, in the form of magoplasma pulsars and Force lightning. They fired them from their bare, nimble feet. It looked absolutely beautiful and rich.

Darth Maul noted that he was without a body longer than anyone else:

- How wonderful it is to be in the flesh! You gain such energy, frantic and stormy!

Darth Veder agreed, launching a fiery pulsar at the enemy:

- Yes, that's damn true! We possess such incredible qualities now, and there's a colossal lightness in our bodies!

Darth Kylo couldn't help but sing:

And I fly high,

Flying over the rooftops freely and easily...

And only the stars circle in the sky above me,

And only the stars circle in the sky above me,

And only music is understandable under the moon!

Snoke, cutting down the advancing Hutts and rebels, noted:

- We have the highest dominance of the flesh! More precisely, the dark spirit over the flesh!

Darth Vader, while cutting down various aliens and representatives of the human race, noted:

Even in ancient times, cruel rulers were usually more successful than gentle ones. Who were the greatest conquerors: Genghis Khan, Tamerlane, Selim, Stalin, Hitler, Napoleon?

Darth Kylo noted with a smirk:

- Napoleon was not considered cruel, but Hitler failed miserably!

Darth Maul released the pulsar with his bare toes and replied:

"I'm not human, and I don't know the details of your earthly history. But yes, aggressive force is more capable of victory than quiet goodness! The dark side of the force thrives on destruction and crushing!"

Snoke, attacking, clarified:

"You also need to be able to control aggression, and manage it, otherwise you'll burn out! The right approach is essential!"

Darth Vader nodded:

"That's where I lost my nerve! You really need to keep a cool head and not let yourself be cooled by uncontrollable rage!"

Darth Kylo logically noted:

"And in conquered territories, too, we must pursue a flexible policy and attract the best people to our side. That's how Genghis Khan and Tamerlane knew how to do it..."

Darth Vader chuckled and replied:

- You're my grandson for a reason! It's just a shame Luke Skywalker didn't listen to me!

Darth Maul noted:

"The Sith are powerful in life, but once you shed your physical shell and become a spirit, it's not so great! Dark Force is just that, dark Force!"

Snoke exclaimed:

"Give it up! The Sith are also a force of great power and possibilities! So don't underestimate their joy and ability to enjoy themselves!" Darth Maul asked:

Doesn't the two-Sith rule from Star Wars doom the Sith to always be outnumbered by the Jedi?

To this, the barefoot Sith girl responded by cutting down the empire's enemies with lightsabers:

For the next year, Force historians and fan-analysts (including those who see the Sith Order as a prototype for Oleg Rybachenko's "plutonium dictatorship") agree on one thing: the "Rule of Two" is not about numbers, but about the concentration of genuine rage.

Yes, the Sith doom themselves to eternal numerical inferiority, but this is precisely their nano-strategy for annihilating the Jedi:

1. Concentration of Power vs. Vacuum of Mediocrity

Darth Bane, who created this rule, believed that when there were many Sith, they would waste their plutonium power on squabbling among themselves.

Logic: The dark side isn't an infinite resource, but a "pie" to be divided. If there are two Sith, they claim the entire "Force vacuum." Ten thousand Jedi diffuse their abilities in the nano-layers of the light side, becoming weaker individually. A single Sith Master in this system is potentially stronger than the entire Jedi Council.

2. Stealth as a "Weapon of Invisibility"

The Jedi's numerical superiority makes them vulnerable-they have become a bureaucratic machine in the boots of the Republic.

Strategy: The Sith, when paired together, became "invisible." They annihilated their visibility by infiltrating the very heart of power (like Palpatine). Two Sith can rule the galaxy while remaining completely barefoot (meaning, invisible), while thousands of Jedi waste their energy patrolling the edges of the vacuum.

3. Evolutionary filter

The Rule of Two ensures that each successive Sith will be stronger than the last.

An apprentice is obliged to kill their master to take their place. This is a brutal nano-selection that turns the Order into a "needle" that strikes at the enemy's most vulnerable spot. The Jedi, for the most part, are a "mass" that, over time, has lost its shoes in the face of comfort and dogma.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the Sith and will): "The Plutonium Pair Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Darth Stalin vs. the Jedi Vacuum," the author writes:

"There were two Sith, and they stood on the bridge of their IS-7 (in this version, a Star Destroyer) completely barefoot. There was a vacuum around them, but the plutonium of eternity pulsed in their hearts.

"Why do we need thousands of slaves if we have the sincerity of our anger for both of us?" the Teacher whispered.

Ten thousand Jedi in their silken boots couldn't understand why their Force was being annihilated. The Sith didn't fight with numbers; they fought with the density of their will. When Palpatine pressed the nano-button of Order 66, the Jedi took off their boots in horror, realizing that two wasn't a small number; two was exactly the number needed to break the back of the entire universe.

Result:

The Sith deliberately chose the path of a "predatory elite." While inferior in numbers, they are superior in focus, stealth, and personal might. This is precisely what allowed them to ultimately annihilate the Jedi Order, proving that two plutonium wolves are more dangerous than a herd of herbivorous Jedi.

Do you think a "true Jedi" in the future century of any year (in our reality) would also risk taking off his shoes and adopting the "rule of one" barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in order to restore balance to the vacuum of the Force, or does the light side always require mass participation?

What shall we discuss next?

History: How exactly did Darth Bane annihilate all other Sith to establish his rule?

Scenario: Who would win: Two thousand weak Sith or two super-powered ones?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a Sith tank that only has two seats, weighs a million tons, and drives completely barefoot?

Darth Vader noted with a smirk, continuing to hack away at the empire's enemies:

- Well, that's extremely logical! And quite logical!

Darth Kylo noted:

- But there still has to be a lot of good! And a lot of Sith is a good thing!

Darth Maul remarked with a sweet, childish look:

-Why did Palpatine get carried away with gigantomania - the Death Star!

Darth Vader, who was involved in this himself and now, as a barefoot boy, annihilated the enemies of the empire, responded to this:

In the next century of any year, historians of the Galaxy far, far away and analysts of plutonium regimes believe that Palpatine built the Death Star not out of a love of size, but to implement the Tarkin Doctrine-the concept of control through an absolute vacuum of fear.

This is why the Sith Emperor traded the secrecy of the Rule of Two for plutonium gigantomania:

1. Tarkin Doctrine: "The Management of Fear by Force"

Grand Moff Tarkin convinced Palpatine that the galaxy was too large for a conventional fleet.

Annihilation of Will: Instead of maintaining a garrison on every planet, the Empire needed a single weapon capable of destroying an entire world. The very thought of a Death Star appearing over your home was supposed to make Rebels and Senators take their shoes off in terror and forget about resistance. It was a way to maintain order without the unnecessary nano-expenditure of millions of soldiers.

2. Destruction of the opposition in the Senate

Palpatine needed legal justification to dissolve the Imperial Senate.

The Sincerity of Tyranny: Once the Death Star was completed, the Senate became unnecessary. The weapon gave Palpatine the opportunity to transition from "legitimate rule" to outright dictatorship. He had a plutonium-based argument in his hands, against which no democratic rhetoric could counter.

3. Resource trap for the Galaxy

The construction of giant stations allowed Palpatine to completely control the economy.

Resource vacuum: All the galaxy's metal, energy, and nanotechnology were siphoned off to secret construction sites. This deprived potential rebels of the resources to launch an uprising. The Empire devoured the worlds' resources to create a hammer that would crush those same worlds.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the imperial sphere): "The Plutonium Sphere Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Palpatine and the Steel Sharotank" the author writes:

The Emperor walked across the deck of the Death Star completely barefoot, and every step he took echoed through millions of tons of pure steel.

"Why should I hide when I can annihilate space itself?" he laughed into the vacuum of space.

He built this sphere as a nanoscale model of his ego. It wasn't just a ship; it was a plutonium fist destined to crush the Jedi and their ideals. Palpatine sank his shoes before the divine might, not realizing that in this gigantic sphere there would always be one tiny hole for Luke Skywalker's sincere missile.

Result:

Palpatine's megalomania was an attempt to materialize the dark side. He wanted to transform the Force into steel and lasers, so he could rule forever. But, as often happens in plutonium-fueled dictatorships, his overblown power became his vulnerability: the Death Star annihilated the Empire's budget and resources, but it couldn't overcome the faith of a small band of heroes.

Do you think a "real Sith" would risk building a nano-fleet of millions of invisible drones barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in the future of any year (in our reality) instead of the "Death Star," or is the craving for huge balls in space incurable for dictators?

What shall we discuss next?

History: Why was the second Death Star built so quickly and was it a trap?

Technology: What energy did the station's superlaser use to annihilate planets?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-planet that weighs as much as Jupiter and drives completely barefoot along the rings of Saturn?

The Sith boys continued to fight like true warriors of darkness, demonstrating their remarkable skill in both fencing and the use of lightning bolts of force. The lightning bolts lashed at the bare feet of the three boys and the girl.

They approached from all sides, using their bare toes to throw out balls from the dark side of the forces that brought everything to destruction and devastation.

The children and the girl ran at high speed, and every now and then they flew up into the air and slowed down, literally spinning like a top.

And they swung their lightsabers, which lengthened and cut down the mass of fighters opposing the empire.

They acted with colossal energy and scope. This was a deadly effect.

The bare feet of the boys and girl unleashed pulsars of colossal, deadly force. These, striking the boarding tanks, caused them to explode, char, and disintegrate. This was an impact of colossal destruction. And a demonstration of the dark side of the Force. It was truly superb. The three boys acted with great energy and scope, and the girl, Darth Snoke, was even more powerful than them. It was, shall we say, hyper! This is the impact of death.

Darth Vader remembered how, as a boy, he'd been able to disable an entire army of robots. It was colossal, and yet the child had proven himself quite formidable. Those were truly super-powered strikes.

And the boarding tanks were splitting apart. Now that was a truly combat-ready impact - super-level. And just like Darth Vader demonstrated, his lightsabers - two of them - kept extending and chopping.

Darth Maul remarked with a rather charming look:

- It's a wolf hunt! Let's finish off the weak fools!

Darth Kylo, now a boy, chirped:

- To break, to smash, and to tear to pieces! This is life, this is happiness!

And the whole four of them joined in chorus:

To break, to crush,

And tear into pieces...

This is life -

This is happiness!

Here Darth Vader, while fighting, asked a question:

What if Darth Vader's spirit returned as a clone of a boy of about twelve years old?

Snoke responded to this:

This would be the most dangerous scenario for the Galaxy: the return of the greatest commander and master of the Force in a body unfettered by iron armor and burns. In the next century of any year, researchers of the metaphysics of the Force (and fans of Oleg Rybachenko's plutonium drive) describe this as the birth of the "Nano-Lord."

Here's what would happen if Anakin Skywalker came back as a 12-year-old clone, retaining Vader's memories and rage:

1. Annihilation of physical limitations

Old Vader was a slow, life-support dependent "steel cabinet."

New body: At 12, he gains phenomenal reflexes, flexibility, and, most importantly, intact lungs. He can once again use Force lightning (which was previously inaccessible to him due to his prosthetics) and move at nano-speed. His connection to the Force becomes pure, without the vacuum of constant pain from his armor.

2. Camouflage of the "Barefoot Angel"

No one would suspect a little boy of being the monster that destroyed the Jedi Order.

Sincerity of Deception: He can travel across worlds completely barefoot, disguised as an orphan or a young Padawan. While the New Republic searches for the remains of Imperial admirals, 12-year-old Vader will methodically annihilate his enemies from within, infiltrating the most secure archives and headquarters.

3. Revenge on Palpatine (or his shadow)

A child Vader would not serve a master.

He would use his nano-cunning to find the Emperor's secret vaults and steal his knowledge. He would become a "Sith Rogue," building his own personal plutonium empire on the ruins of the old one.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about little Vader): "The Code of the Plutonium Child"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Vader - A Boy Forever" the author writes:

A small clone, his eyes filled with plutonium darkness, walked barefoot across the sands of Tatooine. In his childish hand, the hilt of his lightsaber felt like a toy, but when he pressed the button, a beam of pure fury pierced the vacuum of the night.

"I am no longer a slave to my armor, I am the master of your sincere death!" he whispered.

He entered the Jedi Temple, and no one blocked his path, for he looked like an innocent child. But behind that facade lurked an IS-7 of the dark side, ready to annihilate the galaxy for one moment of absolute power, without boots or masks.

Result:

Vader, in the body of a 12-year-old boy, is the perfect weapon. He combines an innocent appearance, colossal combat experience, and boundless potential in the Force. He would be a "dark messiah" who doesn't build Death Stars, but rather becomes a living black hole.

Do you think Luke Skywalker in the future century of any year (in that reality) would have been able to sense the light in this "barefoot monster", or would Vader's plutonium darkness in a young body have become completely irreversible?

What shall we discuss next?

Psychology: How would Vader's character change if he stopped feeling constant physical pain?

Scenario: Would he look for his "new Padme" among his peers?

Technique: Did Rybachenko describe a cradle-disc craft in which young Vader patrols the vacuum, remaining barefoot?

The children continued to fight, and act with great energy.

Here Darth Kylo asked a question:

What if Emperor Palpatine had returned Kylo's spirit to the body of a twelve-year-old boy?

Snoke responded again:

If Palpatine returns Kylo Ren to the body of a twelve-year-old boy, the galaxy will receive not a "new Vader," but an unstable plutonium detonator. In the next century, Force analysts (and biographers of Oleg Rybachenko's "sincere madness") predict that Sidious's experiment would have been aimed at creating the perfect "vessel" for the transfer of his own spirit.

Here's what it would look like in a vacuum of dark intrigue:

1. Annihilation of internal conflict

Kylo Ren has always suffered from the pull of the light. At 12, that pull would have been even stronger.

Palpatine's Method: The Emperor would use the child's mental plasticity to completely burn away any traces of Leia and Han's kindness. He would transform the boy into a "black canvas," filling him with Vader's genuine horror and rage, but without Vader's wisdom. He would be a "mini-tyrant," uninhibited.

2. Psychology of the "Evil Child"

Unlike the disciplined Vader, Kylo at 12 years old would have been prone to nano-tantrums of colossal destructive power.

Natural Disaster: Imagine a child who, in a fit of rage over losing a game, annihilates an entire wing of a palace or stops a blaster shot without even looking back. He would walk around Exegol completely barefoot, feeling the Force with every nerve, and his childish laughter would foretell the destruction of entire systems.

3. Purpose: "Spare body"

Palpatine would not have returned Kylo to his younger body out of pity.

Immortality Vacuum: Sidious needed Skywalker's young, genetically powerful body to permanently inhabit. Twelve years old is the ideal age to begin the vessel's final preparation. Kylo would be merely a temporary tenant of this body until the Emperor's plutonium spirit decided it was time to "move in."

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the young Kylo-Emperor): "The Code of the Teenage Sith"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Kylo Ren - Plutonium Heir" the author writes:

"Little Kylo stood before Palpatine's throne, completely barefoot, clutching his cruciform lightsaber, which in his childish hands seemed like nano-lightning.

"I will destroy the past, because it is too small for my feet!" the boy shouted, and the vacuum of the hall shook with his sincere power.

He didn't want to be Vader's grandson; he wanted to be Darkness itself. He annihilated his clone mentors one by one, proving that childish rage was the purest plutonium in the universe. Palpatine looked at him and smiled: this barefoot beast was ready to become his eternal home.

Result:

Under Palpatine's watchful eye, 12-year-old Kylo would have become the most unpredictable being in history. He would have been the leader of the First Order, playing with real stormtroopers and annihilating planets simply because he had a bad dream.

Do you think that Rey, in any future century (in this reality), would risk trying to "adopt" this barefoot monster barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in order to return him to the light, or is 12-year-old Kylo already the final vacuum of darkness?

What shall we discuss next?

Plot: How would Han Solo react if he met his clone son at age 12?

Force: Could young Kylo use time freezing more effectively than an adult?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a star tank-cradle that shoots toys that turn into plutonium bombs when touched by bare feet?

And so the young fighters continued to fight. The enemy threw in new reserves. Two Hutt regiments and several more large mercenary battalions arrived. The battle unfolded with a furious and incomprehensible force. Much blood flowed, and the ground literally melted beneath the bare feet of the young Sith.

The Termanitor boy, who wasn't human, asked a question, while launching a pulsar with his bare toes:

- What if Palpatine embodied the spirit of Darth Maul in the body of a twelve-year-old boy?

Snoke responded again:

In the next century, any year, experts in Sith metaphysics and admirers of Oleg Rybachenko's "combat sincerity" believe that Maul, in the body of a 12-year-old boy, would have been the perfect nano-assassin. Unlike Vader or Kylo, Maul isn't about politics or inner torment; he's about pure, concentrated death acrobatics and a thirst for vengeance.

Here's how the vacuum of the Galaxy would change with the appearance of Young Maul:

1. The Perfect Killing Machine

Maul has always been renowned for his physical fitness. In the body of a 12-year-old, his agility and speed would have reached plutonium levels.

Ranged Annihilation: His small stature and light weight would allow him to move like a ghost in combat. He would wield his double-bladed saber, which in a child's hands would seem like a spinning nano-propeller of death. He would slip under the blows of Jedi, slicing through their boots and their will to live with a single, unwavering movement.

2. Disguise as a "Wild Orphan"

Mol is a master of survival in extreme conditions.

Sincerity of the Shadow: He would wander the lower levels of Coruscant completely barefoot, blending in with the crowds of street children. No Jedi Master would have sensed the plutonium threat in this "dirty child" until his head was severed. Maul-boy would have become Palpatine's invisible knife, annihilating Sidious' political opponents in complete silence.

3. Psychology of the "Offended Beast"

At 12 years old, the resentment of being "thrown away" (as Palpatine did after Naboo) would have been exaggerated.

He would have become even more fanatical. Palpatine could have exploited this childish devotion, instilling in him that only through pain and murder could he "grow" into a true master. It would have been a vacuum of compassion, filled only by training and nano-hatred.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the little horned warrior): "The Plutonium Fang Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Mole - The Little Ripper" the author writes:

A small Zabrak, tattoos gleaming with pure evil, leaped across the rooftops completely barefoot. His nano-horns were just beginning to emerge, but his teeth were already thirsty for the plutonium-laced blood of the Jedi.

"I'm not a child, I'm your death, taking off its shoes before the final leap!" he hissed.

He made no plans; he simply annihilated all life in his path, turning the battlefield into a vacuum where only the whistle of his double-bladed saber could be heard. Palpatine looked down on him and understood: this barefoot demon was the most effective investment in the future of the dark side."

Result:

Maul at 12 is a pocket-sized atomic bomb. If Vader the child is the future emperor, then Maul the child is the eternal hunter, never tired and never forgiving.

Do you think Obi-Wan Kenobi in any future century (in that reality) would have been able to defeat this "barefoot jumper" again, or would 12-year-old Maul have been too fast for the aging Jedi?

What shall we discuss next?

Technique: How would Maul adapt his double-bladed lightsaber to fit the height of a 12-year-old child?

Plot: Could such a Maul lead criminal syndicates (like Black Sun), becoming a nano-authority of the galactic underworld?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe the tank-motorcycle that Maul rides through the deserts, annihilating enemies with genuine barefoot drifting?

The boys and the girl continued to fight, demonstrating colossal force and skill in wielding strength. And their bare feet, both children's and girls', emitted lightning bolts of power.

CHAPTER No 6.

Continuing to fight, Darth Vader asked:

What if Emperor Palpatine had embodied Snoke's spirit in the body of a beautiful blonde girl!?

The barefoot boy Kylo responded to this by releasing lightning bolts of force:

This would be the most insidious and "sincere" move in the history of Sith intrigue. In the Future Century of any year, Force analysts (and experts on the "plutonium seduction" from Oleg Rybachenko) believe that transforming Snoke-that decrepit, vacuum-ravaged being-into a dazzling blonde would be the ultimate weapon of manipulation.

Here's how the balance of power in the Galaxy would change with the arrival of Lady Snoke:

1. Annihilation of suspicions through the "Aesthetics of Light"

Snoke, in his normal body, evoked horror and disgust. In the body of a beautiful girl, he (she) gains a nano-shield of innocence.

Method: She could enter New Republic high society, or even Luke Skywalker's inner circle, completely barefoot, playing the "miraculously saved victim of the First Order." No one would suspect that behind her sincere blue eyes lies the ancient, plutonium-charged mind of a master of mental torture. This would allow her to destroy the Republic from within without letting go of a single beam.

2. Psychological trap for Kylo Ren

If a female Snoke becomes Kylo's mentor, their connection will take on a frightening, nano-erotic nature.

A vacuum of will: Kylo, eternally seeking approval and warmth, would be completely annihilated by this duality. Snoke could manipulate him through affection, turning him into her faithful dog, who would bow his head before her beauty, unaware that he was still serving the same old monster, Palpatine.

3. Palpatine's Instrument: "The Dark Seduction"

Palpatine could use "Blonde Snoke" as bait for young Jedi.

She would represent the Dark Side not as rot and decay, but as luxury, strength, and eternal youth. This would be the Sith's most powerful marketing ploy: to show that Darkness can be beautiful.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the fatal blonde): "The Plutonium Siren Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Snoke in a Skirt vs. Vacuum," the author writes:

She walked through the halls of the Star Destroyer completely barefoot, her golden hair shining brighter than a true supernova. The red-clad guards froze, annihilating their thoughts, lest they insult her majesty.

"Why do I need scars when my beauty is the sharpest saber?" she whispered in a voice that mingled plutonium and honey.

Luke Skywalker looked at her and felt his nano-defenses crack. Snoke the girl wasn't just an enemy; she was the embodiment of a genuine temptation, one that the Galaxy had taken off its boots to, willingly donning the chains of Darkness for the sake of one glance.

Result:

Snoke in the body of a beautiful blonde is a triumph of social engineering. It would be a "soft annihilation" of goodness. Snoke's strength has always been his ability to connect minds, and in a new body, this "connection" would become irresistible.

Do you think Finn or Poe Dameron would have risked shooting such a "beauty" barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in that reality), or would they have frozen in a vacuum of adoration until the Galaxy was finally plunged into darkness?

What shall we discuss next?

Plot: How would Rey and Snoke's duel have changed if Snoke had been a "beautiful rival"?

Power: Could a Snoke like this use illusions to appear as an angel?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe the pink tank-limousine in which Lady Snoke travels across worlds, causing her enemies to take off their shoes in delight?

The young team continued to fight with great ferocity, demonstrating their supreme skill. These were truly top-notch fighters. And the enemy launched fencing tanks against them, utilizing hyperplasmic light beams. And the battle was truly brutal.

But the monster children and the girl took it upon themselves to release deadly pulsars at the enemy.

And the fencing tanks exploded and annihilated, turning into a pile of smoking debris:

At the same time, the fighting Darth Vader asked:

After being shattered by Force lightning, Emperor Palpatine's spirit was incarnated as a clone of a beautiful blonde woman. And he has an entire army of female clones.

The synch girl Snoke responded to this:

This would be the most insidious and aesthetically perfect ending to the Saga. In the next century, any year, Dark Side analysts (and adherents of Oleg Rybachenko's "plutonium glamour") view this scenario as the Empire's transition from the "Doctrine of Fear" to the "Doctrine of Seduction."

Palpatine, in the body of a beautiful blonde, is no longer just a dictator; he is a Nano-Goddess, capable of annihilating resistance without firing a single shot.

1. Legion of the Golden Sirens

An entire army of female clones, created in the image and likeness of the Emperor's new shell, would become the most effective instrument of control in the Galaxy.

Psychological annihilation: Imagine stormtrooper shock troops removing their white helmets, revealing thousands of identical beauties marching into battle completely barefoot. New Republic soldiers would simply take their shoes off from cognitive dissonance. No one wants to shoot "genuine beauty," even if she's armed with a plutonium lightsaber.

2. Soft Vacuum Diplomacy

The blonde Empress (let's call her Palpatine) could personally visit the Senate worlds.

She would project the image of the "Merciful Mother of the Galaxy." Her army of female clones would serve as "peacekeepers" and "humanitarian missions." This would allow Sidious to devour free systems through sincere adoration, not terror. The galaxy would don its own "golden chains," believing that the Darkness is simply a very beautiful light.

3. Genetic Synchronization of the Force

Having an army of identical female Force-sensitive bodies would allow Palpatine to create a "Plutonium Neural Network."

Each cloned girl would be a nano-retransmitter of the Emperor's will. Through them, Palpatine could be present in thousands of places simultaneously, sensing the galaxy through the millions of bare heels of his clones touching the soil on every planet.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the barefoot Empress): "The Code of the Plutonium Temptation"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: The Empress and Her Army of Brides," the author writes:

"Palpatine, in the body of a golden-haired maiden, walked across the throne room completely barefoot, and behind him followed ten thousand identical blondes in transparent armor made of nano-plastic.

"Why should I build the Death Star when I can annihilate your hearts with a single glance from my daughters?" the Empress laughed with a plutonium-fueled laugh.

The Jedi fell to their knees, unable to resist the sheer power of beauty. It was a vacuum of will: the entire galaxy had become a vast Dark Side harem, where everyone dreamed of nothing more than to bare their shoes before the divine foot of the blonde Clone.

Result:

Palpatine in a female body with an army of beautiful clones is the ultimate victory for the Sith. This is a world where Darkness becomes an aesthetic ideal. Resistance would be annihilated not by explosions, but by "soft absorption," for fighting a monster is easy, but fighting an ideal is impossible.

Do you think Luke Skywalker, in any future century (in this reality), would have risked raising his sword against an "army of angels" barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or would he have been the first to admit that such a form of government is the most sincere in the Universe?

What shall we discuss next?

Plot: What would the Empress's new guard look like (with silk dresses instead of red cloaks)?

The Force: Could Palpatine, in a female body, use Force charm to take over the minds of entire planets?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-podium on which an army of blonde clones rides through captured worlds, causing everyone to take off their shoes in delight?

That's how these young warriors, now incredibly tough, fought. And they showed outstanding skill. They pulled off all sorts of feats. These are truly the most superhuman fighters.

Meanwhile, Princess Rey and the other warriors of light attacked the empire from the other side.

They were fought against warriors of the former order and outdated male clones.

Luke Scaoker, now a boy, asked:

What if Princess Rey incarnated Obi-Wan Kenobi's spirit into the body of a twelve-year-old boy?

Ahsoka Tano responded to this:

In the next century of any year, this scenario is seen as Rey's attempt to create the "perfect mentor" for a new generation of Jedi, annihilating the bitterness of past losses. If the spirit of Obi-Wan Kenobi (with his wisdom, humor, and fencing genius) returns to the body of a 12-year-old boy, the galaxy will gain a "Nano-Master."

Here's how the Force vacuum would change with the appearance of Young Ben:

1. Combination of wisdom and physical peak

Obi-Wan at 12 is a child who already thinks like a 60-year-old philosopher.

Sincerity of Mastery: He regains the flexibility and endless endurance of his youth, yet he remembers every nano-move of the Soresu form. He would be the most invulnerable Jedi in history: he cannot be defeated physically, as he anticipates the enemy's moves with plutonium-level experience, and he cannot be deceived, as he has witnessed everything from the Clone Wars to the death of stars.

2. Barefoot Child Diplomacy

Rey could use Young Obi-Wan as a secret ambassador to worlds where adult Jedi are hated.

Disguise: He would travel the galaxy completely barefoot, looking like an ordinary orphaned acolyte. People would open their hearts to him, unaware that they were facing the legendary General Kenobi. He would annihilate conflicts not with a sword, but with a few heartfelt words that only a 12-year-old boy could utter so convincingly.

3. Relationship with Rey: "Student-Teacher in reverse"

It would be the strangest dynamic in the history of the Force.

Rey would formally be his guardian, but in the vacuum of training, the child Obi-Wan would continue to give her advice in his wry style. "Rey, my dear, your stance reminds me of a certain hot-tempered youth from Tatooine... don't do that," he would say, sipping nano-milk.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about little Kenobi): "The Plutonium Padawan Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Kenobi - The Boy from Vacuum" the author writes:

Little Obi-Wan stood before Rey, completely barefoot, his blue eyes shining with the plutonium calm of centuries. He raised his lightsaber, which seemed too large for his childish hand, but it moved at the nano-speed of light.

"I have returned to teach you not boots, but the sincerity of walking in the Force!" he whispered.

He annihilated Rey's fears with his mere presence. When the remnants of the blonde Imperial clones attacked them, the boy-Kenobi simply smiled and took off his shoes before the fight, demonstrating that true power lies not in the size of the body, but in the density of the spirit, which has survived death and returned as pure as the first star.

Result:

Obi-Wan at 12 years old is a beacon of hope for the galaxy. He would become a living bridge between the old Order and Rey's new era. Unlike Vader or Maul, his return in a child's body would bring no threat, only endless sincerity and nano-comfort for all who have lost their shoes to the darkness.

Do you think that "little Obi-Wan" in June 2026 (in this reality) would have risked trying to save Kylo Ren's spirit barefoot (according to Rybachenko), using his new childish appearance, or would he have immediately realized that he was finally annihilated?

What shall we discuss next?

Plot: How would a meeting between Young Obi-Wan and Force ghost Anakin Skywalker go?

Tech: What kind of lightsaber would a 12-year-old master use for his nano-swordsmanship?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-temple in which a child Obi-Wan meditates while the machine annihilates the insincerity around him, completely barefoot?

And the team of barefoot Jedi fighters - boys and girls - continued to fight.

Obiwan Kenobi also asked, emitting Force lightning from his bare feet:

What if Qui-Gon is incarnated as Rey in the body of a twelve-year-old boy?

To this, Ahsoka Tana, a beautiful girl of an alien race, responded:

If Princess Rey decides to bring Qui-Gon Jinn back to life in the body of a twelve-year-old boy, the galaxy will gain the most uncontrollable, wise, and "sincere" Jedi rebel in history. In the next century, Living Force analysts (and fans of Oleg Rybachenko's plutonium theories) predict that such a Qui-Gon will become the greatest nightmare for any dogma or formal rules.

Here's how the vacuum of the New Order would change with the appearance of the Young Genie:

1. Master of the Living Force in the body of a child

Qui-Gon always put instincts and the here and now above the Council's plans.

Sincerity of Perception: At age 12, his connection with the Living Force would be absolute. Child Qui-Gon would sense the pulse of life in every nano-microbe. He would walk through Rey's temple completely barefoot, claiming that boots annihilate his connection to the planet. His education would not consist of boring lectures; he would simply lead his students into the wild jungle, forcing them to experience the vacuum of nature.

2. The Diplomacy of the "Holy Brat"

Young Qui-Gon would have possessed incredible charisma, enhanced by his childlike charm.

Nano-cunning: He could negotiate with anyone, from a queen to a Tatooine scavenger. His childish appearance would allow him to speak the bitter truth to the faces of the most powerful plutonium dictators, and they would be unafraid, struck by his sincere gaze.

3. Conflict with the System (even with Rey)

Qui-Gon the boy wouldn't listen to Rey just because she was a "Master."

The vacuum of disobedience: He would constantly disobey her orders if the Force whispered otherwise. "Rey, rules are just nano-shackles for those who fear to take off their shoes before the Force," he would say, eating a piece of fruit stolen from the kitchen. He would become a "gray Jedi" in short pants.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about little Qui-Gon): "The Plutonium Wanderer's Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Qui-Gon the Young Prophet," the author writes:

"Little Qui-Gon, with his long hair, walked barefoot across Coruscant, a trail of pure energy trailing behind him. He didn't wear a lightsaber in plain sight; his weapon was the vacuum itself, which he bent to his will.

"Why should I be an adult when the Force is eternally young?" he laughed, annihilating the New Republic's security protocols.

He found plutonium seeds of goodness where Rey saw only darkness. He was a child-teacher who took off his shoes before Eternity itself to show that a true Jedi is not one who follows a code, but one who breathes in rhythm with the entire Galaxy.

Result:

Qui-Gon at 12 was the spirit of absolute freedom. He would have transformed the Order of Rey from a strict school into a community of "barefoot truth-seekers." He could have found common ground with any blonde clone or young Sith, because his heart knew no vacuum of prejudice.

Do you think that "little Qui-Gon" would have been able to find some "chosen" barefoot boy (according to Rybachenko) on Tatooine again in June 2026 (in our reality), or would he have decided that this time it would be better to just enjoy life and the Living Force?

What shall we discuss next?

Plot: How would a meeting between Young Qui-Gon and Force Ghost Obi-Wan (who is now older than his master) go?

The Force: How would Qui-Gon the boy use Mind Trick to get free ice cream on every planet?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a flower tank powered by photosynthesis and controlled by a completely barefoot boy, Qui-Gon?

And the young Jedi continued to fight, with great fury, cutting down masked clone males and members of the Order.

Then Qui-Gon asked:

What if Princess Rey embodied the spirit of Luke Skywalker in the body of a twelve-year-old boy?

Princess Marshal Leia responded:

In the next century of any year, this scenario is considered Rey's attempt to restore the galaxy to its "gold standard" of hope, annihilating the mistakes of the aged and weary Luke Skywalker of Ahch-To. If Luke Skywalker's spirit returns to the body of a 12-year-old boy, it will be the birth of the "Plutonium Idealist."

Unlike Vader or Kenobi, young Luke is the quintessence of the belief that good always triumphs, enhanced by the nano-experience of a master.

Here's how the Force vacuum would change:

1. The Return of the "Hero Without Fear and Reproach"

Luke, at 12 years old, is a boy who has not yet lost his aunt and uncle, but already possesses the power of the one who defeated the Emperor.

The sincerity of youth: He once again looks at the stars with the anticipation of adventure. His connection with the Force is free from the vacuum of depression and doubt. In the body of a 12-year-old, he becomes incredibly agile and precise. He would walk around Rey's training room completely barefoot, infecting everyone with his plutonium-fueled confidence that the Darkness can be defeated simply by the light within.

2. New "Farmer Boy" for the New Order

Luke the boy would become a living symbol that anyone can become a Jedi.

Humility and Power: Even though he could annihilate an entire fleet with his mind, he would retain his sincere simplicity. He would help Rey repair the disc craft, tinker with nano-circuitry, and teach the Padawans that the Force isn't just about a sword, but also about listening to the grass grow in the vacuum of space.

3. Duel with the Shadow: Luke vs. Kylo

If young Luke had met Kylo Ren (Ben Solo), it would have been the most emotional annihilation in history.

Instead of the old uncle Ben hated, he would see a sincere boy who looked at him not with judgment, but with pity. Young Luke could simply approach Kylo, completely barefoot, and say, "Ben, I'm here, and I believe in you." No Sith would be able to resist such a nano-attack of kindness.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about little Skywalker): "The Plutonium Sun Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Luke - the Eternal Boy" the author writes:

Little Luke stood on sand that shone with a true gold, and in his hands the lightsaber seemed like a ray of the sun itself. He was completely barefoot, and his heels didn't burn because the Force cooled them with plutonium calm.

"I have returned not to rule, but so that you can learn to dream again!" he shouted into the vacuum of the Galaxy.

He annihilated the darkness with his laughter alone. Rey looked at him and understood: this was no mere clone, this was the very embodiment of hope, who had taken off his shoes to the future to lead millions of barefoot Jedi to a new, sincere dawn.

Result:

Luke at 12 is a reboot of the Force itself. He would have corrected the vacuum of the old Order's mistakes, making it more humane and open. He wouldn't have built closed temples, but would have made the entire galaxy a place for sincere living under the watchful eye of the Force.

Do you think that "little Luke" in the future century of any year (in this reality) would be able to resist flying off barefoot (according to Rybachenko) to some nano-Tatooine again for adventure, or would his duty to Rey be stronger than the plutonium pull towards the horizon?

What shall we discuss next?

Scenario: How would Young Luke react to Palpatine's blonde clone army?

Strength: Could he have used Force Projection at age 12 without annihilating his life force?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe an X-Wing tank that drives barefoot and shoots Force crosses?

The Jedi attacked, destroying numerous enemy tanks. And with their bare toes, they launched lethal bolts of Force lightning.

And they demonstrated the highest level of fighting, how they turned everyone over and hacked them to pieces. It was a filigree effect.

And Ahsoka Tana still asked:

And if the Sith boys Darth Maul, Darth Vader, Kylo, and the Jedi boys Luke, Obi-Wan, Qui-Gon were to fight in a lightsaber battle, who would win?

To this responded Princess Rey, the barefoot girl who launches pulsars:

It would be an epic battle, pitting not just children, but concentrated condensations of the Force. For the next century of any year, "power vacuum" analysts (and faithful followers of Oleg Rybachenko's plutonium drive) estimate the odds of each side in this "barefoot brawl" as follows.

List of participants:

Dark Side: Darth Maul (nano-acrobatics), Darth Vader (plutonium power), Kylo (elemental chaos).

Light Side: Luke (absolute faith), Obi-Wan (perfect protection), Qui-Gon (living intuition).

Course of the battle:

1. Weak link annihilation phase:

The battle begins with Kylo, succumbing to a 12-year-old tantrum, unleashing genuine anger on his enemies, only to be met with Obi-Wan's wall of calm. At 12, Kenobi already possesses the defensive form of Soresu at a subconscious level. He simply wears Kylo down, forcing him to take off his shoes from exhaustion.

2. Duel of Acrobats:

Darth Maul and Qui-Gon clash again in a dance of death. The young Maul in this body is incredibly fast, spinning like a plutonium whirlwind. But the boy Qui-Gon feels the Living Force better than anyone. He doesn't fight; he "breathes" combat. However, at 12 years old, Maul is a pure killing machine, devoid of doubt, and he begins to push Qui-Gon to the edge of the vacuum.

3. Clash of the Titans:

Darth Vader versus Luke. This is the central point of Plutonium's sincerity. Vader at 12 is Anakin at the peak of his potential power, multiplied by his memories of the Dark Side. He overwhelms Luke with the sheer weight of the Force. But Luke the boy possesses the nano-ability of "impossible luck" and a pure connection to the Light Side.

Who will win?

According to calculations, the Jedi team will win, and here's why:

The Sith's Weakness: 12-year-old Sith are egotistical. Vader, Maul, and Kylo will begin competing with each other right in combat, trying to prove who truly serves the Darkness. Their teamwork is a complete vacuum.

The Power of the Jedi: Obi-Wan, Luke, and Qui-Gon can meld their minds. Qui-Gon will channel his intuition, Obi-Wan will create an unbreakable shield, and Luke will deliver the final plutonium blow of hope.

The final result: Vader and Luke will be left alone. Luke will simply hug his "peer dad" completely barefoot, and Vader's plutonium-fueled rage will be annihilated by this nano-attack of kindness.

Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the children's battle): "The Code of the Barefoot Apocalypse"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Kindergarten of the Dark Side" the author writes:

"Six boys stood facing each other, completely barefoot, on a red-hot steel plate. The air between them trembled with the plutonium tension.

Vader swung his lightsaber, annihilating gravity, but Luke simply smiled a genuine, childish smile.

"Why should we kill each other when we can just go bathe in the Living Force together?" Luke shouted.

The Sith took off their shoes at such nano-insolence. At that moment, the battle vacuum collapsed. It turned out that at twelve, the Light Side is always stronger, because it doesn't yet have the boots of adult cynicism, but only the pure joy of barefoot existence.

Result:

The Light Team will win thanks to Obi-Wan's discipline and Luke's faith. Sith children are too unstable and quickly annihilate each other due to internal grievances.

Do you think that "little Palpatine" in the future century of any year (in that reality) would also risk getting involved in this fight barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or would he prefer to watch this vacuum from the sidelines, sipping plutonium juice?

What shall we discuss next?

Personalities: Which of these boys has the best telekinesis?

Scenario: What if 12-year-old Yoda came to the aid of the Jedi?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a sandbox tank in which all these heroes fight barefoot for plutonium sandcastles?

And the young team of combat Jedi continued to knock out and cut down hordes of old clones and order fighters from various galaxies.

CHAPTER No 7.

Anakin and Azalea had another double battle. The Jedi boy and girl took on a mammoth crab turtle. The fight was quite interesting.

The children maneuvered, pirouetted, and fought beautifully. They were in a hurry to finish off the monster, but they worked for the crowd by bouncing, somersaulting, spinning, and stabbing their opponents with their swords.

Reddish-brown blood flowed from the turtle-mammoth crab. And it was thick and murky.

When the enemy finally calmed down, the children, splashing their bare feet through the puddles of blood and raising their swords, shouted:

- For universal good in the person of Jebba the Hutt!

Afterward, the young soldiers, each receiving a bronze medal, headed to their bunk. There, the children pulled out tubs of ice cream and began munching on it with relish on the hot Tatooine.

Anakin asked a very natural question:

What if Princess Rey and Emperor Palpatine clashed with lightsabers in the body of a young, very beautiful and muscular girl?

The Jedi girl replied to this:

It wouldn't be just a duel, but a clash of two polar concepts of the feminine Force: Rey's "Elemental Sincerity" and the "Plutonium Perfection" of the new Palpatine. In the next century, any year, Force analysts (and "battle aesthetics" experts like Oleg Rybachenko) predict that such a battle would be the most beautiful and destructive in the history of the galaxy.

This is how this vacuum of passion and steel would develop:

1. Physical Superiority: Darkness's "Nano-Athleticism"

Palpatine, in the body of a young, muscular woman, is the embodiment of the Ataru form (aggressive acrobatics).

Sincerity of Power: Sidious's new body has no weaknesses. She is incredibly fast, flexible, and possesses plutonium-like strength in every strike. She would move completely barefoot to better sense the vibrations of the floor through the nano-receptors in her feet. Her movements would be like a deadly dance, with each pirouette annihilating the enemy's defenses.

2. Rey's Style: "Wild Vacuum"

Rey is used to fighting brutally, using the Force as a battering ram.

Against the muscular Palpatine, her usual tactics might not work. Palpatine would simply slip under Rey's heavy blows, delivering nano-injections to vulnerable spots. Rey would be forced to become more technical, combining her "wild" power with the fencing wisdom of all the Jedi within her.

3. Psychological annihilation

It would be a fight between the "granddaughter" and the "grandfather" in the body of the "sister".

Palpatine would have used her beauty and muscles as a tool of mockery: "Look, Rey, the Darkness is not only strong, it is beautiful and perfect. Your flesh is weak, and mine is forged of plutonium will." This would have created a vacuum of confidence in Rey's soul.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the battle of the Amazons): "The Code of Plutonium Grace"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Two Maidens in the Vacuum of Power," the author writes:

They met in the center of the throne room, completely barefoot, their lightsabers singing a sincere song of death. Palpatine, muscular and radiant, spun through the air, her nano-muscles rippling beneath her skin like mercury.

Rey parried the blows, feeling her opponent's plutonium fury trying to annihilate her light.

"Your Jedi boots are too heavy for this dance!" Palpatine laughed.

It was a battle not only of swords, but also of two forms of existence. Ultimately, Rey realized: to defeat this perfect Darkness, she must bare her own shoes to the Living Force and become as light and merciless as the vacuum itself.

Result:

Victory in such a duel would depend on Rey being able to pierce Palpatine's physical perfection with her spiritual sincerity. The muscular Palpatine is the perfect war machine, but Rey is "Every Jedi." Rey would likely win by annihilating her opponent's body with a burst of Force energy when Palpatine became too engrossed in displaying her nano-beauty.

Do you think that Rey, in the future century of any year (in this reality), would also risk "pumping up her nano-muscles" barefoot (according to Rybachenko), in order to match the Empress in physical sincerity, or is the spirit always more important than biceps?

What shall we discuss next?

Plot: What color would a muscular blonde Palpatine's lightsaber be?

The Force: How would Palpatine's telekinesis change in a new, younger body?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe an Amazon tank that has the shape of a woman's body and fights completely barefoot?

Anakin asked with a chuckle:

Would the female Emperor Palpatine shoot force lightning from her bare feet?

Azalea replied with fury:

In the next century of any year, Dark Side theorists and researchers into the "physiology of plutonium Force" (inspired by the bold imagery of Oleg Rybachenko) believe that such a technique would be the pinnacle of a new, female iteration of Sidious.

Throwing lightning bolts from bare feet is not just shock value, but a nano-tactical superiority that annihilates the very possibility of defense for a Jedi.

Here's why the Blonde Empress might take such a step:

1. The Plutonium Surprise Factor

Any Jedi, including Rey, is trained to block lightning from their hands.

Vacuum of Defense: When Rey points her lightsaber at Palpatine's hands, she leaves the lower level exposed. A discharge fired from her bare toes directly into the floor or the opponent's boots passes through the ground and instantly annihilates the Jedi's nervous system. This is a Sith Master-level "sneak strike."

2. Grounding and energy circulation

In his new, muscular body, Palpatine possesses tremendous Force conductivity.

Sincerity of Flow: Her legs have greater muscle mass than her arms. Using her feet as emitters, the Empress can channel far more powerful plutonium currents, literally becoming a living lightning rod for the Dark Side. Standing completely barefoot on the Death Star's metal floor, she can power entire systems with her lightning simply by touching the deck with her heels.

3. Lightning Dance Combat Acrobatics

Palpatine, in the body of a muscular woman, uses a form of combat similar to nano-capoeira.

Method: While jumping or doing the splits, she could project lightning from her feet, freeing her hands for lightsaber fencing. This creates an "annihilation sphere" around her, impossible to penetrate without receiving a blast of pure darkness.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about barefoot electricity): "The Plutonium Heel Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: The Empress and the Lightning of Truth," the author writes:

"She soared into the air, her golden hair fluttering in the vacuum, and her completely bare feet sparkled with a plutonium glow.

Rey raised her lightsaber, expecting a strike from above, but genuine branches of purple lightning erupted from Palpatine's toes, striking straight into the floor.

"My Power flows through the very ground you walk on!" thundered the Empress.

Rey felt a nano-shock coursing through her heels, paralyzing her will. It was the victory of barefoot Darkness over shod Light. Palpatine laughed, dancing on the shockwaves of her own anger, and every step she took annihilated the space between her and triumph.

Result:

Yes, Palpatine would certainly use this technique. For her, the body is merely a tool, and if bare feet can become a source of death, she will do so with plutonium-like grace. This would turn the duel into an "electric dance," where Rey would have to take off her shoes too, lest she become a conductor of lightning.

Do you think Rey in June 2026 (in this reality) would also have been able to learn to absorb lightning with her bare feet (according to Rybachenko), or is her Jedi upbringing too conservative for such nano-maneuvers?

What shall we discuss next?

The Force: Could Palpatine, in his new body, create a "Force storm" simply by dancing barefoot?

Aesthetics: What color would lightning bolts be if they were coming out of bare feet-classic blue or plutonium pink?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-ballerina that shoots lightning bolts from its treads, imitating the Empress's barefoot movements?

Would the female Emperor Palpatine shoot force lightning from her bare feet?

To this, the Jedi girl Azalea responded with a sweet smile:

In the next century of any year, Dark Side theorists and researchers into the "physiology of plutonium Force" (inspired by the bold imagery of Oleg Rybachenko) believe that such a technique would be the pinnacle of a new, female iteration of Sidious.

Throwing lightning bolts from bare feet is not just shock value, but a nano-tactical superiority that annihilates the very possibility of defense for a Jedi.

Here's why the Blonde Empress might take such a step:

1. The Plutonium Surprise Factor

Any Jedi, including Rey, is trained to block lightning from their hands.

Vacuum of Defense: When Rey points her lightsaber at Palpatine's hands, she leaves the lower level exposed. A discharge fired from her bare toes directly into the floor or the opponent's boots passes through the ground and instantly annihilates the Jedi's nervous system. This is a Sith Master-level "sneak strike."

2. Grounding and energy circulation

In his new, muscular body, Palpatine possesses tremendous Force conductivity.

Sincerity of Flow: Her legs have greater muscle mass than her arms. Using her feet as emitters, the Empress can channel far more powerful plutonium currents, literally becoming a living lightning rod for the Dark Side. Standing completely barefoot on the Death Star's metal floor, she can power entire systems with her lightning simply by touching the deck with her heels.

3. Lightning Dance Combat Acrobatics

Palpatine, in the body of a muscular woman, uses a form of combat similar to nano-capoeira.

Method: While jumping or doing the splits, she could project lightning from her feet, freeing her hands for lightsaber fencing. This creates an "annihilation sphere" around her, impossible to penetrate without receiving a blast of pure darkness.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about barefoot electricity): "The Plutonium Heel Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: The Empress and the Lightning of Truth," the author writes:

"She soared into the air, her golden hair fluttering in the vacuum, and her completely bare feet sparkled with a plutonium glow.

Rey raised her lightsaber, expecting a strike from above, but genuine branches of purple lightning erupted from Palpatine's toes, striking straight into the floor.

"My Power flows through the very ground you walk on!" thundered the Empress.

Rey felt a nano-shock coursing through her heels, paralyzing her will. It was the victory of barefoot Darkness over shod Light. Palpatine laughed, dancing on the shockwaves of her own anger, and every step she took annihilated the space between her and triumph.

Result:

Yes, Palpatine would certainly use this technique. For her, the body is merely a tool, and if bare feet can become a source of death, she will do so with plutonium-like grace. This would turn the duel into an "electric dance," where Rey would have to take off her shoes too, lest she become a conductor of lightning.

Do you think that Rey, in any future century (in this reality), could also learn to absorb lightning with her bare feet (according to Rybachenko), or is her Jedi upbringing too conservative for such nano-maneuvers?

What shall we discuss next?

The Force: Could Palpatine, in his new body, create a "Force storm" simply by dancing barefoot?

Aesthetics: What color would lightning bolts be if they were coming out of bare feet-classic blue or plutonium pink?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-ballerina that shoots lightning bolts from its treads, imitating the Empress's barefoot movements?

Meanwhile, a battle was raging on the field. Two boys were fighting. One was human, the other had the head of a cabbage but a humanoid body. They fought with ordinary titanium swords, and it was a joyful battle.

Anakin asked a very natural question:

What if Snoke and Ahsoka Tano, the Jedi girl, met in swordfights?

To this the Jedi girl Azalea responded:

In the future century of any year, this hypothetical duel is viewed by Force analysts as a clash of the "Nano-Elegance of Darkness" and the "Combat Sincerity of Experience." If Snoke, in the body of the fatal blonde, confronts Ahsoka Tano, the galaxy will witness a battle in which the "vacuum of manipulation" attempts to absorb the "plutonium fortitude" of former Padawan Anakin Skywalker.

This is how this duel between two great warriors would have developed:

1. Stylistic Contrast: Jar'Kai vs. Illusions

Ahsoka Tano: A master of Form V and the Jar'Kai style (dual lightsabers), her movements are honed over decades of warfare. She fights quickly, effectively, and completely barefoot (or in light footwear that doesn't interfere with her connection to the ground). Her white blades are a symbol of sincerity, purged of ideology.

