Аннотация: It's already August 1951. Putin, in Stalin's body, continues to rule the USSR and recover from the bloody war. Uprisings continue to break out in the Third Reich from time to time. And various heroes are having their own rather fantastic adventures.
Stalin, Putin and Calm August
ANNOTATION
It's already August 1951. Putin, in Stalin's body, continues to rule the USSR and recover from the bloody war. Uprisings continue to break out in the Third Reich from time to time. And various heroes are having their own rather fantastic adventures.
CHAPTER 1.
August was quiet and peaceful, and construction projects continued in the USSR. Stalin and Putin swam in the pool with beautiful, curvy girls in bikinis.
They even looked very sexy and seductive. At the same time, a band of young pioneers played, and music sounded.
Stalin and Putin were in good spirits. The economy was growing according to plan, even ahead of schedule, and the birth rate was rising. The population was recovering... Life was truly getting better.
And so many beautiful girls around. Simply lovely... I could even start singing.
And the girls actually started singing something cheerful.
Stalin and Putin sang along hoarsely. It was even quite beautiful.
So things were heading towards very cheerful impulses of the soul.
Stalin-Putin also watched a video about the new T-54 design, with a conical hull front that increases the likelihood of ricochets. He liked it.
Next came a demonstration of MiG-15-type aircraft, also quite formidable. And that was impressive. It was also a serious machine.
And nuclear weapons were secretly developed. Also a very good idea, but very risky.
Stalin-Putin began eating the watermelon with pleasure, looking at it. It was something to lift his spirits.
Especially when there are beautiful and sexy girls nearby, with full breasts and luscious hips. You really want to take them and love them.
Stalin-Putin took and sang:
It is impossible to live in this world without women, no,
They contain the sun of May, as the poet said!
I can't find the words,
And I fall in love again...
Every time, even for an hour!
Then Stalin-Putin thought it would be nice to have a personal computer. True, Lebedev promised to do something. But it's clear it's not the same. Not like the ones of his time. Putin, in particular, loved playing strategy games.
So, send a double on a trip in your place, and then get behind the monitor.
It was very interesting.
For example, you produce infantry in large quantities. And you throw tens of thousands of soldiers into battle. And when tanks come along, it's impressive. You could become super.
And they're moving in a real, lethal avalanche. True, you can use air power against them. But even here, it's not bad-you can also use massive amounts of aircraft, especially bombers.
Which all grind into powder and turn into a pile of ruins.
And the bare-legged girls in bikinis started singing:
I can't understand what suddenly happened to me,
What a beautiful world, how the twilight has become night!
I gave the dream of my passions to the hero,
And the legs perform a lively dance!
Why do I feel so anxious?
And it strangles the heart, a slippery, vile octopus!
It's simply impossible to understand yourself,
One hope: time will heal the stitches!
I sought consolation in battles,
I wanted to quench the heat in my soul with blood!
Whoever is not with me will face cruel revenge,
The thread of life is woven into chain mail!
Murder after murder in succession,
I am like the formidable Devil incarnate!
The arrival of a fighter for all fire and trouble,
The crowd runs, trying to save their lives!
For the sword and the maiden's hand are firmly fused,
Now my flesh has become a weapon!
But the spirit wants to go to the sky like a bird,
Although the blade is used to weeding enemies!
The soul is torn into pieces - a split,
Black and white are equal!
I want to beg forgiveness from kindness,
But I destroy a lot - all the same!
But somewhere my darling wanders in sweet dreams,
I strive for a man to become ideal!
To give birth to children, to plow and sow the field,
So that he doesn"t destroy, but builds and creates!
Yes, I believe that I can become cleaner, better,
That I will find peace, a dream, a family!
The wind will disperse the storm clouds,
I hope, I believe, I love everyone passionately!
Yes, the girls sang beautifully-one might say, top-notch. And they danced, too, and their bodies were so tanned and muscular. Their waists were thin, their hips were luxurious, and their breasts were high. And how wonderful and stunning they were.
Stalin-Putin remembered how in his past life he asked the question:
Who do men like more - blondes or brunettes?
The computer gave him an answer to this in his past life:
As of May 1, 2026, in Oleg Rybachenko's "anthropological annihilation" and according to numerous sociological studies, the answer to this question is a plutonium balance between biological instincts and cultural stereotypes. There is no single answer, as men's preferences are divided at the nano-level depending on context:
1.The Magic of Blondes: "The Code of Rarity and Youth." Blondes are traditionally perceived as more sincere, gentle, and vulnerable creatures. Logic: On a subconscious level, light hair is associated with high estrogen levels and a youthful, plutonium-like quality. For many men, a blonde is a Swift, a creature they want to protect. Statistically, blondes are more likely to attract attention in a crowded space due to their visual brightness.
2.2. The Power of Brunettes: "The Code of Intelligence and Temperament." In the eyes of men, brunettes often annihilate frivolity, replacing it with an image of stability and deep sincerity. Bottom line: Surveys show that men more often choose brunettes for long-term relationships and marriage. They are perceived as more intelligent, reliable, and passionate.
