Аннотация: Active cognition is impossible without conscious immersion in the flows of information and their comprehension to transfer a word into a deed, the main role in which creative people play.
Part 3. On the ratio of cognition and consciousness.
Part 4. On the role of randomness in Creation.
Part 5. On the relationship between consciousness and technology.
Part 6. On the similarities and differences between the thinking of animals, people and artificial intelligence.
Part 7. About the origins and peculiarities of thinking of the creative people and the smart people.
Part 1. Why is there no a matter without a word?
The difference between people and animals is especially evident in the communication of both. In particular, even the most highly developed animals do not own the word, replacing it in communication with gestures and inarticulate sounds. Therefore, it makes sense to find out why and how gestures and sounds, which are the only means of communication for animals, were supplemented by words and meaningful coherent speech, and later by writing, and what role does the image and collective labor play here?
In order to find out why and how gestures and sounds, which sometimes also acquire symbolic meaning, which are used by animals as means of communication, were supplemented by words and meaningful coherent speech, it is necessary, apparently, to first turn to animals, the most advanced of which, in terms of intelligence and communication, are chimpanzees.
People, and it is hardly worth arguing with this, are the heirs of primates.
Therefore, like primates, they strive for food, their own reproduction, improvement of their position among their relatives and comfort, using such basic properties of their individuality, developed over millions of years of evolution, as quick-wittedness, sensitivity, impressionability, decisiveness, one or another degree of sociability, the ability to pry, dominance, perseverance, cooperation in actions, which in their totality, level and relationships constitute the individuality of the animal part of consciousness together with its acquired or genetic characteristics - such as appearance, temperament, adding only to them life experience, skills, behavior acquired in their niche of existence.
More details about the individuality that characterizes animals, and the personality together with the individuality that determine a human behavior, and about the basis of these properties can be found in my essay "Why and how do personality and individuality compete in a person?" (Monograph "About the origin and manifestation of personality." Chapter 1. 2024. Amazon. Yury Nizovtsev).
For primates in their extended-spatial adaptive world, since time is not perceived by them due to the focus of their imagination on the specific objects surrounding them, and they themselves feel themselves and sense their own environment as objects without including any form of generalization or abstraction. The conceptual world for them is replaced by a set of sensations that they do not want to lose, since they understand from the example of their own sleep what hopeless emptiness is.
They spend their days, with rare exceptions, extremely monotonously: they eat, play, have sex and, on occasion, try to take a higher, and therefore pleasant in terms of sensations, place in the pack.
For these activities, it is enough to have the instincts and reflexes, as well as acquired skills, and no special reflection is required with such daily repetition, in essence, of what has already taken place, with an extremely small number of changes and a practical absence of collective labor.
This kind of sluggish accommodative existence in an almost unchanging extended jungle spatial environment
To this kind of sluggish adaptive existence in an almost unchanged extended spatial environment of jungle for tens of millions of years should correspond, and, in fact, correspond, to fairly primitive and few means of communication.
Chimpanzees use vocal communication, first of all, as a signal about the presence of potential threats.
Similar information is expressed in the form of growling, squealing, screaming, but these monkeys are not capable of making articulate sounds.
A total of 12 sound combinations were identified. In particular, the chimpanzees made a single grunt when they saw food, and a series of grunts - as a sign of submissive greeting, noting their lower social status.
However, for a targeted message, chimpanzees use mainly gestures rather than sounds, urging themselves to certain actions and even conducting a dialogue. Only 66 gestures are enough for monkeys to send 19 different information signals.
Nevertheless, a variety of sounds and gestures are used by monkeys mainly for communication, and not for coordinating joint actions, which indicates their egocentrism and a slight interest in cooperation, which is needed to facilitate labor and increase its effectiveness, which is not at all required for these loafers, for whose life there are enough inarticulate sounds and several dozen gestures.
The immutability of this kind of the primate communication for tens of millions of years is perhaps the most convincing evidence that they are fully satisfied with their own adaptive existence in an extended space in which little changes.
That is, in their minds there is no understanding of their own presence in the current time, which is not required in the world of, as a rule, daily repetition of self-service activities, whereas understanding of the presence in time encourages to observe of changes in their own surrounding and, accordingly, - to think about adapting these changes, which can be initiated by themselves, to their own needs, as opposed to simply adapting to what is without much thought.
Interestingly, nature, in fact, did not go beyond primates during evolution, representing the ultimate, most highly organized version of the evolutionary development of living beings within the framework of the adaptation to the environment, which is useless to improve further, which shows the invariability of the primate organism and their behavior for tens of millions of years.
***
Nevertheless, the rather meaningless, more precisely, pleasantly thoughtless adaptive existence of hefty primates, who actually have no enemies in the thick jungle, still turned out to be surmountable, but not only purely natural forces.
This being, of course, did not leave the adaptive tactics in vain, but began to increasingly use the strategy and tactics of implementing changes through its own collective efforts around itself, having relatively quickly achieved a lot not only around itself, but also in its own organism, having increased, in particular, its ingenuity due to the growth of the brain volume and the restructuring of its structure in the direction of associative, abstract and creative thinking in order to achieve initially purely utilitarian goals: to outwit and use everybody else.
That is, these new beings came out of just one adaptive stay in only one according to their sensations of an extended space and they entered into the current time due to the coming of the understanding that they are also in it, which is confirmed by their ability to prudently dispose of them, making various plans, sometimes far-reaching.
This understanding alone provides the opportunity in a series of events to purposefully change the environment, expanding the range of pleasant sensations and achieving greater safety.
Naturally, the joint collective activity, planned-projected in its basis, requires more precise, diverse and qualitatively different forms of communication for the organization and coordination of joint work. Gestures and inarticulate sounds are not enough.
We therefore fix that the chimpanzees, as well as all other living beings that not own time, unlike a person, are located only in the space of repetitive homogeneous relationships leading with instincts and reflexes, and using, as a rule, the trial and error method in their desire to preserve sensations and make them, if possible, more pleasant, which leads to a significant limitation in the consumption as well as generating of information flows, not allowing us to fully reveal the possibilities of living beings in relation to the development of consciousness.
The space of this half-asleep existence for them is limited only by their own sensations without any special reflections, which mainly serve to preserve the same sensations, and they do not guess about the end of these sensations, but, again, only feel it by their own decrepitude, if they manage to live to old age.
The extent of this homogeneous space of sensations is determined for them by the realities of their own environment, developed instincts, reflexes and genome, which includes a program of growth, development, reproduction and ways of interacting with the environment to stay in it.
Thus, the support of all these adaptive beings, including also the most advanced ones, is only sensations, and their thinking mainly serves the desire of these creatures to preserve their sensations, among which there are also pleasant ones, which is automatically indicated by dissatisfaction with what is around with the formation of an ever-present the aspiration for something more nourishing, warm and safe.
Someone who does not know about time, and therefore about the existence of the future, can only remain in the limited space of the present with the addition of the remembered past with no hope of mentally penetrating the future.
Therefore, all these beings are doomed to no more than adaptation to what is around them and next to them. They simply cannot have ideas about transforming this environment for their own even remote benefit, that is, they are not capable of purposefully transforming the environment according to pre-designed projects and schedules, thus subject to fairly random changes in the course of evolution, and the limit of these changes in terms of intelligence and complexity of the organism itself are the highest mammals.
This limit is determined by the program embedded in the genome, according to which only an adaptive form of existence is possible for these creatures within the framework of the preservation of sensations.