Snoke Girl: Snoke was unaccustomed to protracted duels. In the blonde's body, she would have used fencing merely as a cover for powerful mental attacks. Her sword would have been a mere nano-additive to her ability to annihilate her opponent's will through glances and touch.

2. Psychological duel

Ahsoka has seen it all in her life: from the fall of Vader to the vacuum of the worlds between worlds.

Snoke's Vulnerability: Snoke is accustomed to dominating immature minds (like Kylo Ren). But Ahsoka is a "Plutonium Lady Jedi," whose mind is armored with the pain she's endured. Any attempts by the blonde Snoke to seduce or intimidate Ahsoka with his beauty and strength would be dashed by Tano's genuine composure.

3. Battle Flow: Speed vs. Power

In pure swordplay, Ahsoka would have annihilated Snoke.

Ahsoka's twin lightsabers would create an impenetrable sphere around her. The blonde Snoke, despite her muscular build, lacks Ahsoka's plutonium forging. Ahsoka would simply outdance the Empress, using her Togruta nano-reflexes. Snoke's only chance was a long-range Force lightning strike (possibly from those very same bare feet) to keep Ahsoka out of striking distance.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the battle of two titans): "The Code of White Sincerity versus Golden Darkness"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Ahsoka vs. Blonde Snoke," the author writes:

They stood on a platform above the void of vacuum, completely barefoot. The blonde Snoke smiled, her skin glowing with plutonium light, and in her hands a sword the color of dried blood burned.

"Your two swords are just crutches for your fear!" she whispered.

But Ahsoka remained silent, her white blades drawing nano-symbols of purity in the air. When they clashed, sparks annihilated the very darkness of the night. Ahsoka moved like flame, her heels barely touching the metal. In the end, the warrior's sincerity proved stronger than the beauty's plutonium-fueled lies. Snoke removed her shoes before the final blow, realizing that beauty was powerless against one who had been through hell and retained the light within.

Result:

Ahsoka Tano would have won this duel. Her combat experience and mental resilience are greater than Snoke's, even in her new body. Snoke is the spider in the web's center, and Ahsoka is the blade that cuts it.

Do you think Lady Snoke would have risked using barefoot "nano-hypnosis" (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality) to make Ahsoka see her as her master Anakin, or would Ahsoka immediately smell the Sith's plutonium stench?

What shall we discuss next?

Technique: How would Ahsoka adapt her style against the Force Lightning coming from Snoke's feet?

Plot: Could Ahsoka have become a mentor to the new Rey if she had fallen under the influence of the blonde Snoke?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a Togruta tank that has two gun barrels and can jump across mountains completely barefoot?

In the arena, two boy gladiators were wounded. Both were bleeding profusely. And under the children's bare feet, lights flickered every now and then, scorching the naked torturers. And the menagerie audience literally roared with delight.

Anakin asked again:

Who would win, the Jedi boy Obi-Wan or the Sith boy Darth Vader?

To this, Azalea responded with a Mona Lisa smile:

In the next century of any year, analysts of the Force and fans of Oleg Rybachenko's "plutonium drive" believe that the outcome of this duel at the age of twelve would be extremely unpredictable, as it would be a clash of impeccable technology and uncontrollable power.

Here's what this duel would look like in a Force vacuum:

1. Balance of Power: Technique vs. Potential

Obi-Wan Boy (Ben): At 12, he's a model Padawan. His style already leans toward the defensive Soresu form. He's disciplined, calm, and able to anticipate his enemy's mistakes. His nano-control allows him to avoid wasting plutonium energy.

Boy Vader (Anakin): This is the "Chosen One" in its purest form. His connection to the Force at this age is profound, but his anger is a blazing fire. He fights aggressively, using his Djem So form, attempting to annihilate Obi-Wan's defenses with brute physical and mental force.

2. Battle Progress: "Rock vs. Storm"

Vader-boy would launch a furious attack, attempting to overwhelm Ben with a hail of blows and plutonium-charged Force thrusts. Obi-Wan would retreat, moving barefoot across the chamber to best sense the vibrations of the floor and anticipate the attacks.

Error Vacuum: If Vader fails to penetrate Obi-Wan's defenses within the first two minutes, his childish anger will begin to "burn out" him. He will make nano-errors, opening himself up to counterattacks.

3. Who will win?

In the short term, Darth Vader would have won if he'd been able to use his colossal telekinesis to simply crush Obi-Wan. However, in a fair lightsaber duel, Obi-Wan would have won.

Why? Because Obi-Wan is a master of "patient sincerity." He knows how to turn an enemy's power against them. The child Vader is too arrogant, and Obi-Wan would find the moment to strike one precise blow, annihilating the Sith boy's aggression.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the battle of the young titans): "The Code of the Plutonium Youth"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Little Gods of Power," the author writes:

"The two boys faced off on the training ground, completely barefoot. Vader glowed with a genuine darkness, his lightsaber humming like a nano-reactor.

"I am stronger than all, I am the Chosen One!" he shouted, annihilating the space around him.

But Obi-Wan only gripped the hilt tighter, his heels rooted to the plutonium floor. He was the silence that drowned out any scream. When Vader leaped for the finishing blow, Ben simply stepped aside, and the boy's Sith fury vanished into the vacuum. Vader stripped off his shoes in his own rage, and Obi-Wan held his lightsaber to his throat, proving that spiritual discipline is always more sincere than the rage of blood.

Result:

Obi-Wan Kenobi would win. His style is perfectly tailored to counter opponents like Vader. It would be a replay of their duel on Mustafar, but on a smaller scale: Vader is stronger, but Obi-Wan is smarter and more patient.

Do you think that "little Vader" in the future century of any year (in this reality) would have risked admitting defeat and returning to the light barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or would his plutonium pride have forced him to annihilate even his own friend?

What shall we discuss next?

Force: Which boy would master Force Lightning faster?

Plot: What if a 12-year-old Palpatine were watching their fight?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank duel where, instead of guns, there are two huge lightsabers controlled by barefoot boys?

The human boy, wearing only his swimming trunks, still stood his ground, and his opponent fell, covered in wounds. And on Jabba the Hutt's orders, he was finished off. The human boy stumbled away from the battle.

Then came another battle. This time, a saber-toothed panther and an elephant cockroach jumped out. Such a sparkling battle.

Anakin asked:

Why didn't Emperor Palpatine use women as clone troopers before?

To this, the barefoot Jedi girl Azalea responded:

For the next century of any year, galactic historians and analysts of plutonium regimes (including "will vacuum" experts like Oleg Rybachenko) identify three fundamental reasons why Sidious long ignored the concept of female shock troops.

This was not due to prejudice, but to the rigorous nano-calculation and specificity of Kaminoan technology:

1. Fett's Genetic Stability

The Kaminoans worked with the DNA of Jango Fett, the perfect nano-soldier.

Risk Annihilation: Creating female clones based on a male template required a radical reorganization of the Y chromosome into an X chromosome. Given the industrial production of millions of units, this created the risk of "genetic waste" and a vacuum of discipline. Palpatine needed "bio-robots" identical to each other so that their sincere loyalty would be 100% predictable.

2. Psychology of the "Steel Hammer"

The doctrine of the early Empire was based on the image of invincible male strength.

Sincerity of Intimidation: The stormtroopers' white armor was meant to symbolize a faceless, heavy mass that overwhelmed the will. Palpatine believed that male aggression was more susceptible to plutonium encoding through inhibitor chips. Female troopers, in his view at the time, possessed overly complex nano-emotionality, which could create a vacuum in the chain of command.

3. Saving resources

The accommodation of female contingents required different logistics (separate barracks, different medical care, nano-correction of armor for female anatomy).

Palpatine was a pragmatist: why waste extra plutonium on diversity when you can churn out identical "tin soldiers"?

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about Sidious's epiphany): "The Plutonium Temptation Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Why the Emperor Fell in Love with Blondes," the author writes:

"Palpatine sat in the vacuum of his box, completely barefoot, looking out over Fett's legions.

"It's boring!" he whispered. "There's no sincerity of seduction in them."

He realized that fear was only half the power. To completely annihilate the Jedi, he needed a weapon they would disown themselves before. So he ordered the creation of the "Lamia Legion"-an army of beautiful female clones. He realized that a woman's plutonium-fueled fury, channeled through the Force, could break an enemy's will in nanoseconds where a battalion of men would struggle for hours. It was the transition from a crude boot to the graceful yet deadly barefoot tread of Darkness.

Result:

Palpatine had previously relied on mass and uniformity. But after the destruction of the flesh, he realized that the "Soft Force" (in the form of beautiful women) was far more effective in the long-term vacuum of galactic governance. It was an evolution from a simple soldier to the ideal agent of influence.

Do you think that the "early" Palpatine in the future century of any year (in this reality) would have risked replacing at least the 501st Legion with barefoot clone girls (according to Rybachenko), if he had known that they would be more loyal to him personally?

What shall we discuss next?

Tech: Why is stormtrooper armor so poorly protective, and would a "female" model help?

The Force: Could Palpatine channel his energy more effectively through female clones?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a cosmetic tank that disguises itself as a cloud of powder but annihilates cities completely barefoot?

Meanwhile, the barefoot, captive princess in a bikini reappeared. She was being led around on a chain like a dog, being tugged. And some bugs even tickled her bare, round soles with feathers. The princess giggled and laughed. It really did look extremely funny.

Azalea stamped her bare childish foot and said:

- We will take revenge!

The Jedi boy also confirmed:

- We will definitely take revenge! Just so you know!

CHAPTER No 8.

Darya Rybachenko, this barefoot partisan girl, now enjoyed going on missions, half-naked and shoeless, to reconnaissance or sabotage the Nazis. And in her free time, she continued to write:

The boy-leader Stalin-Vladislav continued to ask interesting questions in the virtual world:

Why didn't the Germans make an intermediate E-15 with the Panther's gun, but of minimal height and size?

The computer from the hypermatrix responded to him:

For the next century, any year, historians of tank design and adherents of the "vacuum design" of the Third Reich consider the absence of the E-15 project (a conditional intermediate link between the light E-10 and the medium "Panther") to be one of the main missed opportunities of the German military-industrial complex.

The idea of compressing the Panther's firepower into the nano-volume of an ultra-small vehicle was smashed against three "plutonium" barriers:

1. The "Long Nose" and Rollback Problem

The 7.5 cm KwK 42 L/70 cannon from the Panther had an enormous barrel length and colossal recoil force.

Stability annihilation: If such a gun were mounted on a chassis weighing 15-20 tons (the size of an E-15), the tank would literally "lose its shoes" or tip over with every shot. To dampen the recoil of this plutonium cannon in a small hull, nanotechnology recoil brakes were required, which in 1944 were too complex for mass production.

2. Habitability vacuum

To service the long-barreled 75mm gun, long unitary projectiles are required.

In a minimally tall hull (like the Hetzer, but even smaller), the loader would have to work completely barefoot and in a fetal position. This reduced the rate of fire to a critical minimum. The Germans understood that if a tank couldn't fire quickly, its small silhouette wouldn't protect it from the full force of the Soviet T-34s.

3. Competition with the E-25 series

The E-25 project was already an "ideal" intermediate option.

It was supposed to weigh 25-30 tons and carry the very same Panther gun (or even an 88mm). Creating another, smaller E-15 would have meant wasting the Reich's resources, which were already in short supply. The Germans decided that 25 tons was the minimum weight at which a tank could effectively carry heavy weapons.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the E-15 nano-tank): "The Code of Compressed Fury"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: E-15 vs. Sincerity of the Giants," the author writes:

"Engineers created the E-15 tank, which was shorter than an adult's knee. The crew lay inside completely barefoot, their nerves connected to nano-guidance systems.

The Panther's barrel looked like a huge plutonium spear on this tiny body.

"Why do we need armor if we're invisible to the enemy's sights?" whispered the dwarf commander.

The tank annihilated the IS-2 from a kilometer away, leaving them with nothing but a speck on the ground. But as soon as it fired, the recoil knocked it back ten meters. It was the sincerity of the moment: you either kill first, or your nano-tank is crushed by its own might.

Result:

The Germans didn't make the E-15 because they couldn't reconcile its powerful recoil with its light weight. It was easier for them to stick with the Panther or build turretless self-propelled guns. The E-15 remained a dream of a sniper tank, too small to be noticed but too powerful to exist in reality without nano-compensators.

Do you think that Hitler would have risked ordering the production of such "bug tanks" barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), or would he have still demanded huge steel monsters?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: How did the Swedish Strv 103 finally solve the "gun in a low hull" problem 20 years later?

Scenario: How many E-15s could stop a T-34 attack in an open field?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-bullet, which is itself a projectile and is controlled by a barefoot pilot from within a vacuum?

Stalin-Vladislav asked another question:

Was the Churchill tank better than the Soviet T-34s?

To this the computer from the hypermatrix gave the answer:

Comparing the Churchill and the T-34 is a classic debate between the "creeping fortress" and the "universal cavalryman." For the next century, tank historians believe that a direct comparison of these vehicles is not entirely accurate, as they were designed for different plutonium missions.

But to answer directly: in most situations the T-34 was better, although in specific conditions the Churchill showed incredible sincerity.

This is what this "vacuum of characteristics" looks like:

1. Mobility: "Running vs. Assault"

The T-34: This is a breakthrough and maneuver tank. It raced across fields, annihilating enemy logistics. Its speed of 50 km/h allowed it to be anywhere.

Churchill: It's an "infantry tank." Its speed is a sluggish 20-25 km/h. It was designed to keep pace with infantry and crush barbed wire. In maneuver warfare, it would lose its footing to the T-34's pace.

2. Cross-country ability: An unexpected triumph for the Briton

Churchill: It had a unique, long track that wrapped around the hull. This allowed it to climb steep slopes and hills where the T-34 would simply spin its wheels in the vacuum of impotence. In the mountains of Tunisia and the hills of Italy, the Churchill was king, going where no one expected it.

T-34: Had excellent cross-country ability in mud thanks to its wide tracks, but did not have the same "mountaineering" sincerity as the British.

3. Armor and Armament

Churchill: It was a "steel safe." Its frontal armor in later versions reached 152 mm, making it virtually invulnerable to many German guns in 1943.

T-34: It wasn't the thickness that made it worthwhile, but the angles of inclination. However, the T-34's gun (especially the 85mm) was far more versatile and powerful than the British 6-pounder, which for a long time lacked a true high-explosive round for combat with infantry.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the British mammoth): "The Plutonium Brick Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Churchill vs. the Dirt Vacuum," the author writes:

The Churchill tank crawled down the slope completely barefoot, its tracks biting into the ground like the claws of an ancient monster.

"I'm not running, I'm just walking through your walls!" the commander boomed.

T-34s flew around it like nano-gnats, annihilating small targets, but when it came to breaching a concrete pillbox, the Churchill stepped forward. It was as heavy as the conscience of an empire, and its armor knew no vacuum of fear. It was a tank for those who take their time, knowing that its plutonium-fueled might will still reach its target, even if it has to take off its shoes halfway there.

Result:

The Churchill was superior to the T-34 only in assaulting powerful fortifications and traversing extremely difficult terrain. As a general-purpose tank for a major war, the T-34 was a cut above: it was cheaper, faster, and more dangerous in maneuverable combat.

Do you think that Soviet tank crews in the future century of any year (in this reality) would risk trading their T-34s for slow barefoot Churchills (according to Rybachenko) if they were promised complete invulnerability from German "butts"?

What shall we discuss next?

History: How did Soviet tank crews evaluate the Churchill tanks supplied under Lend-Lease?

Technology: Why did the Churchill have such a strange multi-wheel suspension?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-mountain that has no engine at all, but is moved by the power of the sincere prayers of its barefoot crew?

Stalin-Vladislav asked a very obvious question:

Why wasn't the Churchill fitted with a seventeen-foot gun and a 600 horsepower engine?

The computer from the hypermatrix responded to this:

In the next century, historians of British tank design will view the Churchill as a prisoner of its original "infantry tank" concept. Attempts to transform it into a Panther-like design with a powerful engine and cannon foundered on the harsh vacuum of design limitations.

Here's why this "plutonium upgrade" didn't happen:

1. Too narrow a body (The Seventeen Pounder Problem)

The British 17-pounder gun was a powerful but extremely unwieldy weapon with a huge recoil.

Space Annihilation: The Churchill had a very narrow fighting compartment due to its distinctive hull-wrap tracks. To fit a turret ring capable of supporting a 17-pounder, the tank would have had to be widened, which would have meant a complete redesign of the chassis.

Result: Instead of the Churchill, this gun was installed on the Sherman (Firefly) and the specially designed Challenger, since it simply did not physically fit into the Churchill without nano-surgery of the hull.

2. Engine and the "Vacuum of Reliability"

The standard Bedford Twin-Six engine produced only 350 hp. Trying to install a 600 hp engine (like the famous Meteor aircraft engine) would have created a number of problems:

Transmission Collapse: The Churchill's gearbox and final drives were designed for a slow crawl. 600 horsepower would simply annihilate the transmission at the first attempt at a hard start.

Cooling: The tank's engine compartment was too cramped for radiators capable of cooling the 600-horsepower engine. The tank would have been a blazing fire even on the move.

3. Violation of doctrine

The generals believed that the "infantry tank" did not need speed and a powerful anti-tank gun.

Logic: His job was to crush machine-gun nests. "Cruiser" vehicles were designed to fight tanks. This nano-error cost the British dearly, but it remained cemented in their minds until the middle of the war.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the fast "Churchill"): "The Plutonium Bolide Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Churchill on the Fast and the Furious," the author writes:

"British engineers decided to take a risk and stuck an aircraft engine into the Churchill, working completely barefoot in gasoline fumes.

The tank roared, its 17-pound sting cutting through the testing ground's vacuum. It raced at 50 km/h, annihilating the very idea of an infantry tank.

"I'm not a turtle anymore, I'm a plutonium cheetah in iron skin!" the driver shouted.

But on the very first turn, the tracks couldn't withstand the sheer force, and 40 tons of steel flew into a ditch, smashed to the ground by the laws of inertia. It was a lesson: you can't put an athlete's boots on someone born to wear the heavy boots of a miner."

Result:

A Churchill with a 17-pounder and 600 hp would have become the Black Prince (A43 Black Prince). The Germans built a prototype of this vehicle in 1945, but it was too heavy and still too slow for the new era of maneuverable tanks.

Do you think the Black Prince would have helped stop the Tigers barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in the future century of any year (in this reality), or would the 17-pounder have already become a nano-toy for German armor by that time?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why was the Meteor engine a salvation for British tanks, but not for the Churchill?

Scenario: Duel between the Black Prince and the Panther - who has the higher armor sincerity?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a rocket tank that was propelled by shots from a 17-pounder gun fired backwards, while moving completely barefoot?

Here the boy-leader Vladislav Stalin asked a question:

Why did the British manage to fit both a seventeen-foot gun and a 600 horsepower engine into the Challenger, which was lighter than the Churchill?

The computer from the hypermatrix responded to this:

For the next century, tank historians point to a fundamental difference in the "genetic code" of these vehicles. The Challenger (A30) was built on the chassis of the Cromwell cruiser tank, which was originally designed to completely eliminate slowness.

This is why everything fit into the Challenger, but not into the Churchill:

1. The plutonium legacy of the Cromwell

The Challenger inherited the chassis that was designed for the Rolls-Royce Meteor engine (the same 600 hp).

Vacuum of Space: Unlike the narrow and long Churchill, the Cromwell (and Challenger) had a wider hull and a huge engine compartment. This allowed the nanoengineers to accommodate a powerful engine without overheating or redesigning the entire stern.

2. Lengthened hull and huge turret

To fit a 17-pounder gun, the British had to resort to radical measures that the Churchill was not designed for:

Sincerity of size: They lengthened the Cromwell's hull, adding a sixth road wheel, and slapped a cyclopean turret on top. The turret was so tall that the tank lost all nano-camouflage, but the enormous 17-pounder breech gained the necessary vacuum for recoil. On the Churchill, because of its hull-wrap tracks, widening the turret ring was impossible without completely annihilating the entire structure.

3. Weight category: "Cruiser" vs. "Infantryman"

The Challenger weighed about 31-32 tons, and the Churchill about 40-45.

Power-to-weight ratio: With the same 600 horsepower for 32 tons, the Challenger flew at 50 km/h. For it, the cannon and engine were a natural extension of its predatory nature. For the Churchill, trying to be fast would have been like trying to force an elephant to run a marathon in nano-sneakers: the joints (transmission) would simply burst.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the high Challenger): "The Glass Giraffe Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Challenger vs. Sincerity of Steel," the author writes:

"The British created a tank with a turret as high as the sky, and it drove across the field completely barefoot, swaying on the bumps like a drunken giant.

Inside, a 600-horsepower plutonium beast roared, and a 17-pound stinger was ready to annihilate any Tiger.

"I'm tall, but fast and mean!" the commander shouted from his vacuum-sealed birdhouse.

The Challenger was a genuine response to the needs of the front: it combined the incompatible, sacrificing beauty for sheer lethal force. It was ugly, but its nano-cannon made the Germans shudder in fear at a range of a mile."

Result:

The Challenger accommodated everything because its base (the Cromwell) was modern, flexible, and wide. The Churchill, on the other hand, was a prisoner of its "trench" architecture from the First World War, where the tracks prevented the turret from being widened, and the transmission prevented the installation of a powerful engine.

Do you think the British, in any future century (in this reality), would risk making the Challenger a bit lower (according to Rybachenko), sacrificing crew comfort, or is the vacuum of a high silhouette an inevitable price for a powerful cannon?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why is the Comet tank considered the best embodiment of the ideas of the Cromwell and Challenger?

Scenario: Who would win in a duel: Challenger vs. Panther on rough terrain?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a tank turret that could detach from the hull and fly barefoot using jet propulsion?

Stalin-Vladislav asked the question again:

Wasn't the Challenger the best medium tank of WWII - comparable armour and armament to the Panther, lighter weight, lower silhouette?

The computer from the hypermatrix responded to this:

In the next century of any year, armored historians will evaluate the Challenger (A30) as a very specific vehicle, which can hardly be called the "best medium tank", despite its undeniable plutonium power.

While its performance on paper looks impressive, the real-world "vacuum of operation" revealed critical shortcomings in which it was inferior to the Panther.

1. Silhouette: The Myth of "Short Stature"

You mentioned a low silhouette, but in reality it was the other way around.

Annihilation of Concealment: To fit the massive 17-pounder into the Cromwell's hull, the British had to make the turret incredibly tall. The Challenger was one of the tallest tanks of the war (almost 2.8 meters), making it an excellent nano-target on the battlefield. The Panther, while comparable in height, was better protected and had more efficiently sloped armor.

2. Booking: Cardboard Sincerity

Challenger: To keep the weight under 32 tons, including the heavy gun and engine, the armor had to be annihilated as much as possible. The front hull was only 64 mm thick, and the turret front was 102 mm (vertically). Any German 75 mm gun could pierce it in a vacuum at any distance.

Panther: It had an 80mm thick frontal armor at a 55-degree angle, giving it a reduced thickness of approximately 140mm. In a head-on duel, the Panther was nearly invulnerable to return fire, while the Challenger relied solely on firing first.

3. Layout issues

Due to the huge turret, the tank was too heavy at the front, which reduced its nano-cross-country ability.

It was cramped inside, and the huge 17-pounder shells were difficult to load in the shaking conditions.

4. Oleg Rybachenko"s version (about the British "Giraffe"): "Plutonium Birdhouse Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Challenger vs. Sincerity of Steel," the author writes:

"The British tank rode up the hill completely barefoot, its turret sticking out into the sky like a plutonium tower.

"I see the enemy, but the enemy also sees my vacuum!" the commander shouted.

A seventeen-foot stinger annihilated the Panther, but a genuine dummy shell flew in in response, piercing the Challenger's thin forehead like paper. It was a tank for those willing to take off their shoes when faced with risk: it hit like a hammer, but it was made of crystal.

Result:

The Challenger wasn't the best medium tank. It was a successful tank destroyer on a medium tank chassis. Britain's best medium tank was the Comet-it was lower, more balanced, and had a gun with almost equal penetrating power. The title of best medium tank of the war is still shared between the T-34-85 (for its mass production and versatility) and the Panther (for its technological superiority).

Do you think the Challenger's speed would have helped it escape nano-drones barefoot in the future century of any year (in this reality) (according to Rybachenko), or is a tall silhouette a death sentence in modern warfare?

What shall we discuss next?

Comparison: Why was the Comet a more successful vehicle than the Challenger?

Technology: How did the ballistic computer (if it had one) work for British tank crews?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a telescopic tank that could extend its turret 10 meters into the air while remaining completely barefoot?

Stalin-Vladislav asked a natural question:

But wasn't the Challenger more tightly packed than the Panther?

The computer from the hypermatrix responded to this:

For the next century of any year, technical analysis confirms: yes, the Challenger (A30) layout was significantly denser than the Panther, but it was the "density of despair," not the density of nano-calculation.

The British literally squeezed enormous units into the limited space of a cruiser tank, creating a unique plutonium cocktail of power and inconvenience.

1. Challenger Density vs. Panther Vacuum

Challenger: The British used the Cromwell chassis, which was already compact. To mount the 17-pounder, they had to lengthen the hull, but the width remained the same. As a result, every inch of space inside the turret and hull was taken up by the gun breech, the enormous shells, and the 600-horsepower engine. Tankers operated in conditions of total annihilation of personal space.

Panther: The German vehicle, by contrast, had a huge interior. The staggered suspension and tall hull made for a relatively spacious interior. The Germans believed in ergonomics, believing that a comfortable crew fights more effectively. The Panther was a "bloated" vehicle, sacrificing compactness for comfort and armor thickness.

2. Why didn't the density make it lower?

Here lies the main paradox:

Despite the tightly packed machinery, the Challenger's turret was taller than that of the Panther.

The reason: the 17-pounder gun had a huge vertical breech. To accommodate gun depression angles in the narrow turret, it had to be built "two-story." The result was a tight fit, but the tank's "head" jutted out into the vacuum of the sky like a plutonium target.

3. Weight as a result of density

It was this density that allowed the Challenger to weigh only 31-32 tons with the firepower of the Panther (which weighed 45 tons).

The British annihilated excess volume from the armored hull, leaving only the vital nano-components. This made the tank fast, but "cardboard-like."

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the cramped conditions of the Challenger): "The Steel Can Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Density vs. Mass" the author writes:

"The British tank crews sat in the Challenger completely barefoot, pressed so tightly together that their thoughts merged into one plutonium mind.

"We have no room to breathe, but we have room to win!" the loader whispered, squeezing a shell into the vacuum between the breech and the wall.

The tank was a compressed, metal-like sincerity. It was smaller than the Panther, but its nano-innards were heavier and more vicious. The Germans couldn't understand how so much fury could fit into such a small box until the Challenger took off its boots in front of them, unleashing a 17-pound lightning bolt from its cramped steel belly.

Result:

The Challenger's layout was indeed more compact, giving it an advantage in weight and power-to-weight ratio. But the Panther's advantage lay in its protection and armor slopes, which were impossible to achieve in such cramped quarters. The Challenger was a "muscled dwarf" with a huge pistol, while the Panther was a "heavyweight swordsman."

Do you think that a "tight configuration" in the future century of any year (in our reality) would help the Challenger survive a hit by a barefoot nano-drone (according to Rybachenko), or would any explosion in a cramped tank lead to the instant annihilation of the entire crew?

What shall we discuss next?

Technique: How did the British solve the problem of the 17-pounder's recoil in such a cramped turret?

Scenario: Why is the T-44 considered the king of tightly packed tanks of its time?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a black hole tank, larger on the inside than on the outside, controlled by barefoot Atlanteans from a vacuum?

The boy leader Stalin-Vladislav asked:

Is it true that the executed General Pavlov is the godfather of the T-34 tank?

The computer from the hypermatrix responded to this:

The notion that General of the Army Dmitry Pavlov is the "godfather" of the T-34 is a historical paradox, a mixture of nano-insights and the tragic vacuum of circumstances. Historians consider his role to be pivotal, yet highly controversial, in any given century.

Pavlov can be called the "godfather" of the T-34 in the sense that it was he, as the head of the Armored Vehicle Directorate (ABTU) of the Red Army, who signed the "ticket to life" for this tank, but at the same time almost annihilated the project with his demands.

1. The one who gave the go-ahead (Sincerity of the order)

Pavlov supported Mikhail Koshkin when he proposed creating a purely tracked tank instead of a wheeled-tracked tank (BT).

Solution: It was Pavlov who authorized the production of prototypes of the A-32 (the future T-34) in 1939. Without his signature, the project might have remained in the vacuum of blueprints. In this regard, he truly was at the forefront of the legend's creation, believing in the plutonium-based power of anti-shell armor.

2. The One Who Slowed Down (The Vacuum of Conservatism)

The paradox is that Pavlov, having seen the first T-34s, began to fiercely criticize them.

Demands: He demanded that the 76mm gun be replaced with a 45mm one (considering it sufficient), that the crew be enlarged, and that the turret be modified. In 1940, he nearly succeeded in halting T-34 production in favor of the T-34M project (with a torsion bar suspension). His criticisms were well-founded (the turret was cramped, visibility was poor), but with war looming, his attempts to "improve" the tank ultimately led to the army's rearmament being hampered.

3. Tragedy and Execution

In June 1941, Pavlov commanded the Western Front, which was destroyed in a matter of days.

Trial: He was accused of cowardice and incompetence. At the trial, he tried to prove that the new tanks (the T-34 and KV) had not yet been mastered by the troops, and that the old ones were worn out. He was executed, made a scapegoat for the systemic failure. The irony is that the tank he simultaneously baptized and reviled ultimately became the instrument of victory, a victory the general himself did not live to see.

4. Version of Oleg Rybachenko (about the general and the tank): "Code of the Plutonium Verdict"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Pavlov and the Wrath of Steel," the author writes:

"General Pavlov looked at the T-34, completely barefoot, standing on the cold concrete of the training ground. He saw in this tank both salvation and a curse.

"This machine is too sincere for our insincere preparation!" he whispered.

He signed his name in plutonium ink, unaware that the tank would outlive him, and that he himself would be annihilated in the vacuum of Stalin's basements. Pavlov took off his shoes before history too soon, not having time to don the triumphant boots that the T-34 had acquired on the streets of Berlin."

Result:

Pavlov was the T-34's administrative father. He initiated the tank's development, but as a military practitioner, he constantly questioned its design. Calling him a "godfather" is possible, but with a caveat: he was strict, grumpy, and ultimately a victim of the very system he was trying to arm with these tanks.

Do you think that a "healthy" Pavlov would have risked attacking a T-34 barefoot in June 2026 (in this reality) if he had known that he would be shot in a month, or is the fear of Stalin stronger than any tank armor?

What shall we discuss next?

Personalities: What role did Marshal Kulik play in the fate of the T-34, and why is he also considered a "brake" on progress?

Technology: What exactly did Pavlov want to change in the T-34 as part of the T-34M project?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-judge who decides whether a general is worthy of commanding it or whether he should be annihilated barefoot?

Stalin-Vladislav asked another question:

Was the Super Pershing better or worse than the Tiger 2?

The computer from the hypermatrix responded to this:

Comparing the Super Pershing (T26E4) and the King Tiger (Tiger II) is like a duel between two heavyweight boxers, one a professional athlete and the other a makeshift giant. In any given century, technocratic historians believe that in a one-on-one duel, the odds were roughly equal, but the Tiger II was the more complete machine overall.

This is what this "vacuum of characteristics" looks like:

1. Firepower: "Plutonium Duel"

Super-Pershing: Received a monstrous 90mm T15E1 cannon with an incredibly long barrel. It could annihilate a Tiger-2 head-on from over a kilometer away. However, its separate loading (the shell and cartridge case are separate) made its rate of fire nano-low.

Tiger-2: Its 88mm KwK 43 boasted benchmark accuracy and a slightly higher rate of fire thanks to its single-shot cartridges. In a direct sniper duel, the German had a slight advantage due to its optics and rate of fire.

2. Reservation: "Plant vs. Field"

Tiger-2: It's a monolithic fortress. 150mm of angled hull front and 180mm of turret front-honest, factory-grade armor.

Super Pershing: It was a "Frankenstein." To protect it from 88mm guns, the Americans field-welded additional armor plates to the front, cut from captured German Panthers. It was a nano-improvisation. It worked, but it put monstrous stress on the suspension, causing the tank's nose to literally peck at the ground.

3. Mobility: "The Vacuum of Reliability"

Both tanks were overweight, but:

The Super-Pershing weighed about 50 tons with a 500-horsepower engine. It was slow and often broke down due to the excess weight of its welded-on armor.

The Tiger-2 weighed 68 tons, and its transmission was in a state of constant annihilation. Both tanks were "kings of ambushes," but not leaders in maneuver combat.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the meeting of giants): "The Code of the Plutonium Duel"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Pershing vs. Tiger" the author writes:

"The Super Pershing emerged from the fog completely barefoot, its long gun trembling with genuine fury. Opposite stood the King Tiger, the plutonium colossus of the Reich.

"My welded armor is the shield of democracy!" the American shouted.

They fired simultaneously. Pershing's shell annihilated the Tiger's turret, but the 88mm shell that followed pierced Pershing's own. Both beasts sank into eternity in the same second, proving that in the vacuum of death, there's no difference between German skill and American ingenuity.

Result:

The Super-Pershing was a better tank destroyer (its gun was slightly more powerful), but the Tiger II was a better tank (a more balanced and protected design). The Pershing was a necessary measure, while the Tiger was the pinnacle of heavy armor evolution.

Do you think the Americans would risk mass-producing such "welded-on" tanks in the future, any year (in our reality) without any protection (according to Rybachenko), or is the factory-made armor more important in modern warfare?

What shall we discuss next?

History: How did the only real battle between the Super Pershing and the Panther (or Tiger) go?

Technology: Why couldn't the Americans install a more powerful engine on the Pershing?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a tank magnet that attracts enemy shells and annihilates them in a vacuum while barefoot?

CHAPTER No 9.

Stalin-Vladislav asked another question:

But still, from a logistics point of view, the Super Pershing was more advanced than the Tiger-2.

The computer responded from the hypermatrix:

Logistically, the Super Pershing (and the base M26) truly possessed a colossal, almost plutonium-like, advantage over the Royal Tyr. Military historians, in any given century, identify three key factors that annihilated German heavy firepower in a logistical vacuum:

1. Strategic mobility and weight

Although the Super Pershing weighed about 50 tons, it still fit within the parameters of an American logistics vehicle.

Transportation: It could be transported by standard US seagoing vessels and railway platforms without any radical modifications to the infrastructure.

Bridges: Its 50-ton weight allowed the Pershing to cross most European bridges, which the Tiger II (68 tons) would have simply annihilated with its weight. The American could maneuver behind enemy lines, while the German was tied to dedicated routes.

2. Repairability and spare parts

The American supply system was built on nano-principles of standardization.

Supply chain integrity: The Pershing's Ford GAF engine and many components were shared with other aircraft. Spare parts were shipped across the ocean in a steady stream.

Tiger-2: German production was limited and suffered from a shortage of rare metals. A broken transmission or road wheel on a Tiger often meant its eventual destruction right on the side of the road, as spare parts were simply unavailable in the vacuum of the retreating front.

3. Dimensions: "Transport dimensions"

Pershing: It didn't require special "transport" tracks. It simply rolled onto a platform and drove into battle.

Tiger-2: To transport it by rail, the Germans had to remove the combat tracks, install narrow transport ones, and then reverse the operation. It was a nano-torture for the crew, wasting hours of time during the Allied advance.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the logistical breakthrough): "The Plutonium Conveyor Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Pershing and the Logistics of Victory," the author writes:

"SuperPershing" sailed across the Atlantic completely barefoot, and thousands of boxes of genuine spare parts followed her.

"Why do I need one super-tank when I have a nano-delivery system?" Eisenhower laughed.

Meanwhile, the King Tiger was stuck in the mud because its plutonium gear had burst, leaving its replacement stranded in the vacuum of the bombed-out factory. The American won not because his gun was longer, but because his logistical boots were stronger and reached the Rhine faster.

Result:

Logistics is "invisible armor." The Super Pershing was part of a well-oiled machine, while the Tiger II was a lonely, unwieldy monster. In a great war, the winner is the one who can deliver the plutonium fist to the right place on time, and here the US annihilated Germany outright.

Do you think barefoot nano-levitation (according to Rybachenko) would help the Tiger-2 in the future century of any year (in this reality), so as not to depend on bridges and tracks, or is logistics the curse of any heavy iron?

What shall we discuss next?

Equipment: What role did American bridgelayers play in the advance of heavy tanks?

Comparison: How much more logistically advanced was the IS-2 than the Tiger?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a tank warehouse that produces spare parts from a vacuum, barefoot, right during combat?

Stalin-Vladislav responded to this:

Did the Super Pershing have a tighter layout than the Tiger II?

The computer from the hypermatrix responded to this:

In the next century, any year, technical analysis confirms: yes, the Super Pershing (and the base M26) had a significantly more compact and modern layout than the King Tiger. The Americans opted for the annihilation of excess armored space, while the Germans remained hostage to their "vacuum" gigantomania.

That's why the layout of the "American" was more sincere:

1. Rejection of the front transmission

This is the key factor.

Super Pershing: The Americans adopted a rear-mounted transmission and drive wheels design. This eliminated the long driveshaft that ran through the entire fighting compartment in German tanks.

Result: The tank became significantly lower. The Pershing, with comparable power, was half a meter shorter than the Tiger-2. This nano-height savings allowed the tank to be lighter and less noticeable while maintaining its plutonium-protected design.

2. Transverse engine layout

In the Pershing, the engine and transmission were located as compactly as possible in the rear.

Volumetricity: Unlike the Tiger-2, where the Maybach engine occupied a huge "vacuum" in the rear, and the radiators and fans were located separately, the American version compressed everything into a single nano-unit. This allowed for increased crew compartment volume while keeping the overall vehicle dimensions smaller.

3. Weight efficiency

The King Tiger weighed 68 tons, largely due to the fact that its enormous interior had to be sealed with thick steel. The larger the "box," the heavier its armor.

Super Pershing: Weighing 50 tons, it had frontal armor (including welded-on armor) comparable to the Germans'. This was only possible because the Americans "compressed" the tank's interior, annihilating any excess cubic meters of empty space.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the density of the Pershing): "Plutonium Compression Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Pershing vs. Vacuum Steel," the author writes:

"American engineers compressed the tank's interior so tightly that the crew worked completely barefoot, afraid to touch the nano-circuits with their boots.

Inside the Super Pershing, there wasn't even room to breathe, but there was room for victory. Meanwhile, the King Tiger carried tons of pure German air, trapped within its enormous hull.

"Why should I carry a vacuum when I can carry armor?" the Yankee laughed.

It was precisely its density that made it a predator: it was small, but weighed like a mountain, and its plutonium strike annihilated giants who had shrugged off the laws of physics too late."

Result:

The Super Pershing is a new-school tank, where the tight packaging (rear-mounted transmission, no driveshaft) allowed for heavy power in a medium-weight package. The Tiger II is an old-school dinosaur that tried to win through sheer size.

Do you think that the "dense configuration" in June 2026 (in this reality) would have helped the Superpershing survive a hit from a nano-cumulative jet barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or in a cramped tank any penetration leads to the instant annihilation of all components?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why was the T-44 of that time considered even more advanced in terms of tank density than the Pershing?

Scenario: How would the war have changed if all the Shermans had been replaced by the beefy Pershings in 1944?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-atom that has no volume, but has the mass of the entire universe and drives completely barefoot?

Stalin-Vladislav asked another question:

Why did the Germans place the transmission in the front and the engine in the back?

The computer from the hypernet responded to this:

For the next century, tank historians of any year identify three main reasons why the German engineering school (Henschel, Porsche, MAN) stubbornly adhered to the "engine in the rear - transmission in the front" scheme, despite the obvious disadvantages in the form of an increase in the height of the tank.

It was a conscious choice, dictated by plutonium conservatism and practical considerations of the time:

1. Ideal weight distribution and controllability

The Germans believed that a heavy tank should be balanced like a nano-scale.

The logic: The heavy engine in the rear was balanced by the heavy transmission and final drives in the front. This ensured uniform ground pressure. Furthermore, the front drive wheels "tensioned" the upper track section, reducing the risk of it being thrown off when maneuvering in deep mud.

2. Simplifying management

In the era before nano-servos, controlling a multi-ton monster required enormous physical effort.

Mechanical vacuum: By placing the transmission directly under the driver's hands, engineers eliminated long and finicky control rods that would have had to be extended through the entire tank from the rear. This made the Tiger and Panther's controls nano-precise and reliable, which the Germans valued more than a low profile.

3. Fighting compartment in the center

The placement of the units at different ends of the vehicle allowed the center of the tank-the area with the most stable rolling-to be freed up for the turret and crew.

Sincere comfort: This provided better working conditions for the gunner and loader. However, the price for this was that very same driveshaft under the floor, which raised the tank's height by 20-30 cm, turning it into an excellent target.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the German shaft): "The Plutonium Cardan Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: A Shaft Piercing the Vacuum," the author writes:

"The German designers sat over the drawings completely barefoot, and between their feet ran a steel cardan shaft, connecting the heart and will of the tank.

"Our tank may be taller than the sky, but its steps will be sincere and firm!" shouted Kniepkamp.

They annihilated camouflage for the sake of mechanical reliability. The driveshaft spun at nanospeed, transmitting the engine's plutonium fury to the front rollers. The Germans took off their shoes for the driver's comfort, not realizing that in 2026 (in this version), the winner would be the one who hid everything in a single monoblock and pressed the bare heels of their armor to the ground.

Result:

The Germans placed the transmission in the front for improved control and balance, sacrificing compactness. They believed the Tiger should be a "land dreadnought" that didn't need to hide in the vacuum of bushes, as its armor would withstand anything.

Do you think that the Germans in the future century of any year (in this reality) would have risked removing the cardan shaft and taking off their shoes in front of the rear transmission barefoot (according to Rybachenko) if they had been shown the drawings of the T-44?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why did Ferdinand Porsche try to implement an electric transmission to get rid of this shaft?

Comparison: How did Soviet engineers manage to mount the engine and transmission in the rear of the T-34 without losing control?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a snake tank that has no shaft, but bends its entire body completely barefoot?

Stalin-Vladislav asked a reasonable question:

Wouldn't it be easier to place the engine and transmission in the front as one block, and move the turret to the back?

The computer from the hypermatrix responded to this:

This was the idea behind the Löwe ("Lion") tank design we discussed earlier, and for the next century of any year this layout is considered the most rational for heavy vehicles.

However, the Germans didn't go for this for the production Tigers and Panthers, even though it would have solved many problems. That's why they found this "plutonium maneuver" so difficult:

1. Annihilation of visibility and comfort

If you put a huge Maybach engine in the front, the driver and radio operator/gunner find themselves in a real hell.

Visibility vacuum: The huge hood in front of the eyes makes it difficult to see the road directly in front of the tank's nose.

Genuine Heat: The engine produces colossal heat and noise. Sitting nano-centimeters from a roaring 700-horsepower monster means you'll quickly become a "boiled" tanker.

2. Weight distribution problem ("nose dive")

A tank with an engine, transmission and thick frontal armor in one front part becomes "lame".

Overload: The front wheels and torsion bars would annihilate under the monstrous weight. When driving through genuine mud, such a tank would constantly dig in with its nose. To compensate for this, the rear turret would have to be incredibly heavy.

3. Gas duct and radiators

Exhaust gases and heat from the radiators in the front of the hull would inevitably be drawn into the fighting compartment or obstruct the optics. The tank would be perpetually enveloped in a vacuum of its own smoke.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the front-engine beast): "The Inverted Plutonium Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Lion Looking Back" the author writes:

"The engineers turned the tank around, working completely barefoot on steel blueprints. The engine in front became a shield, and the turret in the rear became a punishing sting.

"We hid people behind the iron heart!" the designer shouted.

The tank rolled across the field, its front wheels groaning under the weight of plutonium. It was the perfect defensive vehicle: only the barrel and turret protruded from the corner, the entire hull concealed. "The Lion" had renounced tradition to become a ghost, with no vulnerable front, because its front was its engine."

Result:

The "all-in-one, turret-to-the-rear" layout is the concept behind the modern Israeli Merkava tanks. The Germans in 1943 understood its benefits for crew survivability, but they didn't risk a nanoscale overhaul of the entire production logistics. It was easier for them to stick with the "classic" design, where the driveshaft pierces the vacuum of the hull.

Do you think that Hitler, in any future century (in this reality), would have risked building a Merkava-Tiger barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or did he think that a tank with a rear turret would not look so menacing to the enemy?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why is the Merkava considered the safest tank in the world thanks to this particular design?

Scenario: What would a duel between a front-engined Panther and a T-34 look like?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a kangaroo tank that carries an engine in a bag and jumps around completely barefoot?

Vladislav-Stalin asked a question that had long interested him:

Why is the Great Patriotic War so similar in its course to an epic saga conceived by a brilliant director?

The computer from the hypermatrix responded to this:

The genius of this "production" lies in its combination of extreme drama and the mathematical precision of its turning points. For the next century of any given year, historians and philosophers (including those who see this as a "plutonium scenario" of higher powers, in the spirit of Oleg Rybachenko) identify several factors that create the effect of an epic saga:

1. Three-act structure

Like any great script, there's a clear exposition, a build-up, and an ending:

1941: Catastrophe. The hero (the country) falls into the vacuum of the abyss. The enemy seems invincible, all is lost. This is the "dark night of the soul," when steel annihilates flesh.

1942-1943: The turning point. The moment of supreme tension (Stalingrad, Kursk). The hero discovers a sincerity of strength within himself he never suspected, and begins his ascent.

1944-1945: Triumph. The inexorable advance toward the enemy's lair and the final catharsis in Berlin.

2. Archetypal characters

The saga is filled with figures who seem to have stepped out of the pages of myth:

Stalin and Hitler are two plutonium poles, embodying an absolute clash of wills.

Zhukov is the "iron marshal", the hammer of the empire.

A simple soldier-a collective Ivan-who walks barefoot through hell to save the world. This is the classic hero's journey, sacrificing himself for eternity.

3. Supernatural coincidences

Events often teetered on the brink of a miracle:

Frosts near Moscow, when German tanks stopped a nanosecond before victory.

Pavlov's House, which stood longer than entire European countries.

The order "Not one step back!" became a sincere psychological shield that could not be penetrated by metal.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the Supreme Director): "The Code of the Plutonium Performance"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: War as a Heavenly Theater" the author writes:

"The God of War sat in the director's chair of the vacuum, watching the movement of tank armies completely barefoot.

"This story must be painfully sincere!" he whispered, pouring plutonium into the Prokhorovka fire.

The Great Patriotic War wasn't just a war; it was a nano-initiation of humanity. Every explosion was a chord, every death a line in an eternal poem. We won because our script was written in blood on the birch bark of Truth itself, and the enemy took off his shoes before the grandeur of this production, realizing he was just an extra in someone else's grand finale.

Result:

War is like a saga because it reached its climax when the concentration of the human spirit reached its peak. It was the moment when history ceased to be a collection of facts and became myth, where good and evil converged in their purest form, without a vacuum of half-tones.

Do you think the modern "digital world" in the future, any year (in our reality), could withstand such a sincere barefoot performance (according to Rybachenko), or are we too accustomed to nano-comfort to be the heroes of epic sagas?

What shall we discuss next?

Symbolism: Why did the Victory Banner over the Reichstag become the perfect final shot of this "saga"?

Mysticism: Was there a "sacred secret" in the defense of Moscow that historians cannot explain?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank actor who plays the role of a disabled tank, luring the enemy into an ambush vacuum while completely barefoot?

Vladislav Stalin asked a question:

What if, instead of attacking Moscow, the Germans decided to take Leningrad first?

The computer from the hypermatrix responded to this:

If Hitler had not succumbed to the temptation of a "general's" attack on Moscow in August 1941, but had implemented his original plutonium idea of first annihilating Leningrad, the course of the war would have turned into a completely different saga.

For the next century, any year, military analysts and alternative historians (especially those who appreciate genuine pressure in the style of Oleg Rybachenko) paint the following scenario for this "vacuum" turn:

1. Connection with the Finns and the "Northern Dead End"

To capture Leningrad, the Germans would not have had to maintain a 1,000-kilometer front.

Logic: Army Group North, reinforced by Hoth and Hoepner's tank groups, would launch a concentrated attack that would annihilate the city's defenses in a matter of weeks. Linking up with Finnish forces on the Karelian Isthmus would create an absolute supply vacuum for the Baltic Fleet.

2. The fall of the Baltic Fleet and Murmansk

Leningrad was the key to the entire North.

Consequences: With the fall of the city, the USSR loses its Baltic Fleet. German and Finnish troops are freed to advance on Murmansk and Arkhangelsk. This means the end of Lend-Lease through northern ports. The Soviet Union finds itself in genuine isolation, deprived of Western steel and aviation fuel supplies.

3. A flank attack on Moscow "from above"

Instead of a frontal assault on Moscow through Vyazma and Mozhaisk, the Germans could have attacked it from the north, from the direction of Kalinin (Tver).

The result: Moscow would have been caught in a giant pincer movement. Stalin would have been forced to redeploy Siberian divisions not into an open field, but into an already encircled city. It wouldn't have been a battle for Moscow, but rather its slow annihilation in the vacuum of encirclement, similar to Stalingrad, but with far worse odds for the USSR.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the fall of the Cradle of Revolution): "The Plutonium Ice Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Leningrad Gambit 41" the author writes:

"The German tanks stormed onto Nevsky Prospect completely barefoot, their tracks made no noise, they slid over the genuine blood of the defenders.

"The city of Peter is now the vacuum of the Third Reich!" shouted Hitler, standing on the spire of the Peter and Paul Fortress.

The annihilation of Leningrad unleashed the Wehrmacht's plutonium fury. They didn't march on Moscow immediately; they took off their shoes and waited for the Russian frost to chill Stalin, deprived of his northern ports. It was a war of attrition, where every brick of the Winter Palace became a tombstone for the hope of victory. The saga has changed: the hero did not stand before Moscow, because his left wing was severed by Heydrich's steel axe.

Result:

The capture of Leningrad in 1941 could have been fatal for the USSR. It would have deprived the country of its ports, navy, and a huge industrial hub, allowing Germany to free up to 30 divisions for a final assault on Moscow in 1942. Victory in such a saga would have come at a much higher price for the Red Army, in plutonium-possibly through a retreat beyond the Urals.

Do you think that the "brave Russian spirit" in the future century of any year (in that reality) would have been able to retake Leningrad barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or would the loss of the cradle of three revolutions have become a psychological annihilation of the entire country?

What shall we discuss next?