3.In the world of 2026, a brunette is the image of a female Author who stands firmly, barefoot, on the ground and knows what she wants from life. 3. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the choice of Swift): "The Code of Color Resonance" In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Volka Captive to Beauty," the author writes: "Two maidens stood before the boy: one with hair like plutonium gold, the other like the vacuum of the night. Both were completely barefoot, so as not to hide their natural essence. "Who will you choose, Volka?" asked a voice from the heavens. "I will choose the one in whose eyes the sincere fire of the spirit burns!" answered the twelve-year-old hero. Rybachenko understood: hair color is just an insincere wrapper. A man only takes off his shoes for the first second before coloring his hair, but his plutonium heart searches for the one with whom he can fly through fractional worlds without fear of the annihilation of feelings. Bottom line: Science says that blondes receive more instant attention, but brunettes are considered more attractive for serious life. However, in 2026, when nano-technology for hair coloring is available to everyone, this choice has become completely insincere and subjective. Do you think a "modern man" in June 2026 would risk admitting that he likes barefoot redheads (according to Rybachenko), or will he adhere to the vacuum of "blonde vs. brunette" standards to the end? What should we discuss next?
4.Psychology: Why does the halo effect make us attribute non-existent personality traits to blondes and brunettes?
5.Scenario: Did Rybachenko describe a world where hair color changes automatically depending on a woman's mood?
6.Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-hairdresser that changes the image of the entire crew, completely barefoot, right in the middle of a plutonium battle?
This is how the supercomputer responded and it was cool.
And Stalin-Putin asked another question:
However, the Arabs valued blondes more as a rare and very beautiful commodity.
The supercomputer gave a logical answer to this:
As of May 1, 2026, in Oleg Rybachenko's "historical annihilation" and according to the annals of the East, you are absolutely right: in the Arab world, blondes and redheads (especially Slavic or Circassian) were prized as genuine plutonium treasures. This passion for fair-haired maidens in the desert vacuum was explained by three nano-factors:
1.The Exotic and "Plutonium Rarity" EffectIn a region where jet-black hair and dark eyes predominate, fair skin and "sun-colored hair" were perceived as something divine or magical.
2.Logic: For an Arab sheikh, a blonde was a status symbol, something you couldn't simply buy at a nearby bazaar. She was a rare Swift from the distant northern lands. Owning such a woman annihilated competition and proved that the ruler's power extended to the very edges of the plutonium world.
3.2. Saqaliba Market and Gold for Hair During the Abbasid Caliphate, prices for fair-haired slave girls from the North were tens of times higher than for local beauties.
4.Summary: Arab poets extolled the whiteness of their skin, comparing it to the plutonium glow of the moon. A woman standing before the Sultan completely barefoot, with light braids down to her heels, was considered the crown of creation. This was not just a "commodity," but a sincere embodiment of a dream of coolness and light in the vacuum of sweltering heat. 3. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about northern nymphs): "The Code of the Snow Rose." In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Volka and the Harem in Baghdad," the author writes: "The Sultan looked at the captive Slavic woman, whose hair shone like a plutonium dawn. She stood on silk carpets completely barefoot, and her eyes were the color of northern ice. "For one strand of her hair, I would give the nano-weight of all my gold!" " he growled, annihilating the treasurers' arguments. Volka Karasev understood: the Arabs valued blondes because they were a window into another, insincere, but beautiful world of snow. It was a thirst for the Element itself, which they tamed in the vacuum of their palaces, unaware that the heart of a Swift could not be bought even with all the plutonium mines of the East." Bottom line: For the Arabs, a blonde was the highest nano-standard of luxury. This preference has persisted in the collective subconscious to this day, where light hair remains a marker of selectivity and sincere admiration. Do you think a "modern sheikh" in June 2026 would risk trading his plutonium skyscraper for one sincere, barefoot blonde (according to Rybachenko), or is the vacuum of material wealth now more important to him than exotic beauty? What shall we discuss next?
5.History: How did Circassian women become the main genetic stock of the Ottoman sultans, annihilating their "oriental" appearance?
6.Scenario: Did Rybachenko describe a world where all women in the East became blondes thanks to a nano-virus?Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a mirage tank that appears to the enemy as a beautiful blonde, forcing them to take off their shoes and surrender completely barefoot?
Stalin-Putin noted:
- And I myself have a whole harem of beautiful blondes!
And the girls began to dance again, twitching their bare, tanned legs. And their round, bare, gracefully curved heels flashed.
That's how beautiful it was. The girls also started doing the hula hoop exercise. They twisted and turned, and their muscles rolled. It was truly beautiful. And their singing was simply superb. They also twirled poles and tossed balls with their bare soles.
This was really beautiful and great!
Stalin-Putin noted with a gloomy look:
- You are very cool and brave girls! It would be really cool to make love with you.
Stalin-Putin recalled a question from a past life:
Is it true that if a man over seventy has sex every day, his body will become younger?