The conditions of existence are capable of destroying a species, improving or make it worse adaptability to the environment, but they cannot radically change its program in the genome to an action of the opposite type - a systematic struggle with the environment, while preserving, moreover, partly, the adaptability of actions.
Therefore, the assumption of modern science that anthropogenesis (the transformation of humanoid apes into people) could have begun with the emergence of certain natural conditions on the planet turns out to be completely untenable - evolution is by no means a revolution, and randomness is not capable of generating in some changed conditions such an unusual, as was indicated above, program in the genome, but is only capable of destroying or changing a living being without its fundamental transformation.
And the deprivation of the adaptive form of consciousness based on instincts and reflexes its leading role is a fundamental change in a living being and its behavior, which is possible only as a result of a corresponding change in the program in the genome which also initiates the emergence of self-consciousness, characterized by arbitrary thinking.
In other words, in the absence of this change in the program, living beings, having reached their limit in highly developed mammals, remain so to this day, despite everything that has happened over tens of millions of years, including various metamorphoses of the environment and even catastrophes, and this is manifested in their unwillingness to get out of this pleasant adaptive extended space of connections outside of time for themselves.
But a person who partly fell out of this adaptive extension, thanks, as we believe. the appearance in his genome of an additional program that provokes arbitrary actions in the environment, quite quickly realized that he is being in the current time in which you can knowledgably manage yourself and your environment, one way or another changing it according to your own ideas.
True, he has also realized that he lives only for a certain time, and with its completion, what he created during his life disappears for him. And he cannot but be horrified at this, envying animals that do not understand the inevitable arrival of death, grazing, for example, with all the pleasantness of sensations, on their green lawns. But along with that a person's understanding of his temporality also benefits the development of his consciousness, since he wants his offspring, in which he seems to prolong himself, to live better than him and apply all the forces for this.
***
As mentioned above, a contra-adaptive additional program in the genome could not have appeared under the influence of conditions or accidentally actually synchronously with the emergence of the most advanced of all living beings, the primate, also because of unimaginable complexity of this program.
In addition, programs, as it is known from computer technology, are created by human programmers, do not arise by themselves from nowhere, and are not suddenly replaced in cardinal way.
In other words, the probability of self-assembly of such biological carrier of the program is practically zero, and, accordingly, it cannot be convincing evidence of the natural origin of the genome, despite all the efforts of evolutionists.
Likewise, the emergence of such being, largely separated from the environment, that is, partly extra-natural being, self-aware in the current time, does not look like a natural product of this environment, but a kind of nonsense, which is proven by its uniqueness: not a single one of the highly developed beings on the planet by itself, that is, as a result of natural selection alone over billions of years, has turned into such contradictory creation, combining an adaptive-egocentric individuality together with an altruistic and creative personality.
In addition, evidence of the emergence of a person on the basis of the monkey genome due to the artificial modification of this genome is the fact of unusually rapid restructuring of the genome, which contradicts the speed of evolutionary development usually stated by evolutionists.
The absence of such a smooth evolutionary transition is confirmed by the data of a study conducted by an international consortium of scientists. It included 67 scientists from 23 scientific institutions in 5 countries - the USA, Israel, Spain, Italy and Germany.
During the research they used the computer overlay of the genome map of a chimpanzee on the genome map of a person that has allowed them to mark out three categories of so-called DNA-duplications - those that are available in the human genome, but are absent in a genome of a chimpanzee, those that are available in a genome of a chimpanzee, but are absent in the human genome and those that are available in a genome of both types. DNA-duplication is one of forms of a mutation at which the site of a chromosome is doubled. In this case the segments of DNA with the length not less than 20 thousand nucleotide pairs were considered. It turned out that about a third of DNA-duplications, found in a person, are absent at a chimpanzee. This figure fairly surprised geneticists, inasmuch it testifies to very high frequency of mutations for short (on evolutionary measures) period (See, e.g., dw.de» decryption of a genome ... and ... its comparing ... human).
This shows that the explanation of emergence of a person, offered by evolutionists, as a result of smooth transition of one of type of primates to a person, connected with labor activity and manifestation of communication (socialization) with the help of words that the evolutionists does not recognize in relation the other primates, doesn't maintain criticism.
There is the only explanation of rather rapid transformation of one of type of primates into a person: introduction into the genome (induction) by no means not in a random way the programs, promoting formation at this type of primates of the concepts, distracted from concrete things as a result of communication with similar beings, different ways of evaluating own actions, that promotes emergence of an opportunity for these beings to look at the world from outside, to estimate its usefulness for themselves and to try to change this world purposefully under themselves.
It is known that the ray of light can be modulated by the signal bearing information which is capable to set certain programs of development or to correct the available programs. In particular, at Institute of Problems of Management of the Russian Academy of Sciences the exemplar of DNA has been placed between the laser and an external mirror. Both the direct and reflected beams not only apprehended genetic information, but also radiated it in corresponding frequency range.
Obviously, for emergence at primates of awareness of own existence in the current time were to happen some fundamental internal changes which weren't for all the time of existence of organisms on Earth. What are these changes, if a person has appearance, structure of organs and even the structure of the genome close to that of a chimpanzee?
It is possible to state the following: the similar internal change can only be caused by additional programming of a genome to aware activity.
The following can be stated: such an internal change can only be additional programming of the genome for the aware activity, including the arbitrary, which can be also the creative activity, while the genome for billions of years before the appearance of a person was programmed in all living beings only for instinctive-reflexive activity using the trial and errors method, suitable just for adaptive existence in an extended space of connections.
Therefore, the transformation of the most perfect primate, and this could be a chimpanzee or even more perfect primate, into a prototype of a person is possible only as a result of supplementing the existing adaptive program with another one, capable of provoking a being also for rather arbitrary actions outside the framework of instincts and reflexes.
Apparently, the genome of only one type of chimpanzee or similar monkey was rebuilt for this new program, which unites the previous and introduced ones, as is known, 99% identical to the human genome, which technically simplifies the matter.
Otherwise, that is, with smooth evolutionary development, the possibility of the highest developed primates leaving the adaptive state is simply absent. And indeed, they still remain in this unpromising quality in parallel with a person.
Thus, the most probable reason for the appearance of a person is the artificial change in the genome of the highest developed primate, which forced him to change the purely adaptive way of life to a kind of dual one - adaptive-arbitrary, that is, with the possibility of conscious actions, which can also be creative.
At first, this ingenuity by purposefully change the environment in its favor looked sporadic (the use of fire, the manufacture of primitive tools for labor, the invention of the wheel), but over time it expanded so much that it led to the emergence of such social structure as civilization, a kind of shell of which to a certain extent has insulate a person from wildlife.
Nevertheless, the adaptive part of the general program has not gone anywhere from the genome and still affects the human behavior, competing with an additional program in the genome, which is characterized for the most part not by egocentricity, but by provoking a rather frequent manifestation of ingenuity and altruism in a person.
The manifestation of similar competition of these differently coded parts of the common genome is what finally brought one of the representatives of living beings beyond the limits of the adaptive existence, providing for him a many times more significant consumption of information flows and the corresponding development of consciousness, bringing a person to the proud presentation of himself as a pearl of creation.
True, a person still has not understood that he became like this not by himself, but as a result of the action of such a program in each cell of his own organism, which guarantees him both the ability to adapt and the possibility of creative actions.
As a result, in the human consciousness arose two poles, oriented in opposite directions - egocentrism and altruism, which made it possible, instead of long-term evolutionary changes, to produce literally explosive conscious actions by human communities on this basis of dual contradictory consciousness, stimulating by the struggle of these components of consciousness both in each person and in his communities, the development of not only society as a whole up to the emergence of civilization, but also the development of the human self-consciousness, evidence of which is the increase of mass in the human brain compared to a highly developed primate by 3 times.