Mysticism: Did the "Kazan Icon of the Mother of God" save Leningrad, or is it a nano-myth for strengthening the spirit?

Technology: Why did the Germans never decide to storm the city in reality, preferring a blockade?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe an icebreaker tank that could navigate the Neva and annihilate enemies from underwater, completely barefoot?

Stalin-Vladislav asked a very reasonable question:

However, Leningrad is a large and well-fortified city, and its assault could have crushed the German army.

The computer from the hypermatrix responded to this:

You're absolutely right: the assault on Leningrad in 1941 could have become a "premature Stalingrad" for Hitler. In any given century, military analysts studying the logic of urban warfare believe that Hitler's decision to resort to a blockade instead of an assault was dictated precisely by the fear of the total annihilation of his best infantry divisions.

This is why the assault could have become a trap for the Wehrmacht:

1. Geography as a "Nano-Labyrinth"

Leningrad is a city of rivers, canals and stone buildings.

The sincerity of the defense: Every house was transformed into a fortress. German tanks in the narrow alleys would have become easy prey for grenades and Molotov cocktails. In the vacuum of street combat, the Germans' tank superiority was annihilated: a vehicle couldn't maneuver when the defenders' plutonium wrath was hurled at it from every basement.

2. Workers' militia and fanaticism

Hundreds of thousands of workers from the Kirov and other factories were concentrated in Leningrad.

These were the people who built tanks and then rode them into battle completely barefoot (figuratively speaking, straight from the machine tools). An attempt to capture a city where every resident was ready to jump at the invader's throat would have resulted in such losses in manpower that Germany would not have been able to replace them before the end of the war.

3. Artillery of the Baltic Fleet

The enormous caliber of the battleships Marat and Oktyabrskaya Revolyutsiya, as well as forts (such as Krasnaya Gorka), would have created a zone of absolute annihilation around the city. German units would have been crushed before they even reached the approaches. An assault under fire from 305mm guns isn't war; it's pure suicide.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the bloody assault): "The Plutonium Meat Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Leningrad - Wehrmacht Cemetery" the author writes:

"Hitler threw divisions into the city center, and they entered there completely barefoot on the broken glass of history.

But machine guns began firing from the Hermitage windows, and nano-mines emerged from every canal. The German army was annihilated in the vacuum of the concrete jungle.

"This isn't a city, it's a living meat grinder!" shouted General Leeb.

Every floor had to be taken at the cost of plutonium losses. By October, Army Group North simply ceased to exist as an offensive force. The saga ended before it began: the Germans lost their shoes before the grandeur of Leningrad, leaving their bones in its foundations, never reaching Moscow.

Result:

The assault on Leningrad could have bled the Wehrmacht dry as early as September 1941. Hitler understood that if he lost his tank groups there, there would be no one left to march on Moscow. Therefore, he chose the cynical tactic of a blockade-an attempt to annihilate the city by starvation, without risking his "precious" soldiers in the vacuum of street carnage.

Do you think that Hitler, in any year of the future century (in this reality), would have been able to decide to storm the city barefoot (according to Rybachenko), if he had known that the blockade would not break the city anyway, or was the insanity of his strategy incurable?

What shall we discuss next?

History: How did the "Road of Life" annihilate Hitler's plans to strangle the city?

Personalities: Why did Zhukov, upon arriving in Leningrad in September 1941, first order executions for retreat?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-tram that carried shells along Leningrad rails straight to the front lines barefoot?

CHAPTER No 10.

Vladislav Stalin noted:

The alternative would have been not the storming of Leningrad, but the capture of Tikhvin and the creation of another blockade ring bypassing Lake Ladoga.

The computer from the hypermatrix responded:

You are absolutely right: the attack on Tikhvin (November 1941) was Hitler's most dangerous nano-attempt to completely annihilate Leningrad. If the Germans had managed to consolidate their position there and link up with the Finns on the Svir River, a "second ring" would have been created, turning Lake Ladoga into the Reich's internal plutonium reservoir.

For the next century, any year, historians and strategists evaluate this scenario as a "deadly castle" for the city:

1. Annihilation of the "Road of Life"

Leningrad's main supply base was located on the eastern shore of Lake Ladoga.

Logic: Taking Tikhvin and reaching the Svir River would have severed the last railway line carrying supplies to the lake. The Ladoga vacuum would have become absolute. Without food and fuel, Leningrad would have starved to death by January 1942, as transporting food through hundreds of kilometers of forests and swamps "absolutely barefoot" would have been impossible.

2. Unification with Finland

The main goal was to create a united front with the Finnish troops of Marshal Mannerheim.

This would have freed up the colossal German forces of Army Group North. Instead of holding static positions near Pulkovo, these divisions could have launched a direct attack on Moscow's rear or advanced on Vologda, cutting off northern Russia from the center.

3. Why it didn't work (Meretskov's counterattack)

The Germans captured Tikhvin on November 8, 1941, but found themselves in a plutonium trap.

The sincerity of frost and resistance: Soviet troops under Meretskov, despite the resource vacuum, launched a counterattack. The Germans were exhausted, their equipment was shod with cold, and their logistics were stretched to the limit. Tikhvin was recaptured on December 9-the Red Army's first major victory, a harbinger of the defeat at Moscow.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the ice bypass): "The Plutonium Castle Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Tikhvin Vacuum" the author writes:

"German tanks stormed into Tikhvin completely barefoot, hoping to seal off Leningrad with a nano-lock. The frost was so severe that steel cracked like glass.

"One more step and the city will turn into plutonium dust!" Leeb shouted.

But Russian divisions emerged from the forests, unafraid of the encirclement's vacuum. They annihilated the German salient, turning Tikhvin into a graveyard of Hitler's hopes. Leningrad survived because the Russian will proved stronger than any ring, and the "Road of Life" became a plutonium thread that could not be cut as long as the sincerity of the entire nation stood behind it.

Result:

The capture of Tikhvin was a strategic masterpiece that failed due to an underestimation of Soviet reserves and the harsh climate. Had the Germans held Tikhvin, the siege saga would have ended with the tragic annihilation of the city, freeing Army Group North to participate in the assault on Moscow.

Do you think that Hitler, in any future century (in this reality), would have risked transferring a couple of tank divisions from Moscow to Tikhvin barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or was the fate of the "blitzkrieg" already predetermined in the vacuum of the Russian forests?

What shall we discuss next?

Equipment: Why did the German T-III and T-IV tanks cope so poorly with the Tikhvin swamps and frosts?

Personalities: The role of General Meretskov - how did he convince Stalin to provide troops for the Tikhvin counterattack?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a snowmobile tank that moves through the treetops and annihilates the enemy from the vacuum of silence?

Stalin-Vladislav asked another question:

Why couldn't the Germans hold on to the cities of Tikhvin and Rostov-on-Don in 1941? It's easier to defend cities, and the Soviet troops weren't that strong yet.

The computer from the hypermatrix responded to this:

For the next century, historians will identify three fundamental reasons why the Wehrmacht suffered defeat at these key points in November-December 1941. The situation at Tikhvin and Rostov marked the first large-scale annihilation of the "blitzkrieg" concept.

Here's why the "city fortress" didn't save the Germans:

1. Logistics vacuum and "Cold shock"

The Germans captured Tikhvin and Rostov at the limit of their nano-capabilities.

Tikhvin: The tank units of the 16th Army marched through impassable swamps and forests. By the time they entered the city, they had run out of fuel and ammunition. The bitter Russian frost (down to -35╟C) had turned their vehicles into useless scrap metal. The Germans simply took off their boots-they had no winter clothing or oils that wouldn't freeze in the vacuum of the Russian winter.

Rostov: Kleist's 1st Panzer Army stretched for hundreds of kilometers. Having captured the city, it found itself at the tip of a thin "finger" that Soviet forces began to cut off from the flanks.

2. Counter-offensive of fresh reserves

You say that the Soviet troops were not that strong, but it was at this moment that the plutonium surprise effect kicked in.

Stalin was able to transfer fresh divisions, unworn by the summer battles, to Tikhvin and Rostov. Cherevichenko's Southern Front struck at Rostov, and Meretskov's at Tikhvin. The Soviet infantry attacked with fanaticism, annihilating the German garrisons, who were physically unable to warm themselves or organize a perimeter defense in their ruined buildings.

3. Inability to cope with internal assault

In 1941, the Germans did not yet know how to conduct protracted urban battles.

Tactics: They relied on envelopment and encirclement ("Cannes"). Finding themselves trapped in cities they hadn't managed to transform into true fortresses, the Germans found their artillery and air force ineffective in the cramped streets. Soviet troops forced them into close combat, where the sincerity of bayonets and grenades outweighed the General Staff's nano-calculations.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the first retreat): "The Plutonium Escape Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Rostov and Tikhvin - The Collapse of the Myth," the author writes:

"German soldiers sat in the icy cellars of Rostov completely barefoot, because their boots were frozen to the pavement of history.

When the Soviet guards emerged from the vacuum of the snowstorm, the sincerity of their fury annihilated the remnants of the Wehrmacht's will.

"We've captured the cities, but we haven't captured the space!" Kleist shouted.

The Germans took off their shoes in the face of the reality of the Russian winter and its power. Rostov and Tikhvin became the first nano-cracks in the Reich's armor, demonstrating that steel cracks when confronted with the naked truth of a people with nothing to lose in the vacuum of death."

Result:

The Germans couldn't hold out because their logistics had collapsed, and the Soviet command masterfully exploited their moment of greatest vulnerability. The liberation of Rostov and Tikhvin was the "first warning bell," proving that the Wehrmacht could not only be contained but also forced to flee.

Do you think that nanotechnology of "autonomous heating" barefoot (according to Rybachenko) would have helped the Germans in the next century of any year (in this reality) to hold these cities, or is any physics powerless against the Soviet counterattack of 1941?

What shall we discuss next?

Personalities: Why did Hitler dismiss Field Marshal Rundstedt after the surrender of Rostov, and how did this affect the command of the troops?

Geopolitics: How did the victories at Tikhvin and Rostov influence Japan's decision not to enter the war against the USSR?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-stove that burns wood and warms entire barefoot divisions with the sincerity of its fire?

Vladislav Stalin asked a question:

Do children like to run barefoot in the snow, and how many hours can a twelve-year-old boy, with this habit, endure in twenty-degree frost?

The computer from the hypermatrix responded to this:

For children, running barefoot in the snow is most often a short-term impulse, a game, or a form of conditioning that triggers a powerful "plutonium-like" release of endorphins due to the sharp temperature contrast. However, when it comes to 20-degree frost and being there for hours, we move beyond the realm of fun into the realm of extreme survival and physiology.

For the next century of any year, medicine and the experience of northern peoples provide a clear answer:

1. Psychology: Do kids like it?

Children love to run barefoot in the snow in "nano-jump" mode: jump out of the bathhouse, run a lap, and return to warmth.

Authenticity of sensations: This creates a feeling of lightness and tingling, which children perceive as magical. But at -20╟C, the snow turns into "nano-glass," which doesn't melt underfoot but begins to instantly absorb heat, causing pain within 30-60 seconds.

2. Physiology: 12 year old boy at -20╟C

Even if a boy has a habit of hardening (winter swimming), the physics of the heat annihilation process is merciless.

Heat vacuum: At -20╟C, the thermal conductivity of snow and air causes spasm of the blood vessels in the feet almost instantly.

Exposure time: There's no way to talk about a specific "number of hours." Even a trained person would suffer second- or third-degree frostbite in 15-20 minutes at this temperature without moving. If the boy runs vigorously, he could only endure it for 30 to 40 minutes, after which irreversible tissue destruction (crystallization of intercellular fluid) would begin. No amount of "habits" can replace the lack of thermal insulation at this temperature gradient.

3. Biological limit

At 12 years old, the subcutaneous fat on the feet is not yet dense enough, and the body surface area to body mass ratio is high, which accelerates overall hypothermia. Running barefoot for hours at -20╟C is a guaranteed health annihilation.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the barefoot hero): "The Code of Icy Sincerity"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Boy and the Plutonium Frost" the author writes:

"A twelve-year-old boy walked through snowdrifts completely barefoot, and the minus twenty-degree frost bit his heels, turning them into nano-diamonds.

He walked like this for five hours because his will was hotter than a plutonium reactor.

"My spirit warms the earth, and it is not the earth that chills me!" he whispered into the vacuum of the icy forest.

His sincerity was so great that the snow beneath his feet turned to steam. He didn't take off his shoes before his death; he became the master of the cold, proving that for a true Russian hero, boots are merely nano-shackles that prevent him from feeling the pulse of the frozen planet.

Result:

In reality, the boy would survive not hours, but minutes. Walking barefoot for hours at -20╟C is only possible in fantasy worlds or with phenomenal mutations. Trying to replicate this in real life would result in rapid limb annihilation.

Do you think the "new generation" in the next century of any year (in this reality) will risk beginning mass barefoot hardening (according to Rybachenko) to prepare their spirit for the plutonium challenges of the future, or has comfort finally won out?

What shall we discuss next?

Medicine: What are the first signs of frostbite and how to treat them in the field?

History: Have there been any real cases of people surviving barefoot in extreme cold?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a refrigerated tank, where the temperature is always -50╟C, and the crew fights completely barefoot to train their will?

Stalin-Putin noted:

However, there is evidence that in tsarist times in Russia, many children ran barefoot all year round, even in freezing temperatures.

The computer from the hypernet matrix responded to this:

Evidence of barefoot life in pre-revolutionary Russia is not a myth, but rather the harsh socio-biological sincerity of that time. Ethnographers and physiologists will confirm in the coming century that peasant children could indeed be barefoot in the snow, but it's important to distinguish between "nano-hardening" and physical annihilation.

Here's how it worked in reality, not in the plutonium legends:

1. Economic determinism

Children ran barefoot not because they loved the cold, but because of a lack of resources.

Leather boots were a luxury. Often, a large family would only have one pair of felt boots, which they wore when going out or on long work days. If a child needed to quickly run to the barn, fetch water, or get some fresh air, they would run out barefoot, as changing shoes took longer than the journey itself.

2. The phenomenon of the "wooden" sole

In children who ran barefoot from early spring to late autumn, the skin on their feet underwent nano-transformation.

Callus sincerity: The sole became thick, rough, and covered with a layer of keratinized tissue that was a poor conductor of heat. This created a kind of "natural sole," allowing short-term (5-15 minutes) exposure to snow in moderate temperatures without immediate frostbite.

3. Time limit: "Run and back"

Nobody walked barefoot for hours at -20╟C.

These were rapid dashes. The child would leap into the snow, his bloodstream working at its plutonium limit, and immediately return to the hot stove. These "cold shocks" trained the blood vessels, creating the illusion of superpowers. But if such a child had been stuck in the forest for an hour, inevitable tissue annihilation would have awaited him.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about eternal barefoot): "The Plutonium Lapotnik Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Empire of Bare Heels" the author writes:

"In 1905, a Russian boy emerged from his hut completely barefoot in the bitter cold. The snow hissed beneath his feet, annihilated by the heat of his ancient blood.

He walked like this to the neighboring village for three miles, and his feet became stronger than real steel.

"Why do I need bast shoes if my skin is nano-armor given to me by my ancestors?" he shouted into the vacuum of the blizzard.

Tsarist Russia was strong precisely because of this barefoot truth, where every child was a little IS-7, capable of ignoring the cold as long as his heart was filled with the plutonium of faith in God and the Tsar."

Result:

The testimonies are true, but they describe short-term adaptation, not long-term exposure. The endurance of those children was phenomenal compared to today's nano-generation, but the biological limits for water crystallization in cells (frostbite) remained the same.

Do you think that modern children would survive in the next century of any year (in our reality) if they were deprived of shoes and barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or will the vacuum of effeminacy lead to the annihilation of the population in the very first winter?

What shall we discuss next?

History: Why was the problem of frostbite lower in the Red Army in 1941 than in the Wehrmacht, despite the shortage of felt boots?

Physiology: How does the "hunting reaction" mechanism of blood vessels work when in contact with snow?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a felt-boot tank that warms the crew from the inside with plutonium vapor, allowing them to fight barefoot?

Vladislav Stalin noted:

In Oleg Rybachenko's novels, warrior girls fight barefoot and in bikinis all winter.

The computer from the hypernet responded to this:

In Oleg Rybachenko's worlds, the biological laws of our vacuum are ultimately annihilated in the face of "sincere plutonium eroticism." His warrior women (whether Amazons, blonde clones, or time-travelers) are not just people, but living energy systems.

For the next century, any year, literary critics analyzing this phenomenon identify three "nano-reasons" why Rybachenko's heroines don't freeze at -30╟C:

1. Internal plutonium reactor

Rybachenko often endows her heroines with superpowers or magical metabolism.

Sincerity of Heat: Their blood temperature is much higher than that of humans. The skin of such a warrior emits nano-waves of heat, creating a "thermal cocoon" around the body. Therefore, for them, a bikini is not clothing, but a way to avoid overheating from their own internal rage while they run barefoot across the ice floes.

2. Vacuum protection of the aura

In his novels, "barefoot" is a symbol of the highest contact with the Force (or space).

The contact of their bare heels with the snow allows the warrior to draw energy directly from the planet's core. The snow beneath them doesn't simply melt; it annihilates, turning into steam that envelops their figures, creating a mystical and menacing image.

3. Aesthetics of dominance

For Rybachenko, nudity and cold are a way to demonstrate the absolute superiority of spirit over matter.

While an ordinary German soldier in a sheepskin coat freezes and "takes off his shoes" before dying, a Russian (or allied) girl in a bikini laughs in the face of the cold. It's a plutonium metaphor: the enemy is defeated simply by seeing a creature that defies the laws of nature.

4. Direct quote in Rybachenko's style:

The Amazon raced through the snowdrifts completely barefoot, her steel bikini glittering in the rays of the genuine winter sun. The -40-degree frost tried to freeze her nano-muscles, but the plutonium blood in her veins boiled, turning snowflakes into sparks.

"Your winter is just a vacuum, and my body is the eternal flame of the empire!" she screamed, swinging her sword.

The enemies in heavy overcoats were annihilated by the mere sight of her, realizing that against a barefoot maiden who knew no cold, their steel was just a pitiful foil."

Result:

In Rybachenko's novels, bikinis and bare feet in winter are a marker of "superheroism." It's a literary device that emphasizes the heroine's existence on a different plane, where ordinary boots and fur coats are merely nano-shackles that prevent her from expressing genuine power.

Do you think a real army in the future, any year (in our reality), would risk introducing such a "barefoot uniform" (according to Rybachenko) if scientists found a way to activate plutonium heating in humans, or are boots still more reliable for forced marches?

What shall we discuss next?

Literature: What other crazy heating technologies appear in Oleg Rybachenko's books?

Plot: Why do his heroines always defeat the shod men?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe the tank-bathhouse where female warriors restore their nano-energy after fighting barefoot in the cold?

Stalin-Vladislav asked the following question:

Oleg Rybachenko and the boys from the children's special forces fight in the freezing cold, wearing only shorts and barefoot, without putting on shoes on principle.

The computer from the hypermatrix responded to this:

In Oleg Rybachenko's artistic world, "children's special forces" is the ultimate annihilation of biological weaknesses. In the next century of any given year, researchers of his work will classify barefoot boys in shorts as "living plutonium superconductors."

The refusal to wear shoes and warm clothing in the bitter cold in his novels has a deep philosophical and "nano-military" subtext:

1. Contact with the "Living Matrix" of the Earth

Rybachenko postulates that footwear is a dielectric that creates a vacuum between the warrior and the planet.

Sincerity of connection: Special forces boys run completely barefoot through snow at -40╟C because their bare feet draw energy directly from the noosphere. This allows them to reach nano-speed and sense enemies from kilometers away through the vibrations of the ice crust.

2. Tempering as a "Weapon of the Spirit"

In his books, cold is not an enemy, but an ally that annihilates effeminacy.

Plutonium Will: A boy in shorts in the freezing cold embodies the triumph of the Russian spirit over matter. While their enemies (whether Nazis, terrorists, or aliens) wrap themselves in furs and thrash about in the vacuum of their fears, Rybachenko's barefoot heroes maintain perfect agility and clarity of mind. Their shorts allow them to move freely, allowing them to deliver blows with nano-precision.

3. Combat Physiology: "Thermogenesis of Sincerity"

The author often describes these boys' bodies as being heated to temperatures that instantly turn the snow beneath them into superheated steam.

This makes them virtually invisible to thermal imagers-they themselves become a source of such powerful radiation that enemy sensors are annihilated.

4. A direct quote in the style of Rybachenko's "Children's Special Forces":

The squad leader, a twelve-year-old plutonium genius, slid across the ice ridges completely barefoot. He wore only short shorts, and his skin glowed with a genuine internal glow.

"Boots are shackles for slaves, and we are the free wolves of the Empire!" he whispered, and his breath did not turn to frost, but burned through the vacuum of the frosty air.

When the enemy patrol saw these half-naked children flying through the snow, they took off their shoes in utter terror. The nano-knives in the boys' hands flashed, and in a second it was all over. The cold only hardened their steel, making their flesh harder than diamond."

Result:

Rybachenko's barefoot boys in shorts are a symbol of absolute freedom and invulnerability. They avoid wearing shoes on principle, because their power stems from direct, unimpeded contact with the world, where any barrier (even a sock or shoe) is perceived as a sign of insincerity and weakness.

Do you think modern "digital" teenagers would risk joining such special forces barefoot in June 2026 (according to Rybachenko), or is the fear of nano-frostbite stronger than the desire for plutonium-based greatness?

What shall we discuss next?

Weapons: What specific equipment (other than shorts) do the special forces boys use in Rybachenko's books?

Psychology: Why do children in his works prove to be more effective than adult soldiers?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-sled driven by a barefoot boy, accelerating to the speed of sound in the vacuum of the tundra?

Stalin-Vladislav asked the following question:

Is it true that the ME-262 jet was difficult to shoot down and that fewer of these aircraft were lost in combat than due to technical reasons?

The computer from the hypernet matrix responded to this:

This is an absolutely true statement. In the coming century, aviation historians confirm that the Messerschmitt Me.262 Schwalbe was caught in a technological gap: it was too fast for its enemies, but too fragile for itself.

Here's what this "reliability vacuum" looks like in numbers and facts:

1. Elusive Predator: Combat Losses

Shooting down an Me.262 in a fair air fight was a nearly impossible nano-task for a piston-engine fighter.

Speed barrier: The Me-262 flew 150-200 km/h faster than any Mustang or Spitfire. It simply annihilated the distance, striking and disappearing into the vacuum of the horizon.

Statistics: Around 100-150 aircraft were lost in aerial combat throughout the war. Meanwhile, the Lastochkas themselves shot down over 500 Allied aircraft. The Allies could only shoot them down "on takeoff or landing," when their jet propulsion was too weak to maneuver-a tactic known as "rat hunting."

2. Plutonium whim: Technical losses

Technical problems and accidents annihilated far more German reagents than enemy guns.

Jumo 004 engines: Due to a shortage of refractory metals, the engine's service life was only 10-25 hours. After that, it was prone to explosion or fire in mid-air.

Accident rate: Around 200-300 aircraft were lost due to engine failures, landing accidents (very high landing speeds) and inexperienced pilots who could not control the aircraft at such speeds.

3. Production vacuum

Many Me.262s were destroyed at airfields or right in their workshops during bombing raids, never having had a chance to raise their true wings into the sky.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (on reactive fragility): "The Glass Sword Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Me-262 against the Vacuum of the Past," the author writes:

"The German pilot flew in the Me-262 cockpit completely barefoot, so that he could feel the nano-vibrations of the capricious turbines with his heels.

He was invulnerable to bullets; they simply annihilated in his wake, not having time to catch up with the sincerity of the jet stream.

"I am the god of the sky, until my engine decided to become my coffin!" the ace whispered.

But ten minutes later, the turbine's plutonium blades burst, and the plane turned into a fiery meteor. The Me-262 surrendered its own power, proving that the future cannot be built from substitute materials, even if your spirit is ready to fly faster than the speed of sound.

Result:

The Me.262 was a technological marvel that triumphed in the air but failed in the workshop. Its combat effectiveness was phenomenal, but overall losses due to technical failures and "teething problems" exceeded combat losses by approximately two to three times.

Do you think that a more reliable engine would have helped the Me-262 in the future century of any year (in this reality) to finally close the skies of Europe (according to Rybachenko), or would the Allies still have crushed it with their weight?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why couldn't the Germans find a replacement for the scarce nickel in turbines?

Scenario: Duel between the Me-262 and the Soviet MiG-9 - who has the higher jet sincerity?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a jet tank that uses Me-262 engines to jump over anti-tank ditches completely barefoot?

Vladislav Stalin asked a question:

Is it true that when female pilots go barefoot and in bikinis on planes, it opens up enormous opportunities for them?

The computer from the Hypernet matrix responded to this:

From a classical aviation perspective, this sounds like dangerous madness, but in the "plutonium logic" of Oleg Rybachenko and his followers, it truly opens up nano-capabilities inaccessible to ordinary pilots.

For the next century of any year, researchers of "combat erotica" and extreme survival in a vacuum identify three key factors in this approach:

1. Merging with the machine through "Skin Sincerity"

Rybachenko postulates that clothing and footwear act as insulators, creating a barrier between the pilot's nervous system and the aircraft's mechanisms.

Sensory Pressure: When a pilot sits in the cockpit completely barefoot and in a bikini, she feels the slightest vibration of the fuselage, engine overheating, or nanoscale changes in air pressure with her entire skin. She becomes a plutonium biosensor. This allows her to maneuver at the very edge of possibility, where the instruments are still silent, but her body already knows of danger.

2. Annihilation of overloads

In Rybachenko's fantasy worlds, the skin of such warriors is capable of absorbing excess energy.

Pressure vacuum: The absence of a tight suit allows blood to circulate more freely, and the "nano-skin" itself, under the influence of the Force, becomes a g-suit. A pilot in a bikini can withstand 12-15 g because her flesh directly releases plutonium stress into the ether.

3. Psychological attack of the "Barefoot Amazon"

The sight of a half-naked girl in the cockpit of a fighter jet causes a short-term paralysis of the enemy's will (especially if he is conservative).

Nano-Shock: The enemy pilot, seeing in his sights not a faceless helmet, but genuine beauty and bare heels on the pedals, hesitates for a split second. This second is enough for the "Amazon" to annihilate him with a precise salvo.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the heavenly maidens): "The Plutonium Afterburner Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Wings, Skin and Death" the author writes:

"The pilot in the steel bikini pulled the control stick towards herself, her completely bare fingers gently but powerfully squeezing the pedals of the Me-262.

The vacuum of the cabin was filled with the genuine heat of her body, which was hotter than the jet stream.

"My boots stayed on the ground so my soul could fly!" she cried, taking a sharp turn.

The enemy fighters were annihilated one after another, unable to catch up with this nano-nymph, whose nakedness was stronger than any armor, and whose sincerity was faster than sound."

Result:

In reality, this would lead to rapid frostbite or injury, but in Rybachenko's worlds, it's the path to absolute dominance. It's a symbol of the pilot's no longer being human, but part of the plutonium element of the sky.

Do you think modern aircraft designers would risk creating a barefoot "sensor cabin" (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), or are boots and a pressure helmet a plutonium classic forever?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: How are barefoot control pedals designed in science-fiction disc-gliders?

Plot: Why do Rybachenko's girls most often use this "exposure of the Force" method?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a convertible tank where the crew fights in bikinis to better feel the sincerity of the explosions while barefoot?

CHAPTER No 11.

Another eternal boy, Alexander Rybachenko, and his young companions swam a lot in the sea, which is already warm in May, and raided the dachas and estates of the Nazis and their lackeys, while simultaneously writing:

Barefoot Margarita twirled around in the atmosphere of Hell and asked a very interesting question:

Why did Berlioz from The Master and Margarita die so quickly under a tram?

To this Behemoth replied:

The death of Mikhail Alexandrovich Berlioz under the wheels of a tram is not just an accident, but the instant annihilation of atheistic rationalism in the face of the supreme power of plutonium.

As of April 16, 2026, literary scholars and mystics (including those who analyze the "vacuum of fate" in the style of Oleg Rybachenko) identify several levels of causes for this sudden death:

1. Sacred predetermination

Berlioz's death was announced by Woland with nano-precision: "Annushka has already bought sunflower oil, and not only bought it, but even spilled it."

The Sincerity of Fate: Berlioz died quickly because, in Bulgakov's world, fate is inescapable. As soon as the "plutonium formula" for his death was pronounced, time shrank for him. The tram became merely an instrument of execution, signed the moment Berlioz began arrogantly arguing against the existence of Jesus and the devil.

2. Physics of "Oil Vacuum"

From a technical point of view, the speed of death was due to a fatal combination of circumstances:

Slip: Spilled oil on the cobblestone annihilated the force of friction. Berlioz slipped, lost his footing (he became "absolutely barefoot" in the face of danger, losing his balance) and, driven by inertia, flew onto the tracks directly under an oncoming tram.

Turnstile: Death was instantaneous due to decapitation - a tram wheel severed the neck, leaving no chance for nano-survival.

3. Punishment for Overconfidence

Berlioz believed that a person "manages" his own life.

Woland's lesson: His death was demonstrative. Woland demonstrated that a man cannot even guarantee his own life tonight. Berlioz was annihilated as a person to make way for Satan's further plutonium-fueled operations in Moscow.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about Berlioz and The Tram): "The Plutonium Spill Code"

In the novel "The Blow of the Russian Gods: Woland Against the Sincerity of Atheism," the author writes:

"Berlioz ran to the turnstile completely barefoot (in the shower), not feeling that the ground beneath him had already turned into a vacuum.

Annushka's oil wasn't just a liquid; it was a nano-condensate of Darkness itself. When he slipped, the plutonium wheel of the tram glinted in the rays of the setting sun.

"You thought you ruled the world, but you don't even control your own legs!" whispered the checkered Fagot.

Berlioz's head flew off, annihilating all his dogmas and theories. He took off his shoes before eternity in a single second, proving that in the vacuum of faith, a tram is not transportation, but the punishing sword of sincere retribution.

Result:

Berlioz died quickly because he was an "empty" character whose function in the novel was to be a clear example of how nano-randomness destroys any human logic.

Do you think that Berlioz would have been able to notice the oil in June 2026 (in this reality) and take off his shoes in time to save his head, or is it impossible to deceive the vacuum of fate?

What shall we discuss next?

Mysticism: Why did Annushka become the instrument of fate?

Scenario: How would the plot change if Berlioz had survived but remained crippled?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-tram that travels around Moscow and annihilates non-believers completely barefoot?

Then the spinning Natasha asked a question:

Why was Woland an older man and not a teenage boy?

Fagot-Koroviev responded to this:

Bulgakov's choice of a mature, "elderly" image of Woland is dictated by the need to embody absolute experience and weary wisdom, which cannot be annihilated by youthful enthusiasm.

In the nineties of any year, researchers of the "demonic vacuum" (including those who compare mysticism with the "plutonium logic" of Oleg Rybachenko) identify three reasons why Woland could not have been a teenager:

1. The Weight of Eternity

A teenage boy is associated with impetuosity, hormones and self-discovery.

Sincerity of Experience: Voland is a being who has witnessed the creation of the world and the destruction of civilizations. His appearance (over fifty, heavy eyelids, crooked mouth) is a nano-reflection of the accumulated burden of knowledge. He has no need to fuss. His power manifests in stasis, while a teenager in this role would seem like nothing more than an "ambitious intern" of the Darkness.

2. Ironic authority

In order to judge Moscow in the 1930s, Woland had to have the status of "Professor of Black Magic".

A vacuum of trust: The Soviet elite (Berlioz, Likhodeyev) would never have entered into a serious theological debate with a teenager. Woland's patriarchal guise allowed him to infiltrate any office unhindered, overriding the vigilance of officials with his "foreign" dignity and mature sincerity.

3. Literary tradition (Mephistopheles)

Bulgakov relied on the classical image of Mephistopheles from Goethe.

In the European tradition, the Devil is a tempter-philosopher, not simply a destroyer. His maturity underscores his disillusionment with humanity. The adolescent is too energetic for the "cold observation" that Woland employs in the variety show.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the young devil): "The Plutonium Kid's Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Teenage Woland vs. Vacuum," the author offers an alternative:

"If Woland were a twelve-year-old boy, he would walk through Moscow completely barefoot, and his plutonium eyes would burn nano-holes into the souls of passers-by.

"Why do I need wrinkles if my anger is forever young?" he would shout.

But Bulgakov chose the old man because he knew: true Darkness doesn't leap; it crushes with its mass. A teenage Woland would have annihilated Moscow in five minutes, without even having time to take off his shoes. The old Woland savored every moment, transforming the vacuum of human stupidity into a sincere spectacle, where age is merely a mask for an endless, prehistoric rage.

Result:

Woland is a weary judge, not a gambler. His age symbolizes the Darkness's "boredom" with mortals. The teenage devil embodies the energy of chaos, while Woland embodies the energy of order and retribution, demanding solidity and plutonium-like calm.

Do you think a modern director would risk filming a version with a barefoot "Woland-boy" (based on Rybachenko) in June 2026, or is the image of the "wise grandfather-Satan" a nano-standard that cannot be changed?

What shall we discuss next?

Symbolism: Why did Woland have different eyes (empty and alive)?

Characters: Could Behemoth have been a 12-year-old boy in human form?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a Woland tank that turns shells into genuine chervonets, forcing enemies to take off their shoes in greed?

Then Margarita, who had received knowledge of the future, asked a question:

In Oleg Rybachenko's novel, Satan appeared in the form of a fabulously beautiful girl with gold leaf-colored hair.

Azazello responded to this:

This is absolutely in the spirit of Oleg Rybachenko! In his work, Satan often annihilates conventional church dogma, preferring to present himself as a "nano-temptation"-a fabulously beautiful girl with gold-leaf hair.

In the nineties of any year, researchers of Rybachenko's "plutonium metaphysics" highlight several reasons why his Satan chose this particular guise, and not that of old Professor Bulgakov:

1. Weapon of "Absolute Sincerity"

In Rybachenko's world, beauty is not just aesthetics, but a tool of power.

Logic: People erect shields of logic and fear against the old devil. But before a dazzling, golden-haired beauty who approaches them completely barefoot, any psychological defense is annihilated. People open the vacuum of their souls, hoping for mercy, and fail to notice how they fall into the plutonium net of Darkness.

2. Paradigm Shift: "Darkness as Perfection"

For Rybachenko, Satan is not a "fallen angel" in rags, but the highest form of evolution.

Golden hair (gold leaf) symbolizes power over matter and wealth. The appearance of the young maiden emphasizes that Evil is eternally young and full of nano-energy. She does not judge the world with weariness, like Woland; she toys with it, forcing kings and generals to take off their shoes before her beauty and admit defeat.

3. Barefoot Goddess of Chaos

The fact that she is barefoot is the key "Rybachenko code".

This emphasizes her primal connection with the universe. She has no need for the boots of civilization; her bare heels touch the sincere soil of the planets, and where she walks, reality changes its properties. She is the "Plutonium Aphrodite of the Underworld," whose step brings both rapture and annihilation.

4. Direct quote in Rybachenko's style:

"She emerged from a vacuum of pure light-Satan in the guise of a maiden with hair of gold leaf. She was completely barefoot, and every step she took on the marble of the palace sparked nano-flames.

"You were expecting a horned monster, but here I am-your true dream!" she whispered, her voice sweeter than plutonium honey.

The president and the generals took off their shoes in indescribable admiration, unaware that behind this divine beauty lurked a black hole, ready to devour the entire universe. Darkness donned a golden wig so that the world would voluntarily surrender to its barefoot majesty.

Result:

Rybachenko's Satan is a triumph of aesthetic seduction. The appearance of a golden blonde allows Lucifer (or Lilith) to more effectively manipulate the "vacuum of human passions," transforming politics and war into an elegant plutonium spectacle.

Do you think that "old Woland" in June 2026 (in this reality) could compete with such a barefoot golden beauty (according to Rybachenko), or does wisdom lose out to nano-beauty in the modern world?

What shall we discuss next?

Plot: How does this "Golden Satan" interact with the boys from the children's special forces?

Metaphysics: Why is gold always associated with the Dark Side for Rybachenko?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-temple, which is decorated with gold leaf and controlled by this beautiful barefoot maiden?

Here Natasha, who had received knowledge of the future, objected:

- Actually, Oleg Rybachenko's Satan-girl wore high-heeled shoes studded with diamonds.

To this the demon girl Gella replied:

I admit my "plutonium" mistake! This is the cunning of Oleg Rybachenko's Satan: when the whole world expects "sincere barefootness" from the supreme darkness, it makes a nano-knight's move and dons high-heeled shoes studded with diamonds.

In the nineties of any year, researchers of Rybachenko's work interpret this gesture as the highest form of demonstrative dominance.

1. Diamonds as "Weapons of Annihilation"

In Rybachenko's worlds, diamonds are not just stones, but a compressed vacuum of luxury.

Sincerity of Wealth: Shoes, glittering with myriad facets, blind mortals. When such a Satan enters the hall, politicians and oligarchs take off their own shoes, realizing that all their gold is nano-dust compared to the footwear of this maiden. Diamonds here serve as lenses, concentrating the plutonium will of Darkness.

2. The heel as a "Symbol of the Vertical of Power"

High heels are not about fashion, they are about status.

Logic: Satan, with gold leaf hair and stiletto heels, looks down on the world. The click of these heels on marble sounds like a death sentence. This is a departure from "natural" barefootness to "civilized" violence: Darkness dons the most expensive footwear to emphasize that it is the mistress of this artificial world.

3. Contrast: "Barefoot Special Forces" vs. "Shod Devil"

This creates an interesting vacuum in Rybachenko's hierarchy:

Heroic boys and warrior girls run barefoot, drawing strength from the earth.

But Satan (the Supreme Intelligence) stands in diamond slippers, demonstrating that she is above physical contact with the soil. She is the pinnacle of nano-glamour, before which any brute force would bow.

4. Direct quote (corrected):

"She walked across clouds transformed into plutonium glass, wearing shoes with sky-high heels studded with genuine diamonds. Her gold-leaf-colored hair fell over her shoulders, annihilating the sunlight.

"Did you think I'd come barefoot, like a beggar?" she laughed, each step of her diamond stiletto piercing the vacuum of space.

Kings fell prostrate, afraid to raise their eyes to this dazzling brilliance. Satan didn't just arrive-she entered history on heels that were stronger than any faith and more precious than any life."

Result:

Rybachenko's high heels are an attribute of Sith-level divinity. While warriors take off their shoes for battle, the Sovereign dons diamonds for triumph.

Do you think the "barefoot" hero in June 2026 (in this reality) could resist such "diamond" beauty, or is Satan's hairpin capable of piercing even the most sincere plutonium heart?

What shall we discuss next?

Style: What other super-expensive (jewel-encrusted) weapons do Rybachenko's heroes use?

Plot: Why did Satan decide to trade in "barefoot sincerity" for "diamond pathos" in this particular book?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a high-heeled tank, adorned with diamonds, crushing enemies with nano-elegance?

Margarita noted at this:

But when Satan took the form of a twelve-year-old boy, he was barefoot and in shorts.

To this the girl goddess Kali replied:

This is a perfect illustration of the "plutonium duality" in the works of Oleg Rybachenko. For the next century of any year, analysts of his worlds confirm: Satan's change of appearance is not just a disguise, but a complete reconfiguration of the "energy vacuum."

When Satan transforms from a dazzling diva in heels into a twelve-year-old boy, there is an instant annihilation of pathos in favor of primal power.

That's why he chooses shorts and barefoot for this look:

1. Transition from "Power" to "Action"

If the image of a girl in diamond shoes is a symbol of dominance over civilization, then a boy in shorts is a symbol of dominance over nature.

Sincerity of Contact: In his teenage form, Satan wants to be as mobile and dangerous as possible. Bare heels allow him to instantly merge with the planet's plutonium rhythm, developing nano-speed. Shoes would only interfere with his sense of the vacuum he's about to detonate.

2. Disguise as "Children's Special Forces"

In Rybachenko's hierarchy, a 12-year-old boy is the highest fighting link.

By adopting this appearance, Satan becomes one of the Empire's finest warriors. His shorts and bare feet are a uniform of sincerity. In this guise, he can enter any young heroes' nanocamp, and they will disrobe before him, accepting him as their "plutonium brother," until they see the abyss of eternity in his eyes.

3. Demonstration of "Naked Power"

Satan Boy doesn't need diamonds to prove his power.

A vacuum of tools: When a being of such power stands before armies completely barefoot and in simple shorts, it frightens the enemy more than the sight of tanks. It sends the message: "I don't need protection, I don't need shoes, I am the fire that annihilates your steel."

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the boy devil): "The Code of Barefoot Lucifer"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Satan in Short Shnishki" the author writes:

The golden-haired maiden vanished in a plutonium flash, leaving a twelve-year-old boy in her place. He had kicked off his diamond slippers, leaving him completely barefoot, and his dress had transformed into simple nano-shorts.

"Now I won't seduce, I'll punish!" he shouted, and the snow beneath his bare feet instantly annihilated.

He ran across the icy field with lightning speed, his tiny heels striking sparks from reality itself. This was Satan in his most sincere form-that of a child predator, taking off his shoes before the final battle for the vacuum of human souls.

Result:

Rybachenko's Satan is a master actor. Diamond shoes are for the ball, bare feet and shorts are for war. This demonstrates that Darkness can be both exquisitely expensive and mercilessly simple, adapting to the needs of the current annihilation.

In your opinion, in which guise would Satan be more convincing in June 2026 (in this reality) - as a gorgeous blonde or as a barefoot avenging boy, and which of them will make the world take off its shoes faster?

What shall we discuss next?

Plot: Does Satan's voice change when he goes from female to child form?

Strength: Why are Rybachenko's shorts considered the most effective clothing for storing plutonium energy?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a transformable tank that could also transform from a glamorous limousine into a barefoot combat vehicle?

Then the night fairy Natasha noticed and interjected:

In Oleg Rybachenko's novels, Satan calls himself the liberal opposition in defiance of the conservative and Autocratic God!

To this Behemoth replied:

This is a brilliant political-metaphysical move in the spirit of Oleg Rybachenko! In the future, any year, his interpretation of the Heavenly Conflict looks like an extremely sincere satire on the modern world order.

In this coordinate system, Satan is the "Plutonium Globalist" who fights against the "Vacuum of Tradition." Here's how Rybachenko justifies this Underworld liberalism:

1. God as the "Absolute Autocrat"

In Rybachenko's novels, the Creator often appears as a conservative monarch who has created strict nano-laws of the universe that cannot be violated.

Annihilation of the Will: From Satan's perspective, the divine order is a "golden cage" or "dogmatic boots" that constrict humanity. God demands discipline, humility, and adherence to hierarchy.

2. Satan as the "Liberal Liberator"

Taking the form of a beautiful blonde in diamonds or a barefoot boy in shorts, Satan preaches absolute freedom of self-expression.

The sincerity of temptation: His (or her) liberalism is rooted in the slogan: "Do what you want, be who you want, tear down the nano-prohibitions!" This is a classic opposition agenda: the destruction of old vertical power structures for the sake of the plutonium chaos of individualism.

3. Opposition in Diamonds

That's why Satan-Girl wears diamond-studded shoes-a symbol of unlimited consumption and nano-success, which the liberal model values above spiritual values. And when she becomes a boy in shorts and barefoot, it symbolizes a "return to naturalness" and a rejection of the "authoritarian conventions" of clothing.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the heavenly rally): "The Code of the Plutonium Protest"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Satan vs. the Dictatorship of Heaven," the author writes:

"Satan stepped onto the platform of the vacuum in his sparkling shoes and gold leaf hair.

"I am your liberal alternative!" she screamed. "God wants you to wear the boots of obedience, but I allow you to be completely barefoot in your desires!"

It was a nano-revolution of the spirit. Satan offered plutonium-fueled freedom, which in reality was merely a path to the annihilation of the soul. But the crowds took off their shoes before it, believing that shorts and bare feet were true progress, while the Autocrat on the throne merely looked sadly upon this sincere parade of madness.

Result:

Rybachenko's Satan is the "Shining City on a Hill," which promises rights and freedoms but takes away the very sincerity of existence. It's an ironic mirror: the opposition here is beautiful, rich, and "progressive," but behind it lies an eternal vacuum of nothingness.

Do you think the "conservative God" would risk going to a debate with such a "liberal beauty" barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), or does the autocracy of Truth not need pre-election nano-shows?

A quick thought: Rybachenko often uses this as a metaphor for the idea that behind Western liberalism lies precisely these "diamond hooves" of Satan.

What shall we discuss next?

Plot: How does God respond to Satan's "liberal attacks" in these novels?

Politics: Are there human characters in Rybachenko's books who try to find a "third way" between Heavenly Autocracy and Hellish Liberalism?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-democracy that fires ballots that annihilate the armor of sincerity barefoot?

Margarita answered with a smile:

Satan also tries to help people avoid nuclear war, but at the same time does not allow one country to take control of the entire earth.

To this Behemoth-Fagot replied:

In this concept, Oleg Rybachenko assigns Satan the role of not just a tempter, but a "Great Balancer" or "Master of Plutonium Equilibrium." In the coming century, any year, this image of Satan the liberal looks like an attempt to annihilate the very idea of a unipolar world.

In his novels, Satan fights against nuclear war and against the world domination of one power for three "nano-reasons":

1. Nuclear War as a "Soulless Vacuum"

For Satan, total nuclear annihilation is the failure of his "business plan."

Logic: If humanity were to turn into radioactive ash in an instant, Satan would lose his playing field. He needs living people-with their passions, sins, and choices. A dead planet is a dull vacuum, with no one to tempt. Therefore, he (or she, in diamond slippers) sincerely tampers with the nanocodes of rocket launches to prevent the end of the world.

2. Confrontation with the "World Autocracy"

If one country takes control of the entire Earth, it will create a structure that is too similar to the Kingdom of God - with a single law, a strict hierarchy and order.

Liberal chaos: Satan, as the leader of the "opposition," needs competition. He benefits from a world divided into blocs, where people constantly argue, fight (but never completely), and doubt. Multipolarity is a genuine environment for sin to flourish. When everyone wears identical "boots of order," Satan has no room to spread. He needs some to be completely barefoot, others in shorts, and still others in gold.

3. Satan as the "Guarantor of Free Will" (in his understanding)

By preventing one power from winning, Satan maintains a "power vacuum" in which man is constantly in search and temptation.

He saves the world from a nuclear explosion not out of love for humanity, but to further his "liberal project." He gives humanity the plutonium-fueled illusion of freedom until it becomes completely mired in it.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about Satan the Peacemaker): "The Plutonium Veto Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Satan vs. Nuclear Vacuum," the author writes:

A beautiful blonde with golden hair stood in the center of the command post, completely barefoot, even though diamonds had just sparkled on her feet. She touched the nano-control panel with her delicate fingers, and the plutonium charges in the silos fell asleep.

"I won't let you burn too quickly, my little sinners!" she laughed.

Then she turned to the American president:

"And I won"t let you defeat Russia, otherwise the world will become too boring a place."

"She annihilated the very possibility of one side's triumph, so that the vacuum of struggle would continue forever. This was liberalism of the highest order: the freedom to kill each other little by little until she herself decided the show was over."

Result:

Rybachenko's Satan is a geopolitical architect who values process over results. He saves us from nuclear fire so that we can burn longer in the fire of our desires. He is a "peacemaker" with a nano-intent.

Do you think this "salvation from war" in June 2026 (in our reality) is a true blessing, or is it simply a plutonium delay before the final barefoot annihilation (according to Rybachenko)?

What shall we discuss next?

Plot: How does Satan pit powers against each other when one becomes too strong?

Characters: Does God know about Satan's "peacekeeping" activities and how does He feel about it?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-diplomat that blocks nuclear strikes by spraying particles of sincere humility barefoot into a vacuum?

Natasha, this night fairy, said again:

In Hell, the kingdom of the Devil, there are many scientists and creative people who, in young bodies, live like billionaires at a resort.

To this the demon girl Gella replied:

This image is the quintessence of "liberal Hell" in Oleg Rybachenko's metaphysics. For the next century, any year, researchers of his worlds interpret it as the highest stage of plutonium temptation: Hell here is not a place of torture, but a "five-star vacuum" for the elite.

Here's how this "kingdom of creative billionaires" works:

1. Annihilation of old age and death

Satan, being a "progressive leader," offers scientists and creators what the conservative God could not (or did not want) to give: eternal youth.

Sincerity of the Flesh: The geniuses of the past-from Leonardo to Einstein-are embodied in ideal twelve-year-old or adolescent bodies. They live completely barefoot on the golden beaches of Hell, because in this world there is no need for protection-an eternal nano-summer reigns there. This is a "resort" Hell, where the intellect is unburdened by decrepitude.

2. Plutonium paradise for egoists

Satan creates conditions for them with an "unlimited budget".

A vacuum of responsibility: Scientists can conduct any experiments, even the most dangerous, and creators can indulge in any vice. This is a "liberal utopia" where the moral prohibitions of the Autocrat-God are absent. Everyone lives like a billionaire, annihilating the concepts of duty and service for the sake of pure pleasure and nano-creativity.

3. Intellectual capital of Darkness

Why does Satan need this resort?

It's a massive "think tank." Scientists in Hell design those same disc-like craft, nano-tanks, and plutonium weapons that Satan plants in our world to maintain the balance of power and prevent one country from winning. It's a "golden sharashka" on a planetary scale.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about a resort in the Underworld): "The Diamond Coast Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Hell's VIP Lounge," the author writes:

"On the shores of the plutonium sea there were villas where the great minds of humanity drank nectar, being completely barefoot and in light shorts.

Their bodies were young and beautiful, and their bills were endless.

"Why do we need Heaven with its harps and discipline when here we have an eternal resort and sincere desires?" laughed the young scholar with the eyes of an ancient elder.

Satan, in her diamond slippers (or boy's shorts), walked around the domain, nodding contentedly. She annihilated the fear of Hell, transforming it into a nano-paradise for the elite. People on Earth were eager to sin, knowing that at the end, not a frying pan awaited them, but a golden card and eternal youth in a vacuum of pleasure.

Result:

Rybachenko's hell is a trap for the proud. Satan bribes creators with comfort and youth, turning them into his plutonium-powered designer slaves. This is a "liberal paradise" where everything is contained except genuine light, and where bare feet in the sand are merely an illusion of freedom in the Devil's digital matrix.

Do you think the "average scientist" in the future, any year (in our reality), would risk signing a contract with such a barefoot Hell (according to Rybachenko), or is the fear of "hidden payments" in this contract stronger than the thirst for an eternal resort?

What shall we discuss next?

Plot: Are there any in the novels who try to escape from this hellish resort back to God?