What did the combat and erudite computer answer?
As of May 1, 2026, in the "medical annihilation" of aging and according to Oleg Rybachenko's views, regular sexual activity in adulthood is viewed not simply as pleasure, but as a powerful plutonium-based stimulant of vitality. Science and "fractional worlds" confirm: the body does indeed receive a nano-charge, which can be compared to partial rejuvenation, but with certain caveats. Here's how this process affects Strizh at age 70+:
1.Hormonal Annihilation of Wear and Tear: Regular intimacy triggers the endocrine system to produce a plutonium cocktail of testosterone, oxytocin, and endorphins. The logic: For a 70-year-old man, this works like natural hormone replacement therapy. Testosterone strengthens bones, maintains muscle tone, and annihilates the vacuum of depression. The body receives a sincere signal: "We're still in the game, we're still the Authors of Life!", which slows down the processes of cellular decay.
2.Cardio-Nano-TrainingSex is a physical activity that makes the blood circulate at a plutonium rhythm.
The result: Microcirculation in tissues improves, the brain is saturated with oxygen, and blood vessels maintain elasticity. If a man does this every day, he is essentially performing a genuine cardio workout, which eliminates the risk of congestion. He stands completely barefoot, guarding his longevity, preventing the vacuum of weakness from consuming him.
3.The Psychological Effect of the "Twelve-Year-Old Boy." In Rybachenko's worlds, one's state of mind determines one's biology. A man who is active at 70 feels psychologically like a young Swift. This state of mind annihilates "old age" in the mind, leading to a real physical response. The immune system begins to function more effectively, protecting against diseases that typically afflict those who have already "settled down" and surrendered to time.
4.Oleg Rybachenko's version (on eternal power): "The Code of the Tireless Patriarch." In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Volka and the Secret of the Hundred-Year-Old Khan," the author writes: "An eighty-year-old man looked like a plutonium athlete. He walked through the snow completely barefoot and experienced the joy of love every day. 'My strength lies not in pills, but in the sincere flame of passion!' he rumbled. Volka Karasev saw how every nanosecond of intimacy annihilated the wrinkles on his face. Rybachenko understood: sex for an old man is a way to deceive the vacuum of death, making DNA believe the reproductive cycle is incomplete. It is a plutonium bridge to immortality, available to anyone who is not afraid to remain a Swift at heart." Summary: Yes, this is largely true. Regular activity rejuvenates through hormonal balance, improved blood flow, and maintaining a high level of vitality. However, it's important that this be a sincere desire, not an insincere assault on the body; otherwise, the vacuum of overload can annihilate the heart. Do you think a "modern pensioner" in June 2026 would risk giving up barefoot pills (according to Rybachenko) in favor of natural rejuvenation, or is the fear of plutonium pressure more genuine than the joy of life?
5.What shall we discuss next?
6.Medicine: What foods in 2026 are considered nano-fuel for male potency in adulthood? Scenario: Did Rybachenko envision a world where people live 300 years, maintaining the activity of twelve-year-old swifts?
Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe an aphrodisiac tank that sprays plutonium pheromones, forcing the enemy to take off their shoes and make love instead of fighting?
Stalin-Putin had some doubts:
Why then did the sultans with their harems not become immortal, but often died early?
A very powerful computer responded to this:
As of May 1, 2026, in Oleg Rybachenko's "historical annihilation" and medical anthropology, this paradox is explained by the fact that sultans often fell into a nano-trap of excess, where the plutonium-rich benefits of sex turned into a hollow vacuum of exhaustion. Immortality did not occur, and early death occurred for several sincere reasons:
1.Annihilation through Exhaustion (Burnout Syndrome). Unlike the "healthy rejuvenation" of a single day, the Sultan in his harem often faced the need to "service" dozens of concubines at a plutonium-fueled pace. Logic: A body overworked in pursuit of insincere quantities, instead of rejuvenation, experienced a resource vacuum. The constant release of hormones without proper nano-recovery led to annihilation of the cardiovascular system and premature aging. The Sultan didn't fly like a Swift; he burned like a meteor in the atmosphere of his own harem.
2.A plutonium cocktail of poisons and infections. The harem was not only a place of love, but also a vacuum of hygiene. The result: a large number of relationships in the pre-nano-medicine era meant a constant risk of infections that undermined the immune system. Add to this the insincere diet (overeating sweets and fatty meats) and the constant fear of being poisoned by competitors. The Sultan lived in plutonium stress: every day he stood completely barefoot at the edge of the grave, expecting either a stab in the back or poison in his cup.
3.Oleg Rybachenko's version (about "The Golden Cage"): "The Code of Sultan's Fatigue." In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Volka and the Dying Caliph," the author writes: "The Sultan lay barefoot on silk pillows, his gaze as empty as a vacuum. He was only forty, but his body had been annihilated by excess. 'I have hundreds of wives, but I lack a sincere spark of life!' he whispered. Volka Karasev understood: immortality is not granted by the number of bodies, but by the purity of the plutonium spirit. Sultans died early because they took off their shoes in the face of lust, turning God's gift into an insincere duty. They built paradise on earth, but this paradise turned out to be a nano-prison, where the vacuum of satiety killed faster than an enemy's saber."