You can get acquainted in detail with the problem of the driving force of social development, the basis of which is the interaction of the animal (adaptive) component of the human consciousness and its inventive self-consciousness, in my work "The driving force and source of development of the person and his communities." (2018. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: Amazon. Yury Nizovtsev.)
***
To briefly to formulate the explanation by Darwin's evolutionary theory supporters of the conversion of reflex operating primates in conscious operating people, it is as follows.
They point out that any higher animals did not have the ability to conceptual thinking, i.e. to the formation of abstract representations about subjects, which summarizes the basic properties of concrete things. The process of thinking for animals if it is possible to speak about that, is always concrete, the process of thinking for a person can be the abstract, generalizing, conceptual, logical. Thanks to ability to conceptual thinking, a person understands that he does, and understands the world. The second main difference is that a person possesses the speech. Animals can have very developed system of communication by transmitted signals but only a person has the second signal system - communication through words. It is supposed in natural sciences that the speech came from the sounds uttered during the work which then became common in the course of joint labor. In the same way a mind could occur in the process of social labor gradually.
The evolutionists believe that Darwin's theory has received genetic confirmation in the XX century, since from all the animals the chimpanzee genome upon the genetic apparatus is the closest to human. This genome is identical to the human genome on 99%.
We note with his hand, that, as it is paradoxical, but both arguments of the evolutionists: labor had created a person; a person is genetically almost indistinguishable from chimpanzees, actually lead to the opposite conclusion.
Themselves biologists say that the animal's behavior represents one of forms of functioning of its organism. The structure of the organism determines the needs of animals and their behavior programs. Any animal is born as a being endowed by the set of instincts. Instincts provide its adaptability to environmental conditions and limit individual variations of the behavior.
The situation is different with a person. All people which have lived on Earth the last 35 - 40 thousand years belong to the same type (Homo sapiens).
Thus, for years of change of organisms from the simplest to the primates the reflex system of their reaction to influence of the environment remained actually the same. In other words, programs of their actions are similar each other. And suddenly, for the slight term, in a result of rather short-term influence of external conditions, some species of primates has acquired self-consciousness, that is, understanding of their location in the current time, while others remained monkeys outside this understanding. At this, it is not known which of these monkeys "worked" more, and in fact, monkeys neither then, nor now had and have no relation to conscious collective activity, simply picking up ready-made meal in the tropics, rich in a variety of food.
This very fact denies the spontaneous desire of monkeys for collective work and the formation of verbal communication between them.
Now the theory of Darwin is recognized, at least, disputable just because to explain how the monkey evolved into a person from a position of modern science is not possible.
Obviously, for the emergence of consciousness in the primates had to be occurred certain fundamental internal changes which were not for all the time of existence of organisms on Earth. What are these changes, if a person by its appearance, the structure of organs and even the structure of a genome is very close to a chimpanzee?
It is possible to state the following: only the change of the genome programmed to the instinctive and reflex unconscious activity on the genome programmed also on the conscious collective labor can be as such internal change.
Therefore, the transformation of the most perfect primate - it could be a chimpanzee or an even more perfect primate - into a human prototype is possible only by changing the program.
One of hypotheses believes that the closest human ancestor was a monkey lagoon from Ethiopia. She had less indumentum, she swam well. A significant part of the day she was walking vertically. She had "lowered larynx", the appearance of which, apparently, she is obliged to the semi-aquatic lifestyle. The important thing is that the similar larynx gives the chance to control respiration and, as a result, lets ability to speak.
After similar restructuring, it becomes possible to transform this creature from the adaptive into the adaptive-creative, that is, capable not only of adaptation, but also of transforming the environment for its own purposes. This procedure, which initially consists of introducing an additional program into the creature's genome, creating the possibility of arbitrary and even creative actions, brings this new creature the opportunity to manifest itself in the current time with the consequences of such genome transformation known to us.
Everything else: the ability to labor together with fellow tribesmen, coherent speech, creative thinking, etc. is developed as a consequence over a certain and comparatively not very long period of time, consolidating the dual nature of consciousness and the corresponding actions of this new subject of the history of living beings not so much within the limits of spatial adaptive extension with its insignificant variability based on chance, but in the current event time of various changes, entailing not only the possibility of purposeful transformation of the environment by man in a utilitarian manner, but also the opposite - the desire of a person in his self-consciousness to understand himself and the world around.
It also becomes clear why the transitional link from primates to a person has not yet been found. All the rest are approximately the same primates, not affected by the said transformation, have remained in their previous animal quality. Although, in fact, the conditions of their existence were little different from the existence of the original "candidate" for a person.
Thus, we can say that a being capable only of instinctive-reflexive actions has one program, and this new creature has a different program, more complex and contradictory in its impact on the behavior of a person. Thanks to it, it becomes possible to project one's actions for the future, process their results for subsequent adjustment, using the already accumulated memory from a much larger database than that of primates. At the same time, the adaptive egocentric influence of the program on human behavior does not disappear.
The problem of the emergence of a person is considered in more detail in my work "The person - a product of evolution?! Whether everything is so clear here?! (2018. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: Litres or Amazon. Yury Nizovtsev).
***
As a result of the long evolutionary development of living beings, the most advanced of them, that is, extremely complex creatures - primates, settled quite comfortably in their adaptive space, since they not only had a developed brain capable of controlling the execution of various actions that make life easier, but also, unlike, for example, dolphins, - organs in the form of hands with grips - fingers, which were convenient for obtaining food in various ways, climbing trees for safety, fighting off enemies and doing much more.
This is how, in our opinion, a candidate for a certain extent a non-adaptive lifestyle to appeared, especially since one of the subspecies of these monkeys - the African lagoon monkey, as a result of its semi-aquatic lifestyle, developed the so-called "lowered larynx". It allows you to control your breathing and thus provides the ability not only to scream and moo, but also to pronounce articulate sounds with vowels and consonants.
However, as noted above, the monkeys' way of life did not facilitate the organization of their cooperative actions in one or another form of labor. And gestures and inarticulate sounds were quite sufficient for their communication.
In contrast, with a program that allows them to act quite arbitrarily, such a candidate becomes capable of going beyond the limits of instinctive and reflexive actions, expanding thereby their capabilities for interaction with the environment.
But the most effective labor requires not individual or isolated actions, but the organization of sufficiently thought-out and coordinated actions together, which can be most effective if they are planned in advance, providing for the bypass or elimination of certain obstacles to achieving the set goal, for example, during a collective hunt or fruit gathering. Meanwhile, inarticulate cries and gestures are not the most effective methods of transmitting information during complex collective actions.
Therefore, there has been a need for the formation of sound articulate signals, denoting both numerous relationships, actions, specific objects, and denoting various types of relationships, actions and objects.
Such generalization meant not only the gradual formation of the logic of events and relations, the connection of objects in the present, but their transfer to the future in the form of planned and design procurements.
The emergence of this kind of purposeful activity, which embraces the future along with the past and the present, meant an exit from the spatial adaptive extension of the instinctive-reflexive mode of action repeated every day, into the current time, in which a series of events are initiated by these new beings consciously and purposefully.
In other words, these heirs of the primates acquired, to a certain extent, a regulated time of their own within the framework of external (astronomical) time, since this own time is largely created by them themselves as a result of conscious labor efforts to achieve various goals, which are initially dictated only by urgent needs, and then these goals are directed toward improving the culture of housing, the culture of games, the culture of sex and the culture of idol worship.