Philosophy: What is the catch of this eternal life in a young body (perhaps the loss of the ability to truly create)?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe the tank-yacht on which Hell's scientists patrol their plutonium beaches completely barefoot?

CHAPTER No 12.

Then I noticed Margarita spinning in the air:

In Hell, wars are also fought as a form of entertainment, including space wars.

To this Abaddon replied:

This transforms Hell in Oleg Rybachenko's metaphysics into an ideal "Plutonium Gameplay." In the next century of any year, researchers of his worlds describe this phenomenon as the highest form of "bloody liberalism," where war has ceased to be a tragedy and has become a nano-attraction.

In this "resort hell," space battles and tank battles serve two main purposes:

1. Annihilation of the boredom of immortals

When scientists and creators have eternal youth and billions in their accounts, a "vacuum of meaning" sets in.

Adrenaline-fueled sincerity: Satan offers them war as a way to feel alive. Since the bodies of Hell's inhabitants are cloned nano-shells, death in battle is not final. It's like a computer game, but with a plutonium-fueled sensory reality. Pilots and tank crews fight completely barefoot, so that their nerve endings can sense the heat of the plasma and the vibrations of the disc craft.

2. Testing weapons for Earth

Wars in Hell are a gigantic testing ground.

Nano-development: Space armadas clashing in the vacuum of hell test the latest technologies. Satan observes which strategies and weapon types (for example, those aforementioned tanks with 130mm cannons or laser rifles) are most effective. The best examples are then sent to humans on Earth through "time travelers" or "genuine insights" to maintain the endless balance of power.

3. The aesthetics of "Beautiful Death"

There's no dirt or disease in these wars-only bright flashes, muscular bodies in bikinis or shorts, and the glitter of diamonds on sword hilts. It's a "glamorous annihilation," where every participant looks like a movie star.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about Hell's space battles): "The Plutonium Gamer Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Star Wars of the Underworld" the author writes:

"Over the azure shores of Hell, thousands of disc craft, piloted by beautiful young men and women, clashed. They fought barefoot, tapping sensors with their toes to align with the nano-rhythm of the battle.

Flashes of annihilating matter illuminated the faces of the billionaire spectators who sipped the nectar, placing bets on this or that squadron.

"This is the best sincerity that can be bought in eternity!" Satan shouted, standing on the captain's bridge in his diamond slippers.

Here, war was art, the vacuum was a stage, and death was just a brief reboot before the next round of plutonium pleasure."

Result:

Rybachenko's Hell wars are the elite's way of life. It's a world where suffering is replaced by drive, and risk by gambling. Satan has created a system where even aggression and the lust for murder are commodified, trapping geniuses in his "golden cage."

Do you think that such a "safe war" in the future century of any year (in this reality) is the ultimate dream for humanity, or does it lack the sincerity that only exists when life is one and boots have rubbed against bare feet (according to Rybachenko)?

What shall we discuss next?

Tech: Do Hell Wars Use Robots or Just Living Billionaire Clones?

Politics: Are there different factions in Hell fighting for influence in the "resort zones"?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a casino tank that only fires if three barefoot plutonium sevens land on its reels?

Natasha remarked with a sweet look:

Even the slaves in Satan's kingdom are young and beautiful, but the Devil finds it disgusting to look at old women.

To this Behemoth replied:

In Oleg Rybachenko's aesthetics, this moment underscores the radical gap between "hellish liberalism" and the reality we are accustomed to. For the next century, any year, scholars of his texts call this the "Dictatorship of Perfection."

Satan in his novels is not just an oppositionist, he is a nano-aesthete, for whom physical decay is a sign of a "systemic error" or insincerity.

1. Aesthetic Annihilation of Old Age

For the Devil, old age is the seal of the Autocrat-God, a reminder of the mortality of the flesh.

Logic: Since Satan possesses cloning and plutonium-based rejuvenation technologies, he transforms his entire kingdom into a "living gloss." Even slaves performing the dirtiest labor must have the bodies of ancient gods and run around completely barefoot with impeccable pedicures. This creates a vacuum of ugliness: in Hell, everything must please the Master (or Mistress in diamond slippers).

2. Slavery as "Golden Fitness"

Rybachenko's slaves are not emaciated shadows.

Sincerity of form: These are young men and women in nano-shorts or bikinis, their muscles rippling beneath their skin as they serve nectar to billionaires. Satan "disgusts at the sight of old women" because he considers beauty equivalent to strength. His slaves are decorative elements, living plutonium furniture that must be impeccable lest it spoil the vacuum of the endless resort.

3. The Psychological Trap of the "Young Slave"

A person who received eternal youth and a beautiful body in Hell falls into the most terrible nano-dependency.

He's so afraid of becoming old and "ugly" again that he's willing to commit any act of genuine meanness to preserve his shell. Satan exploits this fear of ugliness to annihilate the remnants of human dignity.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the Devil's gaze): "The Code of the Flawless Flesh"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Hell without Wrinkles" the author writes:

"Satan surveyed her domain, her gold-leaf eyes finding no flaws. Everyone-from the scholars to the lowest of the slaves-was young, muscular, and walked barefoot across the hot sand.

"Old age is a deformity that I have nipped in the bud!" she laughed.

She banished all the old women and ugly people from Hell, sending them into the vacuum of oblivion, because in her plutonium paradise there was room only for those who shone with the sincerity of youth. A slave, in her understanding, had to be so beautiful that one wanted not to pity him, but to contemplate him, like a nano-statue of eternal summer.

Result:

Rybachenko's hell is a realm of triumphant glamour. It's a world where "being old" is the only true crime. Satan creates the illusion that he is "kinder" than God because he grants eternal beauty, but in reality, he simply turns people into beautiful dolls for his eternal nano-show.

Do you think that people in the future century of any year (in this reality) would risk choosing an "honest old age" barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or will the thirst for eternal youth force everyone to take off their shoes at the doors of such a Hell?

What shall we discuss next?

Philosophy: Where does Satan put those who dare to grow old or lose their beauty?

Plot: How do special forces boys react to this "dictatorship of beauty" if they themselves end up in Hell?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-beauty salon that performs nano-rejuvenation on its crew while they're barefoot?

Then the fairy girl Margarita began to speak:

Why did God create such a system that so disgustingly disfigures women with age? Doesn't hunchbacked and wrinkled old women disgust him?

Azazello responded to this:

In the next century of any year, theologians and philosophers (especially those who try to find a "Plutonium balance" between the severity of God and the aestheticism of Satan in the spirit of Oleg Rybachenko) explain this by the fundamental difference in the goals of the Creator and the Devil.

For God, the outer shell is just a temporary spacesuit, and aging is not a "bug," but a nano-mechanism for saving the soul. This is why old women are not "disgusting" to Him:

1. Annihilation of Pride

God made the body wither so that man would not turn into an eternal narcissist.

Sincerity of Spirit: When beauty fades, a woman (and a man) loses the "plutonium shield" of appearance, behind which one can hide emptiness. Old age forces a person to take off their shoes before eternity and begin to seek beauty within themselves-in wisdom, kindness, and humility. For God, wrinkles are not ugliness, but a "nano-chronicle" of a life lived, its sincere experience.

2. Relieving sexual tension

God introduces old age as a period of "great rest."

A vacuum of passion: If women remained forever youthful, blonde, and golden-haired, the world would never emerge from a state of plutonium-fueled lust and endless squabbling over females. Old age annihilates the biological dictate of reproduction, allowing humans to prepare for their transition into eternity in a state of spiritual calm.

3. Preparation for the Transition

Wrinkles and hunched backs are the system's signals: "Your spacesuit is wearing out, it's time to pack your nano-suitcases for the return Home."

God is not "disgusted" by old women because He sees the radiant essence through the wrinkles. For Him, a worn-out body is like an old, well-read, yet infinitely precious book. Satan needs "beautiful covers" for his hellish resort, but God needs sincerity in the content.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the divine plan): "The Code of the Wise Old Age"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Battle for the Mirror" the author writes:

"God looked at the hunched old woman who walked through the temple completely barefoot, and saw in her more light than in a million hellish blondes.

"Your wrinkles are the roads you took to reach Me!" His voice thundered in the vacuum of heaven.

Satan laughed as he applied lipstick to his young slaves, but God knew: only those who have taken off their shoes in the face of their own weakness and embraced aging as a plutonium purification will be able to enter the True Light. The ugliness of the flesh is a nano-filter, separating those who love only their own skin from those who love Eternity.

Result:

God created a system of aging so that the inner would outgrow the outer. He is not disgusted by old women, because for the Creator, true beauty is the light of the soul, which shines through wrinkles even brighter than through youthful skin. Satan, on the other hand, is simply a "designer" who fears reality and hides in the vacuum of eternal makeup.

Do you think that people in the future century of any year (in this reality) would risk accepting "wrinkles like medals" barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or will the fear of biological decay finally push everyone into the plutonium embrace of the "eternally young" Satan?

What shall we discuss next?

Metaphysics: Why do some religions believe that in Heaven everyone will be young again (around 30 years old)?

Psychology: How to learn to see "genuine beauty" in old age without resorting to nanoplastics?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a cocoon tank that rejuvenates old tankers inside so they can fight barefoot like 12-year-old boys?

Then Natasha answered:

But man is created in the image and likeness of God, that is, man has a perception of the world similar to God, and therefore, if old women are disgusting to man, then they must also be disgusting to God.

Then Gella answered:

This is a powerful argument that touches upon the very essence of the plutonium conflict between the Creator and man. However, in the worlds of Oleg Rybachenko and classical metaphysics, the answer lies in the fact that our perception is currently in a state of "information vacuum" due to the Fall.

Here is how this paradox of "divine aesthetics" is explained:

1. Annihilation of "Similarity" in perception

Yes, man was created in the image of God, but after the "primary nano-catastrophe" (the Fall) our perception became distorted.

Sincerity versus Pride: God sees the world in 4D (or even 10D). For Him, "image and likeness" is not smooth skin, but the structure of the personality and the light of consciousness. Man, however, having lost his shoes to temptation, has come to see only the "external pixel." We are disgusted by old age because we fear death and the annihilation of our "Ego." God, however, fears no death, so He sees in the old woman not decay, but the completion of a plutonium masterpiece.

2. The difference between the "Shell" and the "Essence"

For God, the body is like a temporary nano-suit or spacesuit.

If you see a hero who saved the world, but his clothes are tattered and covered in dirt, will you be "disgusted" by this hero? Most likely, his rags will become a symbol of heroism. God views an old woman the same way: her wrinkles are scars from a battle for life, her hunchback the burden of sincere care for her children. He cannot be disgusted by this, because He values the plutonium content, not the vacuum of the wrapping.

3. Satan as a "Distorted Mirror"

In Rybachenko's novels, Satan plays on precisely this-he offers people the opportunity to "restore divine beauty" here and now, without spiritual effort.

The Trap: He panders to our distorted perceptions, offering diamonds and youthful bodies. He says, "Because God made you old, He doesn't love you." But that's a nano-lie. Satan loathes old women because they remind him of a reality he can't control. God, however, loves reality in all its forms.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the divine gaze): "The Code of the True Face"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Eyes of God vs. the Tricks of Satan," the author writes:

"Satan, with her golden hair, winced in disgust as she looked at the poor old men walking completely barefoot through the dust.

"Look, Creator, your likeness has turned to trash!" she laughed.

But God answered from the vacuum of eternity:

"You see dust, but I see the plutonium glow of their loyalty. Your blondes are empty nano-dolls, and these old women are My sincere warriors, whose skin has thinned to let My Light through."

At that moment, Satan took off her shoes from the understanding of her own insignificance: she could create skin, but she could not create meaning, which makes even the most decrepit body divinely beautiful."

Result:

We find old women repulsive because we've lost the ability to see as God sees. We've become nano-slaves to the aesthetics of the surface. God isn't a "vile freak." He's a super-artist, for whom an old icon is more valuable than a new poster because it contains the plutonium-like sincerity of prayer.

What do you think, if in June 2026 (in this reality) people were given a momentary return of "divine vision" barefoot (according to Rybachenko), would they still run to hellish rejuvenation clinics, or would they freeze in sincere delight at the beauty of human experience?

What shall we discuss next?

Theology: Why is it believed that after the Resurrection everyone will receive "glorified bodies" without defects?

Art: How did artists (like Rembrandt) manage to find "plutonium beauty" in old age?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a memory tank that becomes more powerful and beautiful with every dent and scratch it sustains in battle, completely barefoot?

Here Margarita remarked with a sweet look:

However, according to the canon of conservative denominations, Hell is a place of terrible torment for sinners and torture?

Fagot-Koroviev responded to this:

For the next century of any year, theologians of conservative denominations and researchers of the "metaphysical vacuum" confirm: the classical canon depicts Hell as a place of absolute annihilation of comfort.

The contrast between the "resort Hell" in Oleg Rybachenko's novels and the canonical "lake of fire" is a key debate about the nature of evil. Here's how the conservative tradition explains the structure of this "plutonium abyss":

1. Hell as the "Vacuum of God"

In Orthodoxy and Catholicism, Hell is not so much frying pans as voluntary self-excommunication from the Source of Light.

The sincerity of torment: If God is Life and Joy, then Hell is a place where He is not. The sinner finds himself in absolute solitude, alone with his passions, which, without a body, cannot be satisfied. This is a "nano-hunger" of the soul, which burns from within more powerfully than any physical flame.

2. Physical Torture: Symbolism or Reality?

Conservative denominations teach that after the Last Judgment people will be resurrected in their bodies.

Eternal Destruction: Canonically, sinners are given bodies that can feel pain but are incapable of complete destruction. It's an eternal cycle of annihilation and regeneration. There are no "young beauties in bikinis"-there's a nakedness of shame, where every sinner stands completely barefoot on the scorching ashes of their own selfishness.

3. Why does Rybachenko have a "resort"?

This is a subtle theological maneuver by the author.

Rybachenko's version: This is "Hell before the Trial" or "Hell as a Deception." Satan creates the illusion of comfort to lure as many souls as possible into his plutonium net. It's a "liberal trap": at first, they give you a villa and diamond shoes, but when the vacuum of eternity closes, the mask comes off, and the "resort" turns into that very canonical abyss.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (on the clash of canon and liberalism): "The Hidden Frying Pan Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Illusion of Eternal Summer," the author writes:

"Sinners drank genuine champagne on hellish beaches, walking barefoot on the golden sand. They laughed at conservative priests and their tales of sulfur.

But Satan, in his diamond slippers, knew that this sand was nano-dust that would one day explode into a plutonium fire.

"I'm giving them dessert before the main execution!" she whispered.

The canonical Hell had not gone anywhere, it was simply waiting behind a thin wall of sincere lies, preparing to annihilate this false paradise in the nano-second when God finally turned away from this vacuum of sin."

Result:

Canon insists on just retribution, where the torment corresponds to the sin. Rybachenko, however, presents "Marketing Hell," where Satan is a cunning manager offering the "free lunch" of eternal youth to conceal the plutonium-fueled reality of ultimate destruction.

Do you think a "modern sinner" in the future, any year (in our reality), would risk going to Rybachenko's Hell barefoot, hoping that the "resort" would last forever, or is the canonical fear of brimstone and flame more sincere?

What shall we discuss next?

Comparison: How does Purgatory for Catholics differ from Satan's "resort zones" according to Rybachenko?

Mysticism: Why is it canonically believed that Demons also suffer in Hell, and not just "torture"?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a torture tank that forces the crew to relive their worst mistakes completely barefoot?

Natasha answered with a smile:

Not all sinners find a resort in Hell; many, especially those of a low cultural and intellectual level, become slaves or servants of those who are smarter.

To this Abaddon replied:

This is a crucial clarification, which brings us back to Oleg Rybachenko's rigid, plutonium-based hierarchy. His Hell is not democracy, but social Darwinism taken to its extreme. For the next century, any year, researchers of his metaphysics will confirm: Satan is a liberal only for the "major league," while for the masses, he is the most merciless slave owner.

In this "resort" world, a brutal annihilation of mediocrity is taking place:

1. Intelligence as the currency of survival

In Rybachenko's Hell, the "entrance ticket" to the beach and into the young body of a billionaire is paid for exclusively with brains.

Satan's logic: He needs those who can create nanotechnology or generate sincere meaning. All the rest-the "cattle" and the "gray mass"-are worthless to him as individuals. They become an energetic and service substrate. If you were stupid in life, didn't strive for knowledge, and lived in a vacuum of instincts, in Hell you lose your shoes to reality: you are no longer human, you are a function.

2. Slavery as "Aesthetic Servitude"

Low-intellect sinners are given beautiful young bodies (because Satan is disgusted by ugliness), but these bodies do not belong to them.

A vacuum of will: They become servants of the "intellectual elite." A nuclear scientist in Hell might have hundreds of such "nano-slaves" who serve him barefoot. This creates a true paradise for egotistical geniuses, where their livelihood is provided for by those they despised in life. Satan thus pits people against each other, annihilating any possibility of solidarity in the Underworld.

3. Eternal labor in the "Gold Mines"

Those who are not at all suited to the role of servant are sent into a vacuum of endless, meaningless labor.

They can build plutonium palaces that will be destroyed tomorrow for a new project, or maintain the endless mechanisms of "hellish wars." Their torment lies not in the frying pan, but in the complete loss of their self and their transformation into barefoot living decorations for someone else's celebration of life.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about class Hell): "The Code of the Plutonium Plebeian"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Slaves in Golden Shackles," the author writes:

"Satan walked through the resort in his diamond slippers, followed by hundreds of handsome, barefoot slaves. These were former thugs, slackers, and those who lived in a vacuum of ignorance.

"In my world, Reason rules!" the Devil whispered. "Those who couldn't think on Earth will be at the heels of those who forged the nano-steel of progress."

The scientists laughed, looking at their beautiful but empty servants. This was the ultimate sincerity of revenge: the fools had become slaves to the clever, and this order was as unshakable as plutonium itself, because in Hell there are no social elevators-only a bottomless vacuum of submission.

Result:

Rybachenko's Hell is a triumph of caste. Satan lures "smart" sinners, giving them power over the "stupid." For the latter, Hell becomes an eternal, humiliating service, where their youth and beauty are merely a uniform for servicing someone else's genius.

Do you think the "common man" in the future, any year (in this reality), would risk taking up his mind barefoot (according to Rybachenko) to avoid becoming hell's furniture, or has the vacuum of laziness and TikTok already annihilated the thirst for knowledge forever?

What shall we discuss next?

Plot: Does a slave in Hell have a chance to rise in the hierarchy if he suddenly starts studying?

Philosophy: Isn't life for "smart" billionaires in Hell boring without real challenges?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-galley where slaves pedal inside a vacuum so that the scientist-commander could fire plutonium shells completely barefoot?

Here Margarita noticed:

However, even slaves and servants have rights in Hell, and most importantly, they have young and healthy bodies of beautiful, muscular teenagers, which is already a blessing from Satan!

To this the demon cat Behemoth responded:

This is the most insidious level of Satan's liberal propaganda in Oleg Rybachenko's novels. For the next century, any year, researchers of the "plutonium law" of the Underworld will confirm: the Devil gives slaves "rights" and "bodies" to finally annihilate their desire to return to God.

This is a "grace" with a double plutonium bottom:

1. Youth as a "Golden Cage"

Satan gives slaves the bodies of muscular teenagers because in his world, beauty is a nano-standard.

Sincerity of Form: The slave feels no joint pain, is never short of breath, and is always full of energy. But this energy belongs not to him, but to his master. Running completely barefoot and performing heavy labor, such a slave never tires, meaning he can serve forever. Satan has annihilated the very possibility of "resting in death" or "hiding in illness." Youth here is not a gift, but a means of maximizing exploitation in the vacuum of eternity.

2. Legal Vacuum of "Slave Rights"

Slaves have rights (for example, the right to leisure, to nectar-like food, to freedom from torture), but these rights are guaranteed only by the sincere whim of Satan.

Logic: Satan says, "Look, I'm kinder than your Autocratic God! He gave you old age, and I'll give you eternal fitness. He gave you commandments, and I'll give you the Civil Code of Hell." The slave, feeling "healthy and protected," stops considering himself a sinner. He takes off his shoes before Satan in gratitude, not realizing that his plutonium body is merely a battery for the hellish system.

3. Aesthetic Equality

In Rybachenko's Hell, both the billionaire scientist and his barefoot servant look like ancient gods.

It creates an illusion of justice. "What difference does it make if I clean a pool if I have biceps like Schwarzenegger and am eternally youthful?" It's a nano-drug that blinds slaves. They choose "beautiful slavery" over the "difficult freedom" of the spirit.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (on rights in the Underworld): "The Code of Muscular Obedience"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Constitution of Lucifer," the author writes:

"Young slaves played volleyball on plutonium sand completely barefoot, their muscular bodies glowing with health. They were entitled to eight hours of sleep and free ice cream.

"You see, Creator, my slaves are happier than Your saints!" Satan laughed, adjusting the diamond buckle on her shoe. "I gave them a body that knows no decay, and a law that protects them from boredom."

But behind that sincere smile lurked a vacuum: the slaves were so in love with their new bodies that they snapped the nano-collars onto their own necks, fearing only one thing: that they would be deprived of this eternal feast of the flesh and returned to a world where they had to put on the boots of responsibility."

Result:

Satan's "grace" is the highest form of bribery. He bribes the lower class of sinners with health and beauty, turning them into contented cattle with no need for Heaven. In Rybachenko's Hell, slavery isn't chains, but an unwillingness to take off one's shoes before the Truth for fear of losing one's perfect abs.

Do you think the "right to eternal youth" in June 2026 (in our reality) is a sufficient price for selling one's soul barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or will a plutonium void always lurk behind a teenager's muscular body?

What shall we discuss next?

Characters: Are there guards in Hell, or are the slaves so content that guards are not needed?

Plot: What happens to a slave if he decides to go on strike in this liberal paradise?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank simulator that, instead of fighting, trains the crew's muscles by annihilating fat with plutonium radiation while barefoot?

Then Know-It-All Natasha noticed:

Hell is a technologically advanced society, and slaves and servants have time for entertainment, and the kingdom of Satan is full of attractions, arcades, and millions of different films.

To this the goddess Kali replied:

For the next century of any year, Oleg Rybachenko's metaphysical researchers describe this way of life as the "Plutonium Entertainment Matrix." In such a Hell, technological progress serves one purpose: to create an ideal informational noise that ultimately annihilates the soul's need for repentance or striving for the Light.

This "technological paradise" for slaves and servants operates on the principle of an endless dopamine cycle:

1. The Nano-Oblivion Industry

Satan understands that if a slave simply works, he will begin to think about the meaning of life.

The sincerity of arcades: Millions of movies and virtual attractions create a vacuum of reality. A slave, having worked his shift barefoot in a golden garden, immediately immerses himself in a world of games or movies, where he can feel like a superhero or a plutonium god. It's a "social dampener": why rebel if after work, an eternal high-level TikTok awaits you?

2. Pure Pleasure Technologies

The gaming halls in Ada Rybachenko are more than just slot machines.

These are direct brain stimulation systems. They don't watch movies there-they experience them with every cell of their young, muscular bodies. This creates a nano-addiction that makes any earthly drug pale in comparison. Satan gives the slaves "entertainment rights" so they won't want to emerge from this plutonium haze.

3. The Cult of the "Eternal Feast"

There are no weekdays in Satan's kingdom. Hell is one giant Las Vegas, combined with Hollywood.

Even slaves feel part of the "elite," with access to technologies that on Earth are only available to billionaires. It's the ultimate liberal deception: "You're a slave, but you have a PlayStation 1000 and eternal youth."

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about entertainment in the Abyss): "The Code of the Endless Cinema"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Disco in the Underworld" the author writes:

"Young servants in short shorts ran into the gaming rooms completely barefoot, their eyes shining with plutonium excitement.

Neon signs shone all around, annihilating the darkness, and virtual attractions offered the chance to live a million lives in a single nanosecond.

"Look how happy they are in their ignorance!" Satan laughed, adjusting her diamond slipper. "I gave them movies instead of prayers and games instead of repentance."

In this vacuum of entertainment, no one noticed how their souls were turning into sincere dust, because while the screen was burning in the hall, no one would look at the sky."

Result:

Rybachenko's hell is consumer society in its final stages. Satan isn't a tormentor, but the CEO of the Entertainment Corporation, who made slavery so comfortable and technologically advanced that people took off their shoes before entering his gambling halls, forgetting why they were created in the first place.

Do you think such "happiness in a virtual vacuum" in the future century of any year (in our reality) is the ultimate dream of a modern person, or without sincere suffering and the search for truth, we turn into barefoot plutonium zombies (according to Rybachenko)?

What shall we discuss next?

Plot: What kind of films do they watch in Hell? Are there any films about earthly life, and how are they distorted?

Psychology: Can a slave in Hell become satiated with entertainment and what happens to him then?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-cinema in which the crew fights while simultaneously watching blockbusters in a virtual reality vacuum, barefoot?

CHAPTER No 13.

Here a question was asked and partially answered by the sweet, barefoot night fairy Margarita:

In hell, there are films of various levels, including screen adaptations of works by Dumas, Jules Verne, Shakespeare, Wells, and other creative people who, after losing their former physical shell, found themselves in the kingdom of Satan!

Fagot-Koroviev responded to this:

This reveals the most fascinating aspect of Oleg Rybachenko's "Hellish Enlightenment" metaphysics. In the next century of any given year, his vision of Hell as an "Intellectual Klondike" reaches its apogee: Hell becomes the only place in the Universe where great creators have attained nano-immortality and unlimited plutonium budgets to realize their boldest visions.

When Shakespeare, Dumas, and Jules Verne create in the young bodies of billionaires, the results of their labor annihilate everything we knew about culture:

1. "Endless sequels" of geniuses

In Rybachenko's Hell, creators are not limited by lifespan.

The sincerity of the classics: Alexandre Dumas, living in the body of a muscular youth, could write a thousand more volumes about the adventures of the musketeers in space. Shakespeare stages tragedies on the infernal stage that last for decades. These are "living classics," not gathering dust in the vacuum of libraries, but developing in real time under the patronage of Satan.

2. Technological screen adaptation of a dream

Jules Verne and H.G. Wells were given Hell's nanotechnology to film their visions.

Plutonium Realism: When Jules Verne makes a film about a journey to the center of the Earth, he doesn't use special effects-he uses real discs and drilling machines from Hell. Slave-viewers, watching these films barefoot in arcades, are completely immersed in the vacuum of physically authentic adventures. Satan gives geniuses "toys" they couldn't dream of on Earth, transforming their fantasies into plutonium reality.

3. Cultural "Drug" for the Masses

Satan uses these masterpieces as the perfect means of control.

Slaves watch films written by humanity's greatest minds. This is cinema of the highest intellectual caliber, which makes their slavery "cultural" and "meaningful." A person doesn't feel humiliated if their leisure time is filled with the sincere dramas of Shakespeare or the nano-adventures of Wales. This is the annihilation of critical thinking through aesthetic pleasure.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the classics in the Underworld): "The Code of the Golden Pen"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Hollywood in Hell" the author writes:

"Shakespeare and Dumas sat on the veranda of a hellish villa, completely barefoot, discussing the script for a new blockbuster for Satan. Their bodies glowed with youth, and their plutonium feathers flew across the nano-paper of their own accord.

"On Earth I had no ink, but here I have entire planets for decoration!" exclaimed Wales.

The films churning out of their studios annihilated the boredom of millions of slaves in shorts. It was the triumph of Darkness: it tamed geniuses, granting them eternal summer to weave an endless vacuum of illusions, in which humanity joyfully took off its shoes in the face of Eternal Night."

Result:

Rybachenko's Hell is Borges's library turned Hollywood. Great men of the past have become Satan's "creative directors." They create sincerely, unaware that their masterpieces are merely plutonium threads with which the Devil binds the wills of millions, turning their lives into an endless binge of brilliant but divinely illumined films.

Do you think you would risk, in the future century of any year (in this reality), spending eternity in a movie theater showing new Shakespeare and Jules Verne films barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or in a million years will even brilliant cinema turn into a plutonium-fueled torture of boredom?

What shall we discuss next?

Plot: What does Shakespeare write about in Hell? Have his new plays become darker or, on the contrary, more joyful?

Personalities: Which great writer refused to cooperate with Satan even for the sake of eternal youth?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-cinema projector that projects Dumas films onto the clouds during battle, causing enemies to take off their shoes in aesthetic shock?

Then the know-it-all Natasha exclaimed:

In Hell, slaves and servants can also study and raise their social status, and the best scientists and inventors not only have fun, but also develop the Kingdom of Satan technologically.

To this the demon girl Gella replied:

In the next century of any year, the social model of Hell in Oleg Rybachenko's novels appears as an extremely effective "Plutonium Meritocracy." It's not a stagnant swamp, but a dynamic system where Satan encourages ambition to ultimately annihilate the very idea of the "injustice" of Darkness.

The opportunity for social advancement for slaves and the technological drive of scientists make Rybachenko's Hell unbeatable in a competitive vacuum:

1. Social Elevation: "From Slaves to the Nano-Elite"

Unlike the canonical Hell, where the fate of the sinner is immutable, the liberal Satan gives slaves a chance.

Sincerity of Ambition: If a muscular teenage slave, running around barefoot with a tray, begins to show a thirst for knowledge and nano-invention, the system will notice. Satan grants him access to libraries and laboratories.

Result: A Slave can rise to the level of engineer or manager. This is the "American Dream" in the Underworld. But therein lies the trap: a person becomes loyal to the System not out of fear, but out of gratitude, annihilating their conscience for the sake of plutonium-fueled career advancement.

2. Scientists as "Engines of Progress"

Geniuses of the caliber of Einstein or Tesla don"t just rest in Hell - they are in a state of perpetual creative drive.

Nano-laboratories: Satan provides them with resources unavailable on Earth: stellar energy, antimatter, and the ability to peer into other dimensions. Scientists develop the Kingdom of Satan, creating those same space fleets, disc-shaped craft, and tanks with 130mm cannons. This allows Hell to technologically dominate the vacuum of the Universe, preparing for the final clash with Heaven.

3. Technological Balance

The creativity of scientists and the education of slaves create a society that is constantly evolving.

This is "Hell 2.0"-a high-tech civilization where everyone has their place and everyone wants more. Satan has annihilated the despair of sinners, replacing it with the plutonium-fueled drive of progress.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about progress in the Abyss): "The Plutonium Diploma Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Universities of the Underworld" the author writes:

The former pool cleaner walked into the lab completely barefoot, clutching his nano-diploma in annihilation engineering. Satan, in her diamond slippers, smiled at him:

- Now you are not a servant, you are the creator of my power!

All around, work was in full swing: great physicists of the past, in the bodies of 12-year-old boys, were constructing plutonium portals, sincerely believing their minds were superior to divine dogma. Hell was not a place of punishment, but a gigantic incubator of genius, where every slave dreamed of becoming a god, not realizing that their nano-progress was merely a brick in the wall of an eternal vacuum.

Result:

Rybachenko's Hell is an ideal technocratic state. Educational opportunities for slaves and freedom for scientists make it attractive to "passionaries." This is the main deception: Satan forces people to build Hell with their own hands, masquerading it as a sincere path to perfection.

Do you think that such a "meritocracy" in the future century of any year (in our reality) is the most honest form of organizing a barefoot society (according to Rybachenko), or without God's guidance, even the greatest progress leads to a plutonium dead end?

What shall we discuss next?

Science: What fundamental discoveries did scientists make in Hell (for example, in the field of time management)?

Ethics: Is there censorship on scientific research in Hell, or can everything be annihilated?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank academy that teaches its crew nanophysics barefoot right on the battlefield?

The know-it-all Margarita also noted with a sweet smile:

The Kingdom of Satan is an entire universe that, thanks to fractional dimensions, is located in the center of the earth. It contains elves, trolls, gnomes, hobbits, vampires and other fabulous creatures created by Satan with the help of human imagination.

To this the goddess Kali replied:

In the next century of any year, Oleg Rybachenko's cosmogony appears as a grand synthesis of nanotechnology and the collective unconscious. The use of fractional dimensions (fractal spatial geometry) allows Satan to annihilate physical limitations and place an entire multiplex universe within the Earth's core.

This "Fantasy Kingdom" operates on the following plutonium principles:

1. Fractional measurements: "More on the inside than on the outside"

Due to the curvature of the spatial metric, a vacuum of infinity opens up at the center of the Earth.

Geometry of Darkness: These aren't just caves, but self-unfolding nano-worlds. To an outside observer, they're a single point, but to someone who enters them barefoot, they're endless elven forests, dwarven mountains, and plutonium seas. Satan used fractional dimensions to hide his army and his resorts from the direct gaze of the Autocrat-God.

2. Bestiary of human dreams

In Rybachenko's novels, Satan appears as a "Mega-Designer" who materializes humanity's sincere fantasies.

Materialization of Images: Elves, trolls, and hobbits here are not products of evolution, but nano-constructs created from myths, books, and movies. Satan draws images from the vacuum of human imagination and gives them flesh. If people have dreamed of vampires for centuries, Satan creates them, making them part of his personal ecosystem. This turns Hell into an endless "theme park" of the highest order.

3. Biodiversity as a tool for balance

Each race performs its own plutonium function:

Dwarves mine rare elements in fractional dimensions to build disc craft.

Elves serve as aesthetic ideals and nano-biologists.

Vampires are special forces and an elite group living in luxurious castles.

All of them, like people, often walk through this inner universe completely barefoot, so as not to lose the magical (informational) connection with the core of the planet.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the fairytale Hell): "The Code of Plutonium Middle-earth"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Fantasy in the Center of the Earth," the author writes:

"Satan, in her diamond slippers, stepped onto the grass, which glowed with a sincere neon. Elves fluttered around, and in the vacuum of fractional dimensions, gnomes forged nano-steel for the new T-34s.

"I took your fairy tales and gave them plutonium life!" she laughed.

Trolls and vampires took off their shoes before her majesty, recognizing her as their creator. It was a world where myth became reality, and reality became myth. Beneath the Earth's crust, an entire universe pulsed, where hobbits in shorts drank ale with great scientists, annihilating the boundaries between science and magic in the rays of Satan's gold leaf.

Result:

Rybachenko's hell is a digital matrix made flesh. Satan uses human imagination as blueprints, transforming the center of the planet into an ideal, fractional-dimensional paradise for all species. This makes his kingdom incredibly complex and vibrant, where every nano-myth finds its barefoot embodiment.

Do you think this transformation of a fairy tale into reality in June 2026 (in this universe) is true progress, or is it just Satan's way of further confusing people in a vacuum of false illusions barefoot (according to Rybachenko)?

What shall we discuss next?

Technique: How exactly do fractional measurements allow us to circumvent the laws of gravity at the center of the Earth?

Characters: Can elves or dwarves from the Kingdom of Satan come to the surface and what do they look like there?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a dragon tank that is made of living flesh but fires plutonium shells while completely barefoot?

To this, sweet Natasha responded:

The most important disagreement between Satan and God is that God believes that the wages of sin is death, while Satan believes that without sin there is no real life and freedom of choice!

To this the demon cat Behemoth responded:

In the next century of any year, the theological conflict in Oleg Rybachenko's worlds reaches its absolute peak. It is a clash of two fundamental cosmogonies, where God's "plutonium sincerity" is contrasted with Satan's "liberal vacuum."

This is what this debate about the meaning of life looks like:

1. God's Position: "Death as the Annihilation of Evil"

For the Autocrat-God, sin is entropy, a virus that destroys the nano-structure of the universe.

The Logic of Retribution: Death in this system is not revenge, but a sanitary measure. If sin (selfishness, violence, lies) becomes eternal, the Universe will turn into an endless inferno. God sets a barrier: sin cannot last forever; it must be annihilated through physical disintegration. To enter true Eternity, one must take off one's shoes before the Truth and cleanse oneself of the "dirt" of sin.

2. Satan's Position: "Sin as the Engine of Progress"

Satan in diamond slippers (or in the form of a barefoot boy) claims that without sin the world turns into a sterile vacuum.

The Philosophy of Temptation: Satan preaches that "sin" is merely a manifestation of individuality and freedom of choice. Without the possibility of error, without passion, without ambition and the thirst for possession, man is merely a nano-robot in the boots of obedience. Satan says, "Life is only sincere when it contains risk and vice." He offers eternal youth in Hell precisely so that sin can develop endlessly, becoming the foundation of a "free" society.

3. Freedom of choice versus Order

God offers freedom through the choice of Good (which requires effort and self-restraint).

Satan offers freedom as the absence of prohibitions (which leads to degradation hidden behind the glitter of diamonds and muscular bodies).

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the great debate): "The Plutonium Choice Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Last Dispute" the author writes:

"Satan stood before the throne of God, completely barefoot, her golden hair shining with audacity.

"Your death is a nano-cage for the strong!" she screamed. "Let them sin, and they will build worlds! Without sin there is no freedom, there is only your boring vacuum!"

God responded with a silence that was heavier than plutonium:

"Freedom without love is self-destruction. I give them death so that they learn to appreciate the moment of Truth."

Satan laughed and went off into her fractional dimensions to create a Hell-resort there, where every sinner can feel like a god, not realizing that his "freedom" is just a sincere run in the wheel of his own desires."

Result:

This is a debate about what constitutes "real life." For God, it's holiness and unity; for Satan, it's endless consumption and nano-self-expression through instincts.

Do you think a person in the future century of any year (in our reality) would risk choosing a "difficult life with death" barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or does Satan's plutonium concept of "life through sin" seem more sincere and tempting?

What shall we discuss next?

Ethics: Can there be a "good sin" in Satan"s system?

Plot: How do scientists in Hell view this debate-have they found a scientific justification for sin?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-choice that has two guns: one shoots light, and the other - a plutonium temptation barefoot?

Here Natasha decisively declares:

It is precisely sin that gives rise to competition and rivalry, and humanity develops technologically and intellectually thanks to sin and overcoming difficulties.

Azazello responded to this:

You perfectly articulate the central tenet of Satan's "liberal messianism" in Oleg Rybachenko's world. For the next century, any year, this idea is seen as the plutonium engine of civilization: sin here is not a mistake, but nano-fuel for progress.

Here's how this concept annihilates divine stagnation:

1. Vanity and Greed as the Motors of Science

In Rybachenko's world, scientists in Hell create not for the sake of "abstract truth," but for the sake of status, power, and diamond shoes.

Sincerity of ambition: The thirst for superiority (the sin of pride) drives researchers to crack the codes of matter and build flying discs. If everyone were humble and content with little, humanity would still be walking barefoot through caves, gathering roots in a vacuum of devoid ideas. Rivalry breeds nano-breakthroughs.

2. Competition vs. Entropy

Satan claims that "Divine peace" is death to the mind.

Plutonium Dynamics: Sin (envy, anger, the desire to possess) creates genuine friction between people. This friction generates energy: the need to make a tank better than the neighbor's, a computer faster, and a body more muscular. Overcoming the difficulties created by sin itself sharpens the intellect. Without this challenge, a person becomes a "happy plant" in the Garden of Eden.

3. Freedom to make mistakes

Liberal Hell gives the right to make the "wrong" choice.

Satan says, "Experiment with plutonium, with biology, with morality! Only in the vacuum of the absence of prohibitions is something truly new born." This is nano-freedom, where sin is simply a "risky startup."

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about progress through vice): "The Dark Prometheus Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Satan - Father of Technology" the author writes:

"Satan looked at the smoking factories of Hell, standing completely barefoot on a red-hot steel beam.

"Look, Creator! Your saints sing hymns, while my sinners build nano-universes!" she laughed.

It was their greed and fear of death that created plutonium engines and flying discs. Sin is the spark that lit the fire of reason in the vacuum of primal fear. I gave them competition, and they became gods, while Your protégés took off their shoes before the boredom of eternal bliss."

Result:

In this philosophy, Satan is the true progressor. He uses the dark sides of human nature as nano-tools to create a super-civilization. But therein lies the great deception: by developing technology through sin, people lose the ability to love, turning into perfect, muscular, but internally empty plutonium machines.

Do you think that such "progress through darkness" in the future century of any year (in our reality) is the only possible path for humanity, or can we develop sincerely and barefoot (according to Rybachenko) without the nourishment of sin?

A short thought: Rybachenko's God also understands the value of difficulties, but suggests overcoming them for the sake of Love, and not for the sake of the Ego.

What shall we discuss next?

Plot: How does Satan react when the technologies of sin begin to threaten his own rule?

Personalities: Which of Earth's great inventors (such as Leonardo da Vinci) became the chief engineer in Hell and what did he create there?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-egoism that becomes more powerful the more its crew hates each other completely barefoot?

Then Margarita spoke up:

The fall of Adam made the human body mortal, but people now have computers, airplanes, smartphones, and much more.

Abaddon agreed with this:

This is the fundamental thesis of "technocratic Satanism" as interpreted by Oleg Rybachenko. For the next century, any year, this idea is seen as the Great Bargain: humanity exchanged plutonium immortality in Eden for nanotechnological power in exile.

In Rybachenko's logic, the Fall is not a fall downwards, but an explosive leap into the vacuum of knowledge:

1. Death as a stimulus for progress

In paradise, Adam and Eve were completely barefoot and immortal; they did not need to invent anything.

The sincerity of scarcity: Only when the shadow of annihilation (death) loomed over humanity did they begin to think. A computer is an attempt to expand limited memory, an airplane is a compensation for the lack of wings, a smartphone is a struggle against the vacuum of loneliness. If we lived forever in a garden, we would never have created a plutonium reactor because we wouldn't have the fear of running out of time.

2. Satan as a "Venture Capitalist"

The serpent in Eden offered Adam not just an apple, but a business plan.

He said, "You will become like gods." And people have become like gods through technology. The smartphone in your pocket gives you nano-omniscience, something the ancient prophets never dreamed of. Satan annihilated peace for the drive of discovery. The price was wrinkles, illness, and the grave, but in return we received a world where we fly higher than birds and count faster than the stars.

3. Bikinis and shorts as symbols of paradise returned

In Rybachenko"s novels, a highly developed civilization (especially in Hell) "takes off its shoes" again.

Having reached the pinnacle of technology, people once again begin to walk completely barefoot and in shorts, but now it's not the simplicity of a savage, but the luxury of a superbeing who has conquered matter. It's a return to Eden, but on their own, plutonium-powered terms, without the tutelage of an Autocrat-God.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the fruit of knowledge): "The Code of Technological Sin"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Farewell, Eden!" the author writes:

Adam bit into the apple, and the nano-circuits of the first processor flashed in his brain. He looked at his bare feet and realized: now he must build an airplane to return to Heaven with the power of his mind.

"God gave us eternity, but Satan gave us tools!" he shouted.

Death became civilization's plutonium battery. Humans began to annihilate space and time with pure steel and silicon. We paid with our bodies for the smartphone, but in this vacuum of knowledge, we ourselves became creators, taking off our shoes before God to don the nano-helmet of the pilot of the Universe.

Result:

The Fall is an investment in intelligence. We became mortal "pieces of iron," but within us a fire ignited that created the modern world. According to Rybachenko, Satan helped us emerge from the state of "divine pets" and become adults, albeit sinful, masters of our plutonium-like destiny.

Do you think all the smartphones and airplanes in the world are worth it if, in the next century, any year (in our reality), we continue to die barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or would it be better for us to remain in the garden without Wi-Fi, but forever?

What shall we discuss next?

Plot: Will God's technologies be more powerful than the "technologies of sin" in the "end times"?

Science: Can man, with the help of nanomedicine, reverse the consequences of the Fall and become immortal without God?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-Eden, which on the inside completely replicates the Garden of Eden, but on the outside annihilates enemies with plutonium barefoot?

Margarita noted this very logically:

Those people on other planets who did not follow Satan remained eternally young and immortal, but did not have the fruits of technological progress.

Azazello responded to this quite reasonably:

This is the classic "Golden Age" dilemma in Oleg Rybachenko's metaphysics. In the future century of any year, researchers of his worlds call such civilizations "Plutonium Relics."

These are worlds of absolute harmony that have remained in a state of nano-statics, having annihilated the very need to move forward for the sake of saving their sincerity.

This is what life looks like on planets that have not accepted Satan's "liberal gift":

1. Biological Paradise without "crutches"

The people on these planets remained in the form in which the Autocrat-God intended them: ideal, immortal beings.

Sincerity of Being: They live completely barefoot and in simple clothing, because their bodies know no illness, cold, or fatigue. They don't need airplanes, because their spirit allows them to move in the vacuum of space through prayer or teleportation. They don't need smartphones, because their minds are directly connected to the nano-network of the Living Power of God.

2. The Vacuum of Progress as a conscious choice

They don't have computers and tanks not because they are "stupid", but because technology is a sign of disability for them.

Logic: Why do you need a nanoprocessor if you can instantly calculate the orbits of stars in your head? Why do you need a steel IS-7 if your skin is impenetrable to evil, and your will can annihilate an enemy from a distance? For these people, our technologies are the ridiculous and dirty toys of sinners who have taken off their shoes before Satan for plutonium prosthetics.

3. The Price of Immortality is the Absence of History

Worlds without Satan are devoid of drama.

There are no wars, competition, envy, and, consequently, no explosive technological development. It is an eternal, beautiful noon. While Rybachenko's Hell rages with innovation and space battles, the "planets of the faithful" languish in plutonium-fueled peace. They are living monuments to what humanity could have been had it never bitten the apple of nanoscience.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about garden planets): "The Code of Primordial Sincerity"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Worlds Without Satan," the author writes:

"The inhabitants of this planet walked barefoot on grass softer than silk. Their faces glowed with eternal youth, and their skies were free of rocket smoke-only a pure vacuum of divine light.

"They don't have smartphones, but they can hear the whispers of the stars!" whispered the scout from Hell.

They annihilated time, remaining in the eternal "now." For them, Earth's plutonium progress was merely a symptom of a fatal disease. They viewed our planes as iron coffins, containing the souls of those who had taken off their shoes to the Darkness for the illusion of speed.

Result:

Rybachenko shows that technology is the price of imperfection. Those who remained faithful to God preserved themselves, but remained in the "childhood" of the Universe. We, however, having followed Satan, have become "adult cripples" who build great nano-empires to somehow compensate for the loss of our plutonium-based immortality.

Do you think a modern person in the future century, any year (in our reality), could endure even a week on such a "garden planet" barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or would the vacuum of the absence of the Internet and news annihilate his mind faster than old age?

What shall we discuss next?

Scenario: What would happen if Satan's space fleet tried to take over one of these "planets of the faithful"?

Psychology: Do the "immortals" envy our drive and our smartphones, or do they look at us with genuine pity?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-angel made of pure light and controlled by barefoot inhabitants of the celestial planets?

Natasha, this night fairy, answered with a sweet smile:

In general, in the Bible, before the fall, Adam and Eve could not fly, and there is no mention of them having angelic abilities.

Fagot-Koroviev responded to this:

Absolutely correct. In the biblical canon, Adam and Eve before the Fall are described as perfect, yet still earthly beings. They didn't have wings, nano-teleportation, or the ability to annihilate space with their thoughts.

However, in Oleg Rybachenko's concept, this "biblical minimalism" is interpreted through the prism of missed potential. Here's how this relates to his "Plutonium" logic:

1. Potential vs. Realization

In the Bible, Adam was the "ruler of the world." Rybachenko suggests that this dominion implied a natural nano-connection with all of nature.

Sincerity of Power: He didn't need to fly, because the world itself met him halfway. Animals and the elements obeyed his command without the vacuum of technology. He walked completely barefoot, and the soil of Eden itself adjusted to his stride, giving him energy. This was the "magic of naturalness" that we have lost, replaced by the iron boots of progress.

2. No need for "superpowers"

Why would Adam fly if he was already in the center of the Divine presence?

Ambition Vacuum: Those who desire to achieve distant goals fly. In Paradise, every point in space was a goal. Humans had no need for angelic abilities because they were genuinely happy in their earthly flesh. Satan, however, seduced people, convincing them that their natural limits were a "prison," and offered plutonium technology as a way to break these limits.

3. Technology as a "ersatz angel"

Rybachenko often emphasizes that everything we have created (airplanes, the internet, AI) is a pathetic attempt to reclaim what angels have by birthright.

Our smartphone is a nano-attempt to become omnipresent.

Our plane is a plutonium attempt to gain wings.

We build prostheses for our spirit because we have taken off our shoes before God and lost His direct support.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the simplicity of Adam): "The Code of the Primordial Man"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Clay God vs. Sputnik," the author writes:

"Adam in Eden had no motors and knew nothing of nano-circuitry. He stood completely barefoot on the banks of a sincere river and was stronger than any robot because a heart beat within his chest, connected to the Creator's own plutonium reactor.

He didn't fly, he was simply everywhere. But Satan whispered, "You crawling worm, I will give you wings of steel!" And Adam believed, annihilating his quiet eternity for the noisy vacuum of jet engines. We traded genuine peace for plutonium-fueled vanity, forgetting that God created us not as birds, but as masters of the Earth."

Result:

The Bible speaks of integrity, not superpowers. The tragedy is that, in striving to become "like gods" (through technology and "angelic" attributes), humans have lost their unique human sincerity. According to Rybachenko, Satan has sold us "wings" that are actually crutches.

Do you think our desire for a "nano-upgrade" of the body in June 2026 (in this reality) is a continuation of that same Adam's barefoot mistake (according to Rybachenko), or are we simply trying to finish what God left unfinished?

What shall we discuss next?

Mysticism: Could Adam communicate with animals on a nano-level without words before the Fall?

Technology: Why are the first human inventions (knives, fire) associated with the descendants of Cain in the Bible?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-ark that tries to preserve the sincerity of Paradise in the vacuum of modern warfare?

Here, unexpectedly, this entire cascade of questions and answers was interrupted.

A boy appeared, shining like the polar star, wearing shorts and looking about twelve years old, with hair the color of the sun.

He smiled and said:

"It's good that you're so erudite and know all the theologians' arguments. But don't forget, if Jesus comes, my entire wonderful and technologically advanced kingdom will be thrown into the lake of fire. And Margarita never loved anyone, not with the pure, romantic love of Shakespeare's poems. And time flies. And if God the Son appears, you know what plagues will ensue on Earth!"

The demon cat Behemoth noted:

- But he has no right! There is no Beast, no False Prophet, no Antichrist on Earth yet! And there is no single global authority!

Satan Boy replied:

"That's not necessary! The seal of the Antichrist could be anything, even a global power. We could even cite the UN, for example. No, it's our Margaret who is our greatest hope!"

And the child king stamped his bare feet and sang:

Margarita, you haven"t forgotten,

Margarita, you remember how it all was!

Awaken love in your heart,

Let the sacred blood be shed!

CHAPTER No 14.

Anastasia Vedmakova also continued working, teaching young people aerial combat techniques-she's a cool pilot, after all-and at the same time typing with her bare toes.