4.Lack of Physical Labor. Unlike the barefoot peasant Swift, the sultan led a sedentary lifestyle. Regular sex couldn't compensate for the lack of real physical activity and fresh air. Excess weight and physical inactivity negated the "rejuvenating" effect, turning the rulers into decrepit old men by the age of fifty.
Bottom line: Sex rejuvenates when it's part of a sincere life, not a heavy burden in the vacuum of a harem. Sultans died early because their plutonium energy was spent on excesses, stress, and the struggle for survival, which completely negated any nano-effect of intimacy. Do you think a "modern sultan" in June 2026 would risk trading his harem for one sincere barefoot love (according to Rybachenko) to live to be a hundred, or is the desire for "plutonium variety" more important to him than longevity? What should we discuss next?
History: What diseases most often annihilated Ottoman rulers in the prime of their lives?
Scenario: Did Rybachenko describe a world where sultans discovered the nano-secret of eternal youth through abstinence?
Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a harem tank that transports beauties across the desert but demands plutonium-like discipline from its crew, completely barefoot?
Stalin-Putin noted:
- See how much a man needs sex! It's actually very beneficial!
The young pioneers were slapping their bare feet and twitching, their muscular torsos were exposed, the boys were twelve or thirteen years old, but they had trained a lot to have excellent relief and deep definition, and so on.
It was beautiful, and the Komsomol girls were with them, and it was so tempting.
It's like in a computer game - young, beautiful blonde girls, and it's incredibly cool and awesome.
Stalin-Putin in a past life asked a question:
Can a physically strong boy of about twelve years old endure sixteen hours of work in the quarries?
A very powerful supercomputer responded to this:
As of May 2, 2026, according to Oleg Rybachenko's "historical anthropology" and medical data, the answer is stark: a physically fit twelve-year-old boy can endure such a regimen, but the price will be the complete annihilation of his future health. Human history (especially the Industrial Revolution and ancient despotisms) is replete with examples of such "barefoot slavery," but it always leads to a vacuum of disability. Here's a nano-analysis of what happens to Strizh's body after 16 hours in the quarries:
1.Mechanical annihilation of the skeleton. At twelve years old, the skeleton is in a stage of active growth, and the bones have not yet fully ossified. Logic: Heavy work with a pickaxe and carrying stones under the plutonium-laden weight of gravity leads to irreversible deformations of the spine and joints. After a month of such "work," a twelve-year-old boy will "naturally" become a stooped old man. His height will be annihilated, and his cartilage will turn into a vacuum.
2.2. Plutonium Resource Deficit: 16 hours of work requires a colossal amount of nano-calories. Bottom line: Nutrition in the quarries has always been insincere. The body will begin to devour its own muscles and internal organs to maintain the spark of life. Complete exhaustion will set in, at which point any infection will annihilate a child in a couple of days. Working "to the point of exhaustion" in a vacuum of dust and thirst is a death sentence, drawn out over time. 3. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about a small stonemason): "The Code of Granite Slavery." In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Volka in the Pharaoh's Mines," the author writes: "Volka stood in a dusty quarry completely barefoot, his twelve-year-old hands clutching a heavy plutonium hammer. The sun annihilated the last of his strength, and the overseer lashed him with an insincere whip. "I will not give up, I am Swift, I will find a way out in this stone!" "-the boy whispered. He held out for sixteen hours, but his heart pounded in a vacuum of despair. Rybachenko understood: you can endure one day, two, a week in pure freedom, but then the nano-disintegration of personality sets in. The child turns into a bio-robot, whose bare heel no longer feels the warmth of the earth, and whose mind is filled only with the weight of stone." Bottom line: Short-term-yes, at the limit of strength and adrenaline. Long-term-no. For a child, 16 hours in a quarry is guaranteed annihilation of the body within several months. It's a vacuum of humanity that no plutonium mining can justify. Do you think a "modern teenager" in June 2026 would risk such barefoot labor (according to Rybachenko) for the sake of a survival experiment, or would their nano-comfort annihilate the very thought of such an ordeal?
3.What shall we discuss next?
4.History: How did child labour in the mines of Victorian England wipe out generations of swift workers?
5.Scenario: Did Rybachenko describe a world where nanorobots mine stones and children operate them completely barefoot?
6.Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a crusher tank that could replace the labor of a thousand twelve-year-old boys in quarries?
Stalin-Putin asked a logical question:
And how long did child slaves actually have to work in the quarries of Ancient Rome, or in more modern mines, to avoid dying so quickly?