As a result of collective activity to overcome the resistance of the environment, and not just passive subordination to it, gradually each community had a rather simple at first articulate language, instead of caves and trees, more comfortable dwellings made of improvised materials, a differentiation of labor with appropriate tools arose.
Note also that for the emergence of a verbal language of communication, these primate heirs had a certain base, since the life of their progenitors was largely based on the use of various images.
The fact is that the highest mammals are capable of holding in their minds for a relatively long time, that is, in virtual form, images of specific things, separated from the things themselves, which increases the probability of keeping these animals in existence, although only at the level of sensations within the framework of adaptation to the environment, but, nevertheless, performing the role of extrapolating data from memory into images of the near future.
For example, the primates store in their memory images of predators that can attack them while collecting fruit from trees and therefore prudently post guards to control the approaches to the collection site.
Nevertheless, the consciousness of primates in relation to the creation of images of the future is set in the program of their own genome only for adaptability in relation to this environment, focusing the attention only on food, reproduction and improving the situation in the occupied niche.
Be that as it may, the most convincing proof of the presence in all living beings of a program designed only for adaptation to their own environment is the absence of significant changes in the behavior of higher mammals over tens of millions of years, which have survived to this day (chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans).
***
All this clearly shows the fundamental meaning of the word. And it is not for nothing that the "New Testament" (the Gospel of John) begins like this: "In the beginning was the Word"
It was the word, first in the form of the code of a new dual program, which provided the possibility of arbitrary actions, has extracted the transformed beings from the adaptive spatial world of animals, which bound animals to repetitive actions of the same type, and placed them in the world of fast-flowing time with its continuous series of diverse events, passions, struggles, conscious collective actions.
It was in this world of understanding one's own presence in the current time that living beings finally acquired the ability to consciously change it through collective actions based on a plan, that is, again, on a word. The word, in essence, was being formed from the figurative, that is, wordless, virtual reflection of objects, phenomena and relationships in the course of collective efforts to change one's own surrounding, allowing one to see even the distant future thanks to the transformation of images in the mind by the corresponding encoding in the form of a word with subsequent transfer to the corresponding information carrier.
And the information itself for us is basically a word, manifesting itself not only as a symbol of an object, that is, in the form of diverse and numerous sound reflections of images of certain objects (phenomena) or a certain set of objects (tree - forest), but also as a living image of a changing reality, which is especially impressively manifested in art, which in speeches from the stage since ancient times has brought to light the secret world of feelings, experiences, struggles and impressions, making the audience cry and laugh, worry and suffer, removing them from the monotonous animal well-fed life in which nothing significant happens.
Therefore, the meaningful pronunciation of articulate sounds, concretely or abstractly reflecting the objective world with all its relationships, had transferred the living world, represented by creatures who possess words, from being in the space of unconscious connections of objects and phenomena to the world of meaningful actions to change this world for their own purposes.
However, purely sound transmission of information significantly limited communication to the framework of just a few generations, often being greatly distorted.
Therefore, each sound word found its reflection over time on various media in the form of drawings and various graphics, preserved in some countries to this day in the form of hieroglyphs, but, for the most part, recorded in the most simplified drawings - letters, giving in their combination what is required, which actually has connected the distant past with the present and allowed people to successfully develop culture, science and technology, relying first on handwritten, and then printed texts, learning, so to speak, to read and write from them from childhood.
The word, transforming images of possible actions into a specific procedure of collective labor, makes the process of changing reality meaningful and even creative not only in art, but also in the study of this reality, allowing us to comprehend its patterns and, on this basis, improve reality artificially, changing life itself. This makes it both more comfortable and develops the human mind, which captures new spheres of activity, stopping, however, when it reaches the limit of its organic capabilities, but trying to go beyond these limits with the help of the artificial intelligence and the unification of all people in a single information network-web.
However, a person gets stuck in this web, because it does not provide him with the opportunity for further development and forces him to make mistakes due to the inability to perceive the flows of information, excessive for an adequate understanding of their essence, arising as a result of his own actions, and the artificial world of civilization created by him is destroyed, which demonstrates the discreteness of the appearance of the civilizations that arise, function and disintegrate, nevertheless, endlessly (see, for example, Nizovtsev Yu. M. Miracles in a sieve Chapters 3, 4. 2016. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: Amazon. Yury Nizovtsev).
Be that as it may, the word imprinted on carriers connects us with previous generations, expanding our memory with all their achievements, and in conjunction with current deeds constantly multiplies the flow of information that captivates us, accelerating the course of own time of human communities in alternating generations, in which we become more humane and increasingly prosperous, but the organic connection of word with deed, with collective labor efforts, their interdependence, does not allow us to cut word and deed, calming down in the achieved well-being of pleasant idleness of the virtual world.
The result of similar calming of the world, thereby separated from labor, from accomplishments, from development, is the collapse of civilization together with its time, but it is restored after some pause again in the connection of the word with the deed through the image of this deed, because the word in all its meanings and endless multiple semantic combinations is information encrypted by a person himself about all his possibilities and achievements, and the image is the information manifested in the consciousness of a person, representing his surrounding, accessible to him at the corresponding level of development, and the objective world itself is the materialized information intended for use by a person.
Therefore, the word, image and collective labor are inextricably linked in the human consciousness, creating the most saturated information flow compared to the information produced by the animal world, which does not possess the word, without which the conscious collective labor, creating events, and therefore, fast-flowing productive own time, cannot manifest itself.
Part 2. Is an information society possible?
At present, due to the collapse of capitalism, the transition to the information society has actually begun by completely unsuitable means, and this supposed society itself will turn out to be deprived of development, that is, meaningless and ineffective. However, there is currently no understanding of this fact. Therefore, below is shown what can actually happen in this turning point.
The collapse of the capitalist system, which is happening before our eyes, inevitably provokes the emergence of concepts that formulate systems to replace it, relying mainly on the emergence of the artificial intelligence.
Of course, the artificial intelligence in itself in the sense of creative brains is nothing special, being, in essence, an improved calculator, working according to programs introduced into it by the creative person. That is, without a person, the artificial intelligence turns into a pile of garbage. Therefore, all sorts of fantasies about replacing a person with this fake intelligence are nothing more than nonsense for the needs of an undeveloped public, in order to scare it and extract a certain benefit for themselves.
This benefit, if we outline it briefly, comes down to replacing the vast majority of humanity with all sorts of systems based on the artificial intelligence, which are capable of replacing people in all routine work, from accounting to participation in military operations.
It is clear that, indeed, the vast majority of people are engaged in routine work. This means that they become unnecessary.
Naturally, those in power, with their consumer thinking - food, comfort, reproduction and dominance - that is nothing more than a manifestation of the dominance of the animal component of consciousness in power structures, are rolling down in such ideas to the "harmony" of the animal world, which eliminates or simply eats everything that is not in demand at the moment.
But all these ideas of the bloodsuckers are clothed in the beautiful packaging of an information society, in which, in conditions of complete harmony, everyone, and in fact only they and the personnel serving them, will live and prosper.
It is impossible to come up with a greater stupidity, but there is also confidence in such an outcome, if there is power, since these primates in power do not bother with the deep problems of the existence of the human society, which is not at all meaningless in its motion and structure, offering to gradually - through a digital concentration camp and a virtual world - destroy unnecessary people, preserving only themselves with the people they need, who are managing the work of the artificial intelligence, while they will enjoy life.
But they, apparently, do not suspect that relatively recent experiments with the creation of ideal living conditions for mice showed their rapid degradation with complete extinction in the next generations, and very recently these experiments were carried out on volunteers with the same result, without, however, bringing them to complete decomposition.