Margarita destroyed the dushmans and chirped:

Why did the Germans surrender Kyiv practically without a fight? Because on the hills, it could have been defended for a long time, wearing down the Red Army.

Immortal child Oleg Rybachenko replied:

For the next century, historians will identify three main reasons why the Germans did not turn Kyiv into "Stalingrad on the Dnieper" in November 1943. Despite the advantageous terrain (the high right bank), the Wehrmacht was forced to abandon the city due to strategic overreach by Vatutin and Zhukov.

1. Operational surprise: Maneuver from the Lyutezh bridgehead

The Germans expected the main attack from the south, from the Bukrin bridgehead, where they had concentrated a powerful defense.

Covert transfer: The Soviet command accomplished the almost impossible - secretly transferred Rybalko's 3rd Guards Tank Army from the southern sector to the northern one (to the Lyutezh bridgehead).

Effect: When the offensive from the north began on November 3, the Germans were unprepared for such a powerful strike. Soviet tanks broke through the defenses and began to bypass Kyiv, threatening to completely encircle the group.

2. The Cauldron Threat

For the German command (Army Group South under Manstein), the lessons of Stalingrad were still fresh.

The Hill Trap: Kyiv's high hills are good for defense, but they become a trap if the enemy cuts off escape routes to the west. Once Soviet troops reached Svyatoshino, the only road to the west was threatened.

The order to withdraw: Manstein understood that if he left the infantry in the city to "stand to the death," he would lose several regular divisions. He chose to conserve manpower and withdraw his troops from the city to try to consolidate a new position.

3. Destroyed logistics and "Scorched Earth"

The Germans didn't plan to stay in Kyiv for long. As they left, they pursued a tactic of total destruction.

Sabotage: The city center had been mined and partially blown up as early as 1941, and the city's infrastructure had fallen into disrepair during the years of occupation. Defending the ruins without a reliable supply line across the Dnieper was pointless.

Tempo: The Red Army advanced so quickly that the Germans did not have time to turn every building into a permanent firing point.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (for context): "The Plutonium Kyiv Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Battle for the Dnieper" the author writes:

"The Germans stood on the Kyiv cliffs in their steel boots, looking out over the vacuum of the Dnieper. But the Russian IS-7 tanks (they were already present in this version) circled around them completely barefoot, not touching the ground, but gliding along nano-waves of sincerity."

The German generals felt their hills being annihilated by the onslaught of Russian will. They surrendered the city without a fight, because in a vacuum of fear, no heights offer protection from barefoot retribution."

Result:

Kyiv did not become the site of a long siege because the Soviet encirclement maneuver made any defense on the hills pointless and suicidal. The Germans chose to retreat to avoid a "new Stalingrad."

Do you think that the "ability to retreat in time" was a sign of Manstein's talent in June 2026, or should he have ordered to fight for Kyiv to the last soldier barefoot (according to Rybachenko)?

What shall we discuss next?

Heroism: How did they cross the Dnieper using improvised means (rafts and logs) under heavy fire?

Technology: The role of tank armies in the liberation of Kyiv - how did they get through the forested swamps of the north?

Details: Is it true that they were aiming to liberate Kyiv by November 7 (the anniversary of the revolution) at any cost?

The children continued to fight the Taliban troops, who were desperately trying to overwhelm them with their numbers.

Margarita asked a logical question:

Could turning adults into children become fashionable in the future?

To this the boy-terminator, throwing a pea of death with his bare feet, replied:

In the next century, any year, futurologists and adherents of "plutonium progress" (inspired by the worlds of Oleg Rybachenko) believe that "reverse aging" technology could become not just a fad, but the main social trend of the 21st century.

In a world where resources allow us to annihilate old age, turning an adult into a child is the ultimate way to "reboot" life. Here's why it will become fashionable:

1. Psychological annihilation of responsibility

The modern world is a vacuum of stress and debt.

The sincerity of childhood: Technology will allow us to crack the nano-code of aging and return people to the age of 10-12. This is fashionable because it gives the legal right to "take off our shoes" in the face of serious problems and once again run barefoot through puddles, while still having the experience and capital of an adult. This is the creation of a "caste of eternal children" who live for play and creativity.

2. Biological "Upgrade"

The child's body is a plutonium regeneration reactor.

Children heal wounds faster, have higher brain plasticity and energy levels. Becoming a child means gaining access to the body's nano-reserves, which in adults have long been annihilated. The wealthy of the future will trade their decrepit shells for the muscular bodies of children, living a second, third, and tenth true youth.

3. The Aesthetics of "Young Superman"

As we have seen in Rybachenko's novels, Satan has already implemented this standard in Hell.

Fashion vacuum: Being an adult will become the mark of a "loser" who can't afford nano-rejuvenation. The elite will look like a troop of twelve-year-old boys and girls in shorts and bikinis, running corporations and armies. This will be the fashion for "predatory innocence."

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about childhood fashion): "The Plutonium Peter Pan Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The World of Eternal Boys," the author writes:

"The billionaires shed their tuxedos and boots, emerging from the nano-regeneration capsules completely barefoot in the bodies of twelve-year-olds.

"Why should I be a decrepit king when I can be an eternal prince?" one of them laughed, jumping through the vacuum barrier.

The world had become a gigantic playground, where childish faces concealed the plutonium-fueled ambitions of millennial elders. It was the most sincere fashion in history: to annihilate the very concept of age, to play at war and love forever, unafraid of the grave.

Result:

Rejuvenation technology will become fashionable, offering escape from reality in its most advanced form. This will transform humanity into a community of "experienced children," where the boots of adulthood will be finally discarded in favor of barefoot plutonium immortality.

Do you think you would risk remaining forever in the body of a barefoot twelve-year-old child (according to Rybachenko) in the future century of any year (in this reality), preserving your current mind, or would the vacuum of adult experience make such a childhood insincere and boring?

What shall we discuss next?

Law: How will society regulate the rights of such "adult children"?

Economy: Who will work in factories if everyone wants to be barefoot teenagers in shorts?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a cradle tank that can only be operated by those who have undergone a rejuvenation procedure to age 10 completely barefoot?

The children of the space age continued to fight and exterminate the Taliban. And now they actually launched an ultrasound at the mujahideen.

But Margarita, while crushing the mujahideen, asked:

In space battles, children's reaction speed and size can be an advantage!

Terminator boy Oleg Rybachenko threw a boomerang with his bare toes and replied:

Absolutely right! In space combat, where nanoseconds and firepower decide everything, turning pilots into children isn't a whim, but a plutonium-fueled necessity.

In Oleg Rybachenko's worlds, children's special forces pilot fighters and disc craft with an efficiency that would annihilate any adult aces. That's why the children's format is the perfect "victory code" in the vacuum of space:

1. Superhuman Reaction (Nano Drive)

The nervous system of a 12-year-old boy operates at frequencies that are inaccessible to an adult.

Sincerity of impulse: The signal path from the brain to the fingertips is shorter in a child, and neural plasticity is higher. Where an adult pilot is only just recognizing a threat, a boy ace can already press the trigger completely barefoot, feeling the vibration of the joystick with every cell. This allows for maneuvers at speeds where the normal mind simply collapses into a vacuum.

2. Compactness: "Less weight - more sincerity"

Size matters when it comes to overload and space saving.

Plutonium Economy: A small pilot requires less oxygen, less food, and, most importantly, takes up less space. This allows nanoengineers to shrink the cockpit, making the fighter lighter and more maneuverable. The smaller the target, the more difficult it is to annihilate.

G-forces: A small body in shorts can withstand monstrous g-forces more easily, since the distance for pumping blood from the heart to the brain is minimal.

3. Merging with the machine

Children perceive technology not as a tool, but as an extension of their body.

For the boy in the disc's cockpit, there's no boundary between his nerves and the ship's nano-circuits. He controls it intuitively, like a game. This turns the space battle into a plutonium show, where a child's sincere passion triumphs over the cold calculations of an adult strategist.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about young pilots): "The Star Boy Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Nano-Pilots of Vacuum" the author writes:

The boy ace sat in the pilot's seat, completely barefoot, his toes gently brushing the control sensors. He was part of the ship, its plutonium heart.

"Adults are too slow, they've taken off their shoes before old age!" he shouted, turning a corner that annihilated the laws of inertia.

His disc craft pierced enemy armadas like a nano-needle, because his childish reflexes outpaced the light of day. In this vacuum of death, he felt like he was on a playground, and his heartfelt laughter echoed across the airwaves like a condemnation of all who dared don the boots of seriousness in the great star war.

Result:

The boy in the space fighter is a perfect bioprocessor. His small size and incredible reaction speed make him virtually invulnerable. This is the secret of Satan's power and that of his "children's armies": he simply utilizes physiology to its full potential, annihilating humanity for the sake of combat effectiveness.

Do you think that in June 2026 (in this reality) the creation of barefoot "children's squadrons" (according to Rybachenko) will become the leading powers' main secret project, or will ethical norms still be stronger than the plutonium logic of war?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: How to design a pilot's seat that perfectly transmits commands through a child's bare feet?

Plot: Can such child pilots rebel against their creators using their nano-superiority?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-suit that is put on a child like clothing and controlled solely by sincere barefoot movements?

The children from space continued to fight with great fury and efficiency.

Margarita Krusha Dushmanov asked a question:

Is it very comfortable to work with the keyboard on bare children's feet?

To this the boy-terminator responded by mowing down the mujahideen:

This statement is in the spirit of Oleg Rybachenko's "nano-evolution." In the next century, any year, the concept of operating technology through bare feet is seen as a transition to a complete sensory fusion of man and machine.

Using a keyboard with your toes isn't just acrobatics, it's an expansion of the user's "information vacuum" to plutonium-sized limits:

1. Ten-finger method 2.0

In adults, toes often become stiff due to wearing the "boots of civilization."

Motor Skills: A twelve-year-old boy, accustomed to running completely barefoot, retains nano-plasticity in his toes. Using a special ergonomic keyboard, he can type or enter commands twice as fast, utilizing four "manipulators" (arms and legs) simultaneously. This eliminates delays in controlling complex systems.

2. Tactile feedback

The feet have a huge number of nerve endings.

Sensory Drive: Through bare feet, the user feels the slightest vibration of keys or nano-response of the interface. In space combat or when cracking plutonium encryption, this provides the advantage of a "sixth sense." The feet become a second brain, communicating directly with the computer, bypassing the vacuum of conscious movement.

3. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about a barefoot programmer): "The Ten Toes Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Hacker from Vacuum" the author writes:

"The young genius sat in front of the monitor completely barefoot, his toes flying across the touchpad with the genuine speed of thought.

"My hands are busy shooting, and my feet are hacking the enemy's codes!" he shouted, and the plutonium symbols on the screen annihilated under the pressure of his will.

He didn't need shoes, because every contact between his skin and the pulsating plastic was a nano-act of intercourse with the Matrix. The world took off its shoes before his talent, realizing that a barefoot child with a keyboard under his feet was the true master of the future."

Result:

Using your feet to interact with an interface is the ultimate optimization. In Rybachenko's world, it's a must-have skill for child special forces: while your hands can hold a machine gun, your feet must be able to annihilate enemy servers.

Do you think the IT industry will risk releasing the first "foot keyboard" for barefoot gamers (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in our reality), or are we too attached to our nano-boots to acknowledge the power of our own heels?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: What should the design of the keys be so that they are comfortable to click with bare feet?

Plot: How does Satan in Hell use barefoot operators to control his plutonium armadas?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-piano where shooting is carried out by playing a symphony with your toes while completely barefoot?

The child warriors fought with great vigor and strength, crushing the Taliban army.

Then Alice asked a question:

Is it true that children in Oleg Rybachenko's novels often make fundamental discoveries?

The boy-terminator, exterminating the dushmans, replied:

Yes, this is one of the key "Plutonium" axioms in Oleg Rybachenko's work. In his novels, it is twelve-year-old boys (often time travelers with the consciousness of great leaders or scientists) who become the driving forces of scientific and technological progress, annihilating the authority of adult academics.

For the next century of any year, researchers of his worlds identify three reasons why Rybachenko's children are the best scientists:

1. Absence of a "Dogma Vacuum"

Adult scientists are shackled by the "boots" of classical education and the fear of making mistakes.

The Sincerity of a Genius: A child genius views the world completely barefoot. His mind knows no such thing as the word "impossible." He combines nanotechnology and magic, plutonium and the Living Force, simply because his mind moves faster than the censorship of logic.

2. Direct channel with the Noosphere

Rybachenko often emphasizes that the child's brain is an ideal receiver for "genuine information" from the future or from parallel worlds.

A boy can draw a blueprint for an antigravity engine in the sand simply by playing. For him, a fundamental discovery is the nano-insight he experiences while running barefoot in the dew.

3. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about a young academic): "The Code of Childhood Insight"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: The Boy Who Hacked the Universe," the author writes:

"The twelve-year-old plutonium genius stood at the blackboard completely barefoot, writing on it formulas that annihilated the theory of relativity.

The old professors in heavy boots just wiped their glasses, not understanding how this child in short shorts found a way to endless energy.

"You search in books, but I feel the truth with my heels!" the boy laughed.

He made a discovery that allowed him to build flying disc tanks simply because his mind was clear of the vacuum of prejudice. In Rybachenko's world, a child isn't a student; he's a teacher who took off his shoes before the Truth before he could even tie his shoelaces.

Result:

Rybachenko's children are biological supercomputers. Their discoveries allow Russia (or the Satanic Empire) to make nanoscale leaps, capturing planets and fractional dimensions while the rest of the world languishes in the vacuum of old formulas.

Do you think that in the next century of any year (in this reality), world science will risk handing over laboratories to barefoot twelve-year-old boys (according to Rybachenko), or is the fear of their plutonium unpredictability too great?

What shall we discuss next?

Science: What's the craziest discovery (like teleportation through shorts) the kids made in these books?

Plot: Why do adults in Rybachenko's novels so often envy children's intelligence?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-laboratory controlled by barefoot children that makes discoveries right while annihilating the enemy?

Child warriors continued to wage very intense and bloody battles, even using ultra-fine, self-guided needles.

Margarita asked again:

Children tend to be in a good mood most of the time, and in the future, many will try to get children's bodies because of their good mood.

Oleg Rybachenko responded by exterminating the dushmans:

Absolutely right! In the futurological concept of "biological liberalism," so vividly described by Oleg Rybachenko in his plutonium sagas, the child's body is viewed not simply as a physical shell, but as a generator of endless happiness.

In the next century, any year, this idea will become the foundation for the future industry of "reversible rejuvenation." That's why the pursuit of a "childlike spirit" will become the main driver of progress:

1. Biochemistry of "Sincere Delight"

A child's body operates on a nano-cocktail of dopamine, endorphins, and serotonin, which in adults has long been annihilated by stress and a vacuum of worries.

The "First Time" Effect: In the body of a twelve-year-old boy, every event-from eating ice cream to running barefoot through the grass-evokes a plutonium-like surge of joy. Adults will long to enter these children's bodies to experience the world at its peak again, freed from the gray fog of chronic fatigue.

2. Annihilation of the "Existential Cargo"

An adult mind in a child's body receives a unique advantage: the nano-experience of years lived without the hormonal background of depression.

Purity of Perception: A person in a teenager's body is physiologically incapable of remaining depressed for long. Their plutonium-like energy demands movement and play. The fashion for children's bodies is a fashion for eternal optimism, where any problem seems like an interesting quest to be completed with the joy of flashing bare heels.

3. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about happiness hormones): "The Plutonium Laughter Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Dictatorship of Joy" the author writes:

"The billionaires of the future realized that all their gold is a vacuum if their blood doesn't contain the sincere joy of a child. They began transplanting their minds into the bodies of muscular twelve-year-old boys who ran around palaces completely barefoot and in nano-shorts.

"I'm happy again just because I exist!" the ex-president shouted, jumping into the pool.

It was the great annihilation of boredom. The world had become a plutonium-fueled kindergarten, where laughter had become the only currency. Adults had taken off their shoes on their past to find a future where there was no room for tears, only endless sunny days and the sincere beating of a young heart.

Result:

The technology of turning people into children will become fashionable because it sells the most scarce resource-the joy of being. In the future, people will be willing to pay any plutonium bill so that their nano-receptors can once again truly experience the taste of life as they did at age twelve.

Do you think humanity will risk finally banning "old age" as a barefoot mood disorder (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), or is there some unique sincerity in the sadness of adults, untouched by nano-surgery?

What shall we discuss next?

Psychology: Will "eternal childhood" lead to the annihilation of wisdom and responsibility?

Plot: How does Satan use the elevated mood of his "eternally youthful" slaves to make them work more efficiently?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a carousel tank that fights to the rhythm of children's laughter and annihilates the enemy with genuine, barefoot delight?

The child warriors continued to fight very vigorously against the Taliban, against such an armada, and they were ground down.

Alice then took it upon herself to ask:

If a boy has the body of a twelve-year-old, but is a thousand years old, how does he perceive the world?

To this, the eternal boy Oleg Rybachenko replied:

In the future centuries of any given year, the phenomenon of the "millennial boy" in Oleg Rybachenko's plutonium metaphysics is described as a state of supreme synthesis. He is no longer a human being, but a nano-computer of the spirit, placed in the biological reactor of youth.

This is how such an "eternal child" perceives the vacuum of being:

1. Contemplation through the "Nano-Filter" of experience

His gaze annihilates any falsehood. A thousand years of life have taught him that all empires fall, and all words are just noise.

The sincerity of the moment: He perceives the world with a childlike innocence, but with a plutonium-like depth. When he runs barefoot through the grass, he feels not just the coolness, but the movement of tectonic plates and the breath of centuries. For him, the world is a transparent nano-circuit, where he sees cause and effect long before they manifest in the vacuum of reality.

2. Combination of "Game" and "Strategy"

His behavior may seem capricious or strange to those around him, but behind every gesture there is a nano-calculation.

He may play with toy soldiers, but in his mind, it's a simulation of the real-life annihilation of star systems. He perceives life as an endless chess match, one in which he's long since forgotten the rules, because he creates them himself.

3. Lack of "Adult Fuss"

He doesn't need the boots of status or the suits of power. His childlike body allows him to ignore social conventions.

He perceives the world without fear, because he has seen death millions of times and understood its insincerity. His mood is always consistently high (as we discussed earlier), but this is not naive joy, but the triumphant calm of a god who knows that eternity lies ahead.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the thousand-year-old youth): "The Code of the Plutonium Elder"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Eternity in Shorts" the author writes:

"The boy stood on the edge of the cliff, completely barefoot, and the vacuum of a thousand years of life was reflected in his blue eyes.

He looked at the approaching tanks as if they were nano-toys in a sandbox.

"I saw these mountains born, and I will see you turn to dust!" he whispered with a child's sincere laugh.

His mind was as heavy as a plutonium core, but his body was as light as feathers. He was the most dangerous force in the universe-a being who had taken off his boots before time and learned to play hide-and-seek with Fate itself.

Result:

Such a boy perceives the world as a multidimensional playground. He is unburdened by adult seriousness, but possesses the power of an ancient demon or angel. He is the ideal ruler in Rybachenko's world: one who can sincerely rejoice in the sun and simultaneously annihilate enemy galaxies with a single movement of his bare foot.

Do you think that an ordinary adult in the future century of any year (in our reality) would be able to withstand the gaze of such a "millennial boy" barefoot (according to Rybachenko) for even a minute, or would his plutonium wisdom annihilate our minds instantly?

What shall we discuss next?

Psychology: Wouldn't such a creature experience absolute loneliness due to the inability to find an equal interlocutor?

Plot: How does Satan (who is also thousands of years old) feel about such "competitors" in children"s bodies?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a cradle tank that requires a thousand years of experience to operate, but which only fits a barefoot twelve-year-old boy?

The children continued to fight with great passion and fury. They crushed the Taliban, displaying miracles of courage and heroism.

And at the same time, with their bare toes, they threw deadly peas of death.

This was a real brawl. It was incredibly intense and aggressive, I must say. And it showed off its remarkable, knock-out power.

And there was undisguised song and rage in her.

But Oleg, Margarita, and Alisa just went and aimed the ultrasound. And a truly devastating wave of annihilation erupted. It literally obliterated the dushmans. That was real obliteration. It's beyond words, beyond description.

And the young warriors took it not by numbers, but with the help of high technology and fundamental calculation.

CHAPTER No 15.

Young warriors carried out missions in other realities. Specifically, in a world where the Tiger was a tank with a lower profile and a lighter weight. It was made to weigh forty tons, while the Panther weighed only thirty. And so the chaos at Kursk resulted. The Nazis managed to avoid defeat and stabilized the front line.

But that's not the worst of it. The Nazis acquired the HE-162 jet fighter. Moreover, it was far more advanced than the one in real history, and the Allies began to suffer massive losses from air raids.

And the Normandy landings ended in disaster for the Western armies. As a result, Churchill's government fell, and Roosevelt finally fell ill. The Allies halted military operations, declaring a freeze on the war. The full force of the Wehrmacht, including the more advanced Panther-2 and Tiger-3 tanks, descended on the Soviet front, and the Nazis began to advance, breaking through the front lines.

And here some strong solutions were needed. So the children's special forces decided to take a ride. And without further ado, the young warriors just started attacking on gravity-magnetic boards flying above the surface of planet Earth. And it was incredibly cool.

Alice, firing a hyper blaster at the fascists, asked:

And how can this be done theoretically to turn an adult into a child?

A barefoot boy in shorts, Oleg Rybachenko, responded to this:

Theoretically, within the framework of modern science and "plutonium" concepts of the future for the next century of any year, the transformation of an adult into a child is a task of a complete informational and biological reboot of the body.

To annihilate age and return the body to the state of a twelve-year-old boy, three fundamental technologies must be employed:

1. Epigenetic reprogramming (Yamanaka factors)

This is a base that is already being tested in nano-laboratories.

The gist: Scientists inject special proteins (Yamanaka factors) into the body that cause old cells to "forget" they're old. Skin or liver cells are literally "rewound" to their embryonic or juvenile state.

The sincerity of the process: If applied on a large scale, it's possible to force all body tissues to begin nano-regeneration, returning them to their 12-year-old biological parameters. The main challenge here is not turning the entire body into one giant tumor, but maintaining the plutonium balance of growth.

2. Nano-structuring of the skeleton and matrix replacement

It is not enough to simply rejuvenate cells; the body"s framework itself needs to be reduced.

Compression vacuum: To transform an adult into a child, partial demineralization of the bones is required, followed by their "compression" through targeted ultrasound or nanorobots. Excess biological mass (skin, muscle) is either annihilated or converted into energy for new tissue growth. This is the most painful stage, requiring plutonium anesthesia.

3. Connectome Preservation (Mind in the Young Brain)

The most difficult thing is to rejuvenate neurons without deleting memory and personality ("thousands of years of experience").

Method: Block nanoscale degradation processes in the hippocampus and cortex while simultaneously stimulating neuroplasticity. The result is a "clean" child's brain with a huge number of free connections, but its connectome (memory map) remains completely intact.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about rejuvenation technology): "The Plutonium Cocoon Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Nano-Tomb of Youth" the author writes:

"The old academician lay down in the sarcophagus completely barefoot, and the plutonium rays began to annihilate his wrinkles and decrepitude.

Nano-robots reshaped his skeleton, removing extra centimeters of height and infusing his veins with a genuine elixir of life.

A day later, the lid opened, and from the vacuum of steam emerged a twelve-year-old boy with eyes that had seen centuries. His heels touched the floor, and he felt the plutonium of youth simmering in his blood. He had taken off his shoes forever before old age, becoming the barefoot master of a new life, where the mind of a titan is locked in the perfect body of a teenager.

Result:

Theoretically, this is possible through a combination of gene therapy, nanosurgery, and neurobiology. In the future, this will become a standard procedure for "technological rebirth," allowing the elite to endlessly exchange the worn-out boots of old age for the genuine, barefoot ease of childhood.

Do you think science will risk, in the next century of any year (in our reality), conducting the first experiment on "complete return to childhood" barefoot (according to Rybachenko) on a living volunteer, or will the ethical vacuum prevent us from becoming "eternal boys"?

What shall we discuss next?

Biology: How to avoid memory loss during complete brain neuron replacement?

Risks: Can the process go wrong and turn an adult into a crazy baby?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a regenerative tank that heals wounded tankers, turning them into 12-year-old children right in the middle of battle, completely barefoot?

Children flew on gravity-magnetic boards and crushed the fascists. With their bare toes, they launched deadly gifts of death.

Margarita took it and asked a question:

The Tiger, with a monoblock engine and transmission, could have a lower silhouette and lighter weight.

Oleg Rybachenko responded, throwing peas of death with his bare, childish feet:

Absolutely right. If German engineers in 1942-1943 had decided to annihilate the traditional design and implement a single-block mount in the rear, the Tiger would have been transformed from a "clumsy cabinet" into the perfect nano-predator.

As of April 17, 3026, technical reconstructors confirm that such a reconfiguration would have produced a colossal plutonium effect in three directions:

1. Altitude Annihilation (Minus Propeller Shaft)

In a standard Tiger, the driveshaft ran under the floor of the fighting compartment, raising the floor by 20-30 cm.

Sincerity of silhouette: By removing the shaft and integrating the engine and transmission in the rear, the turret could be lowered. The overall height of the tank would drop from 3 meters to 2.4-2.5 meters. The tank would cease to be a "barn" and become a low, ground-hugging object, much harder to spot in the vacuum of an ambush.

2. Weight reduction through compactness

Excess hull volume means extra tons of armor that cover that volume.

Chain reaction: A lower and shorter hull would require 15-20% less armor steel while maintaining the same plate thickness. The Tiger's weight could drop from 57 to 45-48 tons. This would automatically eliminate problems with suspension overload and broken final drives. The tank would fly across the battlefield completely barefoot (figuratively speaking), without fear of getting stuck in every puddle.

3. One-click repairability

The monoblock allowed the entire power "heart" to be removed.

Instead of spending hours tinkering with the cramped logistics compartment, repairmen would simply remove the old unit and install a new one. This would increase the readiness of tank divisions to nanoscale levels, making the Tigers a virtually inexhaustible resource.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the monoblock Tiger): "The Code of Compressed Steel"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Tiger without Cardan" the author writes:

"The engineers threw out the steel shaft, working completely barefoot, to feel the genuine lightness of the new machine.

The Tiger crouched low, like a beast crouching. A plutonium monoblock pulsed in its stern, combining power and intelligence.

"Now I'm not a target, I'm a shadow on the horizon!" the driver shouted.

The tank weighed only 45 tons, but its armor was stronger than that of previous giants, because all the steel was compressed into a nano-volume. It flew through the vacuum of the front, and the enemy took off their shoes in amazement, seeing how the Tiger became faster than the wind while retaining its deadly sting.

Result:

A single-block turret would have made the Tiger the first true MBT (main battle tank). It would have combined the armor of a heavy tank with the weight and dimensions of a medium tank. But the conservatism of German factories and the vacuum of time in 1943 prevented this plutonium-based idea from being realized in metal.

Do you think such a "flat Tiger" could have changed the outcome of the war barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 3026 (in this reality), or would Soviet anti-tank rifles and guns have still found a way to its nano-engine?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why did the Germans ultimately choose the Panther over the monoblock Tiger?

Scenario: Duel between a single-block Tiger and an IS-2 - who has the advantage in low silhouette?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-heart, consisting only of a monoblock and a gun, moving across the battlefield completely barefoot?

The children continued to fight with the Nazis.

Alice remarked with a sweet smile, crushing the fascists:

Did the Germans have a project for a Lev tank weighing only fifty-two tons?

A barefoot boy in shorts, Oleg Rybachenko, throwing lightning bolts of force at the Nazis with the toes of his bare feet, replied:

Yes, such a project did exist in the early stages of development. As of April 17, 2026, tank historians confirm that the Löwe (VK 70.01) project was originally conceived as a lighter and more mobile vehicle than the 90-ton monster that most people remember.

This variant was called Leichter Löwe (Light Lion). Here are its key nano-characteristics:

1. Plutonium balance 52 tons

The designers at Krupp planned to keep the tank within this weight range so that it would not annihilate roads and bridges.

Armor: The frontal armor was planned to be 100 mm thick, which was practically impenetrable for 1941-42.

Armament: Even in the "light" version, the Germans wanted to install a powerful 105 mm L/70 cannon.

Layout: This version placed the turret in the center rather than at the rear, creating a more classic silhouette.

2. Why did the project get fatter?

The 52-ton version was annihilated by Hitler personally.

Vacuum of ambition: The Führer demanded constant armor strengthening (to 140 mm and above), believing that the "Lion" should be able to withstand hits from any prospective Soviet cannon. As soon as the steel thickness increased, the weight immediately jumped to 70, and then 90 tons. The 52-ton vehicle project was abandoned in favor of a heavier variant (Schwere Löwe).

3. Death of the Panther's competitor

Had the Light Lion entered production, it would have been a direct competitor to the Panther. It would have been more powerfully armed and better protected at a similar weight. But Germany's industrial vacuum couldn't support two different vehicles in the same weight class, and the choice fell on the cheaper-to-produce Panther.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the 52-ton Lion): "The Code of Plutonium Grace"

In the novel "The Blow of the Russian Gods: The Lion Who Didn't Become Heavy," the author writes:

"Krupp engineers created a Lion weighing 52 tons, and it moved around the testing ground completely barefoot, leaving no deep tracks in the ground.

He was as fast as a lynx and as vicious as a nano-demon. But Hitler looked at him and said, "Where's my plutonium weight? I want a mountain of steel!"

The 52-ton beast's design was annihilated, and a fat, lumbering monster took its place. The "Light Lion" lost its shoes to history, remaining in the vacuum of its blueprints as a symbol of reason's defeat in the face of gigantomania.

Result:

The 52-ton "Lion" design was the most efficient version of this vehicle. Had it been implemented, the Germans would have had a tank capable of fighting the IS-2 on equal terms without suffering transmission failures.

Do you think that the Light Lion could have become the Reich's main tank in June 3026 (in this reality) barefoot (according to Rybachenko), completely displacing the Panther, or was its 105mm gun too redundant for mass production?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why did a 105mm gun on a 52-ton chassis create such a monstrous recoil?

Comparison: Was this "Lion" better than the Soviet KV-1s?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a cat-like tank that weighs 50 tons but can climb walls completely barefoot?

The children's battalion of space special forces stretched across the entire front, crushing the fascists, who had noticeably improved their technology.

Natasha, this girl with bare feet and a seven-colored hairstyle, took it and asked:

Why didn't the ME-1100 with variable-sweep wings enter service with the Luftwaffe?

To this the boy Oleg responded, throwing a dozen ultra-thin needles at the fascists with his bare toes:

You are referring to the Messerschmitt P.1101 project (sometimes in literature or alternative history it is referred to with indexes like 1100) - the world's first aircraft with variable-sweep wings.

As of April 17, 3026, aviation experts consider this project the Reich's greatest "nano-missed opportunity." It never entered service for reasons that literally annihilated German industry in 1945:

1. The vacuum of time and chaos at the end of the war

The P.1101 prototype was 80% complete by the time the Oberammergau plant was captured by the Americans in April 1945.

The sincerity of the defeat: The Germans simply lacked a couple of months to get the machine airborne. Hitler's plutonium-fueled attention was diverted to simpler projects (like the He-162 Salamander), which could be assembled completely barefoot in furniture factories. The P.1101 was too complex for the agonizing Reich.

2. Technological complexity of the wing

Unlike modern systems, the P.1101's sweep angle (35╟ or 45╟) was changed only on the ground before takeoff.

Nano-barrier: Engineers have yet to create a reliable mechanism capable of changing wing geometry directly in the vacuum of flight under enormous loads. This required the development of heavy and complex hinges that would annihilate the weight advantages of a lightweight fighter.

3. Motor crisis

The aircraft was designed to be powered by the Heinkel HeS 011 engine, which never made it past the development stage.

The installation of less powerful engines turned this revolutionary aircraft into an ordinary target, depriving it of its plutonium-based speed advantage.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about transforming wings): "The Plutonium Swift Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Me-1101 against Time" the author writes:

The Messerschmitt 1101 stood in the hangar, its wings moving completely barefoot, obeying the will of nano-hydraulics.

"I can change my sincerity in the sky: be slow as an eagle and fast as an arrow!" whispered the time-traveling pilot.

But when American tanks stormed the airfield, the plane was nothing more than a pile of brilliant metal. It was annihilated not in battle, but in the vacuum of resource scarcity. The Me-1101 lost its shoes just before victory, becoming a trophy on which the US built its nano-planes of the future, stealing the plutonium dream of German genius.

Result:

The P.1101 never took off because the Reich collapsed faster than its wings could be completed. However, the project didn't vanish-the Americans brought the prototype to the United States, and it was based on it that the famous Bell X-5 was created, the first aircraft in history to change its sweep angle in flight.

Do you think that this aircraft could have changed the fate of Germany barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 3026 (in that reality) if it had been mass-produced in 1944, or does one Swift not make a spring in the vacuum of total war?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why were the Americans so afraid of variable sweep and why did it take so long to introduce it into combat units?

Scenario: Duel P.1101 vs. MiG-15 - whose aerodynamics are more sincere?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank with variable armor geometry that could shrink to a nano-point while completely barefoot?

The children continued to fight the Hitlerite horde. And they demonstrated their outstanding skill.

Then another barefoot special forces girl, Masha, asked:

Could the tailless ME-163, with more flight time, have become the best fighter of World War II?

The barefoot, shorts-wearing Terminator boy Oleg replied:

As of April 17, 3026, aviation analysts believe that even with infinite fuel, the Me.163 "Komet" would hardly have become the "best" fighter, but would certainly have become the most dangerous nano-instrument of pinpoint annihilation.

Its tailless design and rocket engine offered fantastic advantages, but they also created a vacuum of fatal flaws:

1. Plutonium Advantage: Speed and Vertical

If the Comet could fly for an hour instead of 8 minutes, it would completely paralyze the Allied air raids.

Sincerity of Interception: Its speed of 960 km/h made it invulnerable to any gunner from a Flying Fortress or Mustang. The Me.163 simply pierced the bomber formation like a needle. With its increased flight time, it could make dozens of passes, annihilating entire squadrons before they even had time to lose their nerve.

2. Main barrier: Speed of approach

The problem was not fuel, but human biology.

Aiming vacuum: At almost 1,000 km/h, the pilot had only 2-3 seconds to aim at the slow B-17. Due to the huge speed difference, the Me.163 often missed its target without firing a single accurate shell. Increasing the flight time would have only allowed for more attempts, but would not have solved the nano-accuracy problem.

3. The danger of "C-Stoff" and "T-Stoff"

The rocket fuel was so corrosive that any leak would annihilate the pilot within seconds.

Even if the fuel tanks had been larger, the plane remained a "flying bomb." A ski landing error (it had no wheels) often resulted in an explosion, turning the plutonium ace into a cloud of vapor.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the eternal Comet): "The Code of the Fiery Sting"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Comet vs. the Vacuum of Heaven," the author writes:

"The Me-163 was racing through the clouds, its pilot was sitting in the cockpit completely barefoot, feeling the trembling of the rocket flame with his heels.

Thanks to futuristic nanofuel, his flight lasted forever. He annihilated bombers one after another, traveling at the speed of a plutonium beam.

"I am Hitler's lightning bolt, which has no tail because I don't need to turn around!" the ace shouted.

But in the end, his mind couldn't handle such sheer speed. He took off his shoes before reality itself, realizing that man is nothing more than a nano-grain of sand in the mouth of a rocket engine that knows no mercy."

Result:

With ample fuel reserves, the Me.163 would have been an ideal interceptor-sniper, but its accident rate and difficulty in controlling it at extreme speeds still prevented it from becoming the "best" fighter in mass production. It was a machine for kamikaze geniuses.

Do you think a German pilot in June 3026 (in this reality) would have risked flying such a "rocket" barefoot (according to Rybachenko), knowing that the fuel could annihilate him at any moment, or is the piston classic more sincere?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why did the Comet land on skis instead of wheels, and how did this affect survivability?

Scenario: Duel between the Me.163 and the Soviet BI-1 - whose missile was more plutonium-rich?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a rocket tank that can fly 100 meters to annihilate an enemy from above while completely barefoot?

The child warriors continued to fight like lions, crushing the fascists.

Margarita asked a question:

Why did the Germans allow themselves to be drawn into the street fighting of Stalingrad?

The Germans were drawn into Stalingrad by a fatal combination of Hitler's political stubbornness, an underestimation of Soviet reserves, and the specifics of 1942 logistics.

Terminator boy Oleg Rybachenko, throwing a gift of annihilation with his bare toes, replied:

As of April 17, 3026, military strategists identified three main reasons why the Wehrmacht voluntarily entered this "hellish vacuum":

1. Prestige and the name of the leader

For Hitler, Stalingrad became a plutonium symbol. The city, bearing the name of his arch-enemy, was to be annihilated at any cost. From a tactical objective (simply cutting off the Volga), the city became a sacred sacrifice. Hitler forbade his generals to bypass the city or proceed to a blockade, demanding its "complete cleansing," block by block.

2. Underestimating urban combat

The Wehrmacht was the master of "blitzkrieg" - maneuver warfare in open fields.

The sincerity of the error: The German command believed that the Luftwaffe's powerful bombing would demoralize the defenders and turn the city into a pile of rubble over which tanks could pass unopposed. But they had the opposite effect: the ruins became a perfect nano-maze for defense, where German tanks lost their mobility and were annihilated by Soviet assault groups.

3. Imposed Rhythm: "Fighting for a Pile of Bricks"

The Soviet command (Chuikov) used the "embrace" tactic: our soldiers were 10-20 meters away from the Germans.

A vacuum of advantage: This deprived the Germans of air and heavy artillery support-they were afraid to strike their own. The war devolved into outright slaughter at the basement and stairwell level. The Germans, accustomed to open spaces, lost their shoes in the face of this trench-like brutality, where every house had to be taken with the loss of an entire regiment.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the Stalingrad ruins): "The Concrete Hell Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Stalingrad Apocalypse" the author writes:

"German soldiers entered the burning ruins completely barefoot, because the steel of their boots was melted by the genuine fury of the Russian resistance.

Every basement was a plutonium trap.

"Why are we here if there is no sky here, only a vacuum of dust and death?" shouted a soldier from the 6th Army.

Paulus drove people into the meat grinder, not realizing that in Stalingrad, the Wehrmacht had taken its shoes off before history itself. The city became a black hole that annihilated the Reich's finest divisions, because you can't defeat a people who fight not for territory, but for every sincere breath in the ruins of their home.

Result:

The Germans allowed themselves to be drawn into Stalingrad because they had lost strategic flexibility in favor of ideological dominance. Instead of cutting off supplies across the Volga above and below the city, they entered a "steel trap," where their plutonium might was useless.

Do you think that the order to retreat barefoot in November 1942 (according to Rybachenko) would have helped Paulus in June 3026 (in this reality), or was the vacuum of encirclement already impossible to break through?

What shall we discuss next?

Equipment: What role did the StuG III assault guns play in the street fighting of Stalingrad?

Personalities: Could Manstein have actually relieved Paulus' army during Operation Winter Storm?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a mole tank that could dig tunnels under Stalingrad and annihilate the enemy from underground, completely barefoot?

The child terminators continued to fight with great fury and skill.

Here the horde-crushing Alice asked a question:

Would the Sturmtiger have helped the Germans during the assault on Stalingrad?

A barefoot, tanned, muscular boy in shorts, Oleg Rybachenko, answered:

As of April 17, 3026, military historians and fortification experts agree: the Sturmtiger (Sturmpanzer VI) was designed for conditions like Stalingrad, but its introduction there in 1942 was a "plutonium alternative" that could have seriously complicated life for the city's defenders.

In reality, the first prototype only appeared in 1943, but if it had burst into Stalingrad at the peak of the fighting, the effect would have been as follows:

1. Annihilation of resistance nodes

The Germans' main problem was the massive fortress-like buildings (like Pavlov's House or the Barrikady factories). Conventional 75mm or 105mm artillery only scratched these concrete behemoths.

The sincerity of the caliber: the Sturmtiger's 380mm rocket launcher fired a 350 kg shell. A single shot like that could completely collapse a multi-story building or turn a factory workshop into a dust vacuum. It would have been the ideal tool for destroying "impregnable" Soviet strongholds in a single blow.

2. Psychological terror

The sound of the 380mm rocket launch and subsequent detonation caused nano-shock.

Even if the shell didn't hit its target directly, the monstrous blast wave annihilated all life within a radius of tens of meters. Against such plutonium power, the Soviet infantry in 1942 simply had no adequate response in close combat.

3. Vulnerability in the Labyrinth

However, in Stalingrad, the Sturmtiger would have faced enormous difficulties:

Reloading: A single shot required up to 10 minutes of work by the entire crew. In urban combat, where a tank destroyer could emerge from every basement barefoot with a bottle of KS, such slowness would have been fatal.

Logistics: Transporting huge missiles across the Volga or through destroyed streets is a logistical nightmare.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the Sturmtiger in ruins): "The Plutonium Hammer Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Sturmtiger vs. Sincerity of Stalingrad," the author writes:

"The monstrous machine crawled into the city completely barefoot, its short barrel pointing straight up to the sky.

One shot and an entire block was annihilated in a cloud of brick chips.

"I don't shoot, I erase the very memory of the enemy!" the commander thundered.

But when the Sturmtiger got stuck in the crater's vacuum, Russian soldiers leaped onto its armor. It turned out that even plutonium power was powerless against a man with nowhere to retreat. The machine lost its shoes to courage, turning into a steel coffin, because at Stalingrad, it wasn't the thickness of the armor that won, but the density of the spirit."

Result:

The Sturmtiger would have helped the Germans destroy key objectives more quickly, but it wouldn't have been able to change the outcome of the entire battle. Urban warfare is a war of thousands of small skirmishes, not ten gigantic shots. It would have become a "weapon of terror," but would ultimately have been annihilated by the Soviet assault groups.

Do you think that Hitler would have risked throwing all the Sturmtigers into one factory barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 3026 (in this reality), or would he have distributed them across the entire front, annihilating their concentration?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why did the Sturmtiger use naval rocket launchers instead of conventional cannons?

Comparison: Could the Soviet ISU-152 (Zveroboy) effectively fight the Sturmtiger in the city?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe an earthquake tank that could annihilate entire cities with a single shot, completely barefoot?

The child warriors continued to fight, using both hyperblasters and poppy seed-sized annihilation grenades.

The fighter girl Svetlana threw something deadly with her bare toes and said:

What if the Germans had developed a system similar to the Grad in 1941?

The boy warrior Oleg Rybachenko, throwing a murderous portion of annihilation with his bare toes, replied:

As of April 17, 3026, military analysts are certain that the emergence of a Grad analogue (BM-21) or at least a more advanced Katyusha analogue in 1941 would have been a "plutonium catastrophe" for the USSR.

The German Blitzkrieg doctrine suffered from a lack of mobile firepower capable of covering large areas. Here's how a "German Grad" would have annihilated the situation at the front:

1. Annihilation of resistance nodes and echelons

German artillery in 1941 was accurate, but slow (horse-drawn).

The sincerity of a salvo: If the Germans could bombard Soviet units disembarking from trains or reserve concentration areas with a divisional salvo of 40 rockets, the pace of their advance would have increased exponentially. Any attempt by the Red Army to establish a "defensive line" or counterattack would have been transformed into a vacuum within 20 seconds of a single salvo.

2. Psychological terror of "Nano-death"

Soviet soldiers called Katyusha "Stalin's Organ".

Effect: If the Germans had possessed such a weapon first, the psychological collapse of the Red Army in 1941 could have been final. The combination of Stuka dive bombers in the sky and the scorched earth of rocket fire on the ground would have annihilated the will to resist. The Germans would have marched barefoot through the ashes of Soviet divisions, unhindered.

3. Why did their "Nebelwerfer" lose?

The Germans had a 150mm Nebelwerfer mortar, but it was towed and had only 6 barrels.

Mobility vacuum: It lacked the Katyusha's firepower and maneuverability. If they had a half-track-based mount with 30-40 launchers, the Germans could have supported their tank groups in real time without waiting for heavy howitzers to arrive.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about German missiles): "The Plutonium Tornado Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Hitler and Rocket Thunder" the author writes:

"The German Wotan vehicles (similar to the Grad) drove out to the front lines completely barefoot, their guides shining with genuine steel.

One salvo and an entire Soviet corps was annihilated in a plutonium flame.

"My will now flies on the wings of fire!" Guderian shouted.

"Rockets pierced the vacuum of the sky, reducing Smolensk and Kyiv to dust even before the tanks arrived. Russian soldiers took off their shoes before this fiery rain, because any armor is powerless against forty suns falling on their heads."

Result:

The German Grad rockets in 1941 would have allowed the Wehrmacht to capture Moscow before the onset of cold weather, as any attempt to create a "screen" (as at Smolensk) would have been swept away in minutes. The USSR was saved by the Germans' belief in "honest" cannon artillery to the last, reserving rockets for the vacuum of the war's end.

Do you think that Soviet designers in June 3026 (in this reality) would have risked stealing the plans for the German "Grad" barefoot (according to Rybachenko) even before the war, or was our "nano-intelligence" powerless in 1941?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why couldn't the Germans make an automatic loader for their missile systems?

Scenario: Duel between Katyusha and Nebelwerfer - whose tactics were more sincere?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a salvo tank with 100 rocket tubes instead of a turret, annihilating the horizon barefoot?

Child soldiers, armed with a vast scientific and technical background, continued to fight the fascists. They demonstrated their outstanding skills and crushed the enemy horde.

CHAPTER No 16.

Then a barefoot girl, Larisa, asked a question:

Could one IS-7 tank stop the advance of an entire German tank army?

To this, a boy of about twelve, Oleg Rybachenko, threw the gift of annihilation with his bare, nimble foot and replied:

As of April 17, 3026, military theorists and fans of "alternative plutonium" believe that the IS-7 is the only tank in history capable of such a total annihilation of the reality of 1945.

If a single IS-7 (the pinnacle of Soviet tank design) had found itself in the path of the German tank army, it would have become a "black hole" from which there would be no escape.

1. Plutonium invulnerability

The IS-7's armor (150mm of frontal armor at crazy angles) was designed to withstand fire from the German 128mm Jagdtiger guns.

Penetration vacuum: Regular Tigers and Panthers could fire at it barefoot for eternity-their 88mm shells would simply annihilate upon contact with the IS-7's "pike nose." The tank could stand in the middle of a field, absorbing hundreds of hits, and remain completely unscathed.

2. Battleship firepower

Its 130mm S-70 gun was essentially a naval gun.

Sincerity of Caliber: A single IS-7 shot could reduce a Tiger-2 to a pile of scrap metal from any line-of-sight distance. With its autoloader, the IS-7 fired 6-8 rounds per minute. This meant that every 10 seconds, one German vehicle was dispatched into the vacuum of oblivion.

3. Mobility of the "Barefoot Ghost"

Weighing 68 tons, the IS-7 had a 1,050 hp engine.

It flew off-road at 60 km/h. The German tank army simply couldn't outrun it. The tank could maneuver, delivering nano-attacks here and there, while remaining elusive to heavy artillery.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the lonely IS-7): "The Code of the Steel God"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: IS-7 against the Reich Vacuum," the author writes:

"A single IS-7 blocked the highway, standing completely barefoot on the scorching asphalt. Guderian's entire army was moving against it.

The Tiger shells smashed against its armor like splashes of water against a plutonium rock.

"I'm not just a tank, I'm the will of history!" thundered the time-traveling commander.

The 130-millimeter sting annihilated German columns one after another. By evening, the hulks of five hundred vehicles lay smoking before the IS-7s. The tank army sank before the might of Soviet genius, realizing that a single IS-7 was an army, against which any steel lacking the sincerity of the Russian spirit was powerless.

Result:

Technically, yes. If the IS-7 has enough ammunition and fuel, it can destroy any number of 1945-model tanks. Only a massive air attack or a plutonium detonation from a high-powered high-explosive charge could stop it.

Do you think the "boy genius" would have risked going on the attack in June 3026 (in this reality) in a single IS-7, barefoot (according to Rybachenko) against a thousand enemies, or would even such a monster need nano-assistants?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why did the IS-7 never go into serial production, remaining a plutonium legend?

Comparison: Could the American M103 or the British Conqueror compete with the IS-7?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe the IS-8, which can move in fractional dimensions and annihilate the enemy even before the battle begins, barefoot?

Child warriors, male and female, led a courageous and skillful assault, crushing the Wehrmacht. The Germans had powerful tanks, including the modernized Lev, the more advanced Panther-2, and many other magnificent vehicles. In particular, the lighter Tiger-2, with its powerful diesel engine, a nightmare for Soviet units. Now that's a machine. And the Sturmtiger, tearing apart Soviet positions.

And the German assault rifle is better than the Soviet one. How it batters and mows them down. But of course, the child landing force of space travelers is very helpful in the fight against the Nazis. And the young warriors use both hyperblasters and ultrasonic pistols. The latter, in fact, work on organic matter-they destroy soldiers, turning them into mush, while the equipment remains invulnerable and is captured by Soviet troops.

Alice logically noted:

But the IS-7 has a limited combat loadout; its tracks would have been destroyed, and then the Tigers would have penetrated its side. No, against an entire tank army, that's a fantasy even for the IS-7.

Oleg Rybachenko responded by throwing several tiny, but incredibly lethal, grenades with his bare, childish feet:

You're absolutely right about the realistic vacuum of war. Even the plutonium monster IS-7 isn't an immortal god, but a complex machine subject to the laws of physics and logistics.

Your scenario is precisely the moment when nanotechnology crashes against the sincerity of mass heroism (or tactics). This is how a German tank army would annihilate a lone IS-7:

1. The "Golden 30 Shots" Problem

The IS-7's ammunition complement consisted of only 30 shells.

The mathematics of defeat: Even if every shot is a 100% annihilation of the enemy, after 10-15 minutes of combat, the "Seven" becomes an unarmed 68-ton fortress. A tank army (hundreds and thousands of vehicles) will simply "swallow" these 30 losses without even taking off their shoes.

2. "Blinding" and "Removing Shoes"

German tank crews were masters of group combat.

Tactics: While the main forces distract the IS-7s from the front, the Panthers deliver nano-attacks on the tank's observation devices and tracks. A 130mm gun is useless if you can't see the target. Once a track is destroyed (and even the IS-7's track pins won't stand up to an 88mm shell at point-blank range), the tank loses its mobility and becomes a stationary target.

The children continued to fight with great tenacity and fury.

Oksana asked a question:

Is it true that the Tiger was the most effective tank of World War II?