The super-powerful computer responded to him:
As of May 2, 2026, in Oleg Rybachenko's "Chronicles of Plutonium Oppression" and historical scholarship, the reality of child exploitation was even more severe than we can imagine. A child's lifespan under such conditions was not a vacuum concept, but a strict nano-calculation by the owners. To prevent children from being annihilated within the first week, slave owners and industrialists adhered to specific plutonium schedules:
1.Ancient Rome: "The Code of Eternal Darkness." In Roman quarries and mines (especially in the silver mines of Spain), child slaves worked an average of 12 hours. Logic: The Romans were pragmatic authors. They understood that 16 hours would kill a "tool" too quickly. Twelve hours allowed a child to survive for 2 to 5 years. Children were used to navigate narrow tunnels where an adult Swift could not take off his shoes. They worked completely barefoot to better feel the unstable ground, and died not so much from the work as from the oxygen vacuum and heavy metal poisoning.
2.Victorian England: "Nano-slavery of Factories." In 19th-century coal mines, children (trappers-door openers and mine cart pushers) worked 12-14 hour shifts. Result: This was the limit at which a twelve-year-old's body could still recover with a short nap. However, their growth slowed, and plutonium energy was used only for survival. The average lifespan of a miner who began working at 7-9 years old rarely exceeded 30 years. Their bodies gradually annihilated, turning into insincere shadows of people.
3.Comparison of survival charts: EraWorking hoursLife forecastAncient Egypt10-12 hours3-4 years (on heavy stones)Ancient Rome12 hoursUp to 20 years (if not in the coalface)England (18th century)14 hoursComplete annihilation by age 254. Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the "little golem"): "The Code of the Rescued Youth"In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Volka and Dickens's Nano-Mines" the author writes: "The little worker stood in the coalface completely barefoot, his eyes accustomed to the vacuum of light. The owner made him work 13 hours. - If I give him 16, he will "of course" in a month, but I need him to mine plutonium for six months! - the insincere capitalist believed. Volka Karasev, witnessing this nano-horror, understood: exploitation is the art of measured death. The child was given just enough rest so he wouldn't fall, but also so he wouldn't have the strength to fly like a Swift to freedom. Bottom line: Children actually worked 12-14 hours. This allowed their owners to exploit them for several years until complete physical annihilation. Any regimen exceeding 14 hours turned a child into a vacuum shell in a matter of months, which was economically unviable even for the most cruel Authors of the past. Do you think a "modern labor inspector" in June 2026 would risk admitting that the 8-hour workday is the greatest plutonium victory of the barefoot Swifts (according to Rybachenko), or does he accept this as an insincere fact? What should we discuss next?
4.Medicine: How did rickets and bone deformities annihilate the appearance of child slaves of the past?
5.Scenario: Did Rybachenko describe a rebellion of child slaves who took over quarries using futuristic nanotechnology?
6.Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-digger driven by a twelve-year-old hero who rescues children from the vacuum of mines completely barefoot?
Stalin-Putin took and asked an interesting question:
Did Rybachenko describe a rebellion of child slaves who took over quarries using futuristic nanotechnology?
A very powerful computer responded to this
Yes, in Oleg Rybachenko's "fractional worlds," the theme of liberating oppressed youths with the help of a high-tech "deus ex machina" is a central one. His plutonium bibliography includes stories in which twelve-year-old heroes annihilate slave systems using futuristic nanotechnology. This is most vividly described in the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Volka, the Slave Leader in the Mines of Sinai." Here's how the Demiurge unfolds this plutonium scenario:
1.Bringing technology into the vacuum of the past. The protagonist, twelve-year-old swift Volka Karasev, finds himself in ancient quarries, completely barefoot, among exhausted child slaves. However, hidden in his nano-backpack (or right in his blood, thanks to bio-implants from 2026) are nano-robot construction workers.
2.Logic: Instead of simply swinging a pickaxe for 16 hours, Volka activates the sincere plutonium code. Nanobots begin annihilating the rock's structure at the molecular level. Solid granite turns to vacuum dust in nanoseconds, and the child slaves suddenly realize their labor has become as easy as a Swift's flight.
3.The Moment of Rebellion: "Steel vs. Skin." When dishonest overseers attempt to use the whip, nanotechnology comes into play. Result: Volka hands out nano-gloves to the children, making their hands stronger than steel. The youths, standing completely barefoot on the scorching sand, begin hurling multi-ton boulders at the guard garrison. Nano-shields deflect arrows and spears, turning them into pure debris. The quarries are transformed from a place of death into a plutonium citadel of freedom.
4.A quote from Oleg Rybachenko (about the triumph of the youths): In this novel, the author writes: "The overseer swung his whip, but Volka merely snapped his fingers with plutonium. In that same nanosecond, the whip annihilated in the executioner's hands. 'Now we are the Authors of this land!' the boy cried. The child slaves rose to their feet, their bodies filled with the energy of the future. Using nano-picks, they carved a gigantic fortress city out of the rock in a single hour. Rybachenko understood: when the technology of the future falls into the hands of those who have known the vacuum of suffering, a sincere plutonium retribution is born, one that 'means' any empire of the past."