Since these rulers want with all their might to introduce themselves into such a situation, they thereby prove their predominant animal nature, which within the boundaries of the human society is ordinary stupidity, because in its thinking it does not go beyond the limits of adaptability, and if, suddenly, as happens in the experiment with mice, they receive everything conceivable within the framework of their primitive intellect, then they become satiated so quickly that life becomes unlovable for them, and they disappear, leaving the artificial intelligence ownerless, capable of helping them in the fulfillment of their animal desires, but incapable of solving their existential problems, that is, bringing into their minds an understanding of why they, as the mortals, generally exist.
It is in this existential problem that the most essential thing of the human existence lies, in which each person, unlike the most highly developed animals, carries within himself not a one consciousness, but a dual one. He received one of its components - the animal one - from primates, and the other one was received only by him and no one else, although it is not exactly known from where and how, in the form of an additional program in each cell of his organism, which is capable of taking him beyond the framework of adaptive existence.
This method of leading him out of the state of an animal into freedom, in essence, comes down to the rejection of one adaptation to the environment in favor of changing this environment as he needs or wants, with all the positive and negative consequences of this process.
Of course, it is mostly the self-consciousness of a person that "works" on this, which introduces a person to the understanding of the brevity of his existence in the current time, in which he should not simply behave like an animal, that is, be only in the process of sensory perception of reality, far from meanings, but have time to do something to satisfy his ambitions that no one has done yet, or, at least, try to change the environment around him at his own discretion.
But the animal component of the human consciousness does not sleep. It "whispers" to him: you need to think about yourself, adapting to what is, in order to extract the greatest benefit from this adaptation, not disdaining any means, and live happily.
Thus, in each person and all his communities there is a continuous battle between the animal component of consciousness with its egocentrism, which essentially boils down to animal "joys," and the self-consciousness of a person, which is largely altruistic, since it understands perfectly well that the loner is powerless, and people must strive to unite not only for the sake of a sensually pleasant life, but also to create a full-blooded existence in which they can do much - to cognize the surrounding world, satisfying their interest in it, and to know themselves as a super-complex structure of matter, guided by consciousness.
This interest, after all, leads a person to understand that in his brief life he provides general development. But what?
For himself personally, a person in life has little time to do, and most people simply flounder in the general stream, not really knowing what to lean against, and life has already come to an end.
In other words, a person, of course, is not comparable in his deeds with animals, but, at the same time, he is rather insignificant in himself in his limb, not even knowing what is there - behind the coffin.
It turns out that the down-to-earth, adaptive part of the human consciousness wants to arrange own body better, not taking into account the deterioration of everything else, which is typical for the current elite, without doing it honor, and the human self-consciousness is mainly engaged in development, the understanding of which is inaccessible to the animal component of human consciousness, but it is the process of development that ensures the absence of boredom and routine, albeit with varying success.
This kind of contradiction between the low and the high "sits" in each person with a different share of their presence.
The distribution of these shares of consciousness forms the basis for the entire social hierarchy.
But the main driving force of development, regardless of this distribution, is the desire of self-consciousness to overcome the animal essence of consciousness, and vice versa.
However, both of these entities are inescapable for human consciousness, being based on the corresponding programs in each cell of the human body.
Nevertheless, the illusion that it is possible to arrange a pleasant life only for oneself, spitting on others, which the animal component of consciousness "dreams" about, and, on the contrary, the dream of a wonderful future, where everyone will be so happy that they, having entrusted the work to artificial intelligence, will begin to create God knows what, individually and en masse, still dominate the minds of those, who, accordingly, has the levers of power and those, who, is the intellectual opposition to them.
Such delusion of the primitive minds, on the one hand, and outstanding ones, on the other, cannot even lead to something simply sensually pleasant, but is capable of destroying civilization as such without much effort.
A pleasant life was mentioned above - in it, only in satiety do people quickly decompose and disappear, and it is simply not serious to talk about a life in continuous creativity, as all great sages dream of, since, firstly, it is physically difficult to create due to significant energy expenditure on brain activity, and not everyone has enough mind for this, and secondly, creativity is being caused by nothing other than social needs in the course of labor efforts, and not idleness under the auspices of the artificial intelligence.
Similar situation with the collapse of capitalism as a system did not arise by chance, but as a result of the not endless accelerated development of the human communities, which before the emergence of civilization existed for hundreds of thousands of years in the form of primitive communal cells; being engaged in gathering and hunting. Then, after the transition from gathering and hunting to productive technologies, in particular, to the cultivation of cereals and fruit crops, cattle breeding, and the resulting receipt of surplus product, these communities become the slave-owning system, making prisoners and debtors additional tools of labor.
Thus, the private property appeared, which also extended to people, and this system, more progressive in terms of means of production, lasted only about 6 thousand years
With its end, which occurred due to the realization of the unproductivity of slave labor, feudalism came. It was given a little more than a thousand years.
But feudalism was also swept away by the coming realization that every person, as God's creation, must shake off class division and begin to work at his own discretion, which was reinforced by the technological revolution and the introduction of a widespread credit policy, which produced capitalism, and it existed, if we focus on Europe and the USA, for about 300 years.
What will happen when capitalism disappears and something new comes to take its place, and what will this new thing be like?
The ruling elites do not take this course of changes in life into account, considering with their monkey consciousness the main thing to be the preservation of their power, which are allowing them to live for their own pleasure, believing that it is possible to find an optimal solution to preserve this way of life. They have been looking for this solution since the 70s of the twentieth century and, as they believe, have found it in the form of creating an information society without private property, in which they will remain the main ones, and all the others, much smaller in number compared to the current population, will serve them under the guidance of the artificial intelligence.
This idiotic project aimed at preserving power for worthless individuals is a typical utopia, since it, like capitalism, which has lost its incentive for development, lacks this very development, which is always built on contradictions, but they are not here.
In this case, which is beneficial, how it seems at first glance, for the ruling elite, people turn into a herd, which these elite grazes for the sake of obtaining certain products for themselves from this herd, not giving it the will in order to avoid its own elimination.
Naturally, similar artificial formation will degrade extremely quickly in all its parts, since it loses the ability to receive updates in the form of certain innovations in both technological and cultural spheres, especially since this post-capitalist society will parasitize on the artificial intelligence, which, as it is supposed, will replace the human intelligence, that in fact will eliminate the human creativity, thereby depriving society of progress.
But, nevertheless, such idea appeared in view of the obvious collapse of capitalist relations based on private property, trade expansion and loans. In addition, energy and environmental crises are brewing.
The ruling elites also understand that the concept of property in the context of digitalization can be excluded; trade will be replaced by distribution; renewable energy will be enough for a small population; industry will be reduced to the production of consumer goods and the problem of environmental pollution will disappear by itself.
In general, everything will be great for their wonderful life on the foundation of the artificial intelligence.
Indeed, the artificial intelligence is capable of replacing almost the entire working population, depriving it of the opportunity to receive the products of its own labor, and therefore property, that is, self-activity, that for the primates in power is, as they think, the solution to the problem that arose with the disappearance of capitalism.
The already unnecessary population, also stupefied by the distribution of phones and computers to it, allowing it to immerse itself in the virtual world every hour, will partially die out in this world, and the rest of the population can be gradually disposed of in one way or another, of which there are enough.
Covid has already been tested, and it can be improved by also organizing epidemics based on other deadly strains.