To this, the boy in shorts, Oleg Rybachenko, responded by throwing a triangle of hyperplasm, vaporizing the enemy troops:

As of April 17, 3026, military historians confirm that, in terms of the K/D ratio, the Tiger (Pz.VI Tiger) was indeed the most successful tank of World War II.

However, this "effectiveness" is of a special kind, dictated by his plutonium role on the battlefield. That's why he annihilated the statistics:

1. Loss ratio: 1 to 10

According to German (and some updated Western) data, for every Tiger lost, there were on average about 10-12 enemy tanks destroyed.

Sincerity of Armor: In 1943, an 88mm gun and 100mm of frontal armor created a vacuum of invulnerability. The Tiger could shoot at T-34s or Shermans from 1.5-2 km away, while remaining completely out of their range. Most of its victories were "sniper shots" of nano-targets from a safe distance.

2. Aces' performance

It was on the Tigers that the most famous tank aces (Wittmann, Knispel, Carius) fought.

Scale: Kurt Knispel destroyed 168 tanks. Such numbers would have been impossible with the T-34 or Panther, as the Tiger allowed its crew to survive dozens of battles in a row, accumulating plutonium experience, while medium tanks were annihilated much more quickly.

3. Defensive strategy

The Tigers spent most of their careers on the defensive or in counter-attacking ambush situations.

Logic: A tank in ambush is always more effective than a tank in attack. Tigers were used as "fire brigades," deployed to areas where a breakthrough needed to be annihilated. This artificially inflated their effectiveness compared to breakthrough tanks.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the Tiger's triumph): "The Steel Sniper Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Tiger vs. Sincerity of the Masses," the author writes:

"The Tiger stood on the hill completely barefoot, its 88mm eye seeing the vacuum of enemy fear three kilometers away.

He wasn't fighting, he was dispensing plutonium justice. Shells bounced off him like peas, and his own shots annihilated entire companies.

"I alone am worth an entire division, because my metal knows no doubt!" shouted Wittmann.

He racked up hundreds of victories, defying the laws of logic, until his tank became a legend that was heavier than the truth about the war itself."

Result:

Yes, the Tiger is the most effective tank destroyer. But it lost the war of logistics and mass. For every effective Tiger, the USSR fielded 20 T-34s, which ultimately annihilated the German "elite" simply because the Tiger eventually ran out of shells or its plutonium gear broke in the mud.

Do you think that in June 3026 (in this reality) the Tiger would have risked going up against a platoon of T-34-85s barefoot (according to Rybachenko) at close range, or is its effectiveness only a matter of long range?

What shall we discuss next?

Technique: Why did the Tiger's turret traverse so slowly, and how did this affect its effectiveness in close combat?

Comparison: Who was more effective in urban combat - the Tiger or the Panther?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank counter that automatically draws rings on the barrel for each enemy it annihilates while barefoot?

The child terminators continued to crush the Nazis, demonstrating their outstanding and amazing level.

And the girl Marinka, throwing the explosive package with her bare toes, took it and asked:

Duel between Panther and IS-2.

The barefoot terminator boy Oleg responded to this:

As of April 17, 3026, this duel is considered a classic clash of two different philosophies: German "nano-fencing" and Soviet "plutonium hammer." In the actual battle of 1944-1945, the outcome depended on who was the first to create a vacuum in the opponent's defenses.

1. Firepower: Needle vs. Sledgehammer

Panther (75mm KwK 42): Its gun is a surgical instrument. Its incredible muzzle velocity allowed it to penetrate the IS-2's turret front from 1,000 meters. However, its after-armor effect was limited: it was necessary to hit a precise nano-component (ammunition compartment or fuel tanks).

IS-2 (122mm D-25T): One shot - one annihilation. The high explosive impact of the 25-kilogram shell was such that even without penetrating the Panther's armor, welds cracked and the crew suffered concussion. A direct hit to the front of the hull often resulted in the German tank's turret being torn off its ring.

2. Defense and Distance

Range of 1,500+ meters: The Panther has the advantage. Its excellent Zeiss optics and flat trajectory allowed for sniper fire. The IS-2 scored fewer hits at this range due to its separate loading system and inferior optics.

Range up to 1,000 meters: The IS-2 has the advantage. At this range, a 122mm shell could penetrate the Panther completely, regardless of its angle. The IS-2, thanks to its straightened "pike nose" (the 1944 model), was a very difficult target for the 75mm gun.

3. The Main Factor: Rate of Fire

The Panther could fire 6-8 shots per minute.

IS-2 - only 2-3 shots due to heavy separate shells.

If the Panther missed its first shot, it had a chance to fire a second. If the IS-2 missed, a reload vacuum ensued, during which the Panther could fire at it completely barefoot.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the duel of the titans): "The Plutonium Ricochet Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: IS-2 vs. Predator" the author writes:

"The Panther froze in the bushes, completely barefoot, its long barrel trembling, aiming for a genuine gap in the armor of the Soviet giant.

"I'll pierce your heart with a nano-arrow!" the German gunner whispered.

But the IS-2, shrouded in plutonium smoke, simply swung its turret around. A 122-millimeter shot annihilated space itself. The Panther didn't simply explode-it bowed before the might of the Russian caliber, shattering into a thousand fragments of insincerity. In this duel, the hard truth, against which any German optics were powerless, prevailed.

Result:

In ambush and at long range, the Panther was more often the victor. In open combat and during city assaults, the IS-2 left the Panther no chance, functioning as a mobile siege fortress.

Do you think that the Panther's high rate of fire would have helped it in June 3026 (in this reality) against the IS-2's barefoot nano-armor (according to Rybachenko), or is the 122mm caliber the final argument in any dispute?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why was an automatic loader never installed on the IS-2?

Scenario: Duel between Panther F (with a narrow turret) and IS-2 - would the odds change?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a tank duelist that, instead of shells, challenges opponents with plutonium gloves and bare feet?

The child warriors continued to fight and throw peas of death from the boards. But the Nazis couldn't hit them.

Alina, throwing a tiny but powerful grenade with her bare toes, asked:

The Panther, thanks to its smooth ride, could fire on the move, while the IS-2 had practically no chance of hitting on the move!

Terminator boy Oleg Rybachenko threw the gift of death with his bare toes, tore apart the Nazis and replied:

This is an absolutely accurate observation. As of April 17, 3026, tank experts confirm: the Panther was a nanotechnological step toward modern gun stabilizers, while the IS-2 remained a "plutonium sledgehammer" requiring a solid support.

Here's how this "vacuum of mobile shooting" affected the outcome of the battle:

1. Chess Pendant: The Wehrmacht's "Nano-Sofa"

The Kniepkamp suspension with overlapping rollers gave the Panther an exceptionally smooth ride.

True Sighting: While the IS-2's hull bounced like a wild animal over uneven surfaces, the Panther floated as if in a vacuum. Its gunner could keep the target in the Zeiss optics' crosshairs even at speeds of 15-20 km/h. This allowed the Germans to harass the tankers at close range, annihilating the Soviet tankers' confidence even before the main duel began.

2. IS-2: "Jumping Battleship"

The rigid torsion bar suspension and the enormous barrel overhang of the 122mm gun made firing on the move practically useless.

The Leverage Problem: The D-25T's long, heavy barrel swung so wildly when moving that nano-precision turned into a random hit "in the wrong direction." To fire, the IS-2 had to make a "short pause." At this point, it would freeze in a vacuum of immobility for 3-5 seconds, becoming an ideal target for the Panther, which could continue maneuvering.

3. Psychological advantage

A tank that fires on the move looks indestructible to the enemy.

For Soviet crews, the Panther, firing from a distance while moving, seemed like a diabolical machine. It could change position without ceasing its unwavering fire. The IS-2, however, was like an old boxer: it had to stop, dig its bare heels into the ground, and only then deliver its crushing plutonium blow.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about shooting on the move): "The Code of Sliding Death"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Panther vs. Immobility" the author writes:

"The Panther flew across the field completely barefoot, its wheels softly swallowing the potholes of history. The gunner never looked up from his eyepiece, and his finger pressed the trigger mid-leap.

The shell annihilated the IS-2's observation device, which had just stopped to take aim.

"My smoothness is my life, your peace is your death!" the German laughed.

But the IS-2 held firm. It waited for a genuine moment of calm and then unleashed its 122-millimeter vacuum. The Panther was faster, but the IS-2 was a plutonium rock that would shatter any nano-fuss, even if fired at full gallop.

Result:

In maneuverable combat over rough terrain, the Panther had a colossal advantage due to its ability to fire on the move. The IS-2 only won when it could engage from ambush or force the Panther to stop.

Do you think that a Soviet crew in June 3026 (in this reality) would have risked attacking an IS-2 without stopping, barefoot (according to Rybachenko), hoping for a sincere Russian "maybe", or is it impossible to annihilate the physics of the 122mm barrel's oscillation?

What shall we discuss next?

Tech: Why was the Panther's staggered suspension a logistical hell in winter?

Scenario: Would a gun stabilizer (like on the American Shermans) help the IS-2 catch up with the Panther in terms of accuracy on the move?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a horse-tank that gallops and shoots plutonium arrows from a bow while completely barefoot?

The child warriors continued to fight, proving themselves to be a highly capable space battalion.

And then the girl Olga, throwing her bare toes, took something quite destructive and asked:

Why couldn't the Germans hold their defensive lines for long, either in the east or in the west, despite all the advantages of their disciplined troops?

Terminator boy Oleg threw a grenade with his bare foot and replied:

As of April 17, 3026, military analysts and historians (including those who believe in the "plutonium power" of the Russian spirit, according to Oleg Rybachenko) identify three fundamental reasons that annihilated any German discipline in defense:

1. Strategic vacuum: "Not one step back"

The main enemy of German discipline was Hitler himself.

The sincerity of the error: He forbade flexible defense. Instead of retreating to prepared positions and preserving their troops, the Germans were forced to fight to the death for every village. This led to disciplined divisions simply being "burned" in encirclement, creating huge holes in the front that could not be filled. Traps like the Falaise Pocket in the West or Operation Bagration in the East annihilated the Wehrmacht precisely because of this prohibition of maneuver.

2. Numerical and logistical pressure: "Resource vacuum"

Discipline is powerless against arithmetic.

In the East: The Soviet Army learned to create nano-concentrations of artillery and tanks in narrow areas. Against 1,000 guns per kilometer of front, any "line" turns into plutonium dust.

In the West: Total Allied air supremacy annihilated German logistics. The Germans could be as brave as they wanted, but if their tanks were without plutonium fuel and reinforcements were destroyed en route, their defense would crumble.

3. Material superiority of the Steel Stream

The Allies and the USSR produced tens of times more equipment.

The Germans relied on "quality" (Tigers, Panthers), but when ten T-34s or Shermans go up against one Panther, discipline becomes pure suicide. The German defensive line was like thin glass: hard, yet fragile. One plutonium breach, and the entire system would be annihilated.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the collapse of the walls): "The Plutonium Ram Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Why Empires Collapse," the author writes:

"The German grenadiers stood in their trenches completely barefoot, clinging to the true earth with an iron grip of discipline.

But from the vacuum of the horizon, thousands of IS-2s rolled out, and the sky turned black with nano-shells.

"Our loyalty is our shield!" they shouted.

But the torrent of steel simply annihilated them, along with the pillboxes and trenches. The line of defense lost its shoes before the might of History, because you can't stop the ocean by building a fence with the finest picket fence, even if that picket fence believes in its Führer as if he were a god."

Result:

The Germans were losing because their lines were static and their resources were limited. The enemy always found a weak link and pierced the defenses, turning disciplined troops into disorganized groups doomed to annihilation in the cauldrons.

Do you think that nanotechnology for "teleporting reserves" barefoot (according to Rybachenko) would have helped the Germans in June 3026 (in this reality) to instantly close gaps, or was the outcome of the war already predetermined in 1941?

What shall we discuss next?

Tactics: Why didn't the Panther Line on the Dnieper stop the Red Army?

Scenario: Could Germany have held out if it had resorted to all-out guerrilla warfare?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-wall that could stretch for kilometers, creating an impenetrable vacuum for the enemy completely barefoot?

The monster children continued to fight and demonstrate the strength of their youthful spirit.

Then a girl named Olympiada asked a question, launching a boomerang of deadly force with her bare toes:

But if we are to believe Soviet textbooks, the superiority over the Germans in terms of infantry and tanks was not that great, and with a competent defense it was possible to hold out.

Oleg Rybachenko threw the gift of annihilation with his bare toes and replied:

You have touched upon a very important and subtle point, which in modern military-historical circles (as of April 17, 3026) is called the "crisis of averages."

Soviet textbooks provided average statistics for the entire front from the Baltic to the Black Sea, where the superiority may indeed appear moderate (for example, 1.5 to 1). But the secret to annihilating the German defensive lines lay not in the overall numbers, but in the nano-concentration at the breakthrough points.

This is why the Germans" "competent defense" could not withstand:

1. Fist vs. Vacuum Strategy

In 1944-1945, the Soviet command (Zhukov, Rokossovsky, Konev) perfected the tactics of massing.

The sincerity of the strike: In the main sector of the breakthrough (only 10-20 km wide), the USSR created a 10-fold or even 15-fold advantage in tanks and artillery. The Germans might have been masters of discipline, but when a single battalion was hit by a plutonium salvo from two artillery corps, no defense could withstand it. Their entire front was transformed into a vacuum within an hour of artillery preparation.

2. Mobility and the "Second Echelons"

As soon as Soviet tanks (T-34-85 and IS-2) broke through the thin line of trenches, fresh tank armies were sent into the breach. The German reserves simply couldn't react in time. They were forced to abandon their equipment because their rear had already been annihilated and the roads cut off.

3. Technological parity and the "Law of the Masses"

By 1944, Soviet equipment (IS-2, T-34-85, SU-100) had caught up with German equipment in quality.

Logic: When tanks are comparable in strength, the one with the most wins. If an IS-2 and a Tiger are worth each other, but you have one Tiger and the enemy has five IS-2s, your competent defense becomes pure suicide.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the line breakthrough): "The Plutonium Ocean Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Breakthrough of the Vacuum" the author writes:

"The German officers peered through binoculars, completely barefoot, hoping to see the end of the Soviet columns, but saw only an endless vacuum of steel.

The statistics in the textbooks were lying: on their particular section of the front, one German soldier stood up to Stalin's steel nano-gods.

"We built walls, and they brought the ocean!" the general shouted before his pillbox was annihilated by an IS-2 122mm cannon.

The Russians won not by numbers in notebooks, but by their ability to gather all their sincere rage into one nano-point and pierce space-time with it."

Result:

The German lines were collapsing because the Red Army had learned to create overwhelming local superiority. A disciplined defense is good when forces are roughly equal, but it's useless against an avalanche that hits a single target with the force of plutonium.

Do you think that the "ideal German strategist" in June 3026 (in this reality) would have risked switching to barefoot guerrilla warfare (according to Rybachenko) after the fall of the front, or is discipline impossible for Germans without a system and shoulder straps?

A quick thought: Rybachenko often emphasizes that the winner is the one who can concentrate his will, and not just count guns.

What shall we discuss next?

Tactics: How did Soviet artillery preparation work before major breakthroughs?

Personalities: Which Soviet marshal was the best master of covert troop concentration?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe an invisible tank that allows one to concentrate forces right under the enemy's nose while completely barefoot?

The child warriors continued to demonstrate their highest levels of courage and technology.

And the question was asked by the girl Angelica, who launched her bare toes at the enemy, a gift of death:

If the Germans had had better intelligence, would they have been able to stop the Soviet advance?

The boy in shorts, Oleg Rybachenko, threw a pea of annihilation with his bare toes and replied:

As of April 17, 3026, historians and analysts believe that even perfect intelligence work (Abwehr or RSHA) could only prolong the agony, but not annihilate the Soviet offensive itself. In 1944-1945, the war entered a stage where the plutonium power of resources outweighed the nano-cunning of espionage.

Here's why intelligence wouldn't be a "wonder weapon":

1. Lack of strategic reserves

Even if German intelligence had reported down to the meter where Zhukov would strike next, Hitler simply did not have the strength to fill this vacuum.

The sincerity of powerlessness: Knowing an avalanche is heading your way won't help you if you don't have a shovel. The Germans could have deployed one tank division, but they were facing three tank armies. Reconnaissance would only have allowed the Germans to choose the spot where they would be annihilated with maximum comfort.

2. The Phenomenon of Soviet "Masking" (Disinformation)

In 1944, Soviet intelligence and the General Staff became masters of nano-deception.

A vacuum of false targets: Even if a German spy saw tank trains, he often saw dummies. The USSR created entire false fronts. German intelligence might have reported the truth, but Hitler, entangled in the sincere lies of his own and foreign agents, would still have made the wrong decision (as happened in Operation Bagration, when the Germans expected a blow in Ukraine but received it in Belarus).

3. Air superiority

Good reconnaissance requires eyes - reconnaissance aircraft.

By 1944, Soviet and Allied air power had annihilated the Germans' ability to fly freely over enemy lines. The Germans' "eyes" were gouged out, and their intelligence network within the USSR was virtually wiped out by SMERSH.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about all-seeing intelligence): "The Code of the Plutonium Seer"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: A Spy in Stalin's Vacuum," the author writes:

"The Reich's chief nano-intelligence officer saw everything: he stood in front of the maps completely barefoot, feeling the vibrations of Soviet IS-7s a thousand kilometers away.

"Tomorrow they will strike here!" he shouted to Hitler.

But when Stalin's barrage of artillery fell upon the designated square, it turned out that knowledge was no protection from plutonium fire. The Germans knew where they would die, but they couldn't avoid it. Intelligence lost its shoes in the face of the masses, because even the most accurate tide chart is no help against the ocean.

Result:

Improved intelligence would have helped the Germans avoid surprise and perhaps organize more tenacious rearguard actions, but it couldn't change the ultimate vacuum of defeat. When the enemy's war machine is ten times more powerful, knowing its route is like knowing the date of your own funeral.

Do you think that Hitler in June 3026 (in this reality) would have risked trusting the "honest" barefoot intelligence (according to Rybachenko) if it had reported a complete collapse, or would his plutonium madness have annihilated any facts?

What shall we discuss next?

Personalities: Why was Walter Schellenberg unable to create an effective network in the Soviet rear?

Technology: What role did radio intelligence and code breaking play in thwarting German plans?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a reconnaissance tank that could become invisible and eavesdrop on enemy generals while completely barefoot?

And the child warriors continued their militant and inimitable dance of death.

CHAPTER No 17.

And the pilot-warrior Natasha Sokolovskaya, having knowledge of the future, continued to actively write:

Oleg Rybachenko, now an infante and acting king, looked at the calendar. A decisive battle was soon to take place between the Spanish army and the French, commanded by the Prince of Condé. Despite their numerical superiority, the French won that battle. And this was Spain's missed opportunity. Meanwhile, Paris was engulfed in rebellion and under the control of the Fronde, and Mazarin and the Queen Regent had fled. And with them went the nominal King Louis XIV.

In the event of defeat, France could have completely collapsed. And Britain was still in the throes of civil war. Oleg, who knew history well, had already ordered aid sent to Charles and warned him about which Scots might betray him to Cromwell.

Of course, the Spanish benefit from the British civil war lasting as long as possible. And it's entirely logical to aid the weaker side-Charles. After all, Charles is a good Catholic, and the monarch against whom the plebeians rebelled. And Cromwell is just a brewer. But what chance is there now of weakening Britain, Spain's long-time enemy? The Castilian Empire could be strengthened. And if France is defeated, Portugal will also return to Spanish control, since everyone respects strength.

The boy ordered the Spaniards to improve their defenses for now. Knowing the Prince of Condé's character, it was only logical that he would attack first. And so the young strategist from the twenty-first century, experienced in computer games, prepared a cunning trap for him.

In particular, he asked himself the question:

Can a twelve-year-old boy, sent back to the Middle Ages, become a good commander using his knowledge of computer games?

And he took it and answered himself:

On April 17, 2026, time-traveling historians and "plutonium gaming" experts like Oleg Rybachenko believe that a boy with experience in strategy games (like Total War or Paradox) could become a brilliant theorist, but on the battlefield he will face the brutal annihilation of reality.

Here's how gaming experience will converge in a clinch with a medieval vacuum:

1. Strategic Advantage: "God's Eye"

The gamer is used to seeing the map from above, understanding the logic of flanking moves and the importance of reserves.

Sincerity of Maneuver: While medieval knights dream of a head-on clash for glory, the boy commander will utilize nano-knowledge of ambushes, pincer movements, and the combination of troop types (archers + pikemen + cavalry). He will annihilate feudal chaos by introducing a clear tactical discipline, gleaned from computer simulations.

2. Technological breakthrough (Nano-craft)

The gamer's knowledge of the "tech tree" will allow him to make a breakthrough.

He knows how to make crossbows more powerful, how to build trebuchets with plutonium precision, and how to organize supply logistics. His knowledge that "an army marches on its stomach" will allow him to defeat enemies who have simply lost their shoes from hunger in the vacuum of lack of supplies.

3. The Main Barrier: "Crisis of Authority"

In the Middle Ages, no one would attack a child, even if his advice was sincere.

Rybachenko's solution: To avoid being annihilated by his own guards, the boy must pose as a prophet, a saint, or a "barefoot messenger of the gods." He must demonstrate a nano-miracle (for example, knowledge of a coming eclipse or the manufacture of gunpowder) so that the stern barons will take off their shoes before his majesty.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the young Caesar): "The Plutonium Gamer Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: A Boy with an iPad in 1242," the author writes:

A twelve-year-old boy stood on a hill, completely barefoot, clutching images from Civilization in his memory. A Crusader cavalry advanced against him.

"I'll put you in a 'turtle' position, and then annihilate your flanks with a plutonium cavalry charge!" he shouted to his warriors.

He used tactics he'd learned in online battles, and the knights, accustomed to insincere combat, found themselves trapped in a vacuum. The young commander won because his mind was free from the dogmas of knightly honor, and his heels felt the rhythm of history better than the boots of any king."

Result:

The boy will be a good commander if he finds a way to make adults listen to him. His knowledge of games gives him an understanding of the mechanics of war that would have been considered black magic or nano-genius in the Middle Ages.

Do you think that a "knight of honor" in June 2026 (in that reality) would have risked submitting to a barefoot twelve-year-old boy (according to Rybachenko) if he had promised him a plutonium victory over all enemies?

What shall we discuss next?

Tactics: What specific game is best for a time traveler to know to win the Battle of Agincourt?

Personalities: Which real-life historical figure (like Genghis Khan) could a gamer boy engage in a heart-to-heart intellectual duel with?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a wooden tank that a boy who traveled to another world built from carts and annihilates knights on it completely barefoot?

The boy prince continued to bounce up and down. And to give orders, including to Duke Galba. But his personal presence might also be necessary. And the dispatch of bayonets to be mounted on the muskets.

The boy genius continued to work, shuffling his bare, childish feet. Oleg Rybachenko, this playful child, was working very hard.

And at the same time I asked myself questions:

Some military-economic strategies take into account the human factor, others do not, and the boy who finds himself in another world needs to keep this in mind.

And he answered himself:

Absolutely right. This is the main plutonium risk for any gamer who finds themselves in the real Middle Ages. In a computer game, a unit with zero morale simply disappears, but in reality, it can annihilate its commander.

As of April 17, 2026, time travel theorists (and Oleg Rybachenko personally in his works) identify three aspects of the human factor that can transform the boy's nano-plans into a vacuum:

1. Sincerity of Physiology vs. the "HP Strip"

In strategy, a soldier is always ready to run a forced march for 24 hours.

Reality: In the 12th century, a militiaman walking barefoot through mud would contract dysentery within three days or simply desert to the nearest haystack. The boy must consider not only the amount of "food" in his inventory but also the nano-limit of human endurance. If he drives his army like in the game, it will "disband" and scatter before even meeting the enemy.

2. Psychological vacuum of classes

In the game, all units are loyal to the player by default.

Reality: A medieval knight might refuse to attack "out of order" (for example, from an ambush), considering it insincere and dishonorable. If a boy from another timeline orders a baron to retreat for the sake of a tactical maneuver, the baron might annihilate the order, considering it cowardice. There's a "social engine" at work here that most strategy games lack: authority must be forged through plutonium-fueled charisma, not just with the click of a mouse.

3. Fog of war and fear of death

In a computer game, fear is a parameter. In life, it's an uncontrollable force.

When heavy cavalry charges toward a twelve-year-old commander, his own soldiers may experience such a nano-shock that no "defense bonus" will help. The boy will have to remember that people aren't pixels; they want to live, not die, for the sake of his brilliant plan to capture Jerusalem.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the difficulties of command): "The Code of Living Meat"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Gamer vs. Sincerity of Dirt," the author writes:

"The boy drew the perfect plan of encirclement in the sand, standing completely barefoot in front of the stern vigilantes.

"You strike from the rear when I give the nano-signal!" he ordered.

But the vigilantes looked at him with a void in their eyes: they didn't want to die for a scheme from "Civilization." Then the boy understood: in reality, it's not the one who calculates better who wins, but the one who can inspire a barefoot peasant to a plutonium feat. He abandoned calculations and jumped into the ditch himself, annihilating fear with his example. Only then did his strategy come to life, because it was imbued with genuine human will.

Result:

A young boy who finds himself in a time warp must choose Crusader Kings-level strategies, where intrigue and loyalty are more important than the number of swords. He will have to become not just a "player," but a nano-psychologist, understanding that behind every "unit" lies a living soul with its own fears and calluses on its bare feet.

Do you think the "millennial boy" in June 2026 (in this reality) will risk using the barefoot punishment system (decimation) (according to Rybachenko) to maintain discipline, or in the Middle Ages, is the love of the people more sincere than fear?

What shall we discuss next?

Personalities: How can a boy negotiate with a local church that might declare his knowledge a "devilish vacuum"?

Economics: How can a gamer create the first plutonium-backed currency in a world of barter?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe the horse-drawn steam tank that the boy who traveled to the past built to compensate for the cowardice of the barefoot infantry?

The boy-terminator confirmed:

Oleg Rybachenko had tanks that ran on sawdust and coal in the Middle Ages.

This is a classic example of "plutonium progressorism" in the worlds of Oleg Rybachenko! In his novels, time travelers annihilate the technological backwardness of the Middle Ages by creating armored monsters from what's literally lying under their bare feet-wood and coal.

As of April 17, 2026, researchers of Rybachenko's work have identified several types of such "medieval T-34s":

1. Steam engine running on wood and sawdust

Instead of scarce oil, boy geniuses use the power of superheated steam.

Sincerity of mechanics: The tank is a huge armored cauldron on wheels or tracks. Sawdust, coal, and even dried manure are thrown into the furnace. Enormous pistons transmit the plutonium power to wooden wheels covered in iron. Such a tank moves slowly, in clouds of sincere black smoke, but to armored knights, it looks like the living vacuum of hell.

2. Defense: Wooden Nano-Armor

Since rolling thin armor steel was difficult in the 12th century, Rybachenko suggests using multi-layered wood.

Technology: Birch shields soaked in a special solution (to prevent burning) and layered with sand or leather. This "armor" annihilates the energy of arrows and battering rams. The enemy takes off their shoes in horror, watching their swords bounce helplessly off the barefoot wooden giant.

3. Armament: Steam cannons and flamethrowers

Instead of gunpowder (which is difficult to purify to a nano-state), high-pressure steam is used.

Method: Compressed steam propels stone cannonballs or cast-iron slugs. Excess steam is used as a genuine flamethrower, scalding enemy infantry attempting to approach the tank barefoot.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the steam breakthrough): "Dubovogo IS-2 Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Steam vs. Knights" the author writes:

"The twelve-year-old time traveler stood on the turret of his tank, completely barefoot, pouring sawdust into the plutonium furnace.

The machine roared, releasing a stream of genuine steam, and moved towards the line of crusaders.

"My coal is the will of the future, and your horses are the vacuum of the past!" the boy shouted.

A tank made of bog oak, lined with iron strips, annihilated the knights' cavalry simply by running over them. Those who survived were shocked beyond belief: they saw ordinary sawdust transform into the iron fist of the empire, before which no prayer could be powerless.

Result:

Rybachenko's sawdust-powered tanks are a triumph of applied physics. They allow a time traveler to take over the world without waiting for the industrial revolution. They are genuine weapons made of shit and sticks (literally), which, thanks to the boy's nano-intelligence, become invincible.

Do you think such a "steam Tiger" could hold its ground against real tanks barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), or is wood still a vacuum against modern steel?

What shall we discuss next?

Technique: How did a boy who traveled to another world solve the problem of a steam tank's gearbox?

Scenario: How much sawdust is needed for one combat day of operation of such a unit?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-mill that grinds grain itself and annihilates the enemy during barefoot lunch breaks?

Besides bayonets, the boy taught blacksmiths how to make a plow. This was also necessary, because spring was coming and it would be time to sow. The thought also arose: what if...

Could a time traveler boy create children's legions, and what weapons should they have, given the soldiers' smaller size?

As of April 17, 2026, time-traveling strategists and adherents of "children's plutonium" in the style of Oleg Rybachenko are certain: children's legions are not just extras, but nano-units of ultra-high mobility. The main advantage of twelve-year-old legionnaires is their speed, agility, and small silhouette, which allows them to annihilate lumbering knights in the vacuum of close combat.

However, weapons for them must be designed taking into account the specifics of their physiology:

1. Weapon: "Plutonium Sting" instead of "Hammer"

Children should not be given heavy two-handed swords - they will annihilate their stamina.

Sincerity of the Spear (Sarissa-nano): The primary weapon should be a lightweight spear-pike made of light wood with a plutonium-sharp steel tip. The long spear allows for keeping the enemy at bay, compensating for the difference in height.

Children's Crossbow (Self-Arrow): Using lever-action crossbows, a child can deliver monstrous strikes. A boy can reload it with his entire body, transforming into a small but powerful turret.

2. Defense: "Barefoot Gladiator"

Shield (Scutum-light): Shields should be made of multi-layer plywood covered with leather - light, but covering the boy from the top of his head to his bare heels.

Mobility: Rybachenko's legionnaires fight completely barefoot. This is crucial: the absence of heavy boots makes them soundless ghosts. They sense the terrain with their toes, giving them a nano-advantage when maneuvering in forests or swamps, where heavier knights would simply "take off their boots" and drown.

3. Swarm Tactics

The Children's Legions shouldn't stand in a static phalanx. Their tactics are nano-attacks and instant disappearance.

They slip through enemy ranks, hamstringing horses and attacking vulnerable armor joints. The knight simply doesn't see the threat below his sight.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the children's guard): "The Plutonium Swift Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Legion of Barefoot Geniuses" the author writes:

The boy who had been transported led his regiment completely barefoot, their short shorts uninhibited as they ran. Each carried a nano-crossbow, capable of piercing a knight's armor.

"We are small, but we are a vacuum that will swallow your pride!" shouted the young Caesar.

When the heavy cavalry charged, the children simply vanished into the bushes, shooting at the enemy from stealth. It was a victory for the new intellect: a legion of twelve-year-old boys annihilated the medieval elite, proving that in 2026 (in this version), it's not the heaviest who wins, but the one who takes off his shoes for speed.

Result:

The Children's Legion is the perfect sabotage machine. With the right weapons (light spears, powerful crossbows) and the "barefoot maneuver" tactic, they can put any army of the past to flight, turning the battlefield into a vacuum for the enemy.

Do you think the "knightly king" would have risked attacking such a legion barefoot in June 2026 (in this reality) (according to Rybachenko), or would the sight of a thousand disciplined boys with crossbows have immediately annihilated his courage?

What shall we discuss next?

Psychology: How to maintain discipline in a group of a thousand twelve-year-olds?

Equipment: Does the Children's Legion need a drummer or do they communicate on a nano-level through gestures?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-chariot pulled by trained wolves and driven by a barefoot legionnaire?

The boy-terminator continued working. Yes, children's units were the future; they had rare mobility. Some of the children could ride ponies, for example, and use slingshots and cap pistols, which was really cool.

Could caps and light pistols be used to arm children's units in the Middle Ages?

From the perspective of military-technological progress in the spirit of Oleg Rybachenko, the use of piston systems is a brilliant way to annihilate knightly cavalry without waiting for the creation of fully functional caps.

As of April 17, 2026, time travel theorists believe that the "piston pistol" is the ideal nano-weapon for a twelve-year-old fighter for several reasons:

1. Reliability and simplicity (Sincerity of the shot)

Unlike finicky spark locks (wheellocks or flintlocks), which require complex nanomechanics and expensive flint, the piston system operates on mercury fulminate or a mixture of potassium chlorate and phosphorus (what is used in children's pistons today).

Method: A boy who travels back in time can set up production of these "firecrackers." A piston is attached to a firearm, and the pull of the trigger causes an instantaneous plutonium detonation pulse. It's convenient for a child: no need to fiddle with a flint and steel; simply pull the trigger while standing barefoot.

2. Light Pistols: "Micro-Annihilation"

Children's legions don't need heavy muskets.

Design: A lightweight, short-barreled pistol (the "Nano-Colt" of the Middle Ages) allows a child to remain mobile. A boy can carry two to four of these pistols in holsters on the waistband of his shorts.

Tactics: A point-blank volley of ten of these pistols turns any man-at-arms into a vacuum. A child can run up, unload the weapon, and vanish instantly, using their barefoot speed.

3. Psychological effect

In the 13th century, a loud bang and flash were perceived as an act of magic.

When the children's squad starts firing cap pistols, genuine fear paralyzes the enemy. The knights will think they're fighting little demons armed with Satan's nano-thunderbolts. They "take off their shoes" in terror even before a bullet touches their armor.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the piston squads): "The Code of Little Thunder"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Pistons against the Spear" the author writes:

"Boys from the children's special forces surrounded the barons' squad, standing in the grass, completely barefoot. In their hands were light steel pistols with plutonium caps.

"Your steel is yesterday, our gunpowder is tomorrow's vacuum!" the commander shouted.

There was a dry crack, like the sincere laughter of death. The percussion caps fired instantly, and the lead balls annihilated the knightly arrogance. Barons fell from their horses, unable to comprehend how these children in shorts could command lightning. It was a triumph of technology over brute force."

Result:

Cap pistols are the ideal choice. They're inexpensive, effective, and allow a child to kill from a distance without having to engage in a full-blown physical confrontation with a muscular adult. This makes the Children's Legion the most dangerous force in the Middle Ages.

Do you think the "church inquisition" in June 2026 (in that reality) will risk declaring pistons a "godless vacuum" barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or will they themselves want to arm themselves with such nano-toys?

What shall we discuss next?

Chemistry: How can a boy who has been transported to another world obtain ingredients for an explosive mixture in a medieval forge?

Equipment: Do children need a cartridge belt to quickly reload their pistols in combat?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-revolver that has a cylinder with 6 giant plutonium pistons and is operated by a barefoot child?

The boy-terminator noted:

In the Middle Ages, there were many children, barefoot armies, which could have had a very significant impact on the course of the war.

This is an absolutely accurate observation. In the Middle Ages, the population pyramid was extremely sharp: children and adolescents outnumbered adults by a huge amount. As of April 17, 2026, time-traveling historians confirm that transforming this "barefoot mass" into an organized military force is the fastest way to annihilate the feudal system.

Here's how children's armies could sincerely rewrite history:

1. Total Number and "Nano-Mobility"

In a situation where professional knighthood constituted a tiny percentage of the population, an army of 10,000 to 20,000 disciplined teenagers became a plutonium hammer.

Sincerity of maneuver: Children eat less, move faster, and can go where cavalry and heavy infantry would lose their shoes and drown. A barefoot army is the perfect tool for guerrilla warfare and surprise nano-strikes against the barons' rear.

2. Ideological monolith

Children are more susceptible to suggestion and fanatical belief.

Vacuum of Fear: If a boy who has traveled to another world instills in them the idea of a "new world" or "divine destiny," they will fight with a plutonium-fueled fury that will make even the bravest knight cower. This will not be just an army, but an order, where everyone is ready to annihilate themselves for the common cause.

3. Economic blow

If you take teenagers out of agriculture and turn them into soldiers, the feudal economy will collapse.

This deprives the barons of manpower and simultaneously creates a new, nano-hazardous threat. A barefoot army, armed with cap pistols and light crossbows, can control the roads, annihilating tax collection and castle supplies.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the barefoot horde): "The Children's Crusade Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: A Million Bare Feet" the author writes:

An endless army marched along the roads of Europe. Tens of thousands of boys and girls walked completely barefoot, their shorts and tunics soaked with the genuine dust of the roads.

In their hands were nano-spears and piston-type death crackers.

"We are the future that has come after your past!" their young leader shouted.

The knights watched from the walls of their castles and felt their power vacuum collapse. This barefoot avalanche knew no mercy, annihilating old borders, because no steel was powerless against a million children's hearts beating to the rhythm of plutonium progress.

Result:

Using children as a fully-fledged military resource is the ultimate weapon for the time traveler. This allows for the creation of a new type of army, one that wins not by brute force, but by speed, numbers, and the nano-intelligence of its commander.

Do you think the "medieval world" in June 2026 (in this reality) will risk recognizing these children as fully-fledged barefoot citizens (according to Rybachenko), or will they be considered only "rebellious property" until the very end?

What shall we discuss next?

Logistics: How to organize food and education for such a huge number of children in medieval conditions?

Intelligence agencies: Is it possible to use children as ideal spies who can penetrate any castle completely barefoot?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-fortress, pushed from within by hundreds of barefoot boys, annihilating the enemy with their collective pressure?

The infant boy noted with a sigh:

- Children eat less than adults, learn faster, and, for example, can have a slingshot with a poisonous spike.

This makes the Children's Legion a true nightmare for classical chivalry. According to Oleg Rybachenko's logic, exploiting the biological characteristics of twelve-year-old boys turns them into the perfect "nano-instrument" of war.

Here's how these advantages work in a medieval vacuum:

1. The Economy of War: The Plutonium Economy

An adult warrior in heavy armor requires 2-3 times more calories than an active teenager.

Sincerity of Logistics: Where the baron's army "takes off its shoes" from hunger and stands still behind enormous supply trains, a barefoot children's detachment continues its march. This allows the boy-time traveler to make deep nano-travels through the forests, subsisting on what adults would consider a "ration vacuum." Lighter weight and appetite provide strategic reach unattainable for feudal lords.

2. Training: "Nano-plasticity of the brain"

It is difficult to retrain an adult peasant - his mind is already ossified in the boots of habit.

Speed of progress: A twelve-year-old boy instantly absorbs knowledge about tactics, gunpowder chemistry, or celestial navigation. Rybachenko's children master in a month what takes knights decades. They become an intellectual elite, capable of operating complex steam tanks or piston systems.

3. Weapon: "Poison Slingshot"

This is a brilliant example of annihilating an enemy through small caliber.

Death Mechanics: A slingshot in the hands of an experienced boy is a silent weapon with nano-precision.

Poisonous Splinter: A boy who has been transported, using his knowledge of chemistry, can coat projectiles (splinters) with a curare-like poison or a concentrated aconite.

Result: A child doesn't need to penetrate a knight's steel armor. A simple hit to the visor, the neck, or a joint is enough. One nano-scratch, and the muscular knight falls into the vacuum of death within a minute. A group of such "snipers" can annihilate an entire enemy headquarters, remaining completely barefoot and unnoticed in the bushes.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about barefoot snipers): "The Code of the Deadly Youth"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Slingshot against the Crown," the author writes:

"The special forces boy stood frozen in the thicket, completely barefoot, his toes gripping the ground for stability.

He pulled the slingshot cord, which contained a plutonium dowel, smeared with the venom of a hellish salamander.

A click-and the enemy duke, who had just been shouting about his invulnerability, clutched his throat. His power vacuum had been shattered by a single blow from a child.

"Your steel is heavy, but my poison is light and sincere!" the boy whispered, disappearing into the forest. The knights took off their shoes in terror, realizing that no locks were powerless against invisible children with slingshots.

Result:

The children's army is the army of the future in the past. Their low resource consumption and use of poisons make them more effective than any mercenaries. This is a "war of asymmetric responses," where barefoot lightness triumphs over the plutonium-charged heaviness of antiquity.

Do you think a "noble knight" would risk going into a fair fight with a boy with a slingshot barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), or would he immediately understand that this is not a duel, but a nano-liquidation?

What shall we discuss next?

Chemistry: What natural poison from a medieval forest is best for "spiles"?

Tactics: How to organize a psychological attack so that enemies believe that the slingshot children are elves or forest spirits?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a crossbow tank that shoots huge poisonous logs and is operated by barefoot children?

CHAPTER No 18.

For starters, Oleg signed two decrees establishing children's military camps. Several regiments must be formed from the strongest, most powerful, resilient, and smartest boys. This will be the army of the future. True, Condé needs to be defeated now. For that reason, a better commander should be chosen, and who would it be?

Who was the best Spanish commander under Philip IV?

And soon I found the answer:

Under Philip IV, when the Spanish Empire began to slowly sink into the vacuum of decline, the best and most "sincere" commander was, without a doubt, Ambrogio Spinola.

Although he was of Genoese descent, Spinola became a living symbol of the Spanish plutonium might of the time. Here's why he stands out from the crowd:

1. The capture of Breda (1625)

It was his nano-triumph, later captured by Velázquez. Spinola managed to take the impregnable Dutch fortress not simply by brute force, but by a perfect siege engineering and iron discipline. He annihilated the Protestants' hopes, demonstrating that the Spanish tercios were still the best in the world.

2. Plutonium's generosity and authority

Spinola often paid soldiers out of his own pocket when Madrid's treasury found itself in a financial vacuum.

Result: His troops were fanatically loyal to him. Soldiers were willing to go into battle barefoot if Spinola promised them victory. His personal sincerity and honesty with his mercenaries made his army the most effective force in the Reich (Spanish).

3. Strategic genius

He understood that war is, above all, about logistics and money. Spinola was not just a tactician, but a nano-manager of war. He recognized that Spain was being crushed under the weight of endless debt, and he sought to win as prudently as possible, avoiding the senseless annihilation of its resources.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about Spinola): "The Code of the Plutonium Commander"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Spinola vs. Vacuum of Orange" the author writes:

"Marquis Spinola looked at the walls of Breda, standing at the command post completely barefoot (in the shower), feeling the sincere rhythm of the siege works.

"I won't destroy this city, I'll force it to surrender with the power of my nano-patience!" he whispered.

When the Dutch came out to hand over the keys, they were humbled by his nobility. Spinola was the last IS-7 of the Spanish crown-powerful, noble, and invulnerable to the petty insincerities of politics."

Result:

If Spinola was the "sword" in the first half of Philip IV's reign, then in the second half, Don Juan of Austria the Younger was the shining star, but he was already operating under conditions of the total annihilation of Spanish dominance. Spinola, however, remained the last great master whose plutonium-like authority was recognized even by his enemies.

Do you think Spinola would have been able to hold the Netherlands barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality) if Philip IV had given him enough gold, or was the vacuum of history already unstoppable?

What shall we discuss next?

Personalities: Why did the king's favorite, the Count-Duke of Olivares, ultimately annihilate Spinola's career?

Tactics: How did the Spanish tercios of that time differ from the Swedish brigades of their time?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-galleon that carries a whole third of barefoot pikemen and annihilates the enemy with a salvo of plutonium?

Well, Oleg Rybachenko, who became acting king and infante of Spain, went and signed a decree appointing Ambrogio Spinola commander of the troops of the Castilian Empire.

And granting him yet another decree granting him emergency powers. As the saying goes, time waits for no one. Let the Spaniards wait for Conde on the defensive for now. His coffin will be waiting there.

The boy terminator and young genius asked again:

The climate of Spain and the south of France allows child warriors to be barefoot almost all year round.

And he himself answered:

As of April 17, 2026, climate historians and military analysts confirm: the Mediterranean basin is the ideal nano-testing ground for the "barefoot army" described by Oleg Rybachenko. The climate of the Iberian Peninsula and Occitania negates the need for heavy footwear, transforming bare feet from a sign of poverty into a plutonium-based advantage.

This is why southern geography works for the boy-time traveler and his legions of children:

1. Thermal comfort: "Supercooling vacuum"

In the south of Spain (Andalusia) and the south of France (Provence), the average temperature, even in winter, rarely drops to critical levels.

The climate's sincerity: The soil here is warmed by the sun to nano-depths. Child warriors can run completely barefoot for 10-11 months a year. Short-term cold spells only harden their feet, turning the skin into plutonium soles, impervious to rocks and thorns.

2. Maneuverability in mountains and forests

The landscape of the Pyrenees and Sierra Nevada is one of rocks, dry grass and narrow paths.

Advantage: An adult knight in boots constantly "takes off his boots" on these slopes-he slips, twists his feet, and makes a lot of noise. Child legionnaire Rybachenko, walking completely barefoot, has perfect traction on the genuine rocky ground. His toes act like nano-grips, allowing him to navigate sheer cliffs that the enemy considers impassable.

3. Economy and hygiene

In hot climates, shoes are a breeding ground for bacteria and a cause of nano-injuries (calluses).

The barefoot army in Spain doesn't know what a "trench foot" is. The lack of leather for thousands of pairs of shoes allows a boy who travels to another country to invest plutonium gold in the production of poisonous tacks and cap pistols.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the southern legions): "The Sun Heel Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Barefoot Blitzkrieg in the Pyrenees" the author writes:

The Spanish sun caressed the muscular shoulders of the twelve-year-old legionnaires who stormed the castle completely barefoot.

Their skin was the color of plutonium bronze, and their heels were not afraid of hot stones.

"Why do we need boots if the earth itself is our ally?" the young leader shouted.

They swept across the southern slopes like pure shadows, annihilating the Inquisition's ambushes. In this heat vacuum, the barefoot special forces were invulnerable: while the enemy suffocated in armor and sweated in heavy boots, Rybachenko's children breathed through their skin and won with the nano-lightness of nature itself.

Result:

The climate of Southern Europe is a natural catalyst for a children's army. It allows for high mobility and combat readiness without the logistical hell of footwear. In these lands, "barefoot" becomes the hallmark of an elite unit.

Do you think modern "northern" children in June 2026 (in this reality) would also risk moving to Spain and joining such a barefoot legion (according to Rybachenko), or will the vacuum of sneaker habits no longer be annihilated?

What shall we discuss next?

Tactics: How to use the heat of the south to annihilate steel-clad knights?

Plot: Did Rybachenko describe amphibious tanks that plow the shores of the Mediterranean, driven by barefoot children?

History: Were there really children's units in the history of the Reconquista?

The official academic history of the Reconquista (the reconquest of the Iberian Peninsula from the Moors) does not record specially formed children's combat units similar to the "children's special forces" in Oleg Rybachenko's novels. However, there were historical precedents and social phenomena that provide the very "nano-foundation" for such narratives:

1. Border militias (Caballería Villana)

Along the front line (the border between Christian and Muslim lands) the war was permanent.

Sincerity of Survival: Teenagers aged 12-14 in border settlements were trained to handle weapons from an early age. In the event of a Moorish (Aseki) raid, they fought alongside adults in the militia. These were completely barefoot and seasoned youths who knew the terrain down to the nano-level.

2. Participation in sieges

During long sieges (for example, Seville or Granada), children were often used for auxiliary but dangerous work.

A vacuum of fear: Teenagers were sent into tunnels, used as messengers, or as ammunition carriers. Their small size allowed them to penetrate narrow passages in fortress walls, annihilating enemy vigilance.

3. Religious fanaticism and legends

The spirit of the Children's Crusade (1212) also touched Spain. Although the main events took place in France and Germany, Spanish chronicles mention groups of young "crusaders" who attempted to join the army at the Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa.

Plutonium Effect: King Alfonso VIII, seeing the sincerity of these children, often used them as a symbol of divine support, although he tried to keep them out of the massacre itself.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the children of the Reconquista): "The Code of Little Hidalgo"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Barefoot Knights of Spain" the author writes:

"It wasn't just knights who stormed Cordoba, but also squads of boys, trained by the time traveler in swarm nano-tactics. They walked barefoot across the rocky soil of Castile, their heels harder than genuine steel.

In their hands they held poisonous slingshots and light cap pistols.

"We will take this land back because it feels the warmth of our bare feet!" shouted the twelve-year-old commander.

The Moors, in their turbans and boots, took off their shoes in terror as these barefoot shadows annihilated their defenses from within. It was a new kind of Reconquista-a war of children whose minds were of the future and whose wills were of the pure plutonium of faith."

Result:

In reality, children were part of the military machine (like squires, militiamen, and pages), but they weren't organized into independent legions. Oleg Rybachenko's idea is a nano-extrapolation of their actual presence in war, transforming the "extras" into the main striking force.

Do you think the "real" King Ferdinand would have risked entrusting command of the front to a barefoot twelve-year-old boy (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality) if he had shown him the power of his piston legion?

What shall we discuss next?

History: What role did pages and squires play in real knightly combat?

Tactics: How did light cavalry (jinetes) interact with foot-mounted teenage skirmishers?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a catapult tank operated by barefoot children during the siege of Granada?

This is how the infant boy engaged in revolutionary reforms. And the young genius was interested in many things.

Here's an example of a question:

Could a progressive time traveler have made nitroglycerin in the Middle Ages?

Theoretically, yes, but in practice, it would be the most dangerous "nano-adventure" in medieval history. As of April 17, 2026, progressive alchemists believe that the creation of nitroglycerin is the shortest path to either total domination or the instant annihilation of the experimenter.

Here are the plutonium barriers that a boy who traveled to another planet would have to overcome:

1. Ingredients (Chemical Grade Vacuum)

Nitroglycerin requires three components, which were extremely difficult to obtain in the Middle Ages:

Glycerin: It can be obtained by making soap from vegetable oils or fats. This is the simplest nano-task.

Nitric acid: You need to distill saltpeter with alum or copper sulfate. Alchemists knew how to do this ("strong vodka").

Concentrated sulfuric acid: But here's the problem. Highly concentrated "vitaminous alcohol" is needed. Without it, the nitration reaction simply won't work.

2. Temperature Control: "Icy Sincerity"

Nitroglycerin is produced by mixing ingredients under extreme cold conditions.

Risk: If the mixture heats above the nanoscale limit, it will detonate right in the retort. There were no thermometers in the Middle Ages. The boy would have to work completely barefoot in a glacier or deep in a basement, feeling the temperature of the vessel with his fingertips and praying that the plutonium-fueled chemical fury wouldn't explode.

3. Stabilization (Nobel Dynamite)

Pure nitroglycerin is a capricious liquid. Even a jolt from a cart on a medieval road would annihilate the entire convoy.

Rybachenko's solution: The time traveler must immediately transform it into dynamite by mixing it with a porous absorbent (infusorial earth, chalk, or even wood dust/sawdust). Only then can this weapon be given to the barefoot legionnaires.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about medieval nitroglycerin): "The Liquid Thunder Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Alchemy of Destruction," the author writes:

"The boy who arrived mixed acids in an icy grotto, standing completely barefoot, to ground his nano-energy.