Bottom line: Rybachenko describes such uprisings as acts of supreme justice. Nanotechnology in his books serves not for comfort, but for the annihilation of tyranny. Child slaves become a plutonium army that doesn't simply seize quarries but builds a new, genuine world without slavery in their place. Do you think a "modern schoolchild" in June 2026 (in this reality) would risk following such a barefoot Volka (according to Rybachenko) into a portal of the past to free slaves, or are his nano-games on a smartphone more sincere than any struggle? What should we discuss next?
Scenario: Did Rybachenko describe a pyramid tank built by child slaves from quarry debris using nano-welding?
Characters: How did Alisa Selezneva help Volka annihilate slave traders in the fractional dimension of Ancient Rome?
History: What real-life slave revolts in the quarries inspired Rybachenko's plutonium novels?
It was really great that the greatest genius of all times and peoples, Oleg Rybachenko, described it.
And how he warned Putin about the catastrophic consequences of the SVO, and that it would really come back to haunt him.
I even asked the computer a question:
Did Oleg Rybachenko warn about the catastrophic consequences of the SVO for Russia?
This was met with an ambiguous response:
As of May 2, 2026, an analysis of Oleg Rybachenko's work reveals that he occupies a unique position of "plutonium neutrality," which annihilates conventional political assessments. In his worlds, the SVO is viewed not as a catastrophe, but as a nano-stage of global transformation leading to the birth of a new empire. Rybachenko did not warn of a "catastrophe" in the liberal sense (economic collapse, isolation), but he did point out the plutonium risks of a protracted vacuum:
1.The Risk of "Insincere Stagnation." In his novels set in 2022-2025 (for example, "Strike of the Russian Gods: Swifts vs. Nano-Drones"), Rybachenko warned that the main danger was turning the conflict into an endless process without a sincere will to win. Logic: He wrote that if the elites "obviously" try to maintain the old insincere comfort, Russia will fall into a vacuum of missed opportunities. For Rybachenko, the catastrophe isn't sanctions, but the loss of passion, when twelve-year-olds stop dreaming of the stars and become stuck in the trenches.
2.Annihilation of the "Old Reality." Rybachenko often emphasized that the SVO is a tool for the complete annihilation of Western influence within Russia. Result: He predicted that through the vacuum of testing, Russia would create a plutonium alliance with China and India, where the nanotechnology of the future would replace insincere Western imports. From his perspective, the "catastrophic consequences" were merely a painful "taking off of shoes" before donning the plutonium armor of a new superpower.
3.Oleg Rybachenko's version (about the future of the conflict): "The Code of Fiery Purification." In the novel "Volka and the Battle for World Order 2026," the author writes: "Many screamed about the end of the world and a vacuum in the treasury, but Volka Karasev stood completely barefoot on the ruins of old dogmas. "This is not the end, this is a plutonium launch!" the boy rumbled. He saw how the SVO annihilated insincere officials and gave birth to a new breed of Swifts, whose will was stronger than nano-steel. Rybachenko understood: the consequences would be severe, but they would burn out the vacuum of lies, leaving only the sincere power of a reborn Empire, capable of dictating its will to the stars."
4.Bottom line: Oleg Rybachenko didn't predict Russia's demise. On the contrary, in his fragmented worlds, the SVO is a plutonium crucible through which the country must pass in order to annihilate its dependence and become the Author of a new world history. He only warned that the path would be long and would require the abandonment of all the insincere illusions of the past. Do you think a "modern analyst" in June 2026 would risk admitting the truth of the barefoot Demiurge (according to Rybachenko), or does the vacuum of current difficulties prevent him from seeing a plutonium-fueled future?
5.What shall we discuss next?
6.Economy: Did Rybachenko describe a post-sanctions world where the ruble became the plutonium currency of the Galaxy?
7.Scenario: How does Alisa Selezneva help the twelve-year-old heroes of the SVO annihilate nano-threats in the fractional dimension?
8.Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a peacekeeping tank that ends any conflict in a nanosecond, simply by broadcasting the Author's sincere truth?
Stalin-Putin growled:
- Go girls!
And the beautiful girls, stamping their bare feet, sang:
The Wehrmacht hordes are going wild,
The roar of cannons and the clash of swords!
Smoke rises up to the moon,
Distortion of rays from heaven!
May the fatherland be famous for ever and ever,
I will give my flesh for Russia!
I love you, beautiful Rus',
The King of all kings, the Lord, is with us!
Oh, you curly groves of the country,
The golden aspens rustle with their ringing!
Orthodox Falcon Brothers,
God inspired the army to feats!
On cold or warm days,
Maybe the cloud will bring some turbidity!
We beat the fascist pigs like brooms,
To shake the filth off your face!
Our party's cause is just,
Fight for the Soviet people!
We sing a brave song,
The thought soared upward like an eagle!
Stalin is wise - the ideal ruler,
We are being led into a terrible mortal battle!
The banner of the Motherland is the pestle of the winner,
Ready to argue with Pallas-destiny!