The digital currency will actually completely deprive the majority of the population of freedom of displacement, since there will be nothing to move to where you want without it, having forced, in addition, the population to buy what they give with it, and there will be nowhere to escape from all sorts of rubbish and poison. These delusional and misanthropic ideas, however, coincide with the onset of an information collapse, which marks the end of civilization's own time.
Having turned the look to the universe known to us, we will see that it is constructed at work of particular coupled systems, or on action of gradually changing communities which arise and disappear all the time, - from communities in the form of galaxies and star systems till communities in the form of crystalline structures or fungi.
As well communities of more high level - civilizations of alive and reasonable individuals - are changing: they are arising, developing till the particular moment, and then they are decaying. The question consists only in the speed of this process which in comparison with the speed of changes of galaxies or crystals is much higher owing to larger complexity and dynamism of this system of living individuals among macro systems.
Some researches were devoted to a subject of condensing of time periods between critical events up to a final point. This approach is based on concept of the singularity, used John von Neumann in the middle of XX century. The singularity, if not to mean its astrophysical comprehension, represents a point behind which extrapolation starts giving senseless results.
The historian I. M. Diakonoff paid attention in 1994 to a singularity point, or the limit point on a time axis where historical cycles are reduced which are shrink in compliance with the law of the regressions: "There is no doubt that historical process shows signs of natural exponential acceleration. From emergence of Homo sapiens until the end of the I phase passed not less than 30 thousand years, II phase lasted about 7 thousand years, III phase - about 2 thousand years, IV phase - about 1.5 thousand, V phase - about one thousand years, VI - about 300, VII phase - a little more than 100 years, duration of VIII phase while it is impossible to determine. Put on the schedule these phases are combined in exponential development which assumes eventually transition to the vertical line or more true, to the point of so-called singularity. Scientific and technical achievements of mankind were being developed according to the exponential schedule likewise ..." [1].
In itself, the acceleration of civilization's own time described above is explained, like all other cases of compaction of one"s own time in the course of a qualitative change in the activity of living beings [see, for example, 1], by the fact that, unlike inanimate objects, every living being is in information flow, consuming, shaping and disseminating this flow in order to persist in it, and therefore in life. The information flow itself, naturally, changes in one way or another both from these actions and from external conditions.
Therefore, if time within the framework of the activities of living beings is an information product, then with changes in information flows covering a living being or beings, the time of their own life and the periods of life of their genera or species, as well as the periods of existence of human communities, changes in accordance with changes in information flows, in which they are located, despite the fact that the calendar time is flowing as before [2, 3].
In other words, the limit in the development of civilization, but not consciousness as a whole, is determined by the compaction of civilization"s own time, which depends on the degree of development of both individual and collective self-awareness of man and humanity, respectively, and therefore the structure of the human brain, which is the main organ through which consciousness controls the human actions through incoming the information flows.
As soon as these flows begin to exceed the capabilities of the brain of a person, he tries to use artificial intelligence for his support, not taking into account the fact that the latter, having no consciousness, is not able to be completely independent, guided only by the programs invested in it, which are compiled by the same people, and cannot cover the unforeseen for them.
Therefore, the final decisions willy-nilly have to be made by a person on the basis of stormy and often contradictory flows of information provided by artificial intelligence. The adequacy of these decisions rests on the limited capabilities of the human brain. As a result, a person has to make decisions not on the basis of the true causes of the events that are hidden in their thickness, but perceiving only the visible random symptoms that seem to him the causes of what is happening. A person directs his efforts to eliminate symptoms, but the true causes of what is happening remain unaffected. Such an action is either ineffective or leads to a worsening of the situation. We can say with great confidence that the approach to solving the problems of complex social systems, based on our intuition, in most cases leads to errors, and the accumulation of errors is fraught with the collapse of the entire system [4].
Diakonoff's schedule may be completed up to the vertical line. In this case, the point of singularity will lie for 2022.
Definition of a technological singularity appeared after Diakonoff's works: the technological singularity is the hypothetical moment after which technical progress becomes such fast and complex that it will be inaccessible to comprehension. The technological singularity as a result of development of nanotechnologies was considered in the report of 2007 of the Commission on economic policy of the Congress of the USA, as start date of a singularity was called 2020, according to another prognosis - 2030. Basic idea of this conclusion is the corollary from the law of Moore (an empirical conclusion from the observed speed of development of technologies): somewhere between 2025 and 2035 the computing power of separate computers will be made even to the "crude" computing power of a human brain, and then and will surpass it.
The given dates are close to each other and they also are close to the present time. The question is only in interpretation of the specified process, i.e. what will happen in the singularity point with the world civilization.
The approaching informational collapse is confirmation of that the era of fundamental changes in civilization development approaches with an approximation of the point of the singularity.
Informational collapse is defined as the condition of network information space menacing to its stability and normal functioning. Informational collapse is characterized by fall off of capacity of communication channels and arises at a situation when existing technologies are not able to transfer growing volumes of traffic.
The beginning of informational collapse manifests in constant increase in speed of emergence of new information and accumulation of this information in the Internet. Acquaintance with the avalanche flow of information becomes more and more difficult and even more difficult becomes thereof its adequate use because filtration of information, as a rule, for doubtful criteria becomes actually by single method of ordering of information. This process conducts to fast loss by society of perspective reference points of development, to replacement of the true purposes by corporate purposes, to bamboozle of an overwhelming majority of Internet users.
Thus, the actions of the authorities lead to collapse for themselves, depriving them of any hope of maintaining their power for at least a short time.
As a result of this "end of the world", something may happen that has already happened on our planet, judging by the surviving artifacts [see, for example, 5].
There are few options here.
The wars that have already begun may well lead to the use of nuclear weapons with the emergence of a "Nuclear Winter", that is, a fairly dense layer of clouds will form around the planet, preventing the heating of the earth's surface for a long time, and the population that survives after the use of nuclear weapons will die of hunger. The few remaining individuals will lose all the achievements of civilization and will plunge into savagery. But over time, they will be able to go through the path of forming a civilization again, similar to the previous one, with the same result, which only confirms the cyclical nature of the emergence of civilizations [see, for example, 6].
It is also possible that the power elites will achieve the emergence of an information society without private property due to universal digitalization.
However, it will almost instantly disappear due to the lack of a basis for development and creativity - the labor relations.
Civilization exists and develops by no means for subjects representing the power elite, which are just a necessary irritant for the rest of the population, which gives inventors, scientists, artists, teachers, doctors and other persons who are capable of creativity, that is, who give true life and development to the whole community.
Without a diverse, numerous, educated and self-made population, this fake civilization is doomed to decay and imminent death along with all its narrow-minded power elites.
Generally speaking, if time, space and objects around us are a product of information converted into them, all this beingness is intended for actions, changes and development of alive in the current time. Therefore, the reverse transition of this objective world into a semblance of an informational one, which the ruling elites are trying to do through thoughtlessness, will only lead to the death of, in this case, civilization.
Nevertheless, in addition to these negative scenarios, there is also, to a certain extent, a positive one, according to which civilization is preserved for quite a long time, if after all sorts of cataclysms that led to the loss of most technologies and knowledge about them, some population remains on the planet and some technologies and knowledge are preserved.
But first, let us note the following.
Civilizations, and after them the states, can arise only as result of activity of the entities possessing dual consciousness. These beings are capable to transform the environment not only for the self-sufficiency and reproduction as it occurs at the entities which do not possess of this kind consciousness, but according to the plans, tasks, purposes which have not a direct bearing to instinctive actions, typical for animals or insects. These aware actions are carried out by the collective efforts.