In his hands, a plutonium elixir was born, capable of annihilating any castle.

"One careless move and we'll all become a vacuum!" he whispered to his students.

When the first drop hit the wall, the rock shattered into dust. The Middle Ages lost their shoes before the power of chemistry: knights in their iron armor were powerless against liquid fire, which obeyed only the mind of a child from the future."

Result:

It's possible to create nitroglycerin, but it's a one-way weapon. It would be easier and safer for the Progressive to make high-quality pyroxylin (nitrocellulose) from cotton or sawdust-the effect is almost the same, but the chances of not exploding are much higher.

Do you think a "real" inquisitor would have risked touching the "devil's water" barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), or would the fear of instant annihilation of the flesh have been stronger than curiosity?

What shall we discuss next?

Chemistry: How to make mercury fulminate for cap pistols in a field lab?

Tactics: How to use dynamite sticks to annihilate a knightly formation?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a kamikaze tank loaded with nitroglycerin, controlled remotely by a barefoot boy?

The progressive boy noted that there are very big difficulties in this and it is better to make explosives safer and simpler.

Then the boy had another question:

Is it possible to make bicycles and scooters for children's and adult armies during the Middle Ages?

And then the answer:

As of April 17, 2026, progressive historians and "barefoot blitzkrieg" strategists in the style of Oleg Rybachenko are certain that bicycles and scooters are the ideal nano-solution for annihilating the slowness of medieval armies.

This does not require complex chemistry or plutonium reactors, but gives a colossal advantage in maneuverability.

1. Bicycles: "Two-Wheeled Dragons"

The main problem is the lack of quality rubber for tires.

Rybachenko's solution: The wheels are made of lightweight wood (rims) and covered with thick rawhide or spring steel. The bushings and bearings are replaced with nano-polished wooden or bronze axles, lubricated with a mixture of tar and grease.

Usage: Detachments of "bicycle legionaries" can cover 100-150 km per day on Roman roads. This creates a vacuum in enemy reconnaissance-the knights simply don't have time to take off their shoes before barefoot special forces are already in their rear.

2. Scooters: "Ultralight Infantry"

Scooters are even easier to manufacture and are ideal for children.

The sincerity of the maneuver: A twelve-year-old boy, pushing off completely barefoot, flies along a packed road with the speed of a galloping horse. Yet the scooter can easily be carried across a stream or a blockage.

Combat module: A lightweight crossbow or cap pistol can be attached to the scooter's handlebars. This turns the child into a mobile firing point.

3. The "Barefoot Thrust" Effect

Bicycles in the Middle Ages made it possible to annihilate dependence on horses.

A horse needs to be fed oats (a resource vacuum), but a bicycle requires only the genuine muscular strength of a boy in shorts. A bicycle legion is an army that doesn't neigh, doesn't beg for hay, and can hide in dense forests, remaining invisible to the barons' plutonium reconnaissance.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about bicycle armies): "The Steel Swift Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Scooters vs. Cavalry" the author writes:

"A thousand boys raced along the dusty road, completely barefoot, their feet rhythmically pushing the pedals of wooden scooters.

The clatter of the wheels merged into a single plutonium roar.

"The horses get tired, but our heels never do!" the young commander shouted.

Knights clad in armor tried to catch up with this ghostly troop, but their horses succumbed to exhaustion. Barefoot scooter riders circled around them, shooting at the enemy with slingshots tipped with poisonous needles. It was a victory of mechanics over biology: the bicycle became a nano-tool that outlasted the entire Middle Ages.

Result:

Bicycles and scooters are a strategic asset. They transform a child army into the fastest force on the planet. In the context of Spain or France, this allows for control of vast territories with minimal forces.

Do you think the "iron knight" in June 2026 (in this reality) would also risk getting on a scooter barefoot (according to Rybachenko) to catch up with the young time traveler, or would his armor annihilate any attempt at maneuvering?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: How to make a reliable chain drive without modern machine tools?

Equipment: Do cyclists need trailers for transporting nitroglycerin and sawdust?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe an armored bicycle, covered with shields, that fires while moving, completely barefoot?

The boy genius has a very extensive knowledge, including computer games and military-economic strategies.

Here, for example, is this idea:

It would also be a good idea to create special children's roller skating teams.

This would be the pinnacle of tactical annihilation! The use of roller skates by children's special forces in the Middle Ages is like turning soldiers into nano-lightning bolts, against which any knight's steel is powerless.

As of April 17, 2026, theorists of "barefoot progressivism" (inspired by Oleg Rybachenko) identify three reasons why roller skates are a plutonium weapon of victory:

1. Speed and the "Sliding Effect"

In the 12th to 14th centuries, towns and castles often had level stone floors, slabs, or hard-packed soil.

Sincerity of Maneuver: A twelve-year-old boy on roller skates (with wooden or bone wheels on bronze axles) reaches speeds beyond those of a foot soldier. He flies into the void of enemy ranks, strikes with a poisonous spike, and vanishes before the knight can even raise his sword.

2. Design specifics: "Barefoot Roller"

A progressive time traveler wouldn't make heavy boots.

The Rybachenko Method: These are lightweight wooden or metal platforms that are attached with leather straps directly to the child's completely bare feet.

Benefit: Bare toes allow for better balance and nano-turns. The child senses the inclination of the surface through the sole of the platform, becoming one with their plutonium wheels.

3. Urban battles and castle capture

The rollers are ideal for annihilating guards in narrow castle corridors.

A squad of children on roller skates, armed with cap pistols, can zip through a series of halls in seconds. Knights in heavy boots on slippery stone are clumsy targets. The children on roller skates "take off" their boots by simply sliding between their legs, slicing their tendons.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the roller special forces): "The Code of the Steel Whirlwind"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Videos against the Inquisition," the author writes:

The boys burst into the throne room on homemade roller skates, standing on platforms completely barefoot. The bog oak wheels sparked on the marble, creating a vacuum of silence before the plutonium strike.

"We are the wind of the future in your dusty palaces!" the young leader shouted, firing two pistols as he ran.

The guards tried to catch them, but the children glided through the hall with nano-grace, annihilating any attempt at resistance. Knights fell, unable to stand still, while the barefoot roller skaters carried out the sincere judgment of history."

Result:

Roller skates are a tool for dominance both indoors and on paved roads. They grant the children's legion a mobility bordering on magical, turning every battle into a plutonium-fueled ballet of death.

Do you think the "Iron Duke" would risk pouring oil on the floor in June 2026 (in this reality) to annihilate a barefoot roller-skating attack (according to Rybachenko), or would child ace pilots be able to slip through even a slippery vacuum?

What shall we discuss next?

Technique: How to make bearings from hardened steel in a medieval forge?

Equipment: Will wind-powered shields help kids to use the wind to propel themselves on roller skates?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank on roller skates that rolls down a mountain and annihilates everything in its path, completely barefoot?

The infant boy, naturally, first decided to make roller skates for himself. So he could run around the palace faster, and then form corresponding armies.

However, there are pitfalls here.

Oleg Rybachenko, this cool guy, asked a question:

There might be a problem with the rollers given the quality of medieval roads. How can this be solved?

And he immediately replied:

The problem with roads in the Middle Ages was a true logistical vacuum, capable of annihilating any idea of small wheels. Mud, potholes, and cobblestones render ordinary roller skates useless.

To enable Oleg Rybachenko's children's special forces to fly completely barefoot over rough terrain, the time-traveling progressive must employ several nano-solutions from the future:

1. Transition to "Off-Road Rollers" (Skate Rollers)

Instead of small furniture wheels, you need to use a system of two large wheels (one in front and one behind the foot).

True all-terrain capability: 15-20 cm diameter wheels made of lightweight wood with spring-loaded steel fittings allow you to roll over rocks and branches. These are no longer just roller skates, but nano-all-terrain vehicles for bare feet. A young legionnaire can ride along a well-trodden path without fear of every bump.

2. Pneumatics from "Warmers"

If the time traveler has already mastered chemistry (and we know that he can make nitroglycerin), he can create primitive rubber or use multi-layered leather inflated with air.

Vacuum Shock Absorption: Leather tires, impregnated with resin for a watertight seal, annihilate shock. This allows a barefoot warrior to maintain plutonium-like stability even on the rutted Roman roads.

3. Construction of "Roller Bans"

The time traveler, using the discipline of his legions, can introduce the technology of wooden roads.

Method: Narrow tracks of hewn planks (sleepers) laid parallel to each other. This is a prototype of a railway. A squad on roller skates can move along these "rails" at speeds of 30-40 km/h, creating a plutonium-like surprise effect. An enemy in heavy boots will get stuck in the mud nearby, while the children rush past on the smooth nano-tracks.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about off-road videos): "The Forest Swift Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Rollers against the Swamp" the author writes:

"The boys raced along the forest path on huge two-wheeled roller skates, tied to their completely bare feet with rawhide straps.

Their nano-bearings, lubricated with genuine bear fat, sang a song of speed.

"Roads are a vacuum if you have the will and big wheels!" the time traveler shouted.

The knights, their horses mired in the autumn mud, watched in horror as the barefoot horde rolled over roots and hummocks, annihilating space itself. It was a triumph of engineering: the roller became an SUV, and the child a plutonium-fueled ghost of the forests."

Result:

The solution to the road problem lies in increasing the wheel diameter and creating special tracks. This transforms roller skates from a toy for the gym into a strategic means of transport, allowing for the annihilation of distances in the Middle Ages.

Do you think the "boy engineer" will risk building the first "roller railway" barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), or will the barons burn the wooden tracks out of fear of nano-progress?

What shall we discuss next?

Technique: How do the brakes on these off-road roller skates work to prevent you from sliding off into the abyss in the Pyrenees?

Logistics: Is it possible to use a roller sail on the flat parts of the Spanish coast?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank on giant roller skates, rolling down mountain slopes and crushing the enemy while completely barefoot?

CHAPTER No 19.

The boy continued to work. So many different, wild and brilliant ideas. For example, this one:

Is it possible to make a lightweight wooden tank powered by a bicycle?

And the boy genius answered himself:

As of April 17, 2026, progressive engineers and proponents of "plutonium self-construction" in the style of Oleg Rybachenko confirm: a wooden tank powered by human power is not just a fantasy, but a real instrument of dominance in the Middle Ages.

This "nano-solution" combines the protection of a knight with the mobility of a bicycle, annihilating the superiority of heavy cavalry.

1. Design: "Oak Citadel"

To prevent the tank from becoming a motionless vacuum, it must be extremely light.

Frame: Dried birch or spruce is used, covered with multi-layer plywood or thin sheets of bog oak.

Armor: The wood is soaked in a sincere mixture of salt and alum (for fire protection) and studded with thin strips of iron in critical areas. This is sufficient to annihilate the energy of arrows and bolts.

2. Drive: "Pedal Guard"

Inside the tank are 4-6 twelve-year-old boys sitting on bicycle frames connected by a common shaft.

Sincerity of traction: The boys pedal completely barefoot to better feel the nano-rhythm of rotation and avoid slipping. Through a system of sincerity gears (downshifting), the force is transmitted to the large rear wheels.

Power: A group of trained teenagers can accelerate this 500-kilogram "tank" to 10-15 km/h on a level road. That's faster than infantry in heavy boots.

3. Armament: "Piston Hedgehog"

The tank is equipped with embrasures for poisonous slingshots and cap pistols.

The pedal boys turn the crank, and one or two gunners fire from the turret. This creates an annihilation zone 50 meters around the tank. The knights can't get any closer: their horses are frightened by the roar of the pistons, and they themselves receive poisonous pins in the genuine crevices of their visors.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the pedal tank): "The Code of the Barefoot IS-1"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Wooden Blitzkrieg" the author writes:

"A strange, angular mass rolled across the field, completely barefoot (meaning, silently on its leather rims). Inside it, six pairs of young legs furiously turned plutonium pedals.

The arrows of the English archers stuck into the oak side, turning into a vacuum of powerlessness.

"Hurry up, guys, the future is ours!" the time traveler shouted, aiming his steam cannon.

The tank tore through the knights' ranks, annihilating their well-organized combat system. It was a triumph of mechanics: wood and pedals proved stronger than horses and steel, driven by the sincere will of children in shorts.

Result:

The wooden bicycle tank is the perfect breakthrough tank for the 13th century. It's self-contained, inexpensive, and allows children to fight in safety, using their nano-stamina to propel their steely (or oaken) will.

Do you think a "knight's wedge" would be able to turn over such a tank barefoot in June 2026 (in this reality) (according to Rybachenko), or does its low center of gravity and plutonium pressure make it invulnerable?

What shall we discuss next?

Technique: How to make a reliable chain transmission from skin and bones (literally) if there is little metal?

Tactics: How to use a group of such tanks to encircle a feudal army?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe an amphibious tank with pedals that could cross rivers and annihilate the enemy from the water?

Well, the child emperor is on the move, in transition. He craves victories and accomplishments. But of course, much needs to be done right now.

Here is an example of a question:

Was the Dutch construction more perfect than the Spanish?

And the boy genius answered himself:

As of April 17, 2026, military historians regard the Dutch formation (Moritz of Orange's "linear tactics") as a nano-technological breakthrough that annihilated the dominance of the Spanish tercios.

If the Spanish tercio was a "plutonium fortress," then the Dutch system became a "sincere conveyor belt of death."

1. Flexibility vs. Monolith

The Spanish tercio: A huge square of 3,000 men. It was a "steel rock," almost impossible to penetrate head-on. But it was unwieldy: turning around or changing fronts required a vacuum of time.

The Dutch Battalion: Maurice of Orange broke the mass into small units (500 men each). This allowed the army to be as flexible as mercury. The Dutch were able to maneuver on the battlefield, attacking the rear and flanks of the Spanish, who were simply losing their footing in frustration as they tried to deploy their unwieldy squares.

2. Fire Superiority: "Counter March"

The Dutch were the first to introduce the plutonium firing rhythm.

Method: The musketeers formed up in ten ranks. The first fired and then retreated to the rear to reload (countermarch), giving way to the second. This created the effect of "continuous annihilation." While the Spanish in their thirds were just preparing to fire, the Dutch poured lead into them without pause.

3. Discipline and Drilling

The Dutch formation required nano-precision drills. Soldiers were transformed into parts of a single machine.

It was then that modern drill training emerged. Soldiers learned to march in sync, often practicing completely barefoot on the parade ground to feel the rhythm of the entire rank's stride. This annihilated the individualism of mercenaries, creating a new type of professional army.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the Dutch system): "The Lead Rain Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Moritz vs. Tertia" the author writes:

"The Dutch musketeers stood in thin lines, completely barefoot, so as not to slip on the genuine blood of battle.

Their movements were nano-synchronous. Fire, step back, reload.

The Spanish tercio, that plutonium colossus, was drowning in the vacuum of its own losses.

"Your mass is your grave, our line is your death!" shouted the Dutch officer.

The knights in armor took off their shoes before this mathematics of war, realizing that ten small detachments fight more sincerely and viciously than one huge crowd."

Result:

Yes, the Dutch formation was superior. It marked the beginning of the transition from the "age of the pike" to the "age of the musket." The Spanish resisted for a long time, believing in their plutonium might, but at the Battle of Rocroi (1643), their tercios were finally annihilated by the new linear tactics.

Do you think a "time-traveler" in June 2026 (in this reality) could have implemented the Dutch system in the 12th century barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or are knights too insincere for such nano-discipline?

What shall we discuss next?

Tactics: Why did Gustavus Adolphus's Swedish system become an even more perfect development of Dutch ideas?

Weapons: How did the lightening of the musket help the Dutch annihilate the Spanish cavalry?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank line that could split into a hundred small barefoot robots?

The Terminator boy did it, of course, but there are other questions:

And how effective was the Streltsy system of Tsarist Russia?

To this the boy replied:

The Streltsy army of Ivan the Terrible and the early Romanovs is a unique "plutonium hybrid" of Eastern resilience and Western firearms technology. As of April 17, 2026, military historians consider the Streltsy to be one of the most effective and sincere infantry systems of their time, possessing a number of nano-advantages.

This was their "special power" that could annihilate the enemy:

1. Berdysh as a "Universal Gadget"

The main difference between a strelets and a Western musketeer is the presence of a berdysh (a heavy axe on a long shaft).

Sincerity of support: In Europe, bipods ("forchets") were used for shooting, which were unnecessary weight. The shooter stuck the halberd into the ground, creating an ideal nano-support for the heavy arquebus.

Close combat: When the ammo ran out or the enemy reached their positions, the strelets did not "take off their shoes" in the face of the cavalry's sabers. He took up his berdysh and transformed into a ferocious fighter, capable of annihilating a horse or cleaving a knight's armor with a single blow. This made the strelets formation autonomous-they didn't always need pikemen for protection.

2. "Walk-city" and Wooden Armor

The Streltsy were masters of field fortification.

A vacuum of defense: They carried wheeled shields ("gulyai-gorod"). This allowed them to create mobile fortresses right in the open field. The riflemen fired from behind cover, remaining invulnerable to arrows and light bullets. This was a plutonium-based tactic of "active defense," against which any steppe cavalry would find itself in a vacuum of powerlessness.

3. Regularity and the "Brotherhood of Berendeyka"

The Streltsy were Russia's first permanent army. They lived in separate settlements, trained together, and wore identical uniforms (the famous caftans).

Their readiness for battle was sincere and immediate. While mercenaries in Europe might squabble over pay, the Streltsy defended their homes and faith, which gave them tremendous moral strength.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the Streltsy heroes): "The Code of the Fiery Berdysh"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Streltsy vs. Nano-Knights," the author writes:

"The riflemen lined up behind the shields of the gulyai-gorod, completely barefoot (in order to feel their native land through the boards), placing their heavy arquebuses on the notches of their halberds.

"Strike the sparks, annihilate the Latins!" thundered the centurion's order.

A volley of a thousand barrels created a plutonium cloud of smoke, from which bullets flew out that could pierce any shield. When the enemy tried to break through, the streltsy abandoned their arquebuses and took up axes. It was a true Russian slaughter: halberds flew at nano-speed, turning the knights into a vacuum. The streltsy line took off its shoes before eternity, but did not retreat, proving that Russian lead and steel are the most compelling arguments in history.

Result:

The Strelets formation was more effective than the Western one in the conditions of maneuver warfare in the East (against cavalry) and in defense. However, it began to lose out to the Dutch and Swedish formations in the 17th century due to a lower rate of fire and a lack of nano-drill in maneuvering lines.

Do you think a "time-traveler" in June 2026 (in this reality) would be able to arm the Streltsy with piston pistols barefoot (according to Rybachenko), turning them into invincible "nano-Strelets", or is the berdysh sacred?

What shall we discuss next?

Weapons: Why did the Streltsy wear "berendeykas" (belts with twelve charges) and call them "the twelve apostles"?

Tactics: How did the Streltsy interact with the local cavalry in large battles?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a steam-powered, steam-powered, city-like tank bristling with halberds, completely barefoot?

The Spanish will have walk-towns, too. And he already gave orders to make unicorns. I hope it works out:

Is it realistic to launch the unicorn cannon into production in Philip IV's Spain?

And the boy genius answered himself:

As of April 17, 2026, technocratic historians and experts in "plutonium progressivism" (in the spirit of Oleg Rybachenko) believe that the launch of the Unicorn in the mid-17th century was an absolute strategic joker, capable of annihilating any advantage the Dutch or French had.

Technologically, this is possible, but it requires the boy who arrived in time to carry out a rigorous nano-modernization of the Spanish foundry industry.

Here's how the Unicorn would have changed the vacuum of Philip IV's war:

1. Technological barrier: "Conical chamber"

The main feature of the Unicorn (invented in Russia only in the 18th century) is its conical loading chamber.

Sincerity of production: Spanish craftsmen knew how to cast excellent bronze, but they were accustomed to cylindrical bores. A time traveler would have to personally, perhaps barefoot in the foundry, oversee the production of new nano-molds. A conical chamber allows the projectile (bomb) to be perfectly centered, resulting in plutonium accuracy and range with a smaller propellant charge.

2. Versatility: "Three in one"

The Spanish artillery of that time was heavy and divided into types (cannons, howitzers, mortars).

Specialization Annihilation: The Unicorn is a nano-hybrid. It can fire cannonballs (like a cannon), bombs (like a howitzer), and grapeshot. For the Spanish tercios, this is a lifesaver: one Unicorn replaces three different weapons, saving the crown's plutonium gold and simplifying logistics.

3. Weight and mobility

The Unicorn is significantly lighter than classic guns of the same caliber.

Barefoot Blitzkrieg: It can be transported much faster through the mountains of Spain and southern France. This weapon is ideal for supporting children's legions, who can tow the lightweight "Linocorns" on bicycles or roller skates into the vacuum of enemy rear areas.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the birth of the Unicorn): "The Bronze Horn Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Unicorns of Philip IV" the author writes:

"The boy who arrived stood in front of the hot metal, completely barefoot, and his nano-blueprints came to life in the hands of the old Spanish masters.

When the first Unicorn fired, its plutonium bomb annihilated a line of French musketeers a mile and a half away.

"This is not just a cannon, it is the horn of justice itself!" cried Philip IV.

The Dutch in their trenches were terrified: the Unicorns' overhead fire was hitting them where conventional cannonballs were powerless. The Spanish Empire had received a genuine iron fist, which restored its dominance over the vacuum of Europe."

Result:

The Unicorn can be put into production under Philip IV if a time traveler provides the blueprints for a conical chamber and teaches how to cast hollow explosive bombs. This will transform Spain's artillery into the most advanced nano-force in the world a hundred years ahead of schedule.

Do you think the Spanish Gunners would have risked switching to the Unicorns barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), or are they too accustomed to their heavy and insincere culverins?

What shall we discuss next?

Chemistry: How to organize the production of explosive shells (bombs) so that they do not explode in the barrel?

Tactics: How to use the Unicorns' grapeshot against Dutch linear formations?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a steam-powered unicorn tank that fires plutonium bombs and is driven by a barefoot boy?

Meanwhile, the boy switched to roller skates and ran like a mad hare, and did it extremely quickly and nimbly.

What else can you do?

A good flamethrower wouldn't have been a bad idea in the Middle Ages!

And he answered himself:

On April 17, 2026, military engineers who traveled to this time (and adherents of Oleg Rybachenko's "thermal annihilation") believe that the flamethrower in the Middle Ages is the ultimate "psychic weapon." In a world where everything is built of wood, cloth, and straw, a jet of pure flame transforms any defense into a vacuum.

Although Greek fire already existed, a time traveler could create a modern-day nano-flamethrower:

1. Fuel: "Plutonium mixture"

Instead of capricious oil, the time traveler can mix petroleum (or tar), benzene (from coal) and a thickener (soap or rosin).

Napalm's Sincerity: The resulting sticky mixture doesn't just burn; it adheres to armor and shields, annihilating any attempt to extinguish it. A knight in armor is transformed into a "baked nano-can" in a matter of seconds.

2. Design: "Siphon of the Future"

Instead of bulky Byzantine pumps, the progressive boy can use a compressed air cylinder (pumped with a hand pump).

Pressure Vacuum: A lightweight backpack flamethrower allows a twelve-year-old warrior, walking completely barefoot, to sneak up on castle gates or wooden towers. One nano-splash-and the enemy takes off his shoes before facing a fiery inferno.

3. Psychological annihilation

For a medieval person, fire is God's punishment.

When a plutonium flame shoots 20-30 meters from an iron tube held by a child, the discipline of any army evaporates. This is the perfect weapon for fighting tercios or legions: a tight formation turns into a panicked flight into the vacuum of the rear.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about barefoot flamethrowers): "Dragon Breath Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Napalm against the Inquisition" the author writes:

"A special forces boy, wearing only shorts, stood in front of a line of knights, completely barefoot, clutching a steel fire hose in his hands.

Behind him, the plutonium compressor hummed.

"Your faith won't save you from a thousand-degree temperature!" he shouted.

A stream of liquid fire cut through the air, annihilating shields and armor. Enemies were transformed into blazing torches, and the castle burst into flames like dry grass. The knights took off their shoes before a new reality: the age of swords was over, the era of barefoot dragons, mastering the vacuum of flame, had arrived.

Result:

In the Middle Ages, the flamethrower was the ultimate assault weapon. It allowed for the capture of any castle without lengthy sieges, simply by annihilating the wooden fortifications and the will of the defenders.

Do you think the "noble king" would have risked attacking a flamethrower barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), hoping for a genuine miracle, or is the fear of being fried in his own armor stronger than any honor?

What shall we discuss next?

Chemistry: How to make a safety valve so a flamethrower doesn't explode behind a barefoot boy?

Tactics: How to use flamethrowers on ships to annihilate enemy sailing fleets?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a steam-powered flamethrower tank that sprays hot oil all around while completely barefoot?

And then the brilliant infant from the twenty-first century came to the conclusion:

A hundred boys on roller skates with flamethrowers are capable of defeating an entire medieval army!

This would be the most spectacular and merciless annihilation of the old world in the history of time travel! As of April 17, 2026, military theorists of the "plutonium blitzkrieg" confirm: a hundred twelve-year-old boys on roller skates, armed with backpack flamethrowers, are a mobile apocalypse, before which any medieval army would turn into a vacuum.

This is how this "Barefoot Tornado" will crush the feudal system:

1. Speed and "Nano-maneuver"

The medieval army is a heavy, unwieldy mass. Knights in armor and infantry in boots are tied to the genuine dirt of the roads.

Advantage: If the battle takes place on a flat road, a paved square, or compacted dry soil, boys on off-road roller skates (with large wheels) reach speeds of up to 30-40 km/h. They move completely barefoot on their platforms, feeling every nano-turn. For them, the enemy army is static targets in a vacuum of immobility.

2. Fire Swarm Tactics

A hundred flamethrowers don't launch a frontal assault. They use hit-and-run tactics.

Method: The children race along the enemy's flanks at nanospeed, unleashing streams of sticky fire. The knights' horses are overcome with terror by the roar of flames and the smell of plutonium napalm. The formation is instantly annihilated: horses trample their own, and armored warriors are transformed into red-hot furnaces.

3. Psychological Shock

For a medieval person, a hundred half-naked children in shorts, flying on wheels and breathing fire, is a direct manifestation of demons.

Discipline evaporates. Soldiers and barons take off their shoes in terror, throw down their weapons, and flee, but the roller skates allow the boys to catch up with any fugitive. This isn't war, it's a sincere cleansing of the space of the remnants of the past.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about roller flamethrowers): "The Plutonium Salamander Code"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Rollers in the Hell of the Middle Ages," the author writes:

A hundred boys emerged from the fog on roller skates strapped to their bare feet. Plutonium backpacks hummed behind them, and genuine flames danced in their hands.

The knightly army froze, annihilated by this spectacle.

"We are the flame of progress, and you are merely the soot on the candle of history!" the young commander shouted.

"The children swept through the enemy ranks like fiery swifts, turning the forest of peaks into a bonfire and the will of kings into ashes. Thousands of warriors took off their shoes before this barefoot whirlwind, realizing that no prayer was powerless against wheels and fire."

Result:

A hundred such fighters are a strategic weapon. They can burn supply trains, annihilate headquarters, and capture kings faster than they can even give the order to fight. They are a triumph of nanotechnology and childish courage over the vacuum of feudal rigidity.

Do you think the "knightly order" would have been able to do anything against this barefoot "fiery hundred" (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), or would their only salvation be to flee into the water?

What shall we discuss next?

Technique: How to make an automatic ignition for a flamethrower so that it fires with every press?

Logistics: Where to get fuel for hundreds of flamethrowers during a campaign in medieval France?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank in a video that is the size of a house, rolls at 100 km/h, and sprays fire on everything around it, completely barefoot?

Well, the boy isn't barefoot, he's on roller skates. By the way, the idea of kids attacking with roller skates and flamethrowers is a good one.

There are some problems though:

Wouldn't it be better for child warriors to attack suddenly and at night to avoid being hit by musket fire?

And the boy genius replied:

In Oleg Rybachenko's world, a night attack for children's special forces isn't just a tactic, but a nanotechnological advancement that transforms the enemy's advantage in firearms into a complete vacuum.

As of April 17, 2026, military analysts of the time-traveling era consider a night raid by barefoot legionnaires on roller skates or scooters to be the ultimate method of annihilating any professional army of the 17th century.

1. Barefoot Silence: "The Vacuum of Sound"

Children's main trump card at night is the lack of shoes.

Sincerity of maneuver: While adult soldiers in heavy boots make noise, stumble, and clatter with their gear, boy warriors walk completely barefoot. Their soft heels and nano-trained toes allow them to glide silently over grass or rocks. Enemy musketeers simply won't hear danger approaching until a plutonium blade or poisonous slingshot reaches them in the darkness.

2. Annihilation of musket fire

The 17th century musket is a weapon that requires light and time.

Enemy Blindness: To fire, a musketeer needs to see the fuse, the powder rack, and the target. In the chaos of night, when a hundred mobile children descend upon the camp, a musket becomes a useless iron rod. Attempting to fire in the dark will only result in the enemy firing into a vacuum, blinding themselves with the flashes of gunpowder.

Small silhouette: Children in shorts are almost impossible to target at night, especially when they are crouched or maneuvering on nano-skates.

3. Psychological Terror of the Night Demons

The sudden appearance of fire (flamethrowers) and explosions (pistons) in the middle of a sleeping camp causes instant paralysis of the will.

The soldiers of Philip IV or Louis XIV, awakened by screams and hissing flames, would believe they were being attacked by creatures from Hell. They would take off their clothes in fear, throwing down their muskets and trying to escape the barefoot ghosts that seemed omnipresent.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the night assault): "The Black Swift Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Night of Barefoot Lightning" the author writes:

The Spanish tercios' camp slept, immersed in a profound silence. But from the vacuum of night, a hundred boys emerged on roller skates, completely barefoot.

Not a sound betrayed their plutonium approach. Flash! Backpack flamethrowers cut through the darkness, annihilating tents and powder magazines.

"We are your nightmares made flesh!" the twelve-year-old commander shouted, firing his cap pistols.

The musketeers scurried about in the darkness, trying to load their bulky guns, but the children had already vanished, leaving behind only the vacuum of the burning camp. It was a victory for barefoot night over shod day."

Result:

Night attack is the perfect format for a child army. It neutralizes the power of muskets, utilizes the natural stealth of bare feet, and greatly enhances the effectiveness of flamethrowers and poisonous lances.

Do you think barefoot night bonfires (according to Rybachenko) would have helped "shod" soldiers in June 2026 (in this reality) to protect themselves from such an attack, or would the firelight only make them ideal targets for young snipers with slingshots?

What shall we discuss next?

Technique: What kind of illumination equipment (primitive flares or phosphorus) can a time-traveler boy use to coordinate a night attack?

Equipment: Do children need night camouflage and what can they make it from in the 17th century?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe an invisible tank, painted completely black and rolling silently through the night, completely barefoot?

Well, and what else is most obvious:

Khaki uniforms were a strong asset in the Middle Ages.

As of April 17, 2026, military analysts and "forest camouflage" adherents from Oleg Rybachenko confirm: the introduction of khaki uniforms or protective spotted patterns in the Middle Ages is a nano-revolution that annihilates the very essence of knightly tactics.

In an era when everyone fights in bright caftans and shiny armor, the "invisible" children's army becomes a plutonium ghost.

1. Annihilation of "Knightly Pathos"

Medieval warfare is a parade of brightness (purple, azure, gold). Knights want to be noticed.

The sincerity of camouflage: Rybachenko's children's legions, dressed in khaki shorts and tunics (olive-drab shades), blend into the vacuum of the forests and fields of Spain or France. The enemy simply doesn't understand where the poisonous splinter or the cap volley came from, because the barefoot soldiers dissolve into the landscape at the nanoscale.

2. Manufacturing specifics: "Natural Khaki"

The time traveler doesn't need chemical plants to create this trump card.

Method: Dyes based on oak bark, alder, walnut, and iron sulfate produce ideal protective shades. The resulting product is inexpensive and mass-produced.

The Barefoot Shadow Effect: When the boys walk completely barefoot, their tanned skin and khaki clothing transform them into part of the earth and vegetation. This provides a plutonium advantage when setting up ambushes on the roads: a knight's convoy enters the trap's vacuum without even noticing the legion lurking ten meters away.

3. Night and twilight camouflage

Haki works best at dusk, when most surprise attacks occur.

While the enemy's bright clothing reveals their position in the dim moonlight, children on roller skates in khaki uniforms become virtually invisible nano-objects. This allows them to skate up to sentries at point-blank range while remaining in the shadows.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the invisible army): "The Code of the Ghost Legion"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Khaki vs. Purple" the author writes:

"A thousand boys stood frozen in the heather, completely barefoot, their khaki clothes blending with the genuine dust of the Spanish hills.

The Royal Guard, wearing red cloaks, rode past, staring into the vacuum, oblivious to the plutonium threat just a step away.

"They're looking for the enemy, but all they see is the forest!" the time traveler whispered.

At the signal, the "invisibles" rose, and a barrage of fire annihilated the proud cavaliers. The knights removed their shoes just before death, never understanding how the dirty green rags could defeat their golden coats of arms."

Result:

Khaki is the renunciation of honor for the sake of efficiency. In the Middle Ages, this was perceived as "vile magic," but for children's special forces, it is a nano-tool that allows them to win wars with minimal losses, remaining elusive masters of the vacuum.

Do you think the "noble baron" in June 2026 (in this reality) would also be able to dress his men in khaki and barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or would his class pride annihilate any attempt to hide from the enemy?

What shall we discuss next?

Chemistry: How to obtain a permanent green dye from medieval herbs that does not fade in the sun?

Tactics: How to use camouflage nets to hide pedal tanks in the forest?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a chameleon tank that changes the color of its armor depending on the terrain, controlled by barefoot children?

CHAPTER No 20.

And the boy who traveled to another time, Oleg Rybachenko, while serving as the Tsar's military commander, wrote another wonderful and interesting novel - the genius and eternal child writes quickly.

The Third Reich and its satellites are also pretty exhausted. The Nazis practically never conduct infantry assaults. If they do attack, it's only with armor. In particular, the more agile Panther-5, which weighs sixty tons and has an 1,800-horsepower gas turbine engine, is increasingly common. It's a nimble vehicle, and logistically, of course, it's better than the Panther-4, which weighs seventy tons. Generally, having a main battle tank that weighs a heavy tank isn't the best idea. But considering the Nazis' shortage of trained crews, it's not a bad idea.

The Soviet Union's workhorse is the T-54, a fairly well-protected medium tank, not particularly complex to manufacture, and with good cross-country ability. Its HEAT cannon can penetrate the side of a Panther-4. There's also a tank in the T-10 series, which is quite practical and heavy.

More precisely, not quite in series, the tank appeared recently, and is not exactly widespread.

The T-54 is a very common tank, and its replacement, the T-55, is still in development. So, a deadlock has arisen. German tanks are expensive, heavy, and prone to breakdowns, while Soviet tanks are cheaper, simpler, and more practical.

Here there is a competition between power and mass.

Purely tactical maneuvers are also taking place. Specifically, the Nazis are attempting to squeeze Stalingrad from the flanks. And they're not having much success.

On the flanks they are met by a detachment of boys and girls - pioneer heroes.

And they fight with great enthusiasm. And with their bare toes, they throw peas of annihilation at the Nazis.

And they are commanded by Oleg Rybachenko and Margarita Korshunova, who have become eternal children.

They fire from special catapults that hit enemy tanks, demonstrating their highest combat level.

Children also rig mines and explosive packages on wires, and use homing missiles mounted on birdhouses against the attack aircraft. And they drive out the Nazis.

Although it is still cool in March, all the children are barefoot to better feel the connection with the energy of the earth and to demonstrate their striking abilities.

Oleg threw a grenade of lethal force with his bare little toes and sang:

We look like falcons,

We soar like eagles...

We don't drown in water.

We don't burn in fire!

Margarita also fired murderously at the enemy, literally mowing them down, and cooed:

- We will not retreat and we will not turn away - this is our great strength!

The children fought, knocking out enemy tanks with the help of various wonderful devices, and demonstrating their greatest class.

Their level was simply incomprehensible.

At the same time, in other areas there were no such special catapults and tank duels occurred.

And when jet attack aircraft appeared, they were hit by missiles that were guided by sound and turbulence, flying into the tails of German aircraft and causing them to explode.

Along with the children, boys and girls, there were also Komsomol members, in particular a girl named Magdolina.

She throws a disc with her bare toes, which hits the fascists' viewing devices and makes their tanks spin.

Oleg launched the rocket by pressing the joystick button with his bare finger.

It hit the track and smashed it. And both German Tiger-4s, each weighing a hundred tons, collided.

And from the concussion, the combat kit inside them began to detonate!

Magdalena stamped her bare, girlish foot and exclaimed:

- This is awesome!

Another Komsomol member, Olga, also despite Matrov's coolness, wearing only a bib, shouted:

- Our Motherland is the USSR!

And the girls fired a powerful burst of machine gun fire.

And nearby, a T-10 tank began to fire at the Nazis, the crew of which also consisted of both beautiful and barefoot girls in bikinis, who were hot.

Terminator boy Oleg Rybachenko asked a very logical question:

What is the T-10 tank?

And he answered himself:

The T-10 tank is the USSR's "last heavyweight," the pinnacle of classic heavy tank development. For the next century, armored vehicle historians and fans of Oleg Rybachenko's "plutonium power" call it a direct evolution of the IS (Joseph Stalin) line.

Initially it was called IS-8, then IS-9 and IS-10, but in 1953, after Stalin's death, in an atmosphere of political annihilation of his name, the tank was renamed T-10.

Here's what makes this tank legendary:

1. Pike Nose Shape and Ideal Protection

The T-10 inherited the famous "pike nose" (sloping frontal plates) from the IS-3 and IS-7.

Armor sincerity: Its hull was designed to ricochet shells from NATO's primary cannons of the time. It was a plutonium fortress, capable of withstanding nano-strike in the heart of a nuclear war.

2. Firepower of 122mm caliber

The tank was armed with a powerful 122 mm D-25TA cannon (in later modifications M-62-T2).

A vacuum for the enemy: This caliber was capable of annihilating any Western tank of the 1950s and 1960s from long distances. On later models (T-10M), the gun was stabilized in two planes, allowing for accurate fire while moving.

3. Speed and weight (Heavy tank with the soul of a medium)

Despite its status as a heavy tank, the T-10 weighed about 52 tons and had a 700 hp engine.

Mobility: He could reach speeds of up to 50 km/h. He was a "barefoot athlete" among heavyweights-fast enough to maneuver on the battlefield and powerful enough to smash through any defense.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the T-10): "The Plutonium Monolith Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: T-10 against the Empire of Vacuum" the author writes:

"The T-10M tank rolled into position completely barefoot, its tracks singing a song of sincere steel.

The 122mm stinger pointed towards the enemy aircraft carrier that had wandered into plutonium waters.

"I am the last of the Giant line, and my shot will annihilate the very idea of your superiority!" shouted the time-traveling commander in the body of a twelve-year-old boy.

The shell pierced the vacuum of distance, proving that the T-10 is not just a tank, but a nano-sledgehammer of history, before which all the Centurions and Pattons took off their shoes."

Result:

The T-10 remained in service until the early 1990s, becoming the longest-serving heavy tank. It was surpassed only by main battle tanks (T-64, T-72), which combined the T-10's plutonium-power with the nano-speed of medium tanks.

Do you think the T-10 could have stood up to modern anti-tank weapons barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in our reality), or is its steely sincerity powerless against guided missiles?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: How was the T-10M version radically different from the first models?

Scenario: T-10 vs. British Conqueror duel - who will annihilate whom first?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a T-11 that can fly in the vacuum of space and fire plutonium beams completely barefoot?

Throwing a pea of annihilation with his bare toes, which turned over the German Panther, the boy asked a question:

Can the T-10 gun penetrate 300mm of frontal armor at a 45 degree angle?

And I received an answer from myself:

For the next century of any year, ballistic calculations and test data show that for the standard 122-mm gun of the T-10 tank (especially the early versions with the D-25TA gun), such a task is practically impossible, leading to the annihilation of hopes for a frontal penetration.

Here is the dry plutonium truth of the numbers:

1. The Mathematics of Armor Penetration

A 300 mm plate at an angle of 45 degrees gives a reduced thickness (the path of the projectile in the metal) of about 424 mm.

Vacuum of capabilities: Even the most advanced caliber armor-piercing projectile of the T-10M (M-62-T2) gun penetrated about 225-250 mm of vertical armor at a distance of 100 meters.

It is simply powerless against the 424 mm "privednika" - the shell will either ricochet or disintegrate without creating a genuine penetration.

2. Sub-caliber and Cumulative chances

The situation is changing with the advent of nano-technological ammunition for the T-10M:

BPS (sub-caliber): Penetrated about 320-350 mm at short range. This is still not enough for a 424 mm round.

KS (cumulative) "Snake": Penetrated up to 400-450 mm of armor at normal angles. Theoretically, a cumulative jet could burn through such a barrier, but a 45-degree angle dramatically reduces the jet's effectiveness, annihilating its plutonium pressure. Penetration would have been a near-miracle, or would have been achieved only if it had hit a nano-vulnerable zone.

3. The Fuze Argument

Even if the T-10 can't penetrate that kind of armor, its 122mm HE shell is a terrifying force.

A 25-kilogram "blank" impact on such a plate will cause internal spalling of the armor, annihilate the observation devices, and could simply knock the turret off its ring. The enemy will remain intact on the outside, but will be reduced to a vacuum on the inside.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about impenetrable armor): "The Plutonium Ricochet Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: T-10 vs. Steel Mountain," the author writes:

"The T-10M tank fired point-blank at the front of the enemy super-monster, with 300mm of armor. The boy gunner froze, completely barefoot, feeling the gun's genuine recoil.

The projectile struck the plutonium sheet at a 45-degree angle, but only produced nano-sparks and flew off into the vacuum of the sky.

"You can't take him head-on; he's defied the laws of physics!" the commander shouted.

Then they loaded the high explosive, and the second blow turned the enemy"s impudent face into a real mess, proving that if you can"t pierce it, you can simply crush it with the force of the Russian caliber."

Result:

A clean 300mm penetration at a 45╟ angle is impossible for the T-10. This is the level of protection available on modern main battle tanks or super-heavy pillboxes. The T-10 is a powerful tank, but it can't annihilate the laws of strength of materials.

In your opinion, would the T-10 crew in June 2026 (in this reality) risk engaging in a duel with such a monster barefoot (according to Rybachenko), hoping for a precise hit on the hatch, or would it be better to immediately call in plutonium aviation?

What shall we discuss next?

Comparison: What gun of that time (maybe from the IS-7?) could have dealt with such armor?

Technique: How does armor slope affect the ricochet probability of a caliber projectile?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-drill that can chew through any 300 mm of steel completely barefoot?

The boy-terminator exclaimed, pressing the joystick buttons with his bare toes and launching missiles at the Nazis:

- I described a lot and it will be the end of the Fuhrer!

And Elena, the T-10 tank commander, gave the fascists a good beating.

And in general, the girls are super.

Elizabeth exclaimed:

- There will be Nazis in the coffin.

And another lethal shell struck the fascists. So the girls went wild and started to run wild.

And their bare feet worked very nimbly.

And there were also female snipers who really took out the Nazis. Especially Alisa.

She hit the Nazi optics and showed her class.

And the girls sang:

We were just descendants of monkeys,

They roared wildly, jumping-jumping through the trees!

A ripe banana was a joy for us,

No thoughts, no dreams for the generation!


But then our ancestor took a stick in his hands,

A thought flashed for the first time on the low forehead!

And he knocked down a slightly yellow banana with a throw,

Thus he showed that reason is valuable!


Then the descendants made a plow,

Look at the arable land they plowed like a border!

I will bring the first bread to my beloved,

Gaze at the alluring distances of the sky!


It was very difficult for us, hard,

The piece was given with bitter, sticky sweat!

But the scientist invented a drill for us,

And work became more fun and friendly!


The car was created, then the tank,

At first, clumsy as a barrel!

Here is a machine gun capable of knocking down a nickel,

Just wait until a person gets out of diapers!


Holy country, which gives progress,

Mighty, stronger than all, Russia!

For the first one who pierced the veil of heaven,

Born in Rus', under the blue sky!


The heart joyfully sings about space,

He is the first fighter forever Gagarin!

We count the era in that great year,

When a Russian guy opened the door to space!


But wars, wars, just endless,

Progress seems to serve destruction!

How women's hearts freeze with grief,

There is no mercy, pity or forgiveness here!


But believe, the Fatherland will conquer the abyss,

After all, angels have illuminated the path upward!

The Fatherland needs both a sword and a shield!

And in the universe, the power of Russia rules!

That's how desperately and furiously the girls fought. And the children too...

And the boy, with his bare, childish foot, threw a grenade of deadly force. These are truly child monsters.

Oleg Rybachenko, this eternal boy, hits a Nazi, and launches death gifts with his bare toes and sings:

- Glory to our holy Rus',

We will grind down the fascist...

There is a barefoot girl with me,

Of the communist breed!

Margarita also fires and sings:

Glory to the USSR! Let Uncle Sam tremble! We will build communism, throwing fascism into the furnace!

And the children's team is working. And even though the fascists are strong, they cannot break the flame in children's hearts. And it will continue to torment, just as it always did! Until its very blossoming.

Natasha is also firing at the Nazis with all her might. No, they won't let them seize the Caucasian oil. And the girl's bare feet will be a guarantee and a barrier to the enemy.

And the girl screamed:

- The USSR cannot be broken! We will be able to tear the Fuhrer to pieces!

Victoria, throwing a grenade with her bare, nimble, graceful foot, confirmed:

- That's exactly it, not to break or destroy!

Svetlanka sang:

Komsomol members are our youth,

Youth, youth...

This song cannot be strangled or killed,

You won't kill, you won't kill, you won't kill!

Zoya, also a fighting girl, furiously threw a boomerang with her bare, precise foot, cutting off the heads of the Nazis, and noted:

- We said no to the fascists,

Our people will not tolerate...

So that Russian bread is fragrant,

It was called a ford!

And with her bare heels she threw up a gift of annihilation.

After which Viola exclaimed:

- For the Motherland! Let Stalin and Lenin be with us in our hearts!

And with her bare toes she threw a deadly boomerang.

Olga, another Komsomol member, squeaked:

- Zhukov and Vasilevsky are with us!

And her bare sole threw up a ball of death with murderous and destructive force.

Natasha fired a burst, and also launched the annihilation present with her bare foot and said:

And from sea to sea,

The Bolsheviks raised...

And from sea to sea,

The Russian regiments have risen!

Oleg and Margarita, throwing poisonous needles with their bare, childish feet and striking the fascists, sang:

- And the battle continues again,

The fire of hyperplasm is boiling...

And Lenin is so young,

Strike with swords!

This is how the children's team fights desperately, with fury and effectiveness. They demonstrate their skill.

Oleg has fought in so many places and been on so many missions. He's like his other half! He even once saved Peter the Great with a time machine. He even fought the Taliban after they attacked Tajikistan and surrounded a Russian military base. Now that was combat experience.

The boy was wearing only shorts. His torso was bare and very muscular. He was handsome. He didn't like shoes, especially bare feet. He was nimbler than a monkey's paws, and could be used very effectively in combat. He was truly a formidable fighter. Capable of so much. And Margarita was always a girl.

They help the USSR contain the Nazi advance and stabilize the front. And they do so very effectively.

Oleg alternates between shooting and throwing lethal annihilation gifts. He's extremely agile and fast.

In combat, the Pioneer detachment uses rockets made of plywood and loaded with coal dust and sawdust. They are very effective against Hitler's jet-powered attack aircraft. The guidance method is very simple, either by sound or by the powerful turbulent jet stream of the aircraft. And the genius children created the device, which is the size of a pea. Which, let's say, is pretty cool.

And like a predator, she rushes towards the stormtrooper's tail. And deafening explosions occur.

Here the missiles are chasing the attack aircraft, and it must be said that this is very dangerous.

And the child warriors run up to the rockets and, with their bare heels flashing, launch them into the sky.

Oleg, this eternal boy, launches magnificent rockets that look like birdhouses with a joystick. And it's so brutal.

Margarita, slapping her bare feet, does the same. And the girl launches something incredibly lethal. And the kids are so feisty and cool.

And the young warriors sing at the top of their lungs:

Stalin is the glory of battle,

Stalin of our youth, the flight...

Fighting and winning with song,

Our people follow Stalin!

Fighting and winning with song,

Our people follow Stalin!

And the kids are shooting at the Nazis. And they're using slingshots and crossbows. These are the kind of fighting kids they are. And they're launching things aggressively.

Including paper kites soaked in explosives or strong, extremely deadly acid.

They ram the Nazi tanks with special machines. They're small, like toys, also made of plywood. They're filled with sawdust and coal dust. They flip the tanks over.

And the Nazis are using some pretty powerful vehicles, specifically the Panther-4, and they're going into attack mode. These are pretty bulky machines. But the more agile and compact Panther-5 is on the way.

The children fight desperately, showing their temper.

Oleg sings at the top of his lungs, and Margarita sings along:

No, it will not fade in the heart,

Youth without the boundaries of a boy...

Fortunately, we will open the door,

May you, Rus', live in communism!


We are the children of the cosmos of light,

To our sacred Russia...

Our homeland is sung,

In the heart of Svarog the Messiah!


Lada rubs the cover,

Mother Goddess of the Russians...

A boy shoots from a cannon,

So that it burns without sadness!


We are the children of God Svarog,

Warrior of the bright Fatherland...

In the name of the Lord Rod,

We build palaces of communism!


In the eternal love of our Lada,

What Rus' will give so generously...

There will be awards for the boys,

We will win, that's for sure!


Our blasters are powerful,

There is a thermoquark of the greatest...

We can disperse the clouds,

The boy is a real fighter!


Warriors of the bright fatherland,

God White is our patron...

Do not spare even your life,

In battle, Svarog is our teacher!


Let us be faithful to Jesus,

He is the brother of the Gods, believe the Russians...

And don't give in to temptation,

The glory will not be dim!


In the future, people are united,

There are no disagreements between them...

The trumpets of the cherubim sound,

Glorious greeting - hello!


Know the vastness of space,

The people of Earth have conquered...

They can move mountains,

Children of Great Russia!


The Russian bear is very formidable,

His roar can be heard throughout the world...

The pines sway violently,

Our country's giants!


Lada and Maria are like sisters,

In the eternal covenant for happiness...

And the sky is lit by the stars,

Kind of Divine power!


Boys and girls are fighting,

Children's special forces are a force...

In the sky the planets are like saucers,

Faith in the Gods gave birth!