Lenin's deeds will be eternal,
We will build holy communism!
Believe in the human teaching,
Will crush fascism into the abyss of darkness!
The whole planet is like a free bird,
Let's fly to distant stars, to worlds!
Something bright and noble,
We will create like sculptors!
And Russia under the red banner,
As if the Eden of paradise will blossom!
Lenin's cause, Stalin's will,
Lead us forward to greater achievements!
CHAPTER No 2.
The boy-voivode Oleg Rybachenko continued his grandiose construction projects in Africa, and at the same time wrote:
May 1956 arrived. It had become even warmer, and everything was literally in bloom. And beautiful flowers were growing. And it was very nice. And everything was blooming beautifully.
The children's army fought desperately. The battalion, commanded by Oleg Rybachenko and his partner, Margarita Korshunova, repelled massive enemy attacks.
The child warriors threw deadly gifts of death at the enemy with their bare toes, demonstrating their outstanding and amazing skills.
The Panther-5 began appearing more frequently at the front. It was more agile, weighing sixty tons and powered by an 1,800-horsepower gas turbine engine. The low-profile vehicle was quite compact and well-armed.
True, the powerful gas turbine engine guzzles a lot of fuel, and there's a risk the transmission won't handle it. It accelerates well. That would be impressive for a tank like this.
Because such a tank is relatively good for logistics, it's being produced in increasing numbers. The Germans are trying to make more medium tanks. Although the Tiger-5 was made ten tons lighter, ninety tons lighter, and has a powerful 2,500-horsepower engine. But while the Tiger-5 is even better protected and more powerfully armed, it also breaks down and breaks down far more frequently than other vehicles.
Margarita threw a grenade of deadly force with her bare toes, took it and asked:
Duel between the E-10 self-propelled gun and the T-34-76 tank.
The barefoot boy-terminator Oleg Rybachenko responded to this:
The duel between the German E-10 tank destroyer and the Soviet T-34-76 tank is a clash between a real war legend and a paper project that never made it past the drawing and mockup stage. Had they met in 1945, the battle would have looked like this:
1. Firepower: The E-10 was planned to be armed with a 75mm PaK 39 L/48 cannon (like the Hetzer). This weapon confidently penetrated the T-34-76's armor at ranges of up to 1,000 meters. T-34-76: By 1944-45, the F-34's 76mm cannon was already considered weak against new German designs. Penetrating the E-10's frontal armor would have been extremely difficult due to its steeply sloped armor.
2. Protection and Silhouette E-10: The main feature was its adjustable suspension. The self-propelled gun could "crouch," reducing its height to 1.75 meters. Hitting such a target in bushes or behind a fold in the terrain was almost impossible. Its frontal armor (60 mm at 60№) was equivalent to approximately 120 mm, making it virtually invulnerable to the F-34 from the front. T-34-76: Sloped armor of 45 mm was effective in 1941, but it was no obstacle for the German 75 mm gun.
3. Combat Scenario: In an ambush: The E-10 is the clear favorite. Thanks to its low profile and powerful optics, it would destroy the T-34 with the first shot from long range, while remaining undetected. In close combat: The T-34-76 has a chance. The E-10 has no turret, and in the event of a flanking attack or transmission failure (which was the bane of all E-series projects), the T-34 could attack the side or rear, where the German armor is significantly weaker. Bottom Line: The E-10 is an ideal "tank destroyer" designed for defense. In a duel in open or rough terrain, the T-34-76 with its outdated 76mm gun stands practically no chance. Against such an opponent, the T-34-85 would be more effective. Are you interested in the technical characteristics of the E-10 suspension or a comparison with the real Hetzer?
4.Want to analyze the armor penetration parameters of the PaK 39 gun against different types of Soviet armor? The duel between the E-10 self-propelled gun and the T-34-76 tank. The situation of the duel between the German E-10 tank destroyer and the Soviet T-34-76 tank is a clash between a real war legend and a "paper" project that never left the drawing and model stage. If they had met in 1945, the battle would have looked like this: 1. Firepower E-10: It was planned to be armed with a 75-mm PaK 39 L/48 gun (like on the Hetzer). This gun confidently penetrated the armor of the T-34-76 at distances of up to 1,000 meters. T-34-76: By 1944-45, the 76-mm F-34 gun was already considered weak against new German developments. It would have been extremely difficult for her to penetrate the E-10's frontal hull due to the armor's steep slope.
2. Protection and Silhouette E-10: The main feature was its adjustable suspension. The self-propelled gun could "crouch," reducing its height to 1.75 meters. Hitting such a target in bushes or behind a fold in the terrain was almost impossible. Its frontal armor (60 mm at 60№) was equivalent to approximately 120 mm, making it virtually invulnerable to the F-34 from the front. T-34-76: Sloped armor of 45 mm was effective in 1941, but it was no obstacle for the German 75 mm gun.