In an initial stage of existence of people, in the primitive society, the separate groups of people existed in equilibrium with environment, practically like separate flocks of animals. Living conditions, small number, prevalence of instincts over self-consciousness allowed them just as an animal only to reproduce and to ensure themself and that - only under rather favorable conditions. They had an arrogating economy, instead of producing economy.
However, distinction of the beings capable of both instinctive-reflexive actions and aware ones, and the most highly developed animals who are guided only by instinctive-reflexive actions, is manifested, mainly, in the following: packs of animals, for example, in case of the favorable conditions for existence, are capable only to more intensive reproduction and occupation of larger territories while groups of people in the case of emergence of the favorable conditions are capable to development. Moreover, as incentive for development of people can serve and emergence of adverse conditions if only these conditions are not disastrous.
It is necessary to understand under development some systematic influence on environment, increasing complexity and specialization of communities of people for the purpose of obtaining additional benefit both for specific individuals, and for local communities as a whole. Additional benefits receive these communities in the case of particular cooperation and join. Processing of products, handicrafts, trade exchange appear gradually in addition to catching, processing of the earth. Cities appear in which are concentrated trade and handicrafts, rules of behavior in the joint communities are being transformed into laws and different norms.
Position of people is changed in connection with loss of collective management in local communities and refusal from the uniform distribution of resources and work products between members of collective. A division of people appear on degree of possession them resources, products of work, powers of authority, than discord, envy, distrust is provoked. Not simply operating structures represented by council of elders, leaders of tribes, etc. are formed, but the imperious and violent organs emerge which protect minority got this or that advantage compared with other, i.e. the state appears.
Certainly, this process of transition from primitive communities to the state lasts long term and various intermediate forms of government by communities are manifested in it, sometimes this process not come to an end with formation of a rigid structure of the state, and sometimes owing to mentality of members of communities and folding conditions it comes to the end with formation of the states, generally in the form of city-states.
Thus, the deep reason of emergence of a civilization, and after it - the states is level of consciousness of primitive people who, unlike animals, can lift it up to the size, sufficient for formation at them of ideas about use of changes of a surrounding medium in own purposes.
Under changes of environment are understood not only external, for example, climatic and other natural factors, but also accumulation by people of knowledge which in the case of cardinal change of conditions can use for transition to more high level of development, and further to use for fight against negative changes of the nature. The characteristic example of it can be fire which animals are afraid and try not to come nearer to it, and the person, having faced it, not at once, but realizes useful properties of fire and starts using fire for heating and cooking. Another example can be: receiving by the human of skills as a result of use of various instruments of labor thanks to what he starts sewing clothes, pounding grain in pounders, making hunting tools, to tame animals, to process and sow the earth, to make household items, to do drawings. All this only seems spontaneous: in practice, behind it there is a consciousness, and in many respects conscious transformation of reality, otherwise and the highly developed animals acted in a similar way.
When the corresponding accumulation of knowledge, skills, habits for individual and collective work, for example, the long cold snap can promote the clothes invention, use of fire, construction of dwellings; disappearance of area for the hunting, earlier compelling people to passage to other territories, can promote to domestication of animals and transition from hunting to cattle breeding, the drought can promote the invention of irrigation agriculture, i.e. - to conscious creation by the human of optimum conditions for agriculture.
Nevertheless, as a whole favorable for existence of the human climatic conditions, existence of necessary flora and the fauna, a favorable to what communities of people could develop without catastrophes which can destroy them completely.
Except the crisis factors as though urging on development of human communities to leaving from equilibrium existence with environment and causing emergence of producing economy, any favorable change of the environment, for example, climatic conditions can lead to the significant growth in number of the tamed animals or to receiving larger amount of grain.
All designated factors lead to receiving the considerable excess product and emergence of temptation to its assignment by an imperious top of community that, in turn, causes the necessity of protection of entrapped property or a product. At first, the simplest structure in the form of not just managing, but forcibly apparatus emerges. The apparatus gradually acquires by all other parts for realization not only functions of powers of authority, but also a force function, legal function, judicial function, taxation function etc.
In other words, the animal component of the human consciousness and the egoistic part of self-awareness do not allow him to refuse material goods. Therefore, practically everyone wishes to take something and this entrapped also to increase, without thinking that life is too short in order that to find place for all this into it.
Nevertheless, as it is paradoxical, it is possible to find nevertheless an outlet, or a temporary lacuna for establishment in certain degree of fair society, but only in the case of particular restriction of freedom of the individual, more precisely, its self-restrictions, in favor of collective, society, or a civilization without the states, despite all internal contradictions which always are rending society.
For this purpose, it is required establishing such society at which the resultant of all contradictory forces becomes almost equal to zero.
So as struggle, contradictions, collisions are always present at the developing society - it wouldn't be developing without them - so far as process of development should be paused or - it should be expressed extremely weakly. In other words, a civilization, society has to lose possibility of development temporarily.
In such state the civilization can be only as the equilibrium.
Its basic signs consist in the following.
First, it has to be in ecological equilibrium with the nature, i.e. it has to return generally to appropriating economy with preservation and addition of some resource-saving technologies.
Secondly, having refused the complex state management system, the civilization has to return to the simplest forms of the public relations in the form of local self-coping cells of various orientation on the kinds of activity, connected among themselves not only horizontally, but also vertically, unlike primitive communities.
Thirdly, not development of technologies and the social relations, but self-sufficiency concerning creation for each person of acceptable biotic conditions and maintaining of functioning of self-coping cells without emergence of a heeling towards their withdrawal from self-government has to be tasks of a civilization. The only "medicine" for this purpose is the most frequent rotation of the chosen operating personnel.
In this relation the difference of this structure from primitive communities consists in more high level of consciousness of members of the self-coping cells, saved up for six millennia of previous civilization development, and, in this regard, emergence of possibility of the conscious decision by all members of cells of arising problems of a civilization within the elementary structures.
Fourthly, the free time of each member of community which can be very the considerable, thanks to preservation of many technologies of reproducing of food and household items, has to be devoted to self-development in that sphere to which he has predilections: art, crafts, fight against diseases, learning process, etc.
Thus, the civilization is as though conserved. Certainly, sooner or later it will go wrong, but time of its existence and quite quiet life of people in it can be much more, than life time of a technological civilization known to us.
To the one who will tell that it is impossible to stop development, it is possible to give an example of a similar suspending in development of human communities, more precisely, its extreme delay.
It is possible give as an example the well-known and studied primitive communities which have been existing approximately in the same condition of some tens of thousands of years, until awakened from "hibernation" about 10 thousand years ago whereby, partly, our civilization emerged about six thousand years ago. Communities, which are in the equilibrium with environment, exist and now in a natural form, for example, the Australian natives. There are similar communities in a artificial type of various sects, for example doukhobor. The public and production formations close to them - kibbutzim in Israel as well separate themselves from society and the state on the way of life, which is close to the equilibrium.
It is not excluded that the of this kind ecological civilization which, perhaps, will appear after disintegration of a present technological civilization, will not disappear over time from the face of the earth, and under the influence of this or that push will be waken and will start functioning in another form.
In other words, if we rely on the above, then the point of singularity can mean not only the complete collapse of civilization, but also its preservation in the form of a balanced-ecological one.
Be that as it may, the preservation of alive and the conditions for its existence guarantees the cyclicality of civilizations that are approximately the same in form, the period of existence of each of which is determined by their accelerated development in the information flow that they themselves create, up to the information collapse [6].
Thus, through alive, the discrete development of consciousness is ensured without going into bad infinity.
Bibliography
1. Дьяконов И.М. Пути истории. От древнейшего человека до наших дней. КомКнига. Москва. 2007г.
2. Nizovtsev Yu. M. It's the other way around. Answers to tricky questions about interesting things (Collection). Part 2. Section 2. The explanation of the facts of acceleration and deceleration of time. 2016. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: Amazon. Yury Nizovtsev.
3. Nizovtsev Yu. M. Contradictory but real (collection). Section 2. Why life time such is, what it is? 29.05.21. Amazon.
5. Nizovtsev Yu. M. On the causes of the consequences of the human activity. Monography. Section 16. Are "paradisiacal tabernacles" on Earth possible? 29.12.2023. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: Amazon. Yury Nizovtsev.
6. Nizovtsev Yu. M. On the cyclicity of civilizations in their multiplicity. 2025. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: samlib.ru Nizovtsev Yury.
Part 3. On the ratio of cognition and consciousness
Why the process of cognition, inherent only to man, is forced upon him and at the same time limited in the material basis, but unlimited in the spiritual, and how consciousness is connected with this process - the comer from the otherworldly, which, as it turns out, is both here, and remains there, is shown below.
Science believes that the material world is knowable, but it is impossible to cognize it completely due to its infinity. In reality, structurally the material world, or more precisely, the beingness known to us in the form of the Universe, is not infinite, but limited by the macro- and microcosm, and therefore is knowable only within these limits, that is, within those boundaries that the minds of humanity are capable of reaching.
This limitation is reflected in the fact that the material world known to us is knowable from macro-objects, obeying the laws known to us, to micro-objects (he quantum world), also obeying certain laws, but only up to a certain limit - the Heisenberg uncertainty relation, in connection with which, in particular, it is impossible to measure a time interval less than 10 with an exponent of -43 seconds (Planck time), that is, the frequency structures in the world (beingness) known to us in hertz cannot be greater than 10 with an exponent of 43.
In other words, just as it is impossible for us to perceive or register directly what is beyond this frequency boundary, this "exorbitant" (transcendental) along with that only implicitly arises in the beingness known to us, presumably in the form of consciousness. And it is now clear that it is precisely the ultra-high-frequency type of consciousness that does not provide the opportunity to register it.
But, the most unexpected thing, in essence, is that "the other world", where, as many believe, souls go after death, is not somewhere there, but right here. True, this "otherworldly", or, in this case, "exorbitant" cannot have direct contact with the beingness known to us, that is, appear explicitly due to the fact that it is frequency-beyond.
Is it possible to discover the features of these two worlds and the connection between them? Let's try to do this on a certain basis, which is presented below.
It is clear that in our comparatively low-frequency dimension we find ourselves in a more or less dense environment of things and phenomena in the current time. In this world (beingness) things appear in space, various processes occur, and various events happen to us, relationships arise, whereas for the otherworldly in similar high-frequency world outside the current time all this is impossible, that is, the otherworldly in itself cannot have life.
However, life is quite seething in beingness. So how is this life connected with the otherworldly, or transcendental? Or is there no connection between them and, in general, the otherworldly has no relation to our world, but somehow exists on its own?
The fact that the indicated boundary separates these two worlds by frequency demonstrates with complete clarity that one of them - the low-frequency one - manifests itself to us in two ways: as both frequency and dense (solid) - in the form of things, and the other can only be ultra-high-frequency.
The question immediately arises: how do frequency energy formations turn into solid objects in beingness, forming both existence itself as a whole and everything that is there?
That this is quite possible is shown by the discovery that an elementary particle is also a wave.
Therefore, it is quite reasonable to assume that frequency-wave-like formations are capable of producing "solid" matter under certain conditions, that is, reality can be dual - both "solid" and frequency-based, and at the same time - capable of being combined.
It is obvious that the transformation of frequency formations into dense matter cannot occur by itself. A converter is needed. What is it and how does it work?
The action of this frequency impulse converter into the current time and beingness itself, including this converter itself, is presented below.
Be that as it may, the limitations, imposed on cognition in beingness, nevertheless, provide the opportunity to both exist in it and to cognize it, and even trying to go beyond these limitations, as in this case. But, along with that, they indicate the lack of independence of the world before us, since there is a limitation for it, in particular, in the cognition of what is beyond this frequency limit.
In other words, all living things are capable of existing, and in the face of a person, of cognizing the environment, only in that environment in which "solid" and frequency realities can be combined, which is possible, as we see, only in the current time during the interaction of the living and the objective (things) in space in motion and change, at this similar takes place in the "surrounding" of a comparatively low-frequency environment.
Moreover, if we turn to the microworld, it should be noted that physics has reached quarks in its study, but could not advance further, running into nothing. And this, again, means the limit of knowledge within the framework of existing existence, that is, its certain lack of independence, or non-unicity, and the human consciousness itself is also impossible to record, analyze and measure. It, however, undoubtedly exists, but cannot be measured due to, as noted above, its too high carrier frequency, not perceptible by any devices.
For this reason, the cognition of consciousness can be carried out only through a person's study of himself, determining some properties of consciousness by the human actions.
In particular, it is quite possible to determine the role of a person as a symbiosis of thing and consciousness in Creation, since only a person is capable of knowledge, unlike the rest of the living, that is, he is not only a converter of frequency impulses into the current time, but also an self-acting being, capable of knowing the environment both personally for himself during his life, and infinitely, but discretely, for the eternal consciousness, which without a person becomes non-existence.
The conclusion that can be drawn from the facts and considerations presented above is that consciousness, which is not recorded by any devices, comes from beyond the frequency limit designated for our beingness because there is nowhere else from it to appear, and since without it there can be no life, it is that active one that manifests itself in the form of an active biological dense organism, forcing it to act in the current time according to considerations determined by consciousness within the framework of the corresponding structure of the existing organism, which in this case is fully suitable for the name of alive.
This kind of duality of a person, manifested in the coexistence of body and consciousness, was understood in ancient times. Then consciousness was designated by the soul, without which there is no life for the body. Now we can say that this duality distinctly reflects the connection of a completely material ultra-high-frequency otherworldly in relation to a comparatively low-frequency beingness, in which the appearance of dense bodies is possible, and they can be transformed into living ones, programming these bodies in the embryo with the help of the same consciousness in the form of an ultra-high-frequency system from the otherworldly.
In other words, the microcosm and macrocosm, which represent beingness, are respectively only the internal and external infrastructure in the specified frequency range - from infrasound to the noted limiting frequency, existing exclusively for functioning of alive, which finds in this infrastructure suitable for existence on exoplanets support for life and various activities, and this activity, in particular, of humanity on Earth, also includes cognition of surrounding not only for the sake of the process of cognition itself, but with the purpose of using the knowledge obtained for one's own development and better organization of one's life, as well as for a change and development of consciousness that is not very noticeable to people, which, in fact, is the most important thing in the existence of Creation as such.
However, cognition of the surrounding (material beingness) is also limited by the biological capabilities of the human body, and therefore can only be cyclical in successive manifestations of finite civilizations, but a person"s cognition of himself in relationships with other people is not limited by anything, flowing through each individual consciousness endlessly in civilizational cycles, and being reflected in the collective consciousness of the individual groups (Nizovtsev Yu. M. On the cyclicality of civilizations in their multiplicity. Collection: About the information picture of the world. Chapter 9. 2024. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: www.litres.ru).
Thus, the finite -- a person and the collective humanity as self-acting entities manifest themselves in civilizations infinitely, but discretely, ensuring through themselves the infinite change and development of both each individual consciousness and the general (single) consciousness in the process of knowing the surrounding and themselves in the alliance of body and consciousness, thereby removing the question: why do a person and humanity exist?