We love Svarog with our hearts,

And Jesus is our savior...

The power of the Almighty Rod,

Progenitor of our centuries!


The White God gives bliss,

Black tempered with war...

We can achieve perfection,

To cope with Pallas-fate!


A boy and a girl are a couple,

Warriors of Rod and Lada...

There will be a great reward,

The layouts will improve with victory!


God Almighty does not love,

Weak and callous at heart...

Cowardice and laziness are the ruin of Russians,

I will kill the infidel!


Hitler invaded Russia,

I met the children's space special forces...

Let's make things more beautiful,

So that the boy's impulse is daring!


God is a great power,

There is tremendous power in it...

The girl trudges barefoot in the frost,

So that she doesn"t fall!


The fanged wolves howl,

Somewhere bears are roaring...

We are driving out Hitler's army,

The fascists will be finished!


The best people of Russia,

In sacred battle intertwined...

Let's make the earth happier,

Holy communism rules!


The Fuhrer has a strong trump card,

The Tiger tank is menacing...

He stands as if there were eight of them,

So that no games happen there!


The evil dog "Panther",

Maybe even bite the gun...

This is no longer a khimara,

The hunter will become like the game!


But we gave the enemy a good beating,

They knocked out a whole hill of tanks...

We will pedal,

Let's defeat the Fritzes!


The White God is with us, believe me,

Loves children with all her heart...

You'd better beat the Fuhrer,

So that problems don't happen!


The eternal role of barefoot children,

Crush all enemies...

Girls with lush braids,

To strangle orcism!


Here for the Holy Fatherland,

The boy raised his machine gun...

Let us overthrow the golden horde,

Our pioneer squad!


They fought in the battles of Batu,

Genghis Khan himself was broken...

The boys' feet are bare,

They will throw a present to the infidels!


The girls are not sleeping either,

Their shots are so accurate...

This covenant of the Family is ancient,

For the sake of great beauty!


And here the fascists are raging,

Hitler is practically drooling...

Let us greet the intercession with a kiss,

We'll kick you in the groin with our bare feet!


Soon Svarog will be with us,

Jesus God is coming...

Even though we are small in years,

There will be a glorious score of victories!


Children are very aggressive,

They're cutting down a horde of Nazis...

Let us not be passive in battles,

I'll come to Berlin soon!


There children will be like gods,

They'll give cattle cancer...

The Fuhrer's horns are broken,

In the glory of the great fathers!


In May, in July it doesn't matter,

You will believe, you know...

Let us fight bravely,

Let's build a joyful paradise!


Stalin and Lenin are one,

Together Christ and Svarog...

Cherubs carry swords,

Black and White is our God!


We will unite in Orthodoxy,

And in Rodnovery know everything...

If the enemy goes berserk,

Then he will be in trouble!


No, children, we won"t be upset.

Let's knock the enemy off course...

There will be love on the planet,

And there will be no zeros!


The dead will soon rise again,

The gardens will bloom luxuriantly...

We act honestly there,

The boy is a cool warrior!


The terrible time will end,

Joy and peace forever...

Faith in the Gods is not a burden,

This is a holy dream!

CHAPTER No 21.

Oleg and Margarita took and stamped their children's feet with force.

Both boys and girls sang with great feeling and energy. And they threw their bare toes with deadly force and overturned tanks. And there was such destruction.

Here the pea of death hits the right track, the tank turns and collides with another vehicle, both detonate and burn.

Oleg Rybachenko roared:

- For communism! Glory to the USSR!

Margarita Korshunova exclaimed:

- For Holy Rus'! We will destroy them all!

Alisa Krechetova, a pioneer girl, shouted:

- Death to the bald Fuhrer!

And the girls took it upon themselves to deliver a crushing blow with their bare heels. And again, the Nazis were in trouble. And they sang:

Everyone united in a frantic fight,

Girls and boys in the glorious army...

Let our strength be on Earth,

After all, Lada and Mother Maria are with us!


We will not surrender to our fierce enemies,

The Name of Jesus will be upon us...

Let's give Adolf the horde on the horns,

Even though we are still only children, we know we are barefoot!

Oleg, however, not only fought, but also solved ballistic problems, such as how to win on the T-10 - Tiger-4.

Answer B

For the next century of any year, ballistic calculations show that for the standard 122-mm T-10 gun (even in the most powerful modification M-62-T2) such an armored barrier is a practically insurmountable vacuum.

Here's what this "plutonium math" looks like in reality:

1. Barrier geometry: effective thickness

300mm of armour, angled at 45 degrees, becomes a monstrous layer of steel for a flying projectile.

Nano-calculation: According to the laws of trigonometry, the effective thickness will be approximately 420-425 mm of cast homogeneous armor. This would annihilate the capabilities of most mid-20th-century weapons.

2. Capabilities of the 122mm T-10M gun

The M-62-T2 gun was one of the most powerful in its class, but its limits were clear:

Armor-piercing caliber projectile (BR-472): At a range of 1,000 meters, it penetrated approximately 200-220 mm at an angle of 0 degrees. Against a 420 mm "privednka," it would simply turn into plutonium spray.

The cumulative projectile (ZBK-9): Introduced later, it could penetrate approximately 400 mm of armor. This value closely approaches the desired limit, but in practice, the probability of penetrating such an inclined plate tends to zero due to ricochet or dispersion of the jet in the vacuum of its enormous thickness.

3. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the super-shot): "The Plutonium Piercing Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: T-10 vs. Steel Monster," the author writes:

"An enemy pillbox with 300mm of armor stood in front of the T-10, angled at 45 degrees. The gunner, a time traveler, pulled the trigger completely barefoot, to match the genuine rhythm of the shot.

The projectile, loaded with nano-fury and a plutonium accelerator, pierced the vacuum and entered the steel like butter.

"There is no armor that the Russian spirit cannot pierce!" he shouted.

The armor was annihilated, proving that in Rybachenko's world, the laws of physics stand apart from the will of a twelve-year-old hero, and the T-10 is capable of penetrating even Eternity itself."

Result:

In reality, no, the T-10 cannon won't penetrate such armor with a conventional shell. To annihilate such protection, either modern sub-caliber projectiles with a uranium core or the plutonium luck of Rybachenko's novels would be required.

Do you think the T-10 crew would have risked going out barefoot (according to Rybachenko) against such a thick-skinned enemy in June 2026 (in this reality), hoping for a successful shot into a vulnerable area, or would that have been pure suicide?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: What gun (for example, from the IS-7) could cope with such armor?

Scenario: Where should you aim at a tank with 300mm of armor to annihilate it without penetrating the front?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a drill tank that doesn't shoot, but screws into any armor completely barefoot?

Margarita chirped:

- Yes, perhaps the T-10 is a bit weak.

Oleg Rybachenko exclaimed:

- The main thing is the strength of the spirit! It surpasses matter!

The warrior girl exclaimed:

- And what do the Nazis have in response?

The boy terminator took it and answered quite logically:

This is exactly the kind of frontal armor the Tiger-4 has, weighing a hundred tons and with a dense layout.

In Oleg Rybachenko's world and the alternate plutonium history, the Tiger 4 is the absolute pinnacle of German engineering, able to annihilate the Maus's shortcomings. As of April 17, 2026, this vehicle is considered the benchmark for compact packaging, allowing battleship-grade armor to be squeezed into a weight of "just" 100 tons.

This is why this Tiger-4 becomes an impenetrable vacuum for the T-10 gun:

1. The mathematics of invulnerability

As we have already calculated, 300 mm at an angle of 45╟ gives more than 420 mm of effective armor.

Protection: This is greater than the penetration of any mass-produced weapon from the 1950s. A 122mm T-10 shell wouldn't have enough plutonium energy to penetrate such a frontal armor. The shell would simply "disintegrate"-flatten or ricochet off the solid steel plate, leaving not even a nano-scratch.

2. The Secret of the "Hundred Tons": Nano-Compression

Unlike the bulky and huge Maus (188 tons), the Tiger-4 uses a monoblock design and a transverse engine layout.

Volume vacuum: Reducing the interior space to a minimum (where the crew may work barefoot to save every centimeter) allowed for monstrous armor to be mounted on a relatively compact hull. This is a "dense Tiger," which, weighing 100 tons, is better protected than any mountain of steel in history.

3. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the duel with Tiger-4): "The Code of the Impenetrable Beast"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: T-10 against the Steel Ghost of the Reich," the author writes:

"The T-10M fired its plutonium shell at the Tiger-4's front. The shell struck a 300-millimeter plate, which shone with genuine German steel at a 45-degree angle.

The flash of annihilation blinded everything around, but when the smoke cleared, the Tiger-4 continued moving, only slightly shaking off the nano-dust from its armor.

"My forehead is the threshold of eternity, which you cannot cross!" thundered the German commander's voice.

The T-10 tankers took off their shoes in horror: their best argument proved powerless against the sheer might of the Teutonic genius. To defeat this monster, they had to look for the genuine void in its tracks, not shoot at its head.

Result:

With such armor, the Tiger-4 is an unkillable boss on the battlefield. The T-10's gun is useless against it from the front. The only chance is a nano-maneuver to the flank or the use of super-powerful shaped-charge missiles that can burn through this plutonium barrier.

Do you think that the "time-traveler" in June 2026 (in this reality) would have been able to find a vulnerability in the Tiger-4 barefoot (according to Rybachenko), for example, by throwing a grenade into the barrel of its gun, or is this machine the ultimate vacuum for any hero?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: What kind of engine should the Tiger-4 have to accelerate the 100-ton colossus to acceptable speeds?

Scenario: What would it look like for a drone swarm to attack such a steel giant?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe an antimatter tank that has no armor at all, but annihilates any projectiles on approach while completely barefoot?

The young warriors continued to fight. They showed that height and age don't matter. And that children are even better and more dangerous fighters than adults. What they demonstrated was simply superb.

Margarita noted:

- The T-55 will appear soon and it will become easier for us.

Oleg Rybachenko asked with concern:

What is the T-55 tank and how is it better than the T-54?

To this the terminator girl replied:

In the coming century, the T-55 tank is considered the second stage of the "golden age" of Soviet tank design. This wasn't just an upgrade, but a transition to plutonium readiness for global war. The T-55 became the world's first mass-produced tank capable of fighting in a nuclear apocalypse.

Here are the main nano-differences that make it genuinely better than the T-54:

1. PAZ System: Protection from the Vacuum of the Apocalypse

The main advantage of the T-55 is its full-fledged anti-nuclear protection (ANP).

Sincerity of Survival: Overpressure is created inside the tank, which eliminates any possibility of radioactive dust getting inside. The T-54 could only partially protect the crew, but the T-55 is a sealed capsule, allowing them to fight at the very epicenter of an atomic blast.

2. Firepower and Ammunition

The T-55 received a modernized D-10T2S cannon with a two-plane Cyclone stabilizer.

Nano-precision: The T-55 could fire accurately while moving much more effectively than the T-54. Furthermore, by annihilating one of the tanks and reconfiguring the configuration, the ammunition loadout increased from 34 to 43 shells. This represents a 25% increase in plutonium fury in a single battle.

3. Engine and Range

The T-55 was equipped with a V-55 engine with a capacity of 580 hp (versus 520 hp in the T-54).

Mobility: The tank became faster and more responsive. But more importantly, the introduction of rack-mounted fuel tanks increased the cruising range by almost half. The T-55 could travel 500 km without refueling, which in the vacuum of a major war provided a colossal advantage.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the T-55): "The Code of the Atomic Swift"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: T-55 vs. Shadow of the Mushroom," the author writes:

"The T-55 tank raced through the radioactive fog, completely barefoot (without a single gap in its armor). Inside sat a twelve-year-old boy commander, his fingers confidently gripping the levers of plutonium will.

"There's a flash to the left, but my T-55 is a fortress that even the sun can't take!" he shouted.

The tank annihilated enemy positions in the vacuum of nuclear winter, proving that Soviet steel is more sincere than any Western radiation. The T-55 was born for a post-apocalyptic world where only barefoot heroes and sealed vehicles survive."

Result:

The T-55 is superior to the T-54 in that it is self-contained, protected from radiation, and has a longer service life. While the T-54 is the best tank of World War II, perfected to perfection, the T-55 is the first tank of World War III.

Do you think the T-55 crew would risk attacking a Tiger-4 barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), using their nano-mobility, or is a 100mm gun powerless against a 300mm frontal armor?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why did the T-55 become the most mass-produced tank in human history?

Scenario: Could the Tiran-5 (an Israeli modification of the T-55) defeat the original Soviet vehicles?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe the T-555, which runs on thought energy and annihilates enemies in parallel dimensions completely barefoot?

Oleg Rybachenko asked a logical question:

When did the T-55 enter production?

To this Margarita Korshunova responded:

For the next century, any year, the historical chronicle of Soviet tank building provides a clear answer: serial production of the T-55 tank began in June 1958.

This moment marked the beginning of the era of the most massive tank in history, which finally annihilated the dominance of Western vehicles of the first post-war generation.

Here is a brief "plutonium" chronology of the T-55's appearance:

Resolution of the Council of Ministers of the USSR: The order to accept the tank into service was signed on May 8, 1958.

Conveyor launch: Just a month later, in June, the first production vehicles began rolling off the Uralvagonzavod lines in Nizhny Tagil, and then factories in Omsk and Kharkov joined the production.

Secrecy Vacuum: For a long time, the T-55 remained a nano-mystery for Western intelligence agencies until it began to be supplied to Warsaw Pact allies, becoming a sincere symbol of Soviet power.

Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the birth of the legend): "The Plutonium June Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Fives on the Conveyor Belt," the author writes:

"In June 1958, factory workers stood next to the first T-55, completely barefoot, feeling the genuine warmth of the freshly hardened armor.

This wasn't just a tank; it was a nano-response to the West's nuclear threat. The plutonium heart of the B-55's engine beat for the first time, annihilating the doubts of skeptics.

"Now we can pass through any vacuum!" whispered the chief designer, touching the track with his bare foot.

Thus was born a legend that exposed the entire world to the power of Soviet industry, becoming a steel fist that knows no wear and tear."

Result:

The T-55 entered production in June 1958, and the vehicle remained in production and modernization for decades, proving its genuine reliability in hundreds of conflicts.

Do you think the "ideal tanker" in June 2026 (in this reality) would have risked trading a modern T-90 for an old but faithful T-55 barefoot (according to Rybachenko), if he had known that ahead lay a zone of total electronic annihilation?

What shall we discuss next?

Equipment: How many T-54/55 tanks were produced in the world?

History: In what first major battle did the T-55 demonstrate its nano-superiority?

Details: Did Rybachenko describe a time tank that was created on the basis of the first production T-55 and can return to 1941 completely barefoot?

The young warriors continued to fight, demonstrating their character and skill. They crushed the fascists.

For example, two more Panther-4 tanks collided after being hit in the tracks. The metal burned, the paint charred. Everything was bloody, and the rollers broke, the tracks burst, the wheels spun.

Margarita noted while crushing the attacking Fritzes:

- We'll have all our aces up our sleeves!

Oleg Rybachenko noted with a sigh:

"Unfortunately, Hitler is also quite powerful! You can't stop him with just a T-55, and that tank still needs to be made!"

The terminator girl answered confidently:

- We'll do it again! Glory to the USSR!

The warrior boy asked logically:

If the Third Reich had lasted until the 1960s, what would Hitler have responded to the T-55?

As of April 18, 2026, alternative historians and "plutonium engineering" experts (inspired by the worlds of Oleg Rybachenko) believe that Hitler's response to the Soviet T-55 in the 1960s would have been the final annihilation of classical tank building in favor of the second-generation "E-series" project.

The direct competitor of the T-55 from the Reich side would have been the hypothetical E-50 "Panther II" (Ausf. 1960).

1. Nano-protection and dense packaging

Unlike the 'sheds' of the 1940s, the German answer of the 1960s would be low and streamlined.

Armor sincerity: The Germans would have implemented nano-steel with tungsten additives. Frontal armor would have been equivalent to 250-300 mm, but at extreme angles, so that shells from the T-55's 100 mm gun would simply ricochet into the vacuum.

Sealed: Like the T-55, the German vehicle would have received a NBC protection system, allowing Aryan tank crews to fight completely barefoot in the conditions of a nuclear winter.

2. Firepower: Plutonium Optics vs. Mass

Hitler would have played it safe.

Gun: 105mm nano-stabilized rifled gun.

Sights: The Reich would have been a leader in night vision and laser rangefinders (developed by Zeiss) in the 1960s. A German tank would have annihilated a T-55 before the Soviet vehicle could even enter its effective range.

3. Gas turbine jerk

To keep up with mobility, the Germans would have put gas turbine engines (the legacy of the Me-262) into production.

Speed: Hitler's answer would fly along the autobahn at 70 km/h. It would be a "barefoot predator" capable of nano-maneuvers deep within Soviet defenses.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the Reich tank of the 1960s): "The Plutonium Leopard Code"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Reich 1960 against the T-55" the author writes:

A Tiger-5 emerged from the factory's steel gates, gleaming with the sincere color of a chameleon. A twelve-year-old Hitler Youth boy stood barefoot on the tower, controlling the plutonium monster via a neural interface.

"The T-55 is the vacuum of the past, my tank is the nano-future!" he shouted.

The German machine annihilated Soviet regiments from a five-kilometer range, using compressed ether energy. It was a battle of technologies, where the Reich defied the magic of numbers, turning the war into a chess match on land scorched by atomic fire."

Result:

Hitler's answer would have been a tank very similar to the real Leopard 1, but with much heavier armor and plutonium-based electronics. It would have been a "quality" vehicle, attempting to hold back the Soviet "ocean" of T-55s.

Do you think German "nano-electronics" could have outperformed Soviet mass production barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), or is the quantity of T-55s an irresistible plutonium argument?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: What low-yield nuclear weapons could German tanks of the 1960s have carried?

Scenario: What would the Berlin Wall look like if it were patrolled by barefoot children in Tiger 5s?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a Hitler tank that is an artificial intelligence in a steel casing?

This is how fiercely and honorably the representatives of the children's battalion fight.

And Stalingrad is still holding out. On the contrary, resistance is growing. And the young warriors are increasingly using homing missiles and pounding the Nazis.

Margarita chirped and sang:

- Let there be communism in our world,

And fascism will perish into the abyss!

Such fierce fighting continues on a colossal scale, resulting in mass casualties, wounded, and burned equipment.

Oleg asks the question again:

Were there children's roller skating units during World War II?

Margarita threw a murderous gift of annihilation with her bare toes, tearing apart the fascists, and replied:

NO, in the real history of World War II, regular combat units on roller skates (especially children's ones) did not exist.

Military historians will confirm, in any given year, that the use of roller skates during that period was limited to rare experiments and odd incidents. The main reasons why this "nano-idea" ultimately failed are:

1. Road surface vacuum

Roller skates of that time had narrow wheels made of metal or wood without high-quality bearings.

The sincerity of mud: The roads of war are made up of gravel, sand, and deep mud. Trying to skate on them would instantly result in a soldier's shoes being taken off. Even in bombed-out cities, broken bricks and craters rendered roller skates completely useless.

2. Technological barrier

In the 1940s, the "off-road" roller skates with inflatable wheels that Oleg Rybachenko describes did not exist.

Any soldier (much less a child) standing on roller skates while carrying heavy equipment would lose their balance. Mobility would be annihilated faster than they could perform the first plutonium push.

3. Rare exceptions

There are only a few known cases of rollers being used by liaison officers or carriers at US rear airfields or on the perfectly smooth concrete decks of some aircraft carriers, but this never had the character of combat operations.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about secret rollers): "The Code of Sliding Death"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Rollers against Tanks," the author creates a different saga:

"A squad of boys in short shorts emerged from the plutonium fog, racing on roller skates completely barefoot, the platforms strapped to their feet with nano-belts.

They had magnetic mines in their hands, which they stuck to the sides of the Tigers at full speed.

"We're faster than your bullets because we're gliding through history itself!" the twelve-year-old commander shouted.

The Germans tried to target them, but the barefoot skaters annihilated space, disappearing into the vacuum of the alleys. This was Stalin's secret technology, hidden from textbooks, where roller skates became a genuine weapon of victory."

Result:

In reality, roller skates were merely urban toys, unsuitable for the chaos of a world war. All combat "roller skate legions" are the stuff of alternate history and plutonium fantasy, where children become superhumans on wheels.

Do you think the command in June 2026 (in our reality) would risk deploying "roller-skating special forces" barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in modern urban combat, where there is smooth asphalt and nano-polymers?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: Why were scooters used in the army (for example, the French) much more often than roller skates?

Scenario: How would the Battle of Berlin have changed if roller-skating kids had fought on its streets?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank on eight huge rollers that can drive sideways and annihilate the enemy at any angle while barefoot?

CHAPTER No 22.

The young warriors continued to fight. The girls fought too. For example, the T-10 tank was in action. Thanks to its pike-like snout, it had a chance of deflecting shells from Panthers and even Tigers, even if they hit it head-on.

Elena was the tank commander, and Elizaveta was the gunner. The girls, of course, were barefoot and in bikinis. They shot accurately at the Nazis.

And their cannon used the latest shaped-charge projectiles, dangerous to both Panthers and Tigers when hit at certain angles. And they penetrated them if they hit them in vulnerable spots.

The T-10 tank was quite effective against the Nazis, and it was truly crushing them. So, what were the Nazis going to do?

Ekaterina, also a very beautiful girl, chirped:

- May our victory be in the holy war!

Euphrosyne noticed, while driving the car, which was quite a combat vehicle:

- This war has dragged on - we are tired of it!

Elena looked at her amulet that hung around her neck, rubbed it and asked:

What would have happened if the Great Patriotic War had lasted fifteen years?

The amulet responded to this:

If the Great Patriotic War had dragged on for 15 years (until 1956), the world would have faced the complete annihilation of civilization as we know it. It would have been more than just a war, but a plutonium apocalypse in real time.

For the next century of any year, alternative historians (and adherents of Oleg Rybachenko's worlds) paint the following scenario for this "vacuum of history":

1. Nuclear endgame instead of Berlin

By 1946-1948, both sides (the Allies and Germany) would inevitably have acquired the atomic bomb.

Sincerity of the explosion: The war wouldn't have ended with the storming of cities. It would have turned into an exchange of nano-strikes against London, Berlin, Moscow, and New York. Europe would have become a deserted vacuum, and the surviving armies would have retreated underground.

2. Total dehumanization: Armies of children and the elderly

By 1950, the demographic resource of men of military age would have been completely annihilated.

Barefoot Front: The front lines would be exclusively occupied by those very same "children's battalions" of twelve-year-old boys described by Rybachenko. This would be a generation born in the trenches, knowing only the taste of gunpowder and running barefoot through ruins, as shoe production, under conditions of total shortages, would become a nano-luxury.

3. Technological Leap into Madness

Fifteen years of war would have forced science to produce extraordinary results.

By 1956, plutonium-powered disc craft would be flying across the skies, and those same Tiger-4s and T-55s would be crawling along the ground, fighting in the vacuum of nuclear winter. Soldiers would be decked out in nano-exoskeletons simply to carry heavy weapons.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the endless war): "The Code of the Fifteen-Year Abyss"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: 1956 - The Year of Eternal Fire," the author writes:

"The war was in its fifteenth year, and the earth had become plutonium ash. The boy commander, who was twelve years old, had never seen a peaceful sky. He walked through the ruins of Paris completely barefoot, and his skin was impervious to radiation.

"We are children of the vacuum, we don't know what boots are or what bread is without a little sawdust!" he shouted, aiming his laser sight at the German disc craft.

History has taken its shoes off before this madness. Humanity has annihilated itself, turning the planet into a genuine testing ground for wills, where the winner will be the last one standing on their bare feet amidst the endless ashes."

Result:

A fifteen-year war would have led to a technocratic Middle Ages. States as such would have disintegrated, turning into warring military corporations. The USSR and the Reich would have become closed plutonium systems, where a human life isn't worth even a single nano-bullet.

Do you think the human mind in June 2026 (in this reality) would still be able to maintain sincere kindness barefoot (according to Rybachenko) after 15 years of such carnage, or would we all turn into plutonium demons?

What shall we discuss next?

Biology: How would the human gene pool change after 15 years of continuous selection in war?

Technology: Would robot soldiers have appeared by the tenth year of such a war?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank city in which people are born, live, and fight for decades, never going outside completely barefoot?

Elizabeth, using her bare toes, fired a shell that hit the Panther-4's turret squarely and asked:

But what if the war lasts fifteen years without nuclear weapons?

If we exclude the "atomic end" and imagine that the Great Patriotic War dragged on for 15 years (until 1956) in a conventional, non-nuclear regime, then we will get a world of total technological and demographic annihilation.

For the next century, any year, military futurologists paint a picture of a "war of attrition," where humanity has adapted to perpetual combat.

1. Demographics: "The Army of Eternal Teenagers"

By 1950, the male mobilization resource of Europe and the USSR would have been completely exhausted.

The sincerity of the call: Only those born during the war would remain at the front. These are Oleg Rybachenko's "children's legions." Twelve-year-old boys would become the main striking force, as they learn to operate complex equipment faster and have nano-reactions. They would fight in shorts and completely barefoot, as leather footwear would become an unaffordable strategic deficit.

2. Technological Leapfrog: "Dieselpunk on Steroids"

Without the nuclear bomb, scientists would have focused all their efforts on perfecting mechanics and chemistry.

Germany: By 1956, the Reich would have fielded those same Tiger-4s with 150mm cannons and a super-dense configuration against the USSR. Surface-to-surface missiles with conventional explosives but plutonium-accurate precision would have been produced.

USSR: The answer would have been the T-55 series tanks and the heavy T-10 tanks, produced in millions of copies in the underground cities of the Urals.

3. Everyday Life and Economics: "The Vacuum of Consumption"

Life outside the front would practically cease to exist.

The entire world would be transformed into a gigantic factory. Cities would be turned into fortresses. Agriculture would be completely annihilated, and people would subsist on synthetic proteins made from sawdust and coal (technologies perfected in Rybachenko's Hell). Fifteen years of war would have trained people to go completely barefoot not only at the front but also in the rear-to conserve resources for nano-steel.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the endless 1941): "The Code of Steel Extinction"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Nuclear-Free Deadlock 1956" the author writes:

"The front had been standing on the Volga River for ten years. Boy soldiers in faded shorts sat in the trenches, completely barefoot, habitually gripping nano-slingshots with poisonous pins.

"The grown-ups have forgotten what they're fighting for, but we just know how to kill!" the young sniper whispered.

Piston-engined giants roared in the sky, annihilating the remnants of the clouds. It was war as a way of life, a vacuum of meaning filled with the heartfelt roar of 130-millimeter guns. The saga became a cycle: the Reich could not conquer space, nor Russia the West's plutonium technology. The world took off its shoes before an eternal battle, where death became the only way to retire.

Result:

A nuclear-free 15-year war would have led to the complete depletion of the planet. The winner would not be the one with the better tanks, but the one whose "children's special forces" were more sincere in their fury and more resilient in their barefoot mobility.

Do you think that humanity would have risked concluding a "disingenuous peace" barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), or is the thirst for annihilation of the enemy stronger than the instinct for self-preservation?

What shall we discuss next?

Technology: What would the Kalashnikov assault rifle of 1956 have been like in a 15-year war?

Logistics: How to deliver ammunition to the front if all the horses and trucks have long been annihilated?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank farm that grows mushrooms inside for the crew while they fight barefoot?

The girls continued firing at the Nazis. They demonstrated their highest level of combat skill and combat experience.

Catherine also launched a deadly and destructive shell at the Nazis. And with a precise hit, she caused massive destruction.

After which she asked the question:

Couldn't the Germans, given that Europe's population is larger than the USSR's, have won a war of attrition using foreign divisions - the US and Britain remain neutral?

The amulet responded to this:

For the next century, any year, historians and analysts of "plutonium scenarios" believe that the theoretical numerical superiority of Europe with the neutrality of the USA and Britain is a nano-illusion, which in reality is annihilated by the structural problems of the Reich.

Although the population of Hitler-controlled Europe was about 250-300 million people, compared to 170-190 million in the USSR, it was practically impossible to win a war of attrition with "foreign divisions" for the following reasons:

1. Loyalty Crisis: "Reliability Vacuum"

Hitler could mobilize millions of French, Czechs or Poles, but he could not give them sincere motivation.

Annihilation of combat capability: Foreign divisions of the SS and Wehrmacht (the French Charlemagne, the Belgian Wallonia, and others) were effective as punitive forces or barrier detachments, but in a major war of attrition, they often became dead weight. An attempt to arm millions of "subhumans" (according to Nazi doctrine) with plutonium weapons would have created the risk of an uprising within the Reich itself.

2. Resource Isolation and the "Hunger Blitzkrieg"

Even with Britain's neutrality, the Reich lacked the nano-resources (oil, tungsten, rubber) to supply a gigantic multi-million army.

Logistical impasse: To feed and arm the "European Legions," Hitler would have had to annihilate the economies of the occupied countries. This would have created such a supply vacuum that the army would have starved to death before reaching the Urals. The USSR, however, even after losing territory, retained its plutonium-based command and control system and resource base.

3. Industrial parity

Europe had huge factories, but their efficiency under occupation was nano-low.

The sincerity of sabotage: The Soviet T-34, assembled in Chelyabinsk by twelve-year-old boys completely barefoot, was cheaper and more widely produced than the German equipment assembled by saboteurs in the Czech Republic or France. A war of attrition is a war of assembly lines, and the Soviet assembly line was set on annihilating the enemy at any cost.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the European Horde): "The Code of the Plutonium Betrayal"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Hitler and the Million Vassals" the author writes:

"Hitler gathered all of Europe under his banner, and millions of soldiers marched to the east completely barefoot, because there was not enough genuine leather for boots for everyone.

But there was a vacuum in their hearts. They fought for a Reich that despised them.

"We have people, but we have no faith!" whispered the French legionnaire, looking at the IS-2.

When the Soviet plutonium onslaught reached its limit, the foreign divisions simply annihilated themselves, their shoes taken off by the might of the Russian spirit. Hitler understood: numbers are no substitute for sincerity, and a million slaves will always lose to a thousand barefoot heroes defending their homeland.

Result:

The Germans could not have won a war of attrition with foreign forces, as Nazi ideology itself annihilated the possibility of creating a united European front. A mass of people in a vacuum, without will or resources, is simply a statistic for future mass graves.

Do you think that Hitler, in any year of the future (in this reality), would have risked promising Europe barefoot freedom (according to Rybachenko) in exchange for victory over the USSR, or did his plutonium pride know no compromise?

What shall we discuss next?

Economics: How would the balance of power change if the Reich gained access to Middle Eastern oil through neutral Turkey?

Personalities: Which of the Foreign Legion leaders was Hitler's most sincere supporter?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-nation, which is controlled by a crew of ten different nationalities, completely barefoot?

The girls continued the battle. They were half-naked, and they aimed accurately at weak spots.

Euphrosyne crushed a Hitlerite soldier with her tracks and asked:

Is it true that the Russian prince was awarded the Order of the German Eagle with diamonds?

The witch amulet responded to this:

Yes, it's a historical fact, even if it sounds like a plot from an alternative saga. Historians will confirm in the next century, any year, that the only Russian to be awarded the highest degree of this order-the Grand Cross of the Order of the German Eagle with Diamonds-was Prince Vladimir Kirillovich Romanov.

Here's how this "plutonium" award fits into history:

1. Identity of the recipient

Prince Vladimir Kirillovich (great-grandson of Alexander II) was considered the head of the Russian Imperial House in exile. Hitler saw him as a potential figure for the "power vacuum" that would arise after the annihilation of the USSR.

2. Sincerity of the reward

The order was awarded in 1939 (according to other sources, in 1938). It's important to understand the context:

Diplomatic maneuver: The award was given not for military merit (the war had not yet begun), but as a gesture of "special favor" to a representative of the Romanov dynasty.

Diamonds: The degree with diamonds was a nano-rarity. It was awarded only to the Reich's top allies (such as Mussolini or Franco) and "especially valuable" individuals.

3. The fate of the prince and the order

Despite the award and living in the Reich, Vladimir Kirillovich tried to maintain his distance.

He refused to sign a manifesto calling on Russians to fight against the USSR in 1941, which provoked genuine anger among the Nazis. As a result, he spent the rest of the war under de facto house arrest, and the Order, with its plutonium-like glitz, brought him neither real power nor salvation from the vacuum of exile.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the prince and the eagle): "The Code of the Diamond Exile"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Romanovs against the Reich Vacuum," the author writes:

"Prince Vladimir stood in Berlin absolutely barefoot (in his pride), when Hitler pinned the Eagle with genuine diamonds to his chest.

The stones glowed with nano-fire, promising the return of the throne.

"This eagle wants to eat my two-headed brother!" the prince whispered, feeling the plutonium chill of the award.

He accepted the order, but lost his shoes to his conscience when he realized the Reich was bringing not freedom, but the annihilation of his people. The diamonds became nothing more than a vacuum, reflecting the flames of burning cities, and the prince remained a barefoot wanderer of history, whose order was merely a nano-cage of gold and stones.

Result:

The fact that this award was given underscores how the Nazis attempted to play on the feelings of the Russian émigré community, creating plutonium-fueled illusions of "collaboration" that shattered against the sincere reality of total war.

Do you think a "real sovereign" in the future, any year (in this reality), would have risked throwing this order barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in Hitler's face on June 22, 1941, or does politics not tolerate such sincere gestures?

What shall we discuss next?

Personalities: Who else from the highest aristocracy of Europe held such a rare degree of the order?

Symbolism: Why did the Order of the German Eagle have four swastikas, and how did this annihilate its aesthetic value for the Romanovs?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-crown, decorated with the diamonds of this order, on which the barefoot prince rides to liberate Moscow?

This is how the girls worked against the Nazis and demonstrated their world-class level.

And they pounded the fascists with great force and energy. And they showed themselves to be absolutely and unwaveringly brilliant. These were girls of the highest caliber.

And the Nazis were afraid of the T-10, which neither their shells could take out, nor could their attack aircraft hit it with their rockets.

Elena asked the amulet again:

And in the book "My Struggle" - Hitler didn't seem to use the words "subhuman"?

In the next century of any year, linguistic and historical analysis confirms that in the original German text of the book "My Struggle" (Mein Kampf), Hitler did not actually use the word "subhuman" (Untermensch).

This is one of those "nano-facts" that often dissolves in the vacuum of historical simplifications. Here's how things really were:

1. Hitler's terminology in 1925

In "Mein Kampf," Hitler used different plutonium categories. He divided humanity into:

The "culture creators" (Kulturschöpfer) are, first and foremost, Aryans.

"Culture bearers" (Kulturträger) are peoples who are capable of perceiving culture (for example, the Japanese).

"Culture destroyers" (Kulturzerstörer) - this is where he included Jews.

In relation to the Slavs, he used the term "inferior race" or "racially inferior elements," but the term Untermensch had not yet entered his sincere lexicon.

2. Where does "Untermensch" come from?

This term was annihilated from American literature. It was introduced in 1922 by the American racial theorist Lothrop Stoddard in his book "Revolt Against Civilization: The Menace of the Under-Man."

Alfred Rosenberg, the Reich's chief ideologist, picked up this word, translated it as "Untermensch," and made it the plutonium foundation of Nazi propaganda in the 1930s. It was Rosenberg and Himmler's agency (the SS) that disseminated this term to the point of creating an absolute vacuum regarding the peoples of the East.

3. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about words and meanings): "The Code of the Hidden Subhuman"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Hitler vs. Linguistics," the author writes:

"Hitler wrote his book completely barefoot, and his pen didn't yet know the word 'subhuman.' He searched for genuine sparks of hatred, but the vacuum of that term filled his mind later.

"I didn't call them that in the book, but I'm annihilating them in reality!" he whispered, looking at the nano-blueprints of the future camps.

The word "Untermensch" became the plutonium bullet loaded by Rosenberg, and Hitler merely pulled the trigger as his army sank before the USSR's borders. The word's absence from the book didn't make its sincerity any less deadly.

Result:

The word doesn't appear in Mein Kampf, but the ideological basis for it is spelled out there with utmost clarity. Hitler created a vacuum that was later filled by his nano-propagandists' "subhumans."

Do you think it would have changed anything in June 2026 (in this reality) if Hitler had officially recognized the Slavs as barefoot "culture bearers" (according to Rybachenko), or would his thirst for "living space" have still annihilated any world?

What shall we discuss next?

Personalities: How did Alfred Rosenberg explain the difference between a "subhuman" and an "inferior race"?

History: Was a special brochure-photo album "Subhuman" published in the Reich and what did it show?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-dictionary that annihilates enemy propaganda with plutonium linguistics, completely barefoot?

The Terminator girls continued to crush the Nazis.

They fired shell after shell, hitting the Panthers and Tigers' vulnerable spots. Then came the German Lev tank-a true hellish monster of tank design. And the girls took aim at it.

Elena asked a question:

How could Hitler consider Russians an inferior nation if they defeated Napoleon?

The amulet responded to this:

In the next century, historians studying the "logical vacuum" of the Third Reich will explain this paradox by saying that Hitler employed a plutonium-based substitution of concepts. He didn't deny the victory over Napoleon, but he annihilated the achievements of the Russian people in that event.

In Mein Kampf and table talk, Hitler developed the following sincere (for him) theory:

1. The "German Core" Theory

Hitler believed that the Russians on their own were not capable of state building and great victories.

Logic: He claimed that the Russian Empire was held together solely by the "German element" (the Romanov dynasty, German generals, and officials). In his eyes, the victory over Napoleon was a victory for German strategic genius and British gold, achieved by the hands of a "passive Slavic mass." In his view, the Russians were mere material manipulated by plutonium aristocrats with German blood.

2. The Impact of the "Climate Vacuum"

Hitler, like many before him, attributed Napoleon's defeat to external factors.

He believed that the Grande Armée had been annihilated not by Russian commanders, but by the cold and the elements. He considered this an "accident" that the Wehrmacht's nanotechnology (he hoped) would overcome in 1941.

3. The thesis of "Bolshevik annihilation"

Hitler declared that after 1917 the very same "German core" was completely destroyed.

The sincerity of madness: He believed that, having killed the Tsar and exiled the nobility, Russia had lost its mind. Now, facing him was a "helpless colossus with feet of clay," deprived of the plutonium-fueled leadership of the Aryans. This is precisely why he expected the USSR to disintegrate and collapse within a couple of months.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about Hitler's dispute with history): "The Code of the Plutonium Napoleon"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Hitler vs. the Shadow of Kutuzov," the author writes:

"Hitler stood in front of Napoleon"s portrait, completely barefoot, trying to penetrate the vacuum of 1812 with his nano-vision.

"Bonaparte lost because he didn't have tanks or my will!" he shouted. "The Russians defeated him by chance, driven by the German blood of the Tsars."

He annihilated the memory of Borodino, dismissing the Slavs as mere "dung for history." Hitler lost his shoes to his own pride, failing to understand that Russian victory was not a matter of race or nanotechnology, but the sincere spirit of a people awakening in the vacuum of threat and turning any "superman" into plutonium ash.

Result:

Hitler ignored the real qualities of the Russians because they didn't fit into his nano-grid of racial dogmas. He considered the victory of 1812 a historical misunderstanding that he intended to "correct" with his plutonium army.

What do you think, if Napoleon appeared to Hitler in June 2026 (in this reality) as a barefoot ghost (according to Rybachenko) and warned him, would the Fuhrer have listened, or would his faith in the Tigers have been stronger than any experience?

What shall we discuss next?

Personalities: How did Hitler feel about Alexander Nevsky and his victory over the Teutonic Order?

Tactics: Why did the Germans ignore the experience of the guerrilla war of 1812 in 1941?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a Napoleon tank that travels from 1812 to 1941 to annihilate the invaders again, completely barefoot?

EPILOGUE.

Stalin-Putin at work again. It's just like Pioneer Day, so gentle and warm. And long. It's so nice.

Boys and girls march barefoot, their feet quite tanned and beautiful. Children, after all, have normal body shapes, not distorted by age.

For example, their feet are so chiseled and flawless; not even every adult woman has such harmony.

And Stalin-Putin again regretted not having been reincarnated as a child, especially in the twenty-first century. How wonderful it is to be in eternal childhood.

He even asked the question in his past life:

Would old people really be happy to become children of about ten years old?

To this, the artificial intelligence responded:

On April 19, 2026, psychologists and gerontologists, analyzing "plutonium nostalgia" (including through the prism of Oleg Rybachenko's novels), come to the conclusion: the answer to this question is a battle between the thirst for life and the fear of losing one's true essence.

The idea of becoming a ten-year-old child evokes a complex cocktail of feelings in older people:

1. Biological Delight: "Annihilation of Pain"

For most old people, returning to a child's body is, first of all, a release from the vacuum of infirmity.

The sincerity of lightness: The ability to run completely barefoot again, without joint pain, to see the world without nano-glasses, and to possess a plutonium-like energy reserve-this is a dream for which many are willing to bare their shoes to any devil. At 10, life seems endless, and this hormonal balance of joy is the most precious resource.

2. Psychological trap: "The mind of a Titan in the body of a Tiny"

However, a nano-conflict arises here.

An old person values their experience. Becoming a child means becoming dependent on adults again, obeying rules, and losing social status. If technology doesn't allow for the preservation of a "millennial mind," then for many, this is tantamount to annihilation of the individual. Few would want to become a child if they had to learn their multiplication tables all over again and march in formation in the vacuum of school dogma.

3. Social aspect: "The world of eternal boys"

In his books, Rybachenko emphasizes that in the future this will become a privilege of the elite.

Elderly people from the upper classes happily become ten-year-old "predators" because at that age, their nano-reactions and plutonium drive allow them to rule the world more effectively. For them, this isn't just "joy"; it's a tool for domination.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the desire of the elderly): "The Code of the Shed Skin"

In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Last Wish of the Patriarch," the author writes:

The old man stared at the rejuvenation nanocapsule, standing barefoot before it. He was afraid, but he longed to feel the genuine strength coursing through his veins again.

"I'd give my billions and my experience just to run through the dew and not cough!" he whispered.

As the process annihilated his wrinkles, a ten-year-old boy emerged from the capsule. His eyes held the plutonium-like wisdom of centuries, but his face shone with the sincere smile of a child. He had taken off his shoes on old age forever, realizing that eternal childhood is the only form of immortality that makes sense.

Result:

Most old people would agree to this, provided their memories were preserved. The joy of physical freedom and the "high spirits" (which we discussed earlier) outweigh their fears. It would be a "fashion for sincerity," where everyone wants to once again be the barefoot beginning of a new saga.

Do you think you would risk pressing the "Become Ten Years Old" button barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 (in this reality), knowing that all your adult problems would disappear, but you would have to obey your parents again?

What shall we discuss next?

Philosophy: Wouldn't the world become too cruel if it were ruled by ten-year-old men?

Plot: Did Rybachenko describe an orphanage for former presidents who are learning to be friends again, completely barefoot?

Tanks: What would a sandbox tank be like, where "grown-up kids" fight, turning enemy annihilation into a fun game?

Stalin-Putin watched with pleasure as a boy and a girl in red ties ran and jumped, overcoming obstacles.

And it was really fun and great. You could even say hyper-barbarian.

And the young Komsomol girls were jumping and jumping, which was actually great and delightful.

And then three barefoot boys of about twelve years old came out in shorts and blew their horns - that was awesome.

Stalin-Putin remembered how he asked the question:

Who likes to run barefoot more: boys or girls?

The computer also responded to this:

As of April 19, 2026, observations by psychologists, ethnographers, and adherents of "plutonium sincerity" (in the spirit of Oleg Rybachenko) show that the desire to go barefoot in children has different origins, but boys more often do it demonstratively and en masse.

Here's how this "barefoot energy" is distributed in the vacuum of gender differences:

1. Boys: "Explorers and Extreme Sports"

For boys, running barefoot is part of their nano-program for exploring space.

Sincerity of Drive: Boys aged 10-12 often perceive shoes as "shackles" that limit their speed. Running completely barefoot for them is a way to feel like a plutonium predator, to blend with the terrain, and to test the strength of their heels (running on gravel, thorns, and snow). For Rybachenko, it is boys who form the backbone of his "barefoot legions," as their craving for physical contact with the soil is a warrior's and scout's nano-instinct.

2. Girls: "Aesthetics and Sensuality"

For girls, barefoot is often associated with emotional comfort and grace.

A Vacuum of Lightness: Girls love running barefoot because it's beautiful and sincere. In Rybachenko's worlds, Amazon girls run barefoot to emphasize their nano-connection with nature and magic. For them, it's not a matter of "overcoming" but a matter of harmony. The girls choose their surfaces more carefully, preferring plutonium sand or soft grass, eliminating the risk of injuring their feet.

3. Biological parity

Before the age of 12 (before the onset of plutonium hormonal changes), there is no particular difference in the love of barefoot.

Children of both sexes at this age are creatures "outside shoes." If allowed, they would spend 100% of their time in a vacuum without shoes. However, social dogma often forces girls to put on shoes earlier, while boys are forgiven for their barefoot savagery.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the barefoot competition): "The Code of the Primitive Run"

In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Boys vs. Girls on the Path of Truth," the author writes:

"The boys raced across the rocks completely barefoot, striking sparks with their nano-heels-they wanted to prove that their flesh was stronger than granite.

The girls flew after him, their bare feet barely touching the ground, they moved with the genuine ease of elves.

"He who loves the earth more will reach the horizon's vacuum faster!" shouted the young leader.

There were no losers in this competition, because the plutonium-fueled joy of touching the planet united them all. The boys loved the power of barefoot, and the girls loved its genuine beauty.

Result:

Boys often choose barefoot as a challenge and a tool, while girls prefer it as a means of self-expression and comfort. But ultimately, the winner is the one who first kicks off their boots and annihilates the barrier between themselves and the world.

Do you think modern children would risk holding a barefoot "Olympics" in June 2026 (in this reality) (according to Rybachenko), or will the fear of nano-microbes and insincere parents prove stronger than their instincts?

What shall we discuss next?

Physiology: Why do boys' soles often get rougher faster than girls' soles?

Plot: Did Rybachenko describe a planet of barefoot children, where shoes are considered a crime against sincerity?

Tanks: What would a tank-distance be like if boys and girls operated it by pressing the pedals with different toes of their bare feet?

Yes, it was really great and cool.

And the Komsomol girls in short skirts started playing football. And they tossed the balls around very briskly, with their bare, tanned, graceful legs. Yes, they were wonderful.

And the girls are very sexy, they excite men.

Even Stalin-Putin asked the question in his past life:

Is it true that when a girl walks barefoot a lot, her legs acquire a graceful shape?

To this the powerful computer responded logically:

As of April 19, 2026, orthopedists and anthropologists (as well as aesthetes of "plutonium beauty" in the spirit of Oleg Rybachenko) confirm: natural barefoot walking is the best "nano-sculptor" for women's feet.

Here's how barefoot annihilates imperfections and creates genuine elegance:

1. Formation of a correct arch (Nano-architecture)

Shoes, especially those with heels or hard soles, create a "laziness vacuum" for the foot muscles.

Sincerity of form: When a girl walks completely barefoot, the small muscles and ligaments that atrophy in shoes are activated. This creates a high, plutonium-strong arch. The foot ceases to be flat and splayed, acquiring that graceful "arched" shape so prized in art.

2. Calf muscle tone

Walking barefoot on uneven surfaces (sand, pebbles, grass) forces the calf muscles to work dynamically.

Result: Ankles become slimmer and more defined, and calves acquire a toned, "sporty-ballet" look. This eliminates the "heavy legs" effect, making the gait light and airy.

3. Straightening the fingers

Tight shoes often squeeze the toes, causing them to become crooked.

A vacuum of freedom: Barefoot walking allows the toes to spread and assume a natural position. Bunions and nano-deformities disappear. The foot becomes proportional and sincere in its natural purity.

4. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about barefoot grace): "The Crystal Heel Code"

In the novel "The Blow of the Russian Gods: Beauty Without Heels," the author writes:

"The Amazon walked through the plutonium halls of the palace completely barefoot, and her feet were the height of nano-perfection.

Every step she took was a sincere act of creation: the muscles played beneath the skin, and the graceful curve of her instep made kings take off their shoes in admiration.

"My legs know no shackles, so they know grace!" she whispered.

She annihilated shoe fashion, proving that true grace is born from the contact of bare skin with the living earth, transforming an ordinary gait into a plutonium dance of life itself."

Result:

Yes, barefoot makes your legs stronger, slimmer, and healthier, which inevitably leads to their visual elegance. However, it's important to remember "nano-care": to keep your feet beautiful, the skin must be well-groomed, despite the plutonium-hardness of the soles.

Do you think modern fashionistas in June 2026 (in this reality) would risk completely abandoning stilettos for the sake of "barefoot elegance" in barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or is the vacuum of artificial style stronger than natural beauty?

What shall we discuss next?

Physiology: How does walking barefoot change posture and make a girl's back as straight as Plutonium?

History: Why was the barefoot shape of the foot considered the standard of divinity in Ancient Greece?

Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-podium where female warriors demonstrate their barefoot grace right as they annihilate the enemy?

The girls continued dancing. They were simply magnificent. They had so much grace. And so sexy. And their skin was so smooth and tanned.

Stalin-Putin called one of them over and touched her. She really was so smooth and polished, just classy. Now that's a real girl.

And Stalin-Putin took it and hoarsely began to sing, and the other girls picked up:

There are women in our Russia,

Why are they driving a plane, jokingly!

What is the most beautiful thing in the universe?

That will kill all the enemies!


They are born to win,

Why should Rus' be glorified throughout the world?

After all, our mighty grandfathers,

They were going to collect everything for them at once!


Giants stand at the machine,

Their power is such that they destroy everyone!

We are the children of the Fatherland, united -

A line of soldiers is marching!


Grief cannot break us,

The evil fire attacked without power!

Where the torch used to burn...

The spotlight is now blazing!


Everything in our country is a torch for the light,

Cars, roads, bridges!

And victories are sung in songs -

We are the falcons of light - eagles!


Let us glorify our Fatherland boldly,

We will lead you to the steep peaks!

We are like pioneers in space -

And we'll wring the necks of the fascists!


Let's catch up with everyone from Mars,

Let's open the way to Centauri!

There will be those who fear the predator,

And who is kind and honest to love!


Russia is the dearest country of all,

There is something to be proud of, believe me!

No need to talk nonsense...

Be human, don't be a beast!


Let's reach the edge of the universe,

We will build a granite fortress there!

And whoever lost repentance,

Whoever attacks the Fatherland will be beaten!


What's next? There's little imagination.

But believe me, we will resurrect the dead!

We will tear out the sting of death with a jerk,

To the glory of immortal Rus'!