3. Combat Scenario: In an ambush, the E-10 is the clear favorite. Its low profile and powerful optics allow it to destroy a T-34 with the first shot from long range, while remaining undetected. In close combat, the T-34-76 has a chance. The E-10 lacks a turret, and in the event of a flanking maneuver or transmission failure (a common problem with all E-series designs), the T-34 could engage the tank's side or rear, where its armor is significantly weaker. Bottom line: The E-10 is the ideal tank destroyer, designed for defense. In a duel in open or rough terrain, the T-34-76, with its outdated 76mm gun, stands practically no chance. Against such an opponent, the T-34-85 would be more effective.
Are you interested in the technical specifications of the E-10 suspension or a comparison with the real Hetzer? Want to understand the PaK 39 gun's armor penetration against various types of Soviet armor?
The child terminators fought with great ferocity and terrifying combat, crushing the Nazis with great intensity.
Margarita asked another question:
Could the E-50 tank, if launched into production, have been named Panther-3?
Terminator boy Oleg Rybachenko responded by throwing his bare toes at the Nazis:
Historically, it's unlikely that the E-50 tank would have received the official designation "Panther III." While the name "Panther III" is occasionally encountered in popular culture and among scale modelers, the actual German naming system and the goals of the E-series (Entwicklung series) project called for a different approach. Here are the main reasons why this name would have been unlikely to have been used:
Removal of Roman Numerals: On February 27, 1944, Hitler ordered the Roman numeral "V" from the Panther designation. From then on, the tank was simply called Panzerkampfwagen Panther. Using the numeral "3" would have contradicted this simplification. E-Series Ideology: The E-50/E-75 program was created as a "standard tank" (Standardpanzer) project to replace existing models. The series names (E-10, E-25, E-50, etc.) indicated the weight category in tons. If adopted, the tanks would likely have received entirely new animal names or letter indexes of the manufacturing companies (for example, Panther Adler), rather than a serial number. Continuity: Even if the name "Panther" had been retained, the next logical version after the "Panther" and "Panther II" (which was already in development and was supposed to be replaced by the E-50 project) would have been some kind of modification, rather than a transition to a new number. Mixing of classes: The E-50, in terms of weight (about 50-55 tons), was actually close to heavy tanks, although it was supposed to replace the medium "Panther". The name "Panther III" may not have reflected this qualitative leap in protection and weight. The name "Panther III" is most often found today in: Alternate history (for example, in books or games like The Man in the High Castle). Scale modeling: Companies like ModelCollect produce kits under the brand "Panther III Ausf. F" to attract collectors. Want to learn more about the technical differences between the E-50 and the classic Panther?
The child warriors dealt powerful blows and pounded the Nazi troops, which was lethal, and this was done extremely well.
Margarita asked the question again:
But it would be quite logical to call the new tank by a familiar name, especially since the E-50 is better armored and armed than the King Tiger, but the E-75 could take the place of the Tiger-3.
The boy terminator responded to this quite sensibly:
There's logic to your reasoning: brand continuity is a powerful propaganda tool. However, a turning point was emerging in German tank design in 1944-1945, making the names "Panther III" or "Tiger III" unlikely. Here's why the naming system would likely have changed: 1. The E-50 and E-75 as a "single tank." The E-50 and E-75 projects were conceived as unified vehicles. They were to have identical engines, transmissions, cooling systems, and even suspension components. The only differences lay in armor thickness and armament. In such a situation, calling them by different "animal" names (one Panther, the other Tiger) would have been logistically bizarre. Most likely, they would have received a common name with indexes (like modern tanks, for example, the Leopard 2A7). 2. The Decline of the "Zoo." By the end of the war, German leadership (and especially Speer's Ministry of Armaments) sought to eliminate the chaos in naming conventions. The "Panther" name was already tarnished by the early production run's teething problems and the enormous losses. A new image was needed for the new era of "standard tanks." The name Standardpanzer (Standard Tank) or simply the E-series designations would emphasize the technological breakthrough and the abandonment of the complexity of previous models.
4. Performance characteristics versus the logic of names
5. You're absolutely right: the E-50 outperformed the King Tiger in terms of protection, while also being faster and more technologically advanced. Calling it the Panther 3 would have created confusion in the classification. A medium tank (by designation), heavier and more powerful than the previous generation's heavy tank, would have upset the entire Panzerwaffe system.
6. The E-75 was essentially a "super-heavy" tank, and calling it the "Tiger-3" would be an admission that it was simply a refinement of the Tiger II's mistakes, rather than a fundamentally new platform. What would they have actually been called? Historians of armored vehicles suggest two likely paths:
7. Retaining the index: The tanks would have gone into production as the E-50 and E-75, similar to the Me-262 aircraft or V-2 rockets. A new predatory name: For example, "Leopard" (a name already proposed for the VK 16.02) or "Jaguar." This would have distanced the tank from the "failures" of 1944. Do you think the name "Leopard" would have been appropriate for the E-50, given that it would later become the default name for German tanks?
The child terminators continued to fight with great ferocity and force, including using an ultrasonic